[WWI] Gnome Monosoupape

[Andy Bannister]

Nope, it's got to be a 109 as punishment. Besides, Fokkers have visible
rocker arms which would only exaggerate the condition.

-----Original Message-----
From: wwi-bounces at wwi-models.org [mailto:wwi-bounces at wwi-models.org] On
Behalf Of Crawford Neil
Sent: 20 September 2006 15:50
To: World War I Modeling Mailing List
Subject: Re: [WWI] Gnome Monosoupape


Thats disgraceful advice Andy, at the least tell him to build a Fokker.
/Neil (shocked of the North) 

-----Original Message-----
From: wwi-bounces at wwi-models.org [mailto:wwi-bounces at wwi-models.org] On
Behalf Of Andy Bannister
Sent: den 20 september 2006 16:21
To: 'World War I Modeling Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [WWI] Gnome Monosoupape

Aye carumba! Hugh, my diagnosis is that you are suffering from one of the
worst cases of AMS I've ever come across!! ;-) I want you to go straight to
your workbench, build two Me109s right out of the box and don't call me in
the morning.

Engine firing sequence in 48th scale.... why I oughta.... grumble,
grumble....

Andy 
 
CEO, Editor in Chief, Choreographer, Teaboy www.warpedplastic.co.uk 

-----Original Message-----
From: wwi-bounces at wwi-models.org [mailto:wwi-bounces at wwi-models.org] On
Behalf Of Hugh Beyts
Sent: 20 September 2006 13:19
To: wwi at wwi-models.org
Subject: [WWI] Gnome Monosoupape


At risk of imposing a serious vain amongst all the witty banter may I
enquire if anyone knows the firing sequence of the Gnome Monosoupape and is
the displacement of the rocker arm(s) & valve(s) going to be noticeable in
1:48 scale?
 
Or should I just worry about turnbuckles?
 
And fabric
 
And etc etc.
 
Hugh