[WWI] Sikorsky S.16

Gennady Nechaeff rhinocerus at gmail.com
Tue Oct 6 07:14:52 EDT 2009


>Over the North Sea, perhaps?

Over 6 hr endurance with additional fuel tank, according V.Mikheev's
"Sikorsky S-16 - Russian Scout" book

2009/10/6, Joseph Fyfield <jsfyfield at gmail.com>:
>
> Ah, yes. Skis for the Russian ice. Makes sense.
> "...flying a long range reconnaissance mission..."
> Really? How long range could they have been? Over the North Sea, perhaps?
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> On 06/10/2009, J.R. Boye <hopeandmercy at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>     Joe, as far as I know, only one, maybe two were floatplanes. The
>> majority were landplanes with wheels or skis.
>>    When Gilsher crashed, he had been flying a long-range reconnaissance
>> mission (with an observer). I don't know for sure, but I get the impression
>> most were never used for their intended role. A few lasted in service until
>> 1919.
>>
>>                                        J.R. Boye
>>
>>
>> Aha. 1915 sounds about right. I thought it looked a bit like a Sopwith
>> Tabloid/Schnieder. Anyone else? By the way, why were they floatplanes? The
>> Muromets weren't floatplanes, were they? You say "They were intended to be
>> escorts..." Intended? didn't they get around to using what 35 of them they
>> had?!
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> "Flying is necessary. Living is not."
>       -Suicide note left by pioneer aviatrix Melli Beese
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.wwi-models.org/pipermail/wwi/attachments/20091006/fb0ee2b1/attachment.html>


More information about the WWI mailing list