WWI Digest 4139 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) Re: bad news by Allan Wright 2) RE: bad news by "Marcio Antonio Campos" 3) Re: Yet another paint question by "Muth and Zulick" 4) Re: Turkish Earthquake by "Muth and Zulick" 5) Re: HOBEY BAKER/ ELLIOT SPRINGS by "Muth and Zulick" 6) OFF LIST: HB C.I vac/ was: Kits to Pass On: Part II (rather long) by "Michael Kendix" 7) Re: "Big Rock Resin Mountains" by "Brian Nicklas" 8) Re: Yet another paint question by John_Impenna@hyperion.com 9) RE: OFF LIST: HB C.I vac/ was: Kits to Pass On: Part II (ra by "Pedro N. Soares" 10) ooops again. by "Pedro N. Soares" 11) Re: Yet another paint question by John_Impenna@hyperion.com 12) Re: where the sprues grow and the styrene roams by CoolSpadLuke@aol.com 13) Re: Yet another paint question by CoolSpadLuke@aol.com 14) Re: Looking for references on Nieuport 17 by "Peter Ecos" 15) RE: More updates (Andreas Martin's models) by "Harris, Mack" 16) RE: More updates (Andreas Martin's models) by Crawford Neil 17) RE: More updates (Andreas Martin's models) by "Pedro N. Soares" 18) Re: HiTech / CSM by "Brent Theobald" 19) IM Article Question by tbittners@sprintmail.com 20) Re: IM Article Question by Allan Wright 21) Re: IM Article Question by KarrArt@aol.com 22) Re: IM Article Question by KarrArt@aol.com 23) Re: IM Article Question by "Diego Fernetti" 24) Re: IM Article Question by "Diego Fernetti" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 08:46:21 -0500 (EST) From: Allan Wright To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: bad news Message-ID: <200202041346.IAA53942@mustang.sr.unh.edu> Take your time Bob, all my best to your family. Allan > > After sitting by her bedside for the last 41 hours, my mother has finally > passed away. I would like to apologize to anyone I have promised work to in > the near future, and say that it will not be forthcoming until final > arrangements are made. > > Regards, > Bob Pearson > =============================================================================== Allan Wright Jr. | Without love life's just a long fight - Southside University of New Hampshire +-------------------------------------------------- Research Computing Center | WWI Modeling mailing list: wwi@wwi-models.org Internet: aew@unh.edu | WWI Modeling WWW Page: http://www.wwi-models.org =============================================================================== ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 11:53:51 -0300 From: "Marcio Antonio Campos" To: Subject: RE: bad news Message-ID: <003601c1ad8b$c2de4310$5d1ba8c0@officesp.starmedia> Bob, My thoughts and prayers are with you, friend. All the best from Brazil Marcio Antonio Campos Redator do GuiaSP StarMedia do Brasil +55 11 30436421 marcio.campos@starmedia.net http://www.guiasp.com.br http://www.guiarj.com.br http://www.nacidade.com.br ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:09:00 -0500 From: "Muth and Zulick" To: Subject: Re: Yet another paint question Message-ID: <000401c1ad8d$e0fdadc0$0100005a@ptd.net> How many on this list use a spray booth? How many, like a lot in the > article, just use a spare room with the window(s) open? No booth. Up until the fire, the windows didn't even open! I don't spray much and figured it wouldn't be too bad. However, with the rebuilt model room now complete, I made sure to have an exhaust fan put in and think I will go buy a respirator. Mike Muth ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:10:54 -0500 From: "Muth and Zulick" To: Subject: Re: Turkish Earthquake Message-ID: <001701c1ad8e$2465d7e0$0100005a@ptd.net> Ken I don't remember where Bulent lives, but the radio said the earthquake was 200 miles from Ankara. Hope he's ok. Mike Muth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kenneth Zelnick" To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Sunday,February 03,2002 1:32 PM Subject: [WWI] Turkish Earthquake > I Just saw that there has been a major earthquake in central Turkey. Hope > Bulent, and any other listees in the area, are OK. > > Ken Zelnick > > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:28:41 -0500 From: "Muth and Zulick" To: Subject: Re: HOBEY BAKER/ ELLIOT SPRINGS Message-ID: <00c001c1ad90$a07fa3e0$0100005a@ptd.net> There is a lot about Elliot White Springs. I remember an article in Over The Front a few years ago, I think. Also, there is a biography that the U. of North Carolina Press put out, sorry, I don't remember title or author. but it should be too hard to find. hth Mike Muth ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Friday,February 