WWI Digest 5005 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) Re: Albatros CXII by Witold Kozakiewicz 2) Re: I need the plans of the Albatros C.Ia by Karen Rychlewski 3) Re: I need the plans of the Albatros C.Ia by Steve Cox 4) Site Update: Ford Armoured Car by ot811 5) RFC book by Morg17ms@aol.com 6) Re: Site Update: Ford Armoured Car by "Matt Bittner" 7) RPM Ford Tc vs. Ambulance by "Matt Bittner" 8) Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site by "Michael Kendix" 9) Re: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site by "Bob Pearson" 10) Re: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site by "Shane Weier" 11) Re: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site by Eric GALLAUD 12) Re: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site by "Bob Pearson" 13) Roden Maybes by pfalzdvii@att.net 14) Re: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site by BRENT THEOBALD 15) Re: Roden Maybes by "Shane Weier" 16) Re: Darwinian build heretic by "Ray Boorman" 17) Steve Cox's wheeled thingie. by Crawford Neil 18) RE: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site by "Pedro N. Soares" 19) RE: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site by Crawford Neil 20) Re: Site Update: Ford Armoured Car by "WW1" 21) Re: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site by "WW1" 22) Re: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site by Crawford Neil 23) RE: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site by "Pedro N. Soares" 24) Re: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site by "Pedro N. Soares" 25) RE: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site by Crawford Neil 26) RE: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site by "Pedro N. Soares" 27) Re: List Chemist Answers (part 1) by "Steven Perry" 28) Roden forthcoming by "WW1" 29) Removing fabric effects was:RE: Re: List Chemist Answers (p by Crawford Neil 30) Shadow in dioramas by Crawford Neil 31) Re: Removing fabric effects was:RE: Re: List Chemist Answers (p by "WW1" 32) Re: Shadow in dioramas by "WW1" 33) RE: Roden forthcoming by Crawford Neil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 22:05:21 +0100 From: Witold Kozakiewicz To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Albatros CXII Message-ID: <3E496591.9000202@bg.am.lodz.pl> W dniu 11-02-03 15:59, Grzegorz Mazurowski napisa³: > In fact this list contains a mistake: Airmo (Jadar) doesn't make C.XII, but > C.XV. I was almost sure that they do C.XII too, but their website doesn't > show this kit. > G. Hi, I have seen resin parts of that kit. It is still "in processing", but I've no idea when it will be ready. As far Airmo released Albatros C.V/16 and C.XV. They are also working on C.X. and some other WWI planes. All resin with Part PE set and Techmod decals. HTH. -- Witold Kozakiewicz ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 16:55:12 -0500 From: Karen Rychlewski To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: I need the plans of the Albatros C.Ia Message-ID: <3E497142.597C1AA7@earthlink.net> Grzegorz Mazurowski wrote: > For the review of the Choroszy kit. > As good as it is possible. I thought that I have a set, but all I have are > various B.I and B.II Albies. G-- There's a GA drawing of the C.I in the Morgala book...how did the C.Ia differ?? Karen ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 22:59:48 +0000 From: Steve Cox To: Subject: Re: I need the plans of the Albatros C.Ia Message-ID: According to Gray & Thetford the C1a had a new type of radiator fitted in front of the leading edge, as part of " an effort was made to clean up the cooling system" regards Steve =========================================== steve@oldglebe.freeserve.co.uk http://www.oldglebe.freeserve.co.uk/steveshome.html http://www.bramptonscalemodelclub.fsnet.co.uk If I didn't spend so much time on line ‹‹ I'd get some models finished ================ > From: Karen Rychlewski > Reply-To: wwi@wwi-models.org > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 16:56:36 -0500 (EST) > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: [WWI] Re: I need the plans of the Albatros C.Ia > > Grzegorz Mazurowski wrote: > >> For the review of the Choroszy kit. >> As good as it is possible. I thought that I have a set, but all I have are >> various B.I and B.II Albies. > > G-- > > There's a GA drawing of the C.I in the Morgala book...how did the C.Ia > differ?? > > Karen > > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 18:47:20 -0500 From: ot811 To: wwi-list Subject: Site Update: Ford Armoured Car Message-ID: <20030211235017.C1052464077@mail.mailsnare.net> Steve Cox sent in photos of his Ford Armoured car. See http://www.wwi-models.org/Images/Cox/Armor/index.html or news. regards Sanjeev ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 19:16:27 EST From: Morg17ms@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RFC book Message-ID: <173.1632afb3.2b7aec5b@aol.com> --part1_173.1632afb3.2b7aec5b_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The book I raved about, The RFC in WWI, is on sale cheap on e-bay: http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3500690332 Tom Morgan --part1_173.1632afb3.2b7aec5b_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The book I raved about, The RFC in WWI, is on sale che= ap on e-bay:

