WWI Digest 4702 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) Re: LeRhone vs Oberusal by Steven Perry 2) Phonix A by "Grzegorz Mazurowski" 3) Re: Sopwith Baby & D.Va - FAA Museum by David Fleming 4) I finished one! by "ZELNICK, KENNETH T" 5) re: Stitched seam advice needed on the AEG Front by "Grzegorz Mazurowski" 6) re: Stitched seam advice needed on the AEG Front by Steven Perry 7) Re: I finished one! by Steven Perry 8) Re: Renault FT17 interior help by GRBroman@aol.com 9) Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. by "Matt Bittner" 10) Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. by "Matt Bittner" 11) Re: AH red/black dilemma again by "Marek Mincbergr" 12) Re: LeRhone vs Oberusal by Steve Cox 13) Re: AH red/black dilemma again by "Shane Weier" 14) Re: LeRhone vs Oberusal by SSH 15) Re: LeRhone vs Oberusal by Steve Cox 16) Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. by "Ross & Wendy Moorhouse" 17) Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. by "Ross & Wendy Moorhouse" 18) Re: LeRhone vs Oberusal by SSH 19) Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. by "Matt Bittner" 20) Re: I finished one! by "Shane Weier" 21) Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. by "Shane Weier" 22) Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. by "Shane Weier" 23) Final Dispatch From the Fuselage Salient by Steven Perry 24) Re: Final Dispatch From the Fuselage Salient by "Ross & Wendy Moorhouse" 25) Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. by "Matt Bittner" 26) Re: Final Dispatch From the Fuselage Salient by "Matt Bittner" 27) Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. by "ibs4421" 28) Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. by Steven Perry 29) Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. by "ibs4421" 30) Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. by "ibs4421" 31) Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. by Steven Perry 32) Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. by "ibs4421" 33) Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. by Steven Perry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 15:03:13 -0400 From: Steven Perry To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: LeRhone vs Oberusal Message-ID: <3DA9C371.3030301@tampabay.rr.com> how about a Cellon covered Eindekker while you're at it? ;-) >>sp > But, the Neuport is next > already have the basic fuse structures mostly done. > Just need to get my head back into it Just my backhanded way of acknowledging all the work that goes into your art. Truly awsome and whatever you decide to do next is just fine by me. It will be a welcome addition to the hobby. Keep on tickling those microchips or whatever you do to get that wonderful output. sp ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 21:06:36 +0200 From: "Grzegorz Mazurowski" To: "Volker Haeusler" , Subject: Phonix A Message-ID: <002f01c272eb$a795f960$0200a8c0@grzesiek> Hi! Anybody knows any plans or photos of the Phonix A flying boat other than in Hauke, Schroder, Totschinger book? I'm very much interested in it. I have Luedemann and RVHP kits, both very similar, of the A 119 plane. But the photo in the mentioned book shows this (A 119) plane with different radiator, different tail and different painting. Cheers! G. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 20:20:09 +0100 From: David Fleming To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Sopwith Baby & D.Va - FAA Museum Message-ID: <3DA9C768.72F235BA@dial.pipex.com> Shane & Lorna Jenkins wrote: > > > While you're at it - anything on the FAA Camel & Shuttleworth Sopwith > Triplane? > Tom gave the story on the Tripe, the Camel is another ex-Leisure Sport replica (another ex-Flyer, G-AWYY) Dave ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 14:16:18 -0500 From: "ZELNICK, KENNETH T" To: "'WWI Modeling Digest'" Subject: I finished one! Message-ID: <15888960D28CD211AD1900105A24907803EC9803@ANO-EXS02> Greetings all, Well, it took two years, but I finally finished the Glencoe A-H Alb I've been working on. It was the toughest thing I've ever tried to build, nothing fit. Pics have been sent to Allan. In an attempt to prove my claimed multiscalarity (new word), next build will be a 1/72 MPM Hansa-Brandenburg W.29. It *can't* be any worse than the Alb. Regards, Ken Zelnick ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 21:10:45 +0200 From: "Grzegorz Mazurowski" To: Subject: re: Stitched seam advice needed on the AEG Front Message-ID: <000401c272ed$3b377120$0200a8c0@grzesiek> Steve! There is a Part PE lacing set - Fokker kind of lacing. Very fine. Like this: / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / Probably you can see scans on the Part website. G. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 15:27:28 -0400 From: Steven Perry To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: re: Stitched seam advice needed on the AEG Front Message-ID: <3DA9C920.2040405@tampabay.rr.com> That looks good G. I think I better order some. sp Grzegorz Mazurowski wrote: > Steve! > There is a Part PE lacing set - Fokker kind of lacing. Very fine. > Like this: > / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / > Probably you can see scans on the Part website. > G. > > > ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 15:29:26 -0400 From: Steven Perry To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: I finished one! Message-ID: <3DA9C996.9050306@tampabay.rr.com> Congratulations Ken! That Glencoe is a serious piece of modeling and it takes a lot to see it through. Looking forward to seeing the photos. sp ZELNICK, KENNETH T wrote: > Greetings all, > > Well, it took two years, but I finally finished the Glencoe A-H Alb I've been working on. It was the toughest thing I've ever tried to build, nothing fit. Pics have been sent to > Allan. In an attempt to prove my claimed multiscalarity (new word), next build will be a 1/72 MPM Hansa-Brandenburg W.29. It *can't* be any worse than the Alb. > > Regards, > > Ken Zelnick > > ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 16:29:49 EDT From: GRBroman@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Renault FT17 interior help Message-ID: <11f.1844a74f.2adb31bd@aol.com> --part1_11f.1844a74f.2adb31bd_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 10/8/2002 8:55:57 PM Central Standard Time, tsollers@bcpl.net writes: > I'm not sure who your current publisher is, but how about Ampersand or RZM? > Both are armor intensive and dabble in WWI on occasion Good call, I'll check it out. I sed to write for Ampersand (Military Miniatures in Review) Glen --part1_11f.1844a74f.2adb31bd_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 10/8/2002 8:55:57 PM Central Standard Time, tsollers@bcpl.net writes:


I'm not sure who your current publisher is, but how about Ampersand or RZM?
Both are armor intensive and dabble in WWI on occasion
Good call, I'll check it out.  I sed to write for Ampersand (Military Miniatures in Review)
Glen --part1_11f.1844a74f.2adb31bd_boundary-- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 16:11:03 -0500 From: "Matt Bittner" To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" Subject: Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. Message-ID: On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 08:15:40 -0400 (EDT), Ross & Wendy Moorhouse wrote: > http://www.militarygameronline.com/CloseCombatFuture/DRIbuild.htm > > You can see how far I have progressed in this build. This was started as I > could not get hold of any Model master Wood pain, which I now have and can > continue with my Lloyd build too. Looking good so far, Ross!! Matt Bittner ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 16:14:30 -0500 From: "Matt Bittner" To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" Subject: Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. Message-ID: Warren, Since you plan on using this one as a "test bed", let me just state that the interior of the plane would have been CDL, since the turquoise would have been painted on *after* they doped the linen, hence no sign of the paint coming through. Unless I'm sniffing too much CA which has effected my brain... ;-) Matt On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 11:20:48 -0400 (EDT), ibs4421 wrote: > Ross, > Great progress! I see that you have found, as I did, that the > images on the Memorial Flight website are a great help. I had a heckuva > time getting all of that interior detail off, having never done that before. > Painted the inside of the cockpit of my F.I in the Fokker turquoise from > Misterkit. I had the control column, rudder pedals and floor, etc. all > assembled. I had painted and folded the interior framework, and set it > aside. the lighting on the kitchen table is not the best in the world, and > when reaching for something, SPLAT!, my hand went right down on top of that > nicely bent and painted framework. I even built up the paint to give it a > round cross-section. I tried to bend it back as best I could, and did a > decent job of it considering the extent of the damage. > I got all excited