[WWI] Added:A Submarine model at the AWM
Knut Erik Hagen
knut.erik.hagen at eunet.no
Mon May 15 12:01:16 EDT 2006
Hei,
The definition I am used to is:
A boat can be taken onboard a ship, but not the other way around.
Eders
Knut Erik
>I used to serve on Daphne class submarines, and later on container liners.
In teh navy we never referred to subs as ships but either boats or pigs or
subs. When I was studying to become a deck officer with the merchant navy, I
was once berated by an 'ancient mariner' who stated categorically that a
modern container liner isn't a ship; a ship is a type of rig where all the
masts carried square sails. Then he was probably biased.
>
>"Nicklas, Brian" <NicklasB at si.edu> wrote: A naval history type explained
to me that when on the ocean they are
>ships, they being large vessels. Exception being submarines, they are
>boats.
>(as in submarines are built by General Dynamics "Electric Boat
>Division")
>Also, vessels intended for primary use on the American-Canadian Great
>Lakes are Boats - ocean vessels (ships) that make their way to the Great
>Lakes via the St Lawrence Seaway are known to "Lakers" as "salties."
>No Diego, that's salties, not saltines.
>I guess there are other rules, but after awhile my eyes glaze over if it
>isn't airplanes or armor... LOL.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: wwi-bounces at wwi-models.org [mailto:wwi-bounces at wwi-models.org] On
>Behalf Of Diego Fernetti
>Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 7:28 AM
>To: World War I Modeling Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [WWI] Added:A Submarine model at the AWM
>
>(what's a submarine called? boat? ship? vessel?)
>D.
More information about the WWI
mailing list