[WWI] Gratuitous posting

[Andy Bannister]

Doesn't need to be stated up front to any degree I think. All I'm saying is
that if you plunk down a lime green & chartreuse Dr.I don't be surprised
when some 'expert' tells you it's wrong, regardless of how pleased with the
outcome you are!
 

-----Original Message-----
From: wwi-bounces at wwi-models.org [mailto:wwi-bounces at wwi-models.org] On
Behalf Of ernest thomas
Sent: 24 November 2007 00:43
To: World War I Modeling Mailing List
Subject: Re: [WWI] Gratuitous posting


Andy, I would never try to pass off my fictions as the real thing, and agree
such schemes,or even deliberate schemes that might have once been accepted
but were later proven spurious, should be stated as such, just to prevent
some future researcher from making the incorrect assumption that it is
authentic. AndI also agree that any known or deliberat deviations from known
or accepted facts should be admitted to when questioned. But stated
up-front? To what degree? 
E.


  _____  

From: a.bann at ntlworld.com
To: wwi at wwi-models.org
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:44:23 +0000
Subject: Re: [WWI] Gratuitous posting




 

 E. wrote:
 
 Maybe the builder just finds the known incorrect scheme more asthetically
pleasing. 
 
Fair enough, but as I say, if you try to pass your fantasy model off as a
representation of the real thing then just don't get upset when the colour
police are all over you because you're just asking for it. 
 
Andy 
 
 
  _____  

Get the power of Windows + Web with the new Windows Live. Power up!
<http://www.windowslive.com/?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_Wave2_powerofwindows_112007>  


  _____  

Share life as it happens with the new Windows Live. Share now!
<http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_Wave2_sharelife_112007
>  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.wwi-models.org/pipermail/wwi/attachments/20071124/2e25c508/attachment.html