[WWI] 1 rb paper critique

[Shane Weier]

*I* said

>I have a sneaking suspicion that we're talking at cross purposes here. the 
>original article proposed that MvR was merely a statictical outrider - that 
>one in a thousand data point way outside the Bell curve, whose existence 
>can be prediced by statisitics. IOW, *someone* was bound to be lucky enough 
>to survive that long.

Mmm. Having gone back through the entire thread, I'm wrong here. The 
confusion is more between the actual paper and the magazine article

Now *I* am confused

Shane

.---- - --- ....- ---.. .-. ..- .-.. . ... .-.-.-

   My Strine is a Toad in Disguise

        Quidvis recte factum,
   quanvis humile, praeclarum
.---- - --- ....- ---.. .-. ..- .-.. . ... .-.-.-