WWI Digest 4896 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) Re: Color question by Daniel Hayward 2) Re: Longest awaited release? by "Thomas Solinski" 3) Roden F2B (was Re: Re: Roden SE-5a et al.) by "Matt Bittner" 4) Re: Help me I'm sick (Hairy Fuselages) by Sean Brian Kirby 5) Re: Hi folks!!nice to meet ya! all...(:o) by Sean Brian Kirby 6) Re: Color question by "Thomas Solinski" 7) Re: Shane The Streaker (Pt 1) by Sean Brian Kirby 8) REAL Nice SE-5 documentation by "Thomas Solinski" 9) Re: Roden F2B (was Re: Re: Roden SE-5a et al.) by "Michael Kendix" 10) Re: Shane The Streaker (Pt 1) by "Shane Weier" 11) RE: the longest wait by "Paul Schwartzkopf" 12) Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? by "Michael Kendix" 13) Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? by Sean Brian Kirby 14) Re: Shane The Streaker (Pt 1) by Sean Brian Kirby 15) Re: Help me I'm sick (Hairy Fuselages) by ot811 16) Re: Help me I'm sick (Hairy Fuselages) by Sean Brian Kirby 17) RE: the longest wait by Sean Brian Kirby 18) Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? by Sean Brian Kirby 19) Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? by "Shane Weier" 20) Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? by "Shane Weier" 21) Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? by Sean Brian Kirby 22) Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? by Sean Brian Kirby 23) Re: Roden F2B (was Re: Re: Roden SE-5a et al.) by "Steven Perry" 24) Special Hobby Tabloid Questions by Ray 25) Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? by "Shane Weier" 26) Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? by "Shane Weier" 27) Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? by Sean Brian Kirby 28) Re: Color question by Sean Brian Kirby 29) Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? by Ray 30) Re: Roden F2B (was Re: Re: Roden SE-5a et al.) by Ray 31) Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? by "John & Allison Cyganowski" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 19:20:38 -0400 From: Daniel Hayward To: Subject: Re: Color question Message-ID: > Also, what does "OT" stand for? > > Thanks, -K- > Kerry, "OT" stands for On-Topic, those things that are directly related to WW1 modeling. "ot" stands for off-topic. I was going through my decal stash the other day and found myself thinking "OT,ot,ot,ot, OT, ot, OT..." as I separated them. Funny how this list gets into your mind so quickly! Dan ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:16:58 -0600 From: "Thomas Solinski" To: Subject: Re: Longest awaited release? Message-ID: <003601c2b5e2$18096360$9eb40c44@ok.cox.net> The Polar Lights DH-4! MrT ----- Original Message ----- > Any advance? > > Dave > > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 18:18:56 -0600 From: "Matt Bittner" To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" Subject: Roden F2B (was Re: Re: Roden SE-5a et al.) Message-ID: On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:49:15 -0500 (EST), Ray wrote: > I'm looking forward anxiously to both. In fact I just swapped my one and only > Revell SE5a in anticipation of the new one. As to the Biff, well me being a > 1/72 modeller I still have both 1/48th Biffs (for when I finally can't see in > 1/72) and I can see at least 3 1/72 biffs in my near future if the model is > up to past Roden standards. I wonder how easy it would be to build a F2A > from an F2B, plus there's post war too. Okay, so does anyone know if the F2B was flown in the RCW? Even if it was, it's still the *least* liked of all WW1 aircraft, personally. Blech! Matt ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 16:26:32 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Brian Kirby To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Help me I'm sick (Hairy Fuselages) Message-ID: <20030107002632.3966.qmail@web14801.mail.yahoo.com> --- SSH wrote: > -------- you can use .002 or .003 " brass sheet > stock to make the > hardware. You wont break a drill bit unless(or > until) it skids. You > can save some money and use .009" steel wire (guitar > string) as a > drill bit. Takes a bit longer though. > regards Thanks for that, man. Hey, Sanjeev - are you an F1 fan? I know a Sanjeev who is. Sean ===== www.pitpass.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 16:29:27 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Brian Kirby To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Hi folks!!nice to meet ya! all...