about getting everything inside the fuselage, and > forgot to test fit the seat and floor combo. when I joined the fuselage > halves, sproing!, the seat went crooked on me. > I am considering leaving this kit as is to serve as a reminder in > patience, and use it as a test bed for paint, finishes, decals, etc. and > just starting over on another kit. > > Warren > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ross & Wendy Moorhouse" > To: "Multiple recipients of list" > Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 7:15 AM > Subject: [WWI] My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. > > > > http://www.militarygameronline.com/CloseCombatFuture/DRIbuild.htm > > > > You can see how far I have progressed in this build. This was started as I > > could not get hold of any Model master Wood pain, which I now have and can > > continue with my Lloyd build too. > > > > Cheers > > > > Ross > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 23:11:36 +0200 From: "Marek Mincbergr" To: Subject: Re: AH red/black dilemma again Message-ID: <007d01c272fd$39a4f700$6c7e92c3@j> Grzegorz, This is what we tald some time ago. I told you, that the red is darker on those photo and black is net too deem. And I stil think, that the fuselage band on L-C Berg is darker that the crosses. :-) BR Marek > Hi! > Some additions to our recent discussion: > 1. On some photos of the red Brumowski's aircraft black outline of the white > skull is definitely darker than red surface of the fuselage. > 2. Red half of the star on the Rudorfer's plane is extremely dark and very > solid. any other colour on this photo isn't that solid - I think that the > cause can be not colour itself, but the paint surface (maybe very matt?). > Look at the black elements on that photo - they have various shades, as they > are probably glossy and reflects light in many ways, depending on the light > angle. Red colour doesn't show that. > ht tp://pilots-n-planes-ww1.com/Central-Powers/Austrio-Hungary/Pilots/R/Rudor > fer/Rudorfer_05.jpg > > BTW, Stefen Karver suggested in other case, that photographers in the WWI > used filters - which sounds reasonable, as the B&W photography uses filters > very extensively. That filters can show the same airplane in different > shades of colours! > Discussed photo of the Linke-Crawford's Aviatik shows not only fuselage > band, but also the "lozenge" hexes with very high contrasts! I have a lot of > hex-painted Aviatiks, and none of them show that contrasts! Is that possible > that Linke Crawford had some special, personal hex scheme? > ht tp://pilots-n-planes-ww1.com/Central-Powers/Austrio-Hungary/Pilots/L/Linke > -Crawford/Linke-Crawford_14.jpg > ht tp://pilots-n-planes-ww1.com/Central-Powers/Austrio-Hungary/Pilots/M/Macou > rek/Macourek_03.jpg > Cheers! > Grzegorz ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 23:22:48 +0100 From: Steve Cox To: Subject: Re: LeRhone vs Oberusal Message-ID: I'm looking at p204 and p206, middle row, left hand side. Both are labelled 110hp regards Steve =========================================== steve@oldglebe.freeserve.co.uk http://www.oldglebe.freeserve.co.uk/steveshome.html http://www.bramptonscalemodelclub.fsnet.co.uk If I didn't spend so much time on line ‹‹ I'd get some models finished ================ > From: SSH > Reply-To: wwi@wwi-models.org > Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 11:20:53 -0400 (EDT) > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: [WWI] Re: LeRhone vs Oberusal > > Steve, > Page 204 of the Harleyford book shows the *rear* view of the > 80HP, and *front* view of the 110HP LeRhone. > Regards > Sanjeev > > > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 08:43:13 +1000 From: "Shane Weier" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: AH red/black dilemma again Message-ID: Grzeg, >Look at the black elements on that photo - they have various shades, as >they >are probably glossy and reflects light in many ways, depending on the light >angle. Red colour doesn't show that. FWIW glossy finishes can appear *darker* or *lighter* because of the glossy finish, so one needs to be carefull. Photographers use glossy B&W paper if the want the densest, most luxurious shadows, because matt finishes diffuse the light falling on them - you can see this on any model, paint it in matt dark grey then coat half with future. The glossy half willl appear very much blacker. OTOH glossy surfaces reflect better than flat ones. If the ambient light falls on the surface from a direction which will produce a direct reflection into the camera