[WWI] Eduard Pfalz

[Mark Shannon]

I agree.  At least the Osprey title says that the black upper surfaces of
the wings are a best guess.  I don't have the FMP book, so I defer to
others who say it is very trustworthy.  I think it is one of those cases
where you can't prove one way of the other with the current known
documentation.  I would trust the books over the instructions.

Mark Shannon
shingend at ix.netcom.com



> [Original Message]
> From: <mikemuth at ptd.net>
> To: World War I Modeling Mailing List <wwi at wwi-models.org>; charles
robinson <rolanddvi at yahoo.com>
> Date: 3/31/2007 11:38:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [WWI] Eduard Pfalz
>
> I think I would go with the big Pfalz book. They seem to have gone to
great
> length in their research.
> Mike Muth
> charles robinson <rolanddvi at yahoo.com> said:
>
> > Duh, Guess I should have also said that I'm doing Carl Degelow's Pfalz
D.IIIa.
> >    
> >   Charles Robinson
> > 
> > charles robinson <rolanddvi at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >   Hello List,
> > I am working on the Eduard Pfalz D.IIIa and have a question. The
> instructions show a black fuselage with silver upper and lower wings.
However,
> Ospreys "Pfalz Scout Aces" and FMP's Pfalz Aircraft book show a black fuse
> with black upper and lower wings. Any idea which is correct? Or are they
both
> correct, just from different time periods?
> > 
> > TIA,
> > Charles Robinson 
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------
> > Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and 
> > always stay connected to friends.
> > 
> > 
> >  	 
> > ---------------------------------
> > Looking for earth-friendly autos? 
> >  Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.  
> > 
>
>
>
> -- 
>
>
>