01,2002 12:41 PM Subject: [WWI] HOBEY BAKER/ ELLIOT SPRINGS > i AM LOOKING FOR INFORMATION ON HOBEY BAKER > ANYTHING BEIDES THE DAVIES BOOK PLEASE > > THANK YOU > DIETRICH > > PS ALSO ELLIOT SPRINGS > -- > > > > > __________________________________________________________________ > Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/ > > Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ > > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 15:43:21 From: "Michael Kendix" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: OFF LIST: HB C.I vac/ was: Kits to Pass On: Part II (rather long) Message-ID: Pedro: Which profile do you mean? Something from the FMP A-H aircraft tome? Michael >From: "Pedro Soares" >Reply-To: wwi@wwi-models.org >To: Multiple recipients of list >Subject: [WWI] Re: HB C.I vac/ was: Kits to Pass On: Part II (rather long) >Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 02:45:40 -0500 (EST) > >Mike, > >Tom is going to send me some images. If they won't include the profile from >your book, I'll ask you then, if you don't mind. > >Thanks a lot >Pedro >----- Original Message ----- >From: >To: Multiple recipients of list >Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 3:27 AM >Subject: [WWI] Re: HB C.I vac/ was: Kits to Pass On: Part II (rather long) > > > > Sorry about stumbling into the middle of the thread and misunderstanding >what you needed. I do have the "Color Profiles of World War I Combat >Planes, which show profiles of both 64.01 and 26.17, but I don't think they >will provide much information as to the interior structure. I will be glad >to send a scan should you want. I do not like to send unsolicited >attachments. > > > > HTH, > > Mike Kavanaugh > > > > > > In a message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2002 5:31:18 PM Eastern Standard Time, >"Michael Kendix" writes: > > > > > Mike: > > > > > > I don't have that book since I hoped that the FMP tome would be >sufficient. > > > Perhaps it has been unclear in our previous postings, but Pedro is >building > > > this HB-C.1 that has a gunner's tower in which he sits and can fire >over >the > > > top of the wing unobstructed. They were built by UFAG and Phönix, >each >was > > > different, I gather. > > > > > > Does this help or make things more confused than ever? > > > > > > Michael > > > > > > >From: CoolSpadLuke@aol.com > > > > > > > >Hi Pedro and Michael, > > > > > > > >I'm probably pooling ignorance here but, "Die Flugzeuge der k.u.k. > > > >Luftfahrtruppe und Seeflieger 1914-1918" has several photos and >profiles of > > > >the HB C.I, one photo with the crew aboard. I'm not so sure that >there > > > >isn't just one crew enclosure for both crew members, pilot's seat >facing > > > >forward and, whatever the observer sits on (a folding seat?) rear of >that. > > > >The coaming around the cockpit extends back almost to the observer's >gun > > > >ring in some photos/drawings and even beyond the forward part of the >gun > > > >ring by several inches on others (a later modification?. If not >aware >of > > > >the question of a separate observer's cockpit and entry to it, I >would >have > > > >assumed from looking at the C.I photo with the crew aboard that it >was >a > > > >single compartment for both crew members. > > > > > > > >FWIW, > > > >Mike Kavanaugh > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > > http://www.hotmail.com > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:47:00 -0500 From: "Brian Nicklas" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: "Big Rock Resin Mountains" Message-ID: Diego, That is GREAT!! Now if we can get "Weird Al" to play that on accordian... (If the late Mel Torme liked OT models, maybe Al does...) Brian ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:47:33 -0500 From: John_Impenna@hyperion.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Yet another paint question Message-ID: Hi Warren, I have read this stupidity in model magazines for years!! Some modelers just LOVE to spend money.....I swear it is at the request of Testors!! ; ) I have reused sealed, thinned paint many times. I have also had it dry up sometimes. The less you have in the bottle, the likelier it will dry up on you. I have some "airbrush-ready" paint that is over 10 years old and all you do is stir it up and spray. A couple of caveats: never por it back into the source-bottle, unles you want to thin the whole pot and you may, after an extended period, have to strain the paint after stirring(which isn't a bad idea in any case). My rule of thumb, if it is a small amount