WWI Digest 4942 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) Re: Solution to Reduce List Editors' Workload by Tom Plesha 2) Re: Finding Flaws After Painting by "Shane Weier" 3) Re: What's Up With The Toko Salamander? by Ray 4) Re: Finding Flaws After Painting by Sean Brian Kirby 5) Re: What's Up With The Toko Salamander? by Sean Brian Kirby 6) my fokker E.IV by "Grzegorz Mazurowski" 7) Re: Finding Flaws After Painting by Ray 8) Re: Finding Flaws After Painting/and non-OT? by Tom Plesha 9) Re: my fokker E.IV by Ray 10) Re: Finding Flaws After Painting by "Steven Perry" 11) Re: Finding Flaws After Painting/and non-OT? by Sean Brian Kirby 12) Re: Solution to Reduce List Editors' Workload by RadspadMike@netscape.net 13) Re: Solution to Reduce List Editors' Workload by "Ross & Wendy Moorhouse" 14) Re: Finding Flaws After Painting by "Shane Weier" 15) Re: Finding Flaws After Painting by RadspadMike@netscape.net 16) Re: Finding Flaws After Painting by "Shane Weier" 17) Re: Finding Flaws After Painting by Ray 18) Re: Finding Flaws After Painting by "Shane Weier" 19) RE: Russian Aeroplanes, 1914-1918 by RadspadMike@netscape.net 20) Re: Russian Aeroplanes, 1914-1918 by "Matt Bittner" 21) RE: Russian Aeroplanes, 1914-1918 by "Matt Bittner" 22) Re: Voss Cowl, Jastagate, Bobilink, wing ripple, Nalgo, Cane Toad by pfalzdvii@att.net 23) Re: Finding Flaws After Painting by pfalzdvii@att.net 24) =?big5?Q?=A4=A4=A4=E5=A6=A8=A4H=BA=F4=AF=B8=B3s=B5=B2?= by chengrenwangzhan02@hotmail.com 25) Re: Finding Flaws After Painting by "Pedro Soares" 26) =?GB2312?B?xfPT0cTjusOjoaOh?= by "yodada" 27) Re: Voss Cowl, Jastagate, Bobilink, wing ripple, Nalgo, Cane Toad by "Shane Weier" 28) From NKR's new releases e-letter by "Shane Weier" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 17:20:54 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Plesha To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Solution to Reduce List Editors' Workload Message-ID: <20030123012054.45846.qmail@web40312.mail.yahoo.com> Pyramid? Later Tom --- RadspadMike@netscape.net wrote: > Hey gang, > > I got to thinking (dangerous, I know) that although > we have a list editor and three (?) assistants, we > are probably overloading them, not so much with > photos of completed models as in the past, but now > with in-process stuff. If my personal experience is > any guide, I have about 300% in-process vs. 5% > completions, so you can see this in-process stuff > can get pretty heavy. > > I think I have found a solution to this > “overload” problem. If each of us had our own > website/domain (and I know many already do!) we > could individually post our in-process stuff and > save wear and tear on the list editors and > much-needed space in the list galleries. > > I am willing to pioneer this project by establishing > a basic website and, to get this thing started, need > at least ten listees to purchase websites from me. > Although I don’t have all the bits and pieces of > this thing tidied up, I’m sure the fee will be > nominal. As an added benefit, any listee taking > advantage of this can do the same thing as I propose > and recoup their website investment plus make some > extra money with which to increase their stash. > > If you would like to take a look and signup then you > need to click on the recent message, subject: [WWI] > dfernet0, which you may have already inadvertently > deleted and need to rescue from the trash. > > Regards, > Mike Kavanaugh > > I’m sure that anything associated with Diego has > to be on the “up and up”. > ;-)) > > > > > __________________________________________________________________ > The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. > Upgrade now! > http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp > > > Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account > today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:22:16 +1000 From: "Shane Weier" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Finding Flaws After Painting Message-ID: Sean > > Actually, *most* OT aircraft were a heck of a lot > > glossier than those ugly dogboxes > > >Hey, you watch your mouth! And where was your >winky-face? While I am all in favour of political correctness I also intend to continue to call a spade a bloody shovel. Beauty being in the eye of the beholder, this one looks at a 1*9 and sees something I'd scrape off my shoe. YMMV and more power to you. No winkey - I was serious, and given that a 1*9 is ot I maintain the right to not like it onlist (ditto any other of the metal encrusted rubbish) Shane ******************************** My Strine is a Toad in Disguise ******************************** _________________________________________________________________ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 17:38:19 -0800 From: Ray To: wwi@wwi-models.org, Sean Brian Kirby Subject: Re: What's Up With The Toko Salamander? Message-ID: <200301221738.19909.Ray_Boorman@telus.net> Sean on the wwi website Pedro has a really good build that will help with your questions. Ray http://www.wwi-models.org/IM/British/salamander.html On Wednesday 22 January 2003 