       http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vie= wItem&item=3D3500690332

Tom Morgan --part1_173.1632afb3.2b7aec5b_boundary-- ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 18:36:18 -0600 From: "Matt Bittner" To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" Subject: Re: Site Update: Ford Armoured Car Message-ID: On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 18:51:31 -0500 (EST), ot811 wrote: > Steve Cox sent in photos of his Ford Armoured car. Looks great, Steve!! Matt ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 18:37:39 -0600 From: "Matt Bittner" To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" Subject: RPM Ford Tc vs. Ambulance Message-ID: It looks like I just can't with with Fords coming from NKR. ;-) Twice I have ordered the RPM Ford Ambulance from Earl, and twice he has sent me the Tc Armored Car instead. Anyone want to trade an ambulance for an armored car? Matt Bittner ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 03:35:19 +0000 From: "Michael Kendix" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site Message-ID: Hannant's show the following Roden kits as: 1/48th Nie.28 1/48th OV-1 Mohawk 1/72nd Camels (F.1 and 2F.1 for now) 1/72nd He 111E 1/72nd Felixstowe 1/72nd Junkers D.I 1/72nd DH9 Hope I'm not repeating anything someone else has already posted. One proviso here is that Hannants have had the Eduard 1/72nd scale Albatros D.III, Ki-43 "Tony" [sic] and Hanriots on their forthcomings for yonks but none of these ever showed. Michael _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 20:17:38 -0800 From: "Bob Pearson" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site Message-ID: <104502346301@smtp-2.vancouver.ipapp.com> > 1/72nd Felixstowe SWOON !!!!!!! Be still my heart.. ... Bob ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 14:26:30 +1000 From: "Shane Weier" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site Message-ID: Michael says: >1/48th Nie.28 >1/72nd Camels (F.1 and 2F.1 for now) >1/72nd Felixstowe >1/72nd Junkers D.I >1/72nd DH9 I hope so, but I'll believe this when I see it on Roden's web page. OTOH wouldn't an injection Felixstowe in 1/72 be a marvellous subject. Can't imagine building more than one, but wouldn't a group of them in colourfull dazzle schemes look amazing Shane ******************************** My Strine is a Toad in Disguise ******************************** _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 05:51:51 +0100 From: Eric GALLAUD To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site Message-ID: <3E49D2E7.4080309@club-internet.fr> I hope the Roden site will be updated soon !!! Eric Shane Weier a écrit: >Michael says: > > > >>1/48th Nie.28 >>1/72nd Camels (F.1 and 2F.1 for now) >>1/72nd Felixstowe >>1/72nd Junkers D.I >>1/72nd DH9 >> >> > >I hope so, but I'll believe this when I see it on Roden's web page. > >OTOH wouldn't an injection Felixstowe in 1/72 be a marvellous subject. Can't >imagine building more than one, but wouldn't a group of them in colourfull >dazzle schemes look amazing > >Shane > > > >******************************** > >My Strine is a Toad in Disguise > > >******************************** > > > >_________________________________________________________________ >MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to >http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp > > > > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 20:55:31 -0800 From: "Bob Pearson" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site Message-ID: <104502573801@smtp-1.vancouver.ipapp.com> Yeah .. there is the 2005 OTF seminar model project .. assorted Felixstowes in dazzle paintjobs. Bob ---------- >From: "Shane Weier" > OTOH wouldn't an injection Felixstowe in 1/72 be a marvellous subject. Can't > imagine building more than one, but wouldn't a group of them in colourfull > dazzle schemes look amazing > > Shane ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 05:04:51 +0000 From: pfalzdvii@att.net To: wwi@wwi-models.org (WWI