[WWI] O/T Favorites (Not)

Crawford Neil Neil.Crawford at volvo.com
Wed Nov 24 10:07:31 EST 2010

It did appear twice, and I agree.
Except for the holiday part, what holiday is that?
Maybe some of the other countries are wonderful too!
PS. I think the Mann&Grimmer is a fine looking aircraft, the undercarriage has a jaunty attitude.

From: wwi-bounces at wwi-models.org [mailto:wwi-bounces at wwi-models.org] On Behalf Of michael wuyek
Sent: den 24 november 2010 15:47
To: World War I Modeling Mailing List
Subject: Re: [WWI] O/T Favorites (Not)

At least the Mann & Grimmer M1 wasn't painted PC10/12, but it still had those eye straining, finger-steadiness testing, annoying to model double wires! What was up with the British and those bloody double wires? And why isn't anyone building anything???? (Holidays to me means time to build!)
(Sorry if this appeared twice, it landed in my own spam folder!!!)

<http://www.wuyekart.com/> www.wykart.com<http://www.wykart.com/>

--- On Wed, 11/24/10, Diego Fernetti <dfernet0 at rosario.gov.ar> wrote:

From: Diego Fernetti <dfernet0 at rosario.gov.ar>
Subject: Re: [WWI] O/T Favorites (Not)
To: "World War I Modeling Mailing List" <wwi at wwi-models.org>
Date: Wednesday, November 24, 2010, 7:04 AM

> I like all OT aircraft, with the possible exception of the Nie 28 which certainly looks like it would have been better aborted before production.

Are you speaking aesthetically or about its engineering faults?
If speaking about the looks, I find utterly disconcerting that you consider the Nieuport 28 abhorrent while tacitly defending such designs as the ill proportioned Blackburn Kangaroo (the ANZAC must have been aggraviated for this) and the Mann-Grimmer M.1, whose "beautiful" lines I attach here.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.wwi-models.org/pipermail/wwi/attachments/20101124/ce1d48bc/attachment.html>

More information about the WWI mailing list