13:23, Sean Brian Kirby wrote: > Um... got a little Toko Salamander, last week. Meant > to ask, sooner - am I supposed to chop off that bit of > lower wing that does not fit up into the fuselage cut > out. This is not mentioned in the instructions, which > also seem to show a bit of this extra plastic > remaining. (I am assuming this kit shares wings with > their Snipe, or some-such.) Also - given the vague > instructions to this effect - should the interior be a > steel color, since this was an "armored" fighter? And > did this plane utilise tubular or wood longerons, &c? > > Thanks in advance... > > > Sean > > ===== > www.pitpass.com > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 17:37:24 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Brian Kirby To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Finding Flaws After Painting Message-ID: <20030123013724.41673.qmail@web14802.mail.yahoo.com> --- Shane Weier wrote: > No winkey - I was serious, and given that a 1*9 is > ot I maintain the right > to not like it onlist (ditto any other of the metal > encrusted rubbish) Hey, I hope you realise my tongue's forever in my cheek. :) So, um... fabric-winged storm-named RAF thingies okay? And I trust you like, at the very least, the P-12 (which one man with whom I spoke said was the most enjoyable plane he ever flew)? Personally, I am an airplane freak - though I tend to be not so big on those things with the giant turbines. What's "YMMV?" Later - Sean ===== www.pitpass.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 17:38:55 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Brian Kirby To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: What's Up With The Toko Salamander? Message-ID: <20030123013855.33722.qmail@web14805.mail.yahoo.com> --- Ray wrote: > Sean > on the wwi website Pedro has a really good build > that will help with your > questions. > > Ray > > http://www.wwi-models.org/IM/British/salamander.html Hey, thanks, man! Cool... Sean ===== www.pitpass.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 02:43:07 +0100 From: "Grzegorz Mazurowski" To: Subject: my fokker E.IV Message-ID: <00f201c2c280$c7c87200$0200a8c0@grzesiek> Huh! It's almost ready. Needs only wheels, prop, guns and rigging. And some minor PE bits. Cool! G. ***************r-e-k-l-a-m-a************** Chcesz oszczedzic na kosztach obslugi bankowej ? mBIZNES - konto dla firm http://epieniadze.onet.pl/mbiznes ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 17:46:40 -0800 From: Ray To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Finding Flaws After Painting Message-ID: <200301221746.40180.Ray_Boorman@telus.net> On Wednesday 22 January 2003 17:23, Shane Weier wrote: > No winkey - I was serious, and given that a 1*9 is ot I maintain the right > to not like it onlist (ditto any other of the metal encrusted rubbish) Actually didn't you mean really ugly, slightly shiny metal encrusted crappy rubbish. Getting back OT and for Sean the blasphemer ;) I think you will find that all the fabric covered aircraft were very shiny, to the point where sometimes researchers have thought there were lines and camouflage on surfaces only to find they were refelections. Hmm I wonder if the Junkers J1 and D1 should be painted flat?? Ray ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 17:46:02 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Plesha To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Finding Flaws After Painting/and non-OT? Message-ID: <20030123014602.75588.qmail@web40306.mail.yahoo.com> Is there some reason why lately this list seems to drift away from OT and to other non-list subjects? .. Unless I'm missing something, I am under the impression that this is a WWI List. .. There are a large number of other sites for the WWII things, Golden Age Aircraft, etc. .. Later Tom .. --- Sean Brian Kirby wrote: > > --- Shane Weier wrote: > > No winkey - I was serious, and given that a 1*9 is > > ot I maintain the right > > to not like it onlist (ditto any other of the > metal > > encrusted rubbish) > > > Hey, I hope you realise my tongue's forever in my > cheek. :) > > So, um... fabric-winged storm-named RAF thingies > okay? > And I trust you like, at the very least, the P-12 > (which one man with whom I spoke said was the most > enjoyable plane he ever flew)? Personally, I am an > airplane freak - though I tend to be not so big on > those things with the giant turbines. > > What's "YMMV?" > > Later - > > Sean > > ===== > www.pitpass.com > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up > now. > http://mailplus.yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 17:51:48 -0800 From: Ray To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: my fokker E.IV Message-ID: <200301221751.48770.Ray_Boorman@telus.net> Pictures ??? ;) On Wednesday 22 January 2003 17:43, you wrote: > Huh! > It's almost ready. > Needs only wheels, prop, guns and rigging. > And some minor PE bits. > Cool! > G. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 20:48:48 -0500 From: "Steven Perry" To: Subject: Re: Finding Flaws After Painting Message-ID: <010401c2c281$931e4740$65a8a8c0@tampabay.rr.com> I think you will find that all > the fabric covered aircraft were very shiny, to the point where sometimes > researchers have thought there were lines and camouflage on surfaces only to > find they were refelections. Trouble with applying gloss to scale models is that the gloss effect is still 1:1. I find a little flat mixed in the last coat takes the bark off the gloss, but still leaves the impression of a shiny airplane rather than a shiny model. Your Mileage May Vary sp ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 17:51:20 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Brian Kirby To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Finding Flaws After Painting/and non-OT? Message-ID: <20030123015120.96720.qmail@web14809.mail.yahoo.com> --- Tom Plesha wrote: > Is there some reason why lately this list seems to > drift away from OT and to other non-list subjects? > . > Unless I'm missing something, I am under the > impression that this is a WWI List. > . > There are a large number of other sites for the WWII > things, Golden Age Aircraft, etc. Simply trying to jerk Shane's chain. Hey - that rhymed! :D Sean ===== www.pitpass.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 20:53:47 -0500 From: RadspadMike@netscape.net To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Solution to Reduce List Editors' Workload Message-ID: <5C858315.43378B12.3E0364A1@netscape.net> Tom Plesha wrote: >Pyramid? >Later >Tom Of course! Wonder how they picked up on Diego's address? What sort of company have you been keeping, Diego? Now married, you should be walking the straight and narrow. ;-)) Mike Kavanaugh __________________________________________________________________ The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 13:04:26 +1100 From: "Ross & Wendy Moorhouse" To: Subject: Re: Solution to Reduce List Editors' Workload Message-ID: <001601c2c283$c1ce1cd0$f5482dcb@future> It would have been a spam spider that went through the archive and pulled part of his email address out. Cheers Ross -----Original Message----- From: wwi@wwi-models.org [mailto:wwi@wwi-models.org] On Behalf Of RadspadMike@netscape.net Sent: Thursday, 23 January 2003 12:56 PM To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: [WWI] Re: Solution to Reduce List Editors' Workload Tom Plesha wrote: >Pyramid? >Later >Tom Of course! Wonder how they picked up on Diego's address? What sort of company have you been keeping, Diego? Now married, you should be walking the straight and narrow. ;-)) Mike Kavanaugh __________________________________________________________________ The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:15:10 +1000 From: "Shane Weier" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Finding Flaws After Painting Message-ID: Sean >What's "YMMV?" Your mileage may vary - in other words *you* might like 1*9's and that's damn fine as far as I'm concerned. OTOH *I* don't care for them, and aside from this email don't discuss them on the list (but I listen politely to the afflicted at model club, then run away at the first opportunity ;-) >So, um... fabric-winged storm-named RAF thingies okay? Errr, if they're also named after an Aussie and built by Sopwith. Which doesn't mean I'll talk about them *here* except under serious provocation >And I trust you like, at the very least, the P-12 Is that an aircraft or a haemorrhoid remedy? Not especially - though I like the period and there are aircraft in it I do like. Not that I discuss them here. >Personally, I am an >airplane freak - though I tend to be not so big on >those things with the giant turbines. Props on the outside == good Props on the inside == bad I can agree with that, not that I discuss those things here .... >Hey, I hope you realise my tongue's forever in my >cheek. :) Mine too. I have GOT to be the person least qualified to complain about talking ot dribble, but mostly my ot posts are poor attempts to be funny. I don't find anything funny about ot aircraft so..... ...I don't discuss them on the list! (offlist now, that's different) Shane ******************************** My Strine is a Toad in Disguise ******************************** _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 21:16:00 -0500 From: RadspadMike@netscape.net To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Finding Flaws After Painting Message-ID: <404B6DDE.5F42A570.3E0364A1@netscape.net> "Steven Perry" wrote: > >Your Mileage May Vary >sp So that's what "YMMV" means! For years, I've wondered and have been to afraid to expose my ignorance by asking. Other acronyms I have figured out or someone explained them . . . this one eluded me. I supposed, "your method(s) may vary", but that didn't always seem to fit in context. "Your madness may vary"? Thanks, Steve. I guess getting three out of four words isn't too bad. Mike Kavanaugh __________________________________________________________________ The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:18:08 +1000 From: "Shane Weier" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Finding Flaws After Painting Message-ID: Ray >Actually didn't you mean