lens, you will see a lighter flare on the surface which is areflection, not the surface. This needn't be a point source of light - bright overcast will do it, and since it comes form half the hemisphere around the subject it will lighten all of it. In summary, as in all attempts to deduce colours from B&W, you can only come to rather loose conclusions without plenty of contributory evidence Shane _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 18:49:01 -0400 From: SSH To: Subject: Re: LeRhone vs Oberusal Message-ID: <20021013225907.7F0571041A6@mail.mailsnare.net> Steve, On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 18:26:29 -0400 (EDT), Steve Cox wrote: >I'm looking at p204 and p206, middle row, left hand side. Both are >labelled >110hp -------- seems that I am talking about a different edition of the book. Mine is called "Fighter aircraft of the 1914-1918 war", a Harborough publication, and *seems* to be the 2nd edition (autumn 1960). Page 206 in my book shows 4 in-line engines. Pg 204 and 205 show rotaries / radials (the only rotaries in this section), 4 to a page. Inlines are 8 engines over 2 pages. P 204 shows : 80hp lerhone, 110hp lerhone, 130hp clerget, 100hp gnome monosoupape p205 shows: 150hp bentley, 200hp bentley, 320hp dragonfly, 110hp oberursel. Location of intake pipe is : 80hp lerhone - front, 110hp lrehone - back, 110hp oberursel - back. Maybe they had an error in the earlier editions which they corrected in my edition? regards Sanjeev ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 23:55:12 +0100 From: Steve Cox To: Subject: Re: LeRhone vs Oberusal Message-ID: sorry, I meant p208 Steve > From: SSH > Reply-To: wwi@wwi-models.org > Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 18:50:48 -0400 (EDT) > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: [WWI] Re: LeRhone vs Oberusal > > Steve, > On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 18:26:29 -0400 (EDT), Steve Cox wrote: >> I'm looking at p204 and p206, middle row, left hand side. Both are >> labelled >> 110hp > -------- seems that I am talking about a different edition of the > book. Mine is called "Fighter aircraft of the 1914-1918 war", a > Harborough publication, and *seems* to be the 2nd edition (autumn > 1960). > Page 206 in my book shows 4 in-line engines. > Pg 204 and 205 show rotaries / radials (the only rotaries in this > section), 4 to a page. > Inlines are 8 engines over 2 pages. > P 204 shows : 80hp lerhone, 110hp lerhone, 130hp clerget, 100hp gnome > monosoupape > p205 shows: 150hp bentley, 200hp bentley, 320hp dragonfly, 110hp > oberursel. > > Location of intake pipe is : 80hp lerhone - front, 110hp lrehone - > back, 110hp oberursel - back. > Maybe they had an error in the earlier editions which they corrected > in my edition? > regards > Sanjeev > > > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 08:53:29 +1000 From: "Ross & Wendy Moorhouse" To: Subject: Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. Message-ID: <000101c2730b$c3011de0$1b4e2dcb@future> I wonder how many other DRI spawns there will be from your article Matt? ;-) Cheers Ross > On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 08:15:40 -0400 (EDT), Ross & Wendy Moorhouse > wrote: > > > http://www.militarygameronline.com/CloseCombatFuture/DRIbuild.htm > > > > You can see how far I have progressed in this build. This was started as I > > could not get hold of any Model master Wood pain, which I now have and can > > continue with my Lloyd build too. > > Looking good so far, Ross!! > > > Matt Bittner > > > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 08:53:19 +1000 From: "Ross & Wendy Moorhouse" To: Subject: Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. Message-ID: <000001c2730b$c2ed47c0$1b4e2dcb@future> Warren, Mate I know what you mean about fingers and that frame work. Every time I touch mine it goes out of shape just a small amount. The sooner I can get it fitted to the floor base and then into the fuselage the better. Cheers Ross ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 19:20:53 -0400 From: SSH To: Subject: Re: LeRhone vs Oberusal Message-ID: <20021013233058.BE3D11041AE@mail.mailsnare.net> Steve, You are right. The plot thickens ! Either 110hp lerhones came in both flavours, or the photo on pg 208 is mislabelled. regards Sanjeev ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 18:25:34 -0500 From: "Matt Bittner" To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" Subject: Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. Message-ID: On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 