(:o) Message-ID: <20030107002927.41679.qmail@web14807.mail.yahoo.com> --- Fernando wrote: > my friend Dan Hayward has been telling me that i > should get on list > and join in on the fun!..so here iam ! Fernando! Bienvenidos! Thanks for joining us. By all means, enjoy yourself. Sean ===== www.pitpass.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:28:37 -0600 From: "Thomas Solinski" To: Subject: Re: Color question Message-ID: <017401c2b5e3$b86dc340$9eb40c44@ok.cox.net> HI Kenny! Since someone else did the colo(u)r part OT= On Topic i.e. WW-I modeling ot=off topic other than WW-I modeling i.e. Sp@t$*res Bf-One Oh thingies and assorted vehicles powered by suck squeeze burn blow. HTH MrT ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kerry Lynn" To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 5:59 PM Subject: [WWI] Color question > My apologies if this has been previously asked & answered: > I am building a 1/72 Eduard Dr.I after being away from the hobby > for many years. I would like to know an equivalent color for the > light blue base under the olive streaks. The directions list > Humbrol 1028 (which doesn't exist as far as I can tell) along with > other mfg's, none of which seem to agree. Should it be Aeromaster > 1028 (RLM 76)? > > Also, what does "OT" stand for? > > Thanks, -K- > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 16:39:09 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Brian Kirby To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Shane The Streaker (Pt 1) Message-ID: <20030107003909.85775.qmail@web14803.mail.yahoo.com> --- Shane Weier wrote: > Thanks, and yes, that's more or less how it was > done. > > Errrrmm > > This is taken from a description sent to Pedro in > January last year. Hey, thanks for that! It's easier than it sounds, perhaps. I love the effect - some of the nicest streaking I've ever seen - so I will have to try it on Lothar's Dreidekker. One question: You said Aeromaster thinner, in part one, then Model Master in the second. I am assuming you meant Model Master. Again, thank you, thank you, thank you... Sean ===== www.pitpass.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:38:43 -0600 From: "Thomas Solinski" To: Subject: REAL Nice SE-5 documentation Message-ID: <019201c2b5e5$21dc0200$9eb40c44@ok.cox.net> Hi all, Have a look around the Ole LHS and find a copy of Flying Scale Models. The November 2002 edition has a HUGE bunch of SE 5 info including 1/40th drawings, a flight report of the Shuttleworth aircraft and a complete photo walkaround. And if that's not enough a nice set of free plans for a free flight SE also! MrT ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 00:40:23 +0000 From: "Michael Kendix" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Roden F2B (was Re: Re: Roden SE-5a et al.) Message-ID: >From: "Matt Bittner" >Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 19:20:30 -0500 (EST) > >On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:49:15 -0500 (EST), Ray wrote: > >>I'm looking forward anxiously to both. In fact I just swapped my one >>and >>only Revell SE5a in anticipation of the new one. Dangerous, Ray! dangerous! I ditched my Pegasus Hanriot D.I and the Eduard kit never materialized. The only sure way for the Eduard DH-2 to arrive is for me to hang onto the Revell and Pegasus kits for dear life. Same goes for Roden and the Esci, Revell and the Roseplane SE5a stuff. >Okay, so does anyone know if the F2B was flown in the RCW? Yes, someone probably knows! Bwahahahaha! Matthew Bittner writes: >Even if it was, it's still the *least* liked of all WW1 aircraft, >personally. Blech! Ignoring that and moving smoothly along: I saw a really nice scheme in Irish Free State colours. Would this version have been the same as in WWI? Michael _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 10:43:07 +1000 From: "Shane Weier" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Shane The Streaker (Pt 1) Message-ID: Sean >You said Aeromaster >thinner, in part one, then Model Master in the second. Modelmaster is right - in a black can Shane _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:46:12 -0600 From: "Paul Schwartzkopf" To: Subject: RE: the longest wait Message-ID: > what is the longest time between announcement and > release of a subject for a company still in existence at the time of > release? I seem to recall that the Glencoe company released that they were re-issuing an ot 1/48 Grumman Goose back in the late 80s that never showed