really ugly, slightly shiny metal encrusted > >crappy rubbish. Yeah, but I tried to be polite ;-) >Hmm I wonder if the Junkers J1 and D1 should be painted flat?? A good question. But my datafiles are not with me in this hot dirty black hole :-( Shane ******************************** My Strine is a Toad in Disguise ******************************** _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 18:24:09 -0800 From: Ray To: wwi@wwi-models.org, "Steven Perry" Subject: Re: Finding Flaws After Painting Message-ID: <200301221824.09515.Ray_Boorman@telus.net> Good point Steve, I have been mixing flat pollyscale clear with future to get a sheen that looks ok in 1/72 at least to my eyes. But I still battle with how to reflect this well so it doesnt look toylike. Another thought came to mind. I'll use Barkers infamous Camel as an example. Legend has it that this aircraft had the longest operational life of an OT aircraft in frontline service (about a year). In the year it was in use I recall it had new two upper wings, at least two replacement undercarriages, many patched areas and was completely re-doped more than once. If you then add the fact that the Rotaries of the time spewed oil everywhere (They used a total loss system). A large additive of this oil was caster oil which is extremly corrosive to fabric and wood and you have aircraft that were by definition very well maintained and doped. Therefore very shiney. The trick is trying to capture this on a scale model where the sheen must be toned down or as you said it looks toylike. Ray On Wednesday 22 January 2003 17:50, Steven Perry wrote: > I > Trouble with applying gloss to scale models is that the gloss effect is > still 1:1. I find a little flat mixed in the last coat takes the bark off > the gloss, but still leaves the impression of a shiny airplane rather than > a shiny model. > > Your Mileage May Vary > sp ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:21:10 +1000 From: "Shane Weier" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Finding Flaws After Painting Message-ID: SP says: >Trouble with applying gloss to scale models is that the gloss effect is >still 1:1. I find a little flat mixed in the last coat takes the bark off >the gloss, but still leaves the impression of a shiny airplane rather than >a >shiny model. Yup, that's why I use a satin finish in all scales, a bit glossier on 1/48, and never use full gloss on 1/72 Shane ******************************** My Strine is a Toad in Disguise ******************************** _________________________________________________________________ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 21:32:41 -0500 From: RadspadMike@netscape.net To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: Russian Aeroplanes, 1914-1918 Message-ID: <1673EDF8.0506FFB9.3E0364A1@netscape.net> "Matt Bittner" wrote: >Awesome! The book _Russian Aeroplanes, 1914-1918_ arrived today. > Awesome! This is everything that Dave Z. posted and more. > >My only regret was paying "book rate" to get it shipped. My >patience (or lack thereof) got the better of me. :-) Hi Matt, Me too, on the book rate. I'm still waiting. BTW, probably having more Nieuport kits than any other particular breed (although I'm working on SPADs), what is your opinion of the Crowood book, Nieuport Aircraft of World War One, by Ray Sanger? I ordered it yesterday and am afraid it will tell me more than I ever wanted to know about this aircraft type. Still, this list encourages such an AMS that I thought I probably should have it. Regards, Mike Kavanaugh __________________________________________________________________ The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 21:16:40 -0600 From: "Matt Bittner" To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" Subject: Re: Russian Aeroplanes, 1914-1918 Message-ID: On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 19:33:43 -0500 (EST), Volker Haeusler wrote: > Matt, is there more in the book on the Kazyanenko 5 in addition to the cover > photo already mentioned by Dave Z.? While the cover is a painting, there are three photos inside, along with a drawing. Matt ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 21:17:03 -0600 From: "Matt Bittner" To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" Subject: RE: Russian Aeroplanes, 1914-1918 Message-ID: On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 21:34:53 -0500 (EST), RadspadMike@netscape.net wrote: > Me too, on the book rate. I'm still waiting. BTW, probably having more Nieuport kits than any other particular breed (although I'm working on SPADs), what is your opinion of the Crowood book, Nieuport Aircraft of World War One, by Ray Sanger? I ordered it yesterday and am afraid it will tell me more than I ever wanted to know about this aircraft type. Still, this list encourages such an AMS that I thought I probably should have it. Unfortunately one I don't have yet. One of these days. :-) Matt ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 04:57:34 +0000 From: pfalzdvii@att.net To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Voss Cowl, Jastagate, Bobilink, wing