[WWI] RFC/RNAS Queries

Ray B fokkereiv at yahoo.ca
Sun Feb 11 22:50:58 EST 2007


Any patent was moot on this formulation, The RAF were not allowed to
manufacture it. They developed it but the RAF was government funded
and therefore the formulations were Government owned, the manufacture
was done by various paint suppliers, by tender. 
By 1917 both the RFC and the RNAS were being ordered to use PC10
whenever possible to aide in consistency of supplies and supply
chain. Prior to that the RNAS had there own methods of doping...
Thats why the RNAS  were slow to use PC10.

Ray
--- dave fleming <dave.fleming at dial.pipex.com> wrote:

> Quoting Ray B <fokkereiv at yahoo.ca>:
> 
> > 
> > The RNAS were a bit slower in adoptng PC10/PC12
> 
> My reading recently turned up a possible reason for that in an old
> Scale 
> Aircraft Modelling Ian Huntley column  - according to Mr Huntley,
> the War 
> Office patented the PC10 finish, and one result of the patent was
> that the RNAS 
> (being Admiralty) couldn't use PC10 as it would breach the patent!
> Colurs for 
> RNAS aircraft were known as 'Proprietory Khaki' and had a slightly
> different 
> composition.
> 
> How true this is, I don't know!
> 
> DAF
> 


Models blog
http://sagitariousrising.blogspot.com/

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


More information about the WWI mailing list