I toss it, but say my PC10, I pour back into the airbrush-ready batch. YMMV Regards, John ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 15:48:53 -0000 From: "Pedro N. Soares" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: OFF LIST: HB C.I vac/ was: Kits to Pass On: Part II (ra Message-ID: <12AEB3D996DDD311B98A00508B6D75B301410A4F@TUFAO> Michael, I was replying to Mike Kavanaugh. He said he had some profiles in the Apostolo book, but since Tom said he'd send those to me... oh, hell, read the messages below :-) When Tom sends the scans I'll forward them to you. Pedro > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Kendix [mailto:mkendix@hotmail.com] > Sent: segunda-feira, 4 de Fevereiro de 2002 15:45 > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: [WWI] OFF LIST: HB C.I vac/ was: Kits to Pass On: Part II > (rather long) > > > Pedro: > > Which profile do you mean? Something from the FMP A-H aircraft tome? > > Michael > > >From: "Pedro Soares" > >Reply-To: wwi@wwi-models.org > >To: Multiple recipients of list > >Subject: [WWI] Re: HB C.I vac/ was: Kits to Pass On: Part II > (rather long) > >Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 02:45:40 -0500 (EST) > > > >Mike, > > > >Tom is going to send me some images. If they won't include > the profile from > >your book, I'll ask you then, if you don't mind. > > > >Thanks a lot > >Pedro > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: > >To: Multiple recipients of list > >Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 3:27 AM > >Subject: [WWI] Re: HB C.I vac/ was: Kits to Pass On: Part II > (rather long) > > > > > > > Sorry about stumbling into the middle of the thread and > misunderstanding > >what you needed. I do have the "Color Profiles of World War I Combat > >Planes, which show profiles of both 64.01 and 26.17, but I > don't think they > >will provide much information as to the interior structure. > I will be glad > >to send a scan should you want. I do not like to send unsolicited > >attachments. > > > > > > HTH, > > > Mike Kavanaugh > > > > > > > > > In a message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2002 5:31:18 PM Eastern > Standard Time, > >"Michael Kendix" writes: > > > > > > > Mike: > > > > > > > > I don't have that book since I hoped that the FMP tome would be > >sufficient. > > > > Perhaps it has been unclear in our previous postings, > but Pedro is > >building > > > > this HB-C.1 that has a gunner's tower in which he sits > and can fire > >over > >the > > > > top of the wing unobstructed. They were built by UFAG > and Phönix, > >each > >was > > > > different, I gather. > > > > > > > > Does this help or make things more confused than ever? > > > > > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > >From: CoolSpadLuke@aol.com > > > > > > > > > >Hi Pedro and Michael, > > > > > > > > > >I'm probably pooling ignorance here but, "Die > Flugzeuge der k.u.k. > > > > >Luftfahrtruppe und Seeflieger 1914-1918" has several photos and > >profiles of > > > > >the HB C.I, one photo with the crew aboard. I'm not > so sure that > >there > > > > >isn't just one crew enclosure for both crew members, > pilot's seat > >facing > > > > >forward and, whatever the observer sits on (a folding > seat?) rear of > >that. > > > > >The coaming around the cockpit extends back almost to > the observer's > >gun > > > > >ring in some photos/drawings and even beyond the > forward part of the > >gun > > > > >ring by several inches on others (a later > modification?. If not > >aware > >of > > > > >the question of a separate observer's cockpit and > entry to it, I > >would > >have > > > > >assumed from looking at the C.I photo with the crew > aboard that it > >was > >a > > > > >single compartment for both crew members. > > > > > > > > > >FWIW, > > > > >Mike Kavanaugh > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > > > http://www.hotmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 15:49:54 -0000 From: "Pedro N. Soares" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: ooops again. Message-ID: <12AEB3D996DDD311B98A00508B6D75B301410A52@TUFAO> Sorry, last post was meant for Michael only Pedro ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:54:36 -0500 From: John_Impenna@hyperion.