18:59:01 -0400 (EDT), Ross & Wendy Moorhouse wrote: > I wonder how many other DRI spawns there will be from your article Matt? ;-) No idea, but any will make me more humble than I already am. ;-) Matt ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 09:38:03 +1000 From: "Shane Weier" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: I finished one! Message-ID: Ken, >In an attempt to prove my claimed multiscalarity (new word), next >build >will be a 1/72 MPM Hansa-Brandenburg W.29. It *can't* be any >worse than >the Alb. I built it years ago - pretty easy builf IIRC. There's a long build article on the web site which may give you a few pointers to whatever problems I encountered Shane _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 09:43:33 +1000 From: "Shane Weier" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. Message-ID: Ross says: >I wonder how many other DRI spawns there will be from your article Matt? >;-) I prefer to believe that *my* build last January spawned *Matts* LOL Shane _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 09:46:10 +1000 From: "Shane Weier" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. Message-ID: Matt says: > No idea, but any will make me more humble than I >already am. ;-) To paraphrase Churchill.... Matt is a humble man. Indeed, he has much to be humble about. ;-) Shane _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 20:07:29 -0400 From: Steven Perry To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Final Dispatch From the Fuselage Salient Message-ID: <3DAA0AC1.7070101@tampabay.rr.com> The Commander reports that the battle for the Fuselage salient has been decisively won. Sanding and painting troops asaulted the primered fuselage this morning. In due time they were followed by lozenge and decal regiments. The enemy fought bravely and determinedly as is their nature, but since the Commander foiled their secret weapon, the dreaded Bananna Fuselage,the spirit was out of them and victory was achieved. The Commander will be giving the troops a well deserved break from the AEG Front while he plans the exterior detail and final assembly campaigns that lie ahead. A photo of the newly conquered territiry is available at: http://web.tampabay.rr.com/sperry03/FINFUSE.jpg sp ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 10:13:08 +1000 From: "Ross & Wendy Moorhouse" To: Subject: Re: Final Dispatch From the Fuselage Salient Message-ID: <005d01c27316$79d8eed0$1b4e2dcb@future> WOW seeing how your troops have been on the offensive against this Hun I see they have done a sterling job ole chap. The paint and decal boys are really giving it to the Hun that's for sure. Well done mate. Cheers Ross ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Perry" To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:07 AM Subject: [WWI] Final Dispatch From the Fuselage Salient > The Commander reports that the battle for the Fuselage salient has been > decisively won. Sanding and painting troops asaulted the primered > fuselage this morning. In due time they were followed by lozenge and > decal regiments. The enemy fought bravely and determinedly as is their > nature, but since the Commander foiled their secret weapon, the dreaded > Bananna Fuselage,the spirit was out of them and victory was achieved. > > The Commander will be giving the troops a well deserved break from the > AEG Front while he plans the exterior detail and final assembly > campaigns that lie ahead. > > A photo of the newly conquered territiry is available at: > http://web.tampabay.rr.com/sperry03/FINFUSE.jpg > > sp > > ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 20:07:05 -0500 From: "Matt Bittner" To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" Subject: Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. Message-ID: On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 19:45:29 -0400 (EDT), Shane Weier wrote: > I prefer to believe that *my* build last January spawned *Matts* But of course! Matt ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 20:09:29 -0500 From: "Matt Bittner" To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" Subject: Re: Final Dispatch From the Fuselage Salient Message-ID: On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 20:07:38 -0400 (EDT), Steven Perry wrote: > The Commander reports that the battle for the Fuselage salient has been > decisively won. Sanding and painting troops asaulted the primered > fuselage this morning. In due time they were followed by lozenge and > decal regiments. The enemy fought