[WWI] Eduard 1/48 Camel confusion

M Berggren berggren.berggren at gmail.com
Fri Jul 15 07:08:34 EDT 2011


Thanks for yours answers, Bud and Bob.
I think I'll save the Profipacks and the Limited Edition.

/Magnus



2011/7/14 Bob Pearson <bpearson at citytel.net>

> **
> Check the cowlings and engines. The RNAS one probably has the Bentley and a
> cowl akin to the 2F1, while the RFC has the Clerget and a more symetrical
> cowl. Here are samples of each. In addition to the three options mentioned
> so far, there is a fourth - the nightfighter 'Comic'. also included here cuz
> it looks so cool
>
> Bob
> www.cbrnp.com/RNP/CDv2/index.htm
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* M Berggren <berggren.berggren at gmail.com>
> *To:* World War I Modeling Mailing List <wwi at wwi-models.org>
>  *Sent:* Thursday, July 14, 2011 4:18 AM
> *Subject:* [WWI] Eduard 1/48 Camel confusion
>
>   I've decided to cull the herd, since I'm moving to a house, and I have
> strayed towards ships more than aeroplanes lately.
> When going trough my stash, I realised that there's a bit of redundancy. I
> will never build more than the basic versions of each type, so I figure I
> can sell a few.
>
> I have six Eduard 1/48 Camels:
> 8055 Sopwith F.1 Camel RNAS
> 8056 Sopwith F.1 Camel Profipack
> 8057 Sopwith F.1 Camel RFC
> 8058 Sopwith 2F.1 Camel Profipack
> 8059 Sopwith 2F.1 Camel
> 1122 Sopwith Camel Black Mike
>
> These are basicly two types, the F.1 and 2F.1? Are there any other
> differences that can't be build out of the Profipack versions?
> The Black Mike is a reboxed Profipack with new decals and a dio base? Or is
> there anything else that can be build from the others, that can't be done
> with the Profipack versions?
> Any reason for keeping the non-Profipack kits, except for the decals?
>
> /Magnus
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.wwi-models.org/pipermail/wwi/attachments/20110715/2061b53d/attachment.html>


More information about the WWI mailing list