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Yet another paint question Message-ID: Hi Warren, IMHO, a spray booth AND a respirator is the way to go. Even if I had a window in my workshop, I'd still use a booth. I built one that my wife calls a mostrosity(big enough to accomadate ANY model out there) and keep it on its own table tohe left of my bench. It is vented outside using a Dayton blower(motor is not in the airstream) cut thru a hole in the top which has a filter over it to catch the paint. I ALWAYS use the respirator with enamels, laquers and acrylics. Sometimes, when using Future, I don't bother, but probably should... It definitely pulls the fumes out of the room and it cost me less than $100 with the blower being the most expensive pat and it is 36" wide by 24" high by 20" deep. A lot bigger than the ones you see advertised for $300 or more!!! Hope that helps. Regards, John ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 10:55:41 EST From: CoolSpadLuke@aol.com To: Subject: Re: where the sprues grow and the styrene roams Message-ID: <149.8ea49be.299008fe@aol.com> In a message dated Mon, 4 Feb 2002 6:37:06 AM Eastern Standard Time, "Diego Fernetti" writes: > I'll see you all this comin' fall in the Big Rock Resin Mountains! Bwaaa. . . . I wanna go now! Sounds like paradise to me. Mike Kavanaugh ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 11:09:27 EST From: CoolSpadLuke@aol.com To: Subject: Re: Yet another paint question Message-ID: <4c.602442e.29900c38@aol.com> > How many on this list use a spray booth? How many, like a lot in the article, just use a spare room with the window(s) open? I made a three-sided box with a floor, 18"X18"X18" with quarter-inch plywood. I line it with pieces of cardboard held on by paper clamps. I set it on the end of one of my work tables just below a window which I open when spraying. I also have a fan behind and above me which blows air through the window. I don't usually use a mask for small acrylic jobs, but use a dual-filter mask for enamels, laquers, thinners, etc. I also have the only multi-colored window screen in the house as I spray through it when cleaning the airbrush. Mike Kavanaugh ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 10:19:18 -0600 From: "Peter Ecos" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Looking for references on Nieuport 17 Message-ID: Hi list, Thanks to everyone who responded. Truly helpful. I like this place already! ps. Mark, what's a ham-fisted modeller to do? I've got to model something! _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:19:03 -0600 From: "Harris, Mack" To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: More updates (Andreas Martin's models) Message-ID: That's what they looked like, but I have the Pyro kit, am working on it now, and the wheels are not clear and just have the lines for the spokes. Guess I'll replace with photoetch. Any references that you know of on the triplane? thanks Mack -----Original Message----- From: a.r.martin@t-online.de [mailto:a.r.martin@t-online.de] Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 10:40 AM To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: [WWI] RE: More updates (Andreas Martin's models) Hi Mack, the wheels are straight from the box. Inpact used in this "pre etched parts time" clear plastic for the wheels. I have only painted the spokes with a pencil. Andreas Harris, Mack schrieb: > Andreas, how did you do the wheels on your Avro triplane? > Mack > > -----Original Message----- > From: a.r.martin@t-online.de [mailto:a.r.martin@t-online.de] > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:38 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: [WWI] RE: More updates (Andreas Martin's models) > > > You are right, the Brisfit is the better model. But the Inpact-kits have a > special attraction for me. > > Andreas > > Shane Weier schrieb: > > Al says: > > > > > Another one from Andreas Martin - Avro Triplane. > > > > Which is glorious. First class paint job too. > > > > I *really* have to build all those oldies, they're terrific subjects and > the > > models have stood up well to passing time - they were positively superb > for > > their time. > > > > *However* I think the Bristol Fighter is even better. Very, very nice Biff > > > > Shane > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ********************************************************************** > > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is > > intended only for the use of the addressee(s). > > If you receive this e-mail in error, any use, distribution or > > copying of this e-mail is not permitted. You are requested to > > forward unwanted e-mail and address any problems to the > > MIM Holdings Limited Support Centre. > > > > For general enquires: ++61 7 3833 8000 > > Support Centre e-mail: supportcentre@mim.com.au > > Support Centre phone: Australia 1800500646 > > International ++61 7 38338042 > > ********************************************************************** > > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 17:23:46 +0100 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: More updates (Andreas Martin's models) Message-ID: Just had a look at Andreas models, that Caudron is beautiful, I wish AJP would do these in 1/72. /Neil C. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:25:13 -0000 From: "Pedro N. Soares" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: More updates (Andreas Martin's models) Message-ID: <12AEB3D996DDD311B98A00508B6D75B301410AB3@TUFAO> Mack I'm not sure about this, but the triplane proably features in "those magnificent men and their flying machines". Even if it doesn't it's a good excuse for a trip down memory lane.... :-) Pedro > -----Original Message----- > From: Harris, Mack [mailto:MackH@Health.State.OK.US] > Sent: segunda-feira, 4 de Fevereiro de 2002 16:21 > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: [WWI] RE: More updates (Andreas Martin's models) > > > That's what they looked like, but I have the Pyro kit, am > working on it now, > and the wheels are not clear and just have the lines for the > spokes. Guess > I'll replace with photoetch. > Any references that you know of on the triplane? > thanks > Mack > > -----Original Message----- > From: a.r.martin@t-online.de [mailto:a.r.martin@t-online.de] > Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 10:40 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: [WWI] RE: More updates (Andreas Martin's models) > > > Hi Mack, > > the wheels are straight from the box. Inpact used in this > "pre etched parts > time" clear plastic for the wheels. I have only painted the > spokes with a > pencil. > > Andreas > > Harris, Mack schrieb: > > Andreas, how did you do the wheels on your Avro triplane? > > Mack > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: a.r.martin@t-online.de [mailto:a.r.martin@t-online.de] > > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:38 AM > > To: Multiple recipients of list > > Subject: [WWI] RE: More updates (Andreas Martin's models) > > > > > > You are right, the Brisfit is the better model. But the > Inpact-kits have a > > > special attraction for me. > > > > Andreas > > > > Shane Weier schrieb: > > > Al says: > > > > > > > Another one from Andreas Martin - Avro Triplane. > > > > > > Which is glorious. First class paint job too. > > > > > > I *really* have to build all those oldies, they're > terrific subjects and > > the > > > models have stood up well to passing time - they were > positively superb > > for > > > their time. > > > > > > *However* I think the Bristol Fighter is even better. > Very, very nice > Biff > > > > > > Shane > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ********************************************************************** > > > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is > > > intended only for the use of the addressee(s). > > > If you receive this e-mail in error, any use, distribution or > > > copying of this e-mail is not permitted. You are requested to > > > forward unwanted e-mail and address any problems to the > > > MIM Holdings Limited Support Centre. > > > > > > For general enquires: ++61 7 3833 8000 > > > Support Centre e-mail: supportcentre@mim.com.au > > > Support Centre phone: Australia 1800500646 > > > International ++61 7 38338042 > > > > ********************************************************************** > > > > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 16:33:21 +0000 From: "Brent Theobald" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: HiTech / CSM Message-ID: Howdy! >Of course when my AEG arrives I may have to eat my hat - and that'll >teach >me! (I hope not.) Anyway I'm sure we'll not fall out over it. I think you are going to like it. It is going to look great next to your new Rumpler and Albatros! We won't fall out about it. This is a hobby and supposed to be fun. I don't think I've gotten truly angry at anyone or anything other than myself in its pursuit. Not even TC. :-) Later ya'll! Brent _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 11:42:48 -0500 (EST) From: tbittners@sprintmail.