up. They also said in the early 90s that they had slated for 1996 release the re-vamped Aurora Spad XIII with American decals, the re-vamped Aurora JN-4, and the re-vamped Aurora DH-4. Paul ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 00:45:18 +0000 From: "Michael Kendix" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? Message-ID: Shane: >After I mentioned Tamiya earlier Michael posted that we don't need >Tamiya >to produce WW1 subjects for us. > >Hell, I agree except IMO I *want* Tamiya to *not* make WW1 subjects. >I've >bought several Tamiya kits in the last 10 years and sold all of >them >practically unopened. Too damned boring, not just the subjects >but the >absolute lack of challenge. Your problem is that you simply don't know how to muck up a really easy build. I, on the other hand can make the most straightforward project painful and convoluted. Truthfully, you can easily embellishing these kits to make them more challenging - market add-ons abound; e.g. showing the engine works, opeing stuff up, difficult paint schemes. Add more detail. Michael _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 16:46:16 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Brian Kirby To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? Message-ID: <20030107004616.75336.qmail@web14806.mail.yahoo.com> --- Shane Weier wrote: > Hurrah. A man after my own heart. > Hell, I agree except IMO I *want* Tamiya to *not* > make WW1 subjects. I've > bought several Tamiya kits in the last 10 years and > sold all of them > practically unopened. Too damned boring, not just > the subjects but the > absolute lack of challenge. Yeah, but time saved correcting can be time spent adding additional detail. :) Right? But if a model features accurate outline, little problems here and there are very forgivable. A little filling never hurt anyone. A nice model's a nice model. Sean ===== www.pitpass.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 16:47:12 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Brian Kirby To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Shane The Streaker (Pt 1) Message-ID: <20030107004712.94030.qmail@web14812.mail.yahoo.com> --- Shane Weier wrote: > Modelmaster is right - in a black can Ah, that stuff. And thanks again! Sean ===== www.pitpass.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 19:48:00 -0500 From: ot811 To: Subject: Re: Help me I'm sick (Hairy Fuselages) Message-ID: <20030107004556.2506E690D30@mail.mailsnare.net> Sean, >>>>Thanks for that, man. Hey, Sanjeev - are you an F1 >fan? eh, my closest brush with F1 is the Mi**ge F.1 in 1:48 scale. my humble apologies. regards Sanjeev ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 16:55:00 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Brian Kirby To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Help me I'm sick (Hairy Fuselages) Message-ID: <20030107005500.83984.qmail@web14810.mail.yahoo.com> --- ot811 wrote: > Sean, > eh, my closest brush with F1 is the Mi**ge F.1 in > 1:48 scale. > my humble apologies. > regards Hey, it's cool, it's cool. :) Sean ===== www.pitpass.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 16:56:38 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Brian Kirby To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: the longest wait Message-ID: <20030107005638.1856.qmail@web14804.mail.yahoo.com> --- Paul Schwartzkopf wrote: > I seem to recall that the Glencoe company released > that they were re-issuing > an ot 1/48 Grumman Goose back in the late 80s that > never showed up. They never released that Goose? I seem to remember it on box-sides, many years ago. And they never did it... Sean ===== www.pitpass.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 16:58:08 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Brian Kirby To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? Message-ID: <20030107005808.10325.qmail@web14802.mail.yahoo.com> --- Michael Kendix wrote: > Truthfully, you can easily embellishing these kits > to make them more > challenging - market add-ons abound; e.g. showing > the engine works, opeing > stuff up, difficult paint schemes. Add more detail. Exactly. Any kit can be as challenging as you want it to be. Sean ===== www.pitpass.