ripple, Nalgo, Cane Toad Message-ID: <20030123045739.TNMY9286.mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net@mtiwebc36> I may be mistaken, but a matt clear coat was specified for all German aircraft around 1916 (maybe earlier) Rotaries would cover their aircraft with a hot castor oil mist, so no rotary powered plane could be very 'flat', but pictures of German inline aircraft mostly look pretty 'flat' to me, despite the 'total loss' oiling systems. -- Merrill Anderson > Michael retorts: > > > >Spurs supporters are well known for having their brains in their a** > > > >Well, we need a lot of room for brains our size. > > obvious responses> > > Getting OT for the benefit os Sean, in my previous post I meant to add that > he should look at the wings on photos of OT aircraft. You can often see > reflected people, trees, buildings, other parts of the airframe due to the > shininess of the dope. And it doesn't change much in the time an aircraft is > likely to survive though there were some long serving warhorses about > > ..and some exceptions too. IIRC the German naval aircraft had matt dope > specified. > > Shane > > ******************************** > > My Strine is a Toad in Disguise > > > ******************************** > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 05:20:35 +0000 From: pfalzdvii@att.net To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Finding Flaws After Painting Message-ID: <20030123052046.QSJG2583.mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net@mtiwebc36> Wow! An alternate list motto "Your Madness May Vary" As lunacy of every conceivable (or not) variety is evidenced by list members, that was a BULLSEYE! On another topic, Sean has been agitating (whether he knew it or not) for the position of "List Heretic" (as our beloved list Heretic is now in 'emeritus' status) but he's less subtle, so I propose a NEW LIST TITLE: LIST GADFLY -- Merrill Anderson > "Steven Perry" wrote: > > > >Your Mileage May Vary > >sp > > So that's what "YMMV" means! For years, I've wondered and have been to afraid > to expose my ignorance by asking. Other acronyms I have figured out or someone > explained them . . . this one eluded me. I supposed, "your method(s) may vary", > but that didn't always seem to fit in context. "Your madness may vary"? > Thanks, Steve. I guess getting three out of four words isn't too bad. > > Mike Kavanaugh > > __________________________________________________________________ > The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! > http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp > > Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at > http://webmail.netscape.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 01:57:09 -0500 (EST) From: chengrenwangzhan02@hotmail.com To: \HK98-9.TXT, \HK98-11.TXT, \HK98-12.TXT, \HK98-2.TXT, \HK98-3.TXT, Subject: =?big5?Q?=A4=A4=A4=E5=A6=A8=A4H=BA=F4=AF=B8=B3s=B5=B2?= Message-ID: 妨Hs http://www.linkadd.com/sexsite/new.htm Want to get more people to view your site? http://www.linkadd.com To remove from our mailing list, please email to: chengrenwangzhan02@hotmail.com Subject= REMOVE ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 07:46:23 -0000 From: "Pedro Soares" To: Subject: Re: Finding Flaws After Painting Message-ID: <001501c2c2b3$8851ec40$23475451@netcabo.pt> Gang, Earl is listing the A-model Nieuport IV as available next sunday Pedro .. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 16:10:14 +0800 From: "yodada" To: wwi@mustang.sr.unh.edu Subject: =?GB2312?B?xfPT0cTjusOjoaOh?= Message-ID: <200301230807.DAA27030@mustang.sr.unh.edu> һʼȤɾ½⣡Ǹ 80ԪǮ͵õһ͵Ϣžͽʧҵ𣿽죬 ҵˣ֩ѡΪ֩ԱӵŵʵϢ ļͥϢ˾ⲻ񻰣֩һж÷ḻʡȤɡ ַ http://jgm0838.126.com ʼˣɾ¡ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 18:49:09 +1000 From: "Shane Weier" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Voss Cowl, Jastagate, Bobilink, wing ripple, Nalgo, Cane Toad Message-ID: Merrill, >I may be mistaken, IMHO I think you are. Take a look at page 1 of datafile 1 if you have it for a nice inverted (by reflection in the lower wing) view of an Alb D.III V strut. And so on.... von Bertrab's machine is another excellent example and there are dozens in that volume alone >but a matt clear coat was specified for all German aircraft >around 1916 (maybe earlier Maybe, but IMO if so it either wasn't much used or worked like sh*t. OTOH ISTR that the national *markings* were supposed to be matt, and maybe this is the order in question Shane ******************************** My Strine is a Toad in Disguise ******************************** _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 18:51:23 +1000 From: "Shane Weier" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: From NKR's new releases e-letter Message-ID: Hi all, >and the following are due in Sunday: >Roden 1/72 SE-5A w/Wolseley Viper engine @$12 >Roden 1/72 Albatros D.Va @$12 >Amodel 1/72 Nieuport 1V @$17 Shane ******************************** My Strine is a Toad in Disguise ******************************** _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail ------------------------------ End of WWI Digest 4942 **********************