WWI Digest 4108 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) Re: Tamiya & Future by "Laskodi" 2) Achim Engels new book is now available! by "Gaston Graf" 3) Re: goodies in the mail by "Diego Fernetti" 4) Re: Tamiya & Future was Ceramcoat Acrylics by Nigel Cheffers-Heard 5) Help with Richtofen's "unknown" DV by "Nigel Rayner" 6) Re: Tamiya 'Acrylics' vs. 'Latex' by "Mark Shannon" 7) web site by "Brian & Iva Smith" 8) Re: web site by "Brian Nicklas" 9) Tamiya Paint by "Jim Pliml" 10) Re: Nigels mortars: by GRBroman@aol.com 11) Re: Tamiya Paint by "Muth and Zulick" 12) Re: Tamiya Paint by "Bob Pearson" 13) First Look Mac Fokker D.VII by "Brent Theobald" 14) eduard fokker dvi by "ot811" 15) Sopwith 1 B1 by "ot811" 16) Re: eduard fokker dvi by "Tom Plesha" 17) Re: First Look Mac Fokker D.VII by "Ross Moorhouse" 18) Re: RGB values for French 5-color? by a.r.martin@t-online.de (Rita) 19) Re: goodies in the mail by "John & Allison Cyganowski" 20) Andreas Martin by "Mordecai Sheftall" 21) leaving for a week! by "Grzegorz Mazurowski" 22) Background ideas by "Matt Bittner" 23) Re: Background ideas by "Steven Perry" 24) RE: ARRRRGH by "ibs4421" 25) Re: decals by "Ross Moorhouse" 26) Re: decals by "Bob Pearson" 27) Re: decals by Shane & Lorna Jenkins 28) Re: Background ideas/! by VMA324Vagabonds@aol.com 29) Re: decals by "Bob Pearson" 30) RE: ARRRRGH by "Michael and Sharon Alvarado, NSWCC" 31) 欢迎光临山译网站 by zyf5435@163.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:13:55 -0800 From: "Laskodi" To: "WWI List Post" Subject: Re: Tamiya & Future Message-ID: <001901c1a5d4$6f10b420$493819d0@f4hn201> <<>> My experience is that you can mix Tamiya paints with Future if the Tamiya paint is a small amount (say under 10%) but you still must add an acrylic thinner to get it to spray properly. I use this concoction for a final "fade" coat of about 5% Tamiya paint with 95% Future and then mixed with an equal amount of Pollys Airbrush Thinner. The big benefit here is the translucency effect and also the durable finish that will not scratch (a BIG problem with Tamiya paints as they are extremely fragile). However, Future is NOT a good thinning agent for Tamiya paints as they do "congeal" when mixed. I believe (but don't know for sure) this is because Tamiya paints are a latex base, unlike any of the other acrylics. IMNSHO, the best thinning agent for Tamiya paints is Gunze Sangyo Mr. Color Thinner. Yes I know that it is a lacquer thinner but it "magically" works and produces a hard finish that rivals enamels in durability and airbrushes exceptionally well, better than any acrylic thinner (including Tamiya's own). YMMV ----------Bob ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 20:26:39 +0100 From: "Gaston Graf" To: Subject: Achim Engels new book is now available! Message-ID: Friends, some of you got the news directly from Achim but maybe there are some other among you all who are interested into Fokker aircraft as well so here is what Achim has send to me for information: --------------------------------- Dear Friends, Liebe Freunde, we are happy to inform you that we have finally released our first bi-lingual book on the Fokker Dr.I triplane. To learn more about this one, please click on the image below. Wir fruen uns sehr, Euch nun mitteilen zu k鰊nen dass wir endlich unser erstes zweisprachiges B點hlein 黚er den Fokker Dr.I herausgebracht haben. Um bei Interesse mehr dar黚er zu erfahren, einfach das Bildchen unten Anklicken! All the best and take care! Alles Gute und passt auf Euch auf! Achim Engels --------------------------------- A review will be posted at Jasta Boelcke as soon as I will receive my copy. The picture that Achim had mentionned cannot be clicked from this mail off course since it is not embedded in text only format. Gaston www.jastaboelcke.de ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:41:08 +0000 From: "Diego Fernetti" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: goodies in the mail Message-ID: Mistress Lorna wrote: > And a tight Choke