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 11:01:39 +1000 From: "Shane Weier" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? Message-ID: Michael, >Truthfully, you can easily embellishing these kits to make them more >challenging - market add-ons abound; e.g. showing the engine works, >opeing >stuff up, difficult paint schemes. Maybe. But as I told Greg once - I don't buy aftermarket detail sets because in *my* case they make me feel like a gourmet presented with a superb meal - and someone to eat it for him. I am NOT an elitist about this - I applaud just as loudly each new and better release and am happy to see them and to see what others will make of them. But not me, my purchasisng history suggests that if I buy an OT model it will come from Classic Airframes or MPM or Special Hobby, or..... but not Tamiya. (Exception - sometimes I buy kits because the club wants me to build them, and I do build them, most recently a Revell *jet* :-( ) Shane _________________________________________________________________ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 11:05:54 +1000 From: "Shane Weier" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? Message-ID: Sean >Yeah, but time saved correcting can be time spent >adding additional detail. :) Right? Not really. If you follow that line of reasoning to the ultimate conclusion you end up with a scratchbuilt model. >A nice model's a nice model. Hell yes. But if Mr Tamiya did most of it he's just gone and pinched all my *fun* :-) I'm *not* advocating the increased production of crap kits - just pointing out that I'm one of that type of modeller who gets his jollies from the *process* of building. If that process is short and easy I feel like something's missing. Shane _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:12:17 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Brian Kirby To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? Message-ID: <20030107011217.88910.qmail@web14810.mail.yahoo.com> --- Shane Weier wrote: > (Exception - sometimes I buy kits because the club > wants me to build them, > and I do build them, most recently a Revell *jet* > :-( ) We can see it didn't kill you. ;) Sean ===== www.pitpass.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:18:13 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Brian Kirby To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? Message-ID: <20030107011813.19409.qmail@web14809.mail.yahoo.com> --- Shane Weier wrote: > I'm *not* advocating the increased production of > crap kits - just pointing > out that I'm one of that type of modeller who gets > his jollies from the > *process* of building. If that process is short and > easy I feel like > something's missing. Well, so far as the "crap kits" thing goes - we are getting some lovely, lovely kits from non-Japanese manufacturuers. Roden does good stuff, Special Hobby is adding to the list, and - again - Eduard kits are as good as anyone's. So we don't have to accept much on the cruddy side, anymore. Hey! Can the Eduard kits ever become too "perfect?" I think they're pretty-much there... and they're WWI subjects, to boot! Really, how lucky are we? And, if Tamiya released a couple Pfalz D-XIIs - to 1:48 and 1:72 - you might be ahead of me in line, eh? :) (Wanna' send some letters, y'all?) Sean ===== www.pitpass.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 20:37:18 -0500 From: "Steven Perry" To: Subject: Re: Roden F2B (was Re: Re: Roden SE-5a et al.) Message-ID: <009401c2b5ed$5148d740$64a8a8c0@tampabay.rr.com> > >Okay, so does anyone know if the F2B was flown in the RCW? Yes, at least one. I have a photo in a book. I can look it up if someone needs specifics sp ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:00:21 -0800 From: Ray To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Special Hobby Tabloid Questions Message-ID: <200301061700.21656.Ray_Boorman@telus.net> Since I am sitting here bored with no models to build for a few days (or weeks if SWMBO gets me painting when we move). i have some questions for anyone who has the Special Hobby Tabloid Yes I know wrong scale for me but hey its a Sopwith and a Tabloid which means its on my list of models that dont get into scale choices. Some areas I have questions on are. The Cowls are the slots already cut out or have they given you the option of making your own depending on which aircraft. Does the cowl have the flat wide brace molded in for the nine cyclinder engine? or is it completely curved for the seven cyclinder engines. No biggy but do they give you a chloice of 7 or 9 cylinder Gnome Monosoupe. Have they given you the option of floats and wheels. For wheels are there V Struts and skids/wheels? Enlarged rudder? What about decals have