[WWI] 1/35 or 1/32?

[Dave Calhoun]

and let's not forget the impressive line of 1/32 scale WW 2 armor kits done by Monogram in the 1970's - I grew up building these models that had the awesome building diorama tips done by Sheppard Payne!   
But if Roden is planning on doing a new line of WW1 armor, instead of duplicating what Tauro, Emhar and RPM have done in 1/35 scale, why not go along with their previous line of aircraft and do some kits in the universal 1/48 scale?  Tamiya has recently been doing tons of new WW@ figure & armor kits in 1/48, we need some good WW1 figures of infantry, ambuilances and armor in this scale!
Dave
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:13:01 -0300
From: "Diego Fernetti" <dfernet0 at rosario.gov.ar>
Subject: Re: [WWI] 1/35 or 1/32?
To: "World War I Modeling Mailing List" <wwi at wwi-models.org>
Message-ID: <012901c73a30$d5f98810$7004a8c0 at inte112>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=response

Magnus le Provocateur ? ?crit:
> Now they have a chance to rectify the misstake that Tamiya was making, and 
> start over fresh with wwi-era viechles.

Why, a mistake? Perhaps they wanted to make it in that slightly off scale.

> After a long discussion with some friends, I see that there are positive 
> and negative sides of both scales. What do you think about it?

1/35 may compare with most of the armour and softskin models out there. The 
scale has become a market standard for vehicles and artillery kits. 1/32, 
however, has become unusual by this time, I guess that only older kits by 
Esci (that in the boxtops say 1/35) and Airfix. I think that this is a lost 
battle, Magnus.

> And yes, even if you normaly just do 1/72 or 1/48, your opinion 
> matters....:-)

Go figure!
D.