[WWI] IM Camel two seater review - slightly confused!

[Christopher Malany]

Hi, Carlos:

I think the article is trying to say that with the
unarmed trainer version the modeler doesn't have to
fiddle with armament and PEB Vickers jackets.  Not a
model of clarity, though.

- Chris Malany

--- Carlos Carreira <cacarr1960 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think it's a mistake. I have the kit and it
> doesn't come with PE. It is
> very good value, as - I think - it provides all the
> parts needed to make a
> F1 with the extra wing. It's always good to have
> extra wings!
> 
> Carlos
> 
> On 3/1/07, dave fleming
> <dave.fleming at dial.pipex.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I was interested to see this review
> >
> >
>
http://www.internetmodeler.com/2007/february/first-looks/roden_camel_two-
> > seater.php
> >
> > And in particular
> >
> > "Roden continues its successful run of Camels with
> this variant. The
> > slightly
> > different look of this Camel, combined with a lack
> of armament and those
> > photoetched machine gun barrels, make this a great
> kit for modelers
> > looking to
> > step up to a more complicated biplane kit. Thanks
> to Roden for our review
> > sample."
> >
> > Wooah, hold up there!
> >
> > "and those photoetched machine gun barrels"
> >
> > In an unarmed trainer? And not in my kit?
> >
> > A Typo perhaps?
> >
> > On the same subject, anyone know of a photo of the
> H-823 example?
> >
> > Dave
> >
>