LIst) Subject: Roden Maybes Message-ID: <3E30922F00884037@mta4.wss.scd.yahoo.com> (added by postmaster@mail.san.yahoo.com) A decent injected N28 in 1/48 would be nice, it would go with the Fokkers Mirage is supposed to do. An injection DH 9 would be great, even in " hand me the magnifier" scale, especially as they seem to be making 1/48 kits of some of their 1/72 projects. Damn, I hate all the 'teasing' this year! I'm getting too old and the waiting is making me as grumpy as StE. -- Merrill Your Madness May Vary ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 23:04:36 -0600 From: BRENT THEOBALD To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site Message-ID: Howdy! Is this a joke? If it is then you are darn sneaky sir! This is something I would expect from Shane, Diego or myself. Wouldn't an injected Felixstowe be great?!? The Junkers D.I would be appreciated too. Fingers crossed in Texas. Later! Brent nr: Nieuport 1875-1911 - A Biography of Edouard Nieuport Also on the reading "on deck circle" Hawker - A Biography of Harry Hawker and Stamping Out the Virus - Allied Intervention in the Russian Civil War 1918-1920. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 15:32:19 +1000 From: "Shane Weier" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Roden Maybes Message-ID: Merrill >A decent injected N28 in 1/48 would be nice, it would go with the Fokkers >Mirage is supposed to do. An injection DH 9 would be great, even in " hand >me >the magnifier" scale, especially as they seem to be making 1/48 kits of >some of >their 1/72 projects. Damn, I hate all the 'teasing' this year! I'm getting >too >old and the waiting is making me as grumpy as StE. Oh be quiet - I'm a happy little Vegemite. How could I be any other way (hobby wise) when new kits are appearing faster than I can afford to buy them - so much so that I'm actively hoping the manufacturers *won't* deliver on schedule, but when my finances recover from the last lot of releases! Shane ******************************** My Strine is a Toad in Disguise ******************************** _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 22:19:31 -0800 From: "Ray Boorman" To: wwi@wwi-models.org, multiple recipients of list Subject: Re: Darwinian build heretic Message-ID: <550E9C6F363F0134FA32A33BB4B3B39E@Ray_B.prontomail.com> Hey Ken, one mans brick is another mans object'dart. As long as we have fun with the brick making who cares. Although give me a web cam and i can make it non functional.... Dont know how its just a talent i have. I got the Roden SE5a's tonight wooo i have said it before but we live in a golden age for OT. I'm still at work so hopefully my html isnt showing. Ray Ken DaPeepers wrote >Ferocious work ethic, patience of God and gifts from same. >also Brent's webcam. >In the Goofus/Gallant sweepstakes, talent is *not* the given. >Hanging your tongue out may work for Michael Jordan but so far, my >models >just look like bricks. >I'm joining MrKendix® in the stash ward and bringing me own scriber. > >-MrPeepers ______________________________________________________________ Get Your Free E-mail at http://www.prontomail.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:12:24 +0100 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: Steve Cox's wheeled thingie. Message-ID: Cute! /Neil C. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:14:20 -0000 From: "Pedro N. Soares" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site Message-ID: <12AEB3D996DDD311B98A00508B6D75B302AF7608@TUFAO> Now that's a great way to start a day! All great choices, more than enough for a year of modelling. Thanks Roden. Pedro > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Kendix [mailto:mkendix@hotmail.com] > Sent: quarta-feira, 12 de Fevereiro de 2003 3:37 > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: [WWI] Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site > > > Hannant's show the following Roden kits as: > > 1/48th Nie.28 > 1/48th OV-1 Mohawk > 1/72nd Camels (F.1 and 2F.1 for now) > 1/72nd He 111E > 1/72nd Felixstowe > 1/72nd Junkers D.I > 1/72nd DH9 > > Hope I'm not repeating anything someone else has already posted. > > One proviso here is that Hannants have had the Eduard 1/72nd > scale Albatros > D.III, Ki-43 "Tony" [sic] and Hanriots on their forthcomings > for yonks but > none of these ever showed. > > Michael > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:30:16 +0100 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site Message-ID: > Now that's a great way to start a day! Yes! > > All great choices, more than enough for a year of modelling. > Thanks Roden. Well I hope they're not just vapourware. I'd like all of them except the Mohawk (ugly beast). The Felixstowe is amazing news. /Neil > > Pedro > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 06:27:04 -0300 From: "WW1" To: Subject: Re: Site Update: Ford Armoured Car Message-ID: Neat! Really looks like a nice little model to make company to those Polish marked aircraft! D. ----- Original Message ----- From: "ot811" To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 8:51 PM Subject: [WWI] Site Update: Ford Armoured Car > Steve Cox sent in photos of his Ford Armoured car. > See > http://www.wwi-models.org/Images/Cox/Armor/index.html > or news. > regards > Sanjeev > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 06:37:26 -0300 From: "WW1" To: Subject: Re: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site Message-ID: > 1/72nd Camels (F.1 and 2F.1 for now) I'll be d****d! > 1/72nd Felixstowe Oh! If the Albatros fighters had three part wings, just imagine how many parts these wings will have! > 1/72nd Junkers D.I Corrugations, corrugations, a trend for 2003 > 1/72nd DH9 Cool! I like this one much more than the DH9a and its flat face. Cool markings as well! D. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:46:15 +0100 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: Re: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site Message-ID: > > 1/72nd Camels (F.1 and 2F.1 for now) > Got to have one in a representative collection, but I'll do the SE5 first. > > > 1/72nd Felixstowe Awe inspiring, but what a lot of work, the mind boggles at what Lance did last year. > > Oh! If the Albatros fighters had three part wings, just > imagine how many > parts these wings will have! 250 perhaps? > > > 1/72nd Junkers D.I > > Corrugations, corrugations, a trend for 2003 What a nice easy build this will be, but I wonder if they can beat the finesse of the warbirds or Pegasus version, I guess so seeing what they've done so far. > > 1/72nd DH9 > > Cool! I like this one much more than the DH9a and its flat face. Cool > markings as well! Any DeHavilland is a must! /Neil C. > D. > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:55:13 -0000 From: "Pedro N. Soares" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site Message-ID: <12AEB3D996DDD311B98A00508B6D75B302AF769D@TUFAO> > > Well I hope they're not just vapourware. I'd like all of them > except the Mohawk (ugly beast). Careful Neil, The Nie.28 won't fit in your display shelf either ;-) Pedro The Felixstowe is amazing news. > /Neil > > > > > > > > Pedro > > > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:58:43 -0000 From: "Pedro N. Soares" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site Message-ID: <12AEB3D996DDD311B98A00508B6D75B302AF76AF@TUFAO> > > Any DeHavilland is a must! > /Neil C. I wonder when will they be making an "Olivia" to suit Neil's tastes.... Pedro > > > > > D. > > > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:02:34 +0100 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site Message-ID: I formulated that very carefully. OK 1/48 isn't my scale, and I've already built a Ni28, and I don't like them anyway. But just to fondle the plastic would still be nice, I didn't say I'd buy it just that I'd like it, if for instance you gave it to me;-) /Neil C. > > > > Well I hope they're not just vapourware. I'd like all of them > > except the Mohawk (ugly beast). > > Careful Neil, The Nie.28 won't fit in your display shelf either ;-) > > Pedro > > > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:15:47 -0000 From: "Pedro N. Soares" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: Roden forthcoming on Hannant's site Message-ID: <12AEB3D996DDD311B98A00508B6D75B302AF771C@TUFAO> I'd like it, if for instance you gave it to me;-) Ah, Neil, I like you too much to do such an evil thing to you ;-) Pedro > /Neil C. > > > > > > > > > Well I hope they're not just vapourware. I'd like all of them > > > except the Mohawk (ugly beast). > > > > Careful Neil, The Nie.28 won't fit in your display shelf either ;-) > > > > Pedro > > > > > > > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 05:47:17 -0500 From: "Steven Perry" To: Subject: Re: List Chemist Answers (part 1) Message-ID: <001b01c2d284$1cf17f20$65a8a8c0@tampabay.rr.com> Mark: Thanks for the explaination. I recall enough chem for it to make some sense. I was wondering if the addition of Future might impart some of it's famous leveling & hardening properties to the glue. I had in mind a brushable, sandable filler that might take some of the work out of removing fabric effect molded into some model surfaces. I guess I'll play "chemistry set" and see if it works :-) thanks sp ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:03:03 -0300 From: "WW1" To: Subject: Roden