they only given you military markins or decals for the racing tabloids. As in Sopwith in big letters. The box shows red white and blue roundels have they given you red and white roundels and unions jacks as well? What about the rear turtledeck as it meets the tailplane? I would ask about Kingpost and V channel behind the firewall, but I am pretty sure the Tabloid had a closed in kingpost and no V shaped channel. I would love to get the Tabloid. For me it would be nice to build it as either the Schneider trophy winning aircraft or the prototype that I beleve Harry Hawker toured with. Just as a question are there any 1/72 models of the Tabloid that you can still get, I have the airframe one btw. Ray ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 11:41:35 +1000 From: "Shane Weier" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? Message-ID: Sean > > and I do build them, most recently a Revell *jet* > > :-( ) >We can see it didn't kill you. ;) Yeah, but the ignomy...... Shane _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 11:43:58 +1000 From: "Shane Weier" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? Message-ID: Sean >And, if Tamiya released a couple >Pfalz D-XIIs - to 1:48 and 1:72 - you might be ahead >of me in line, eh? :) Nope. Out of perversity I'd be happy with my completed Toko in 1/72 and my unstarted BM in 1/48 OTOH a Tamiya DH-4 or DH-9a would be a serious temptation. Shane _________________________________________________________________ Help STOP SPAM: Try the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:49:42 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Brian Kirby To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? Message-ID: <20030107014942.27189.qmail@web14809.mail.yahoo.com> --- Shane Weier wrote: > OTOH a Tamiya DH-4 or DH-9a would be a serious > temptation. Point being, you would not absotively, posolutely rule them out, right? Sean ===== www.pitpass.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:52:02 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Brian Kirby To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Color question Message-ID: <20030107015202.25596.qmail@web14811.mail.yahoo.com> --- Thomas Solinski wrote: > OT= On Topic i.e. WW-I modeling > > ot=off topic other than WW-I modeling i.e. Sp@t$*res > Bf-One Oh thingies and > assorted vehicles powered by suck squeeze burn blow. Ohhhhhhhh... now I understand - capitalisation changes the meaing of "ot," and so-on. Was kinda' confused, there. Sean ===== www.pitpass.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:13:31 -0800 From: Ray To: wwi@wwi-models.org, Sean Brian Kirby Subject: Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? Message-ID: <200301061713.31212.Ray_Boorman@telus.net> If it was me I would preffer it if someone/anyone came out with a nice RE8, DH9a or Rumpler CIV, or Staaken or HP1500. In other words something that isnt safe and been done to death by everyone else. I am so sick and tired of companies coming out with ever more accurate models of the same thing. I mean do we really need another (ot alert) blasted P47, when it would have been great if they had brought say a Halifax or Marauder. (end of ot alert) Just my two cents since i am so boreeeeddddd (sheesh i am starting to whine) Ray On Monday 06 January 2003 17:20, Sean Brian Kirby wrote: And, if Tamiya released a couple > Pfalz D-XIIs - to 1:48 and 1:72 - you might be ahead > of me in line, eh? :) > > (Wanna' send some letters, y'all?) > > > Sean > > ===== > www.pitpass.com > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:15:07 -0800 From: Ray To: wwi@wwi-models.org, "Steven Perry" Subject: Re: Roden F2B (was Re: Re: Roden SE-5a et al.) Message-ID: <200301061715.07941.Ray_Boorman@telus.net> Weren't some used in Polish markings against the Russians? On Monday 06 January 2003 17:38, Steven Perry wrote: > > >Okay, so does anyone know if the F2B was flown in the RCW? > > Yes, at least one. I have a photo in a book. I can look it up if someone > needs specifics > > sp ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 20:59:35 -0500 From: "John & Allison Cyganowski" To: Subject: Re: Oefag Alb. DIII Roden was Re: Re: Longest awaited release? Message-ID: <00bb01c2b5f0$6e0f4c30$123f5b0c@millipore.com> Now you've kind of got me hoping you are planning another scratch build....;-) Cyg > OTOH a Tamiya DH-4 or DH-9a would be a serious temptation. > > Shane ------------------------------ End of WWI Digest 4896 **********************