[WWI] Shane Weier is Older

[Douglas Anderson]

August




________________________________
From: Eric Gallaud <egallaud at club-internet.fr>
To: World War I Modeling Mailing List <wwi at wwi-models.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 10:31:37 AM
Subject: Re: [WWI] Shane Weier is Older

Same for me, I was born in November.

Eric

DANIEL CLAMOT a écrit :
> Ooops too....
>  I will inaugure october ;0)
> 
>    ----- Original Message -----
>    *From:* Andy Bannister <mailto:a.bann at ntlworld.com>
>    *To:* 'World War I Modeling Mailing List' <mailto:wwi at wwi-models.org>
>    *Sent:* Saturday, April 11, 2009 1:08 PM
>    *Subject:* Re: [WWI] Shane Weier is Older
> 
>    Oops. I missed out - thought this was another wind-up! Add me to
>    the January birthdays.
>          Andy
>          CEO, Editor in Chief, Choreographer, Teaboy
>    www.warpedplastic.co.uk <http://www.warpedplastic.co.uk>
> 
>        -----Original Message-----
>        *From:* wwi-bounces at wwi-models.org
>        <mailto:wwi-bounces at wwi-models.org>
>        [mailto:wwi-bounces at wwi-models.org] *On Behalf Of *Helen and Chris
>        *Sent:* 10 April 2009 23:31
>        *To:* World War I Modeling Mailing List
>        *Subject:* Re: [WWI] Shane Weier is Older
> 
>        The birth month poll appears to be complete as the number of
>        contributors has not increased for some time.  So, thanks to
>        Rob for setting it up and thanks to those who participated.
>                  Results:-
>                  Jan 1 = 3%
>        Feb 1 = 3%
>        Mar 3 = 10%
>        Apr 4 = 13%
>        May 2 = 6%
>        Jun 6 = 19%
>        Jul 1 = 3%
>        Aug 3 = 10%
>        Sep 4 = 13%
>        Oct 0 = 0%
>        Nov 2 = 6%
>        Dec 4 = 13%
>                  Conclusion:-  June babies were, for me, the surprise
>        winners. I was right in suggesting that my bet was a
>        Gentlemen's one.  Although my March/April prediction claimed
>        23% of the vote, my other bit is best forgotten!
>                  I hope, Dame Karen, that your sense of timing has improved
>        with the years.
>                  Thanks again, everyone,
>                  Chris.
> 
>        No virus found in this incoming message.
>        Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>        Version: 8.5.285 / Virus Database: 270.11.51/2052 - Release
>        Date: 04/10/09 06:39:00
> 


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.wwi-models.org/pipermail/wwi/attachments/20090412/1828bb5f/attachment.html>