bravely and determinedly as is their > nature, but since the Commander foiled their secret weapon, the dreaded > Bananna Fuselage,the spirit was out of them and victory was achieved. > > The Commander will be giving the troops a well deserved break from the > AEG Front while he plans the exterior detail and final assembly > campaigns that lie ahead. Love that face!! Totally cool. Matt ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 20:15:33 -0500 From: "ibs4421" To: Subject: Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. Message-ID: <003f01c2731f$5642e440$a8e51442@dwfjv01> > Since you plan on using this one as a "test bed", let me just > state that the interior of the plane would have been CDL, since > the turquoise would have been painted on *after* they doped the > linen, hence no sign of the paint coming through. D'oh! I thought that the darn thing was painted/doped in turquoise all over right off the bat! Live and learn though, and I thought I was being so smart too. I have spent all day everyday apinting the inside of our new house. I'm about sick of painting. The upside is SWMBO wanted to use primarily OT colours. Our spare bedroom and library are now a nice shade of feldgrau, our sons room is French roundel blue ( he gets a wallpaper border of OT and ot a/c going around the top), and the rest of the house is a really nice, warm CDL. She decided to try a texturing technique in the spare bathroom, happily she settled on a nice Phonix D.I "scrumble camo" finish. I told her those FMP books would come in very handy.! ;) Warren PS: I decided not to highlight the ribs/framework (read that wall studs) with an underlying color, that would have been pushing my luck. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 21:18:38 -0400 From: Steven Perry To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. Message-ID: <3DAA1B6E.6090607@tampabay.rr.com> StE Wrote: >>I prefer to believe that *my* build last January spawned *Matts* Matt replies > But of course! > Like Chivalry in the air, Graciousness in the Scale Wars is rare but not unheard of. sp ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 20:21:27 -0500 From: "ibs4421" To: Subject: Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. Message-ID: <004701c27320$0568d7e0$a8e51442@dwfjv01> Shane, Mate, I found your build quite an inspiration! Add to that Matt's article which I have been waiting for for quite a while, and I feel really amped to handle this again. I do confess to getting the guilts over this. It's the "only 300 were produced and others deserve more attention" thing, but I just love that little tripe. Hey Matt, putting that F.I into a semi-retired state will allow me more time to finish that Nie 17 that sp sent me. Boy Howdy! Am I sucker for punishment or what? Warren ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 20:27:20 -0500 From: "ibs4421" To: Subject: Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. Message-ID: <008301c27320$d7b7f460$a8e51442@dwfjv01> > I have spent all day everyday apinting the inside of our new house. Whoops, I meant to say all day, everyday for the last seven days. Warren ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 21:31:23 -0400 From: Steven Perry To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. Message-ID: <3DAA1E6B.3050809@tampabay.rr.com> > Whoops, I meant to say all day, everyday for the last seven days. Sincere sympathy. sp ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 20:59:38 -0500 From: "ibs4421" To: Subject: Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. Message-ID: <009501c27325$5ae2ea80$a8e51442@dwfjv01> > Sincere sympathy. > sp You know, there was a point this week, that while I was rolling on paint that I thought, and out loud at that, "What would happen if I added half a bottle of future to these gallons of wall paint?" SWMBO did not seem impressed. Warren ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 22:09:29 -0400 From: Steven Perry To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: My Eduard DRI build.. So far.. Message-ID: <3DAA2759.5030105@tampabay.rr.com> ibs4421 wrote: >>Sincere sympathy. >>sp >> > > You know, there was a point this week, that while I was rolling on paint > that I thought, and out loud at that, "What would happen if I added half a > bottle of future to these gallons of wall paint?" > SWMBO did not seem impressed. And it's a wise man who can read that sign and act accordingly.....I'll have to ask how he does it if I ever meet him ;-) sp ------------------------------ End of WWI Digest 4702 **********************