forthcoming Message-ID: Neil of the other side of the equator wrote: > Got to have one in a representative collection, but I'll do the SE5 first. So you already have the Roden SE? > > > 1/72nd Felixstowe > > > 1/72nd Junkers D.I > What a nice easy build this will be, but I wonder if they can beat > the finesse of the warbirds or Pegasus version, I guess so seeing > what they've done so far. I have the Warbirds vac cleaned up and ready to detail. I'm saving it for a rainy day, it looks like a little sweet vacuform to build in a few weeks. > Any DeHavilland is a must! Speaking of which... this may leave just the DH3 as the sole OT De Havilland design without being kitted. D. nl: News. agh! nb: Spad and a DH.... nu: Balilla! ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 12:03:57 +0100 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: Removing fabric effects was:RE: Re: List Chemist Answers (p Message-ID: Not exactly this, but a thing I've been worrying about is the exaggerated mountains and valleys on some kits. One in particular is the Hit-kit LVG CV. What is the best method of improving looks without radical surgery? I was thinking of several layers of future in all the valleys? /Neil C. I had in mind a > brushable, > sandable filler that might take some of the work out of > removing fabric > effect molded into some model surfaces. > > I guess I'll play "chemistry set" and see if it works :-) > thanks > sp > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 12:10:17 +0100 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: Shadow in dioramas Message-ID: Another thing I've been thinking about is simulation of shadow in dioramas. If for instance one was to build a DH1A and wanted to put it on a sandy base to represent somewhere vague in the middle-east. And one wanted to put some blokes in the shade under the wing. It would be easy to photo-copy the plans, cut out the outline, and use it as a mask to spray a darker paint on the shadow area. But would it look good? I'm sure that somebody (Shep Paine?) has done it already, or maybe it just looks silly? /Neil C. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:12:02 -0300 From: "WW1" To: Subject: Re: Removing fabric effects was:RE: Re: List Chemist Answers (p Message-ID: Neil! > Not exactly this, but a thing I've been worrying about is > the exaggerated mountains and valleys on some kits. One > in particular is the Hit-kit LVG CV. What is the best > method of improving looks without radical surgery? I started this as well (wow, and it makes...) for Wanda as the Polish markings make it suitable for a nice gift. The wings are OK dimensionally and I sanded all the ribs from all the flying surfaces. I got nice thin scale wings out of those chunks of wavy plastic. The plastic itself is very nice, white and soft, but not too much. However, I'm still thinking how to correct the fuselage that is way too short in the "nose" and the cockpits need repositioning. D. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:17:45 -0300 From: "WW1" To: Subject: Re: Shadow in dioramas Message-ID: Neil! > Another thing I've been thinking about is simulation > of shadow in dioramas. Atmospheric effects (like shadows) work well as much as they are subtle. I can't say if a strong light/shadow contrast like the one you get in the desert will work if painted.... It may end looking like a poddle. Why no making a "shadow box"? I mean, putting a small light bulb over the model and thus forcing the lighting for the viewer? D. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 12:20:07 +0100 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: Roden forthcoming Message-ID: D: > So you already have the Roden SE? No , wish I had, I'll wait till I go to IPMS-open in Stockholm next year, then wait till 10 minutes before the show close, and then make that estonian guy an offer he can't resist. > I have the Warbirds vac cleaned up and ready to detail. I'm > saving it for a > rainy day, it looks like a little sweet vacuform to build in > a few weeks. Yes, I just sent my Pegasus kit off to Clay, it's very nice too, but I like the idea of a vac, on that particular one. Using Volkers method, you could even do the corrugations on the inside. > > > Any DeHavilland is a must! > Speaking of which... this may leave just the DH3 as the sole > OT De Havilland > design without being kitted. Yes, but that hardly counts it wasn't in service. > D. > nl: News. agh! Yes, 'orrible ain't it > nb: Spad and a DH.... Good man, I promote you to corporal! > nu: Balilla! If you build that, and finish it, you might make Lance-corporal by 2006. /Neil C. > ------------------------------ End of WWI Digest 5005 **********************