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: IM Article Question Message-ID: <20020204164248.57E4C4689E@eclipse.qis.net> Something to ask the list. In addding articles from IM, I've come upon a dilemma. While I have every intention to add *all* WW1 articles to the site, my initial inclination until I magically get more time is to only add the ones that pertain to a review of a kit that exists. For example, that leaves out - for the time being only - Robert Karr's superb O-400, Shane's awesome Biff, etc. Does this hold well with the rest of the list? Keep in mind that not only do I update the site, but I also would like to model as well. Would that offend the scratch builders? Matt Bittner ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 11:47:17 -0500 (EST) From: Allan Wright To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: IM Article Question Message-ID: <200202041647.LAA55280@mustang.sr.unh.edu> Let me add, first one to complain should consider said action as an act of volunteering to help :-) Al > > Something to ask the list. > > In addding articles from IM, I've come upon a dilemma. While I have every intention to add *all* WW1 articles to the site, my initial inclination until I magically get more time is to only add the ones that pertain to a review of a kit that exists. > > For example, that leaves out - for the time being only - Robert Karr's superb O-400, Shane's awesome Biff, etc. Does this hold well with the rest of the list? Keep in mind that not only do I update the site, but I also would like to model as well. > > Would that offend the scratch builders? > > > Matt Bittner > =============================================================================== Allan Wright Jr. | Without love life's just a long fight - Southside University of New Hampshire +-------------------------------------------------- Research Computing Center | WWI Modeling mailing list: wwi@wwi-models.org Internet: aew@unh.edu | WWI Modeling WWW Page: http://www.wwi-models.org =============================================================================== ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 11:52:58 EST From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: IM Article Question Message-ID: <61.1a5b92bf.2990166a@aol.com> In a message dated 2/4/02 8:45:31 AM Pacific Standard Time, tbittners@sprintmail.com writes: << For example, that leaves out - for the time being only - Robert Karr's superb O-400, Shane's awesome Biff, etc. Does this hold well with the rest of the list? Keep in mind that not only do I update the site, but I also would like to model as well. Would that offend the scratch builders? >> Of course we're offended! Right now I'm mooning the monitor in your honor! Just think of these models as VERY limited edition kits! RK ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 11:55:27 EST From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: IM Article Question Message-ID: In a message dated 2/4/02 8:49:38 AM Pacific Standard Time, aew@mustang.sr.unh.edu writes: << Let me add, first one to complain should consider said action as an act of volunteering to help :-) Al >> I am helping- by staying out of the way while people who know what they're doing handle this here "hi-tech" computer stuff! RK ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 14:02:15 -0300 From: "Diego Fernetti" To: Subject: Re: IM Article Question Message-ID: <00af01c1ad9d$b27b99c0$4640a8c0@ssp.salud.rosario.gov.ar> Robert wrote: > Of course we're offended! Right now I'm mooning the monitor in your honor! So then how did you wrote this message??? well, you better spare us of the details... :-0 > Just think of these models as VERY limited edition kits! Limited to one copy? D. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 17:03:24 +0000 From: "Diego Fernetti" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: IM Article Question Message-ID: But we would have them available online, even in the far future?I hope so. D. >From: tbittners@sprintmail.com >Reply-To: wwi@wwi-models.org >To: Multiple recipients of list >Subject: [WWI] IM Article Question >Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 11:45:07 -0500 (EST) > >Something to ask the list. > >In addding articles from IM, I've come upon a dilemma. While I have every >intention to add *all* WW1 articles to the site, my initial inclination >until I magically get more time is to only add the ones that pertain to a >review of a kit that exists. > >For example, that leaves out - for the time being only - Robert Karr's >superb O-400, Shane's awesome Biff, etc. Does this hold well with the rest >of the list? Keep in mind that not only do I update the site, but I also >would like to model as well. > >Would that offend the scratch builders? > > >Matt Bittner _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. ------------------------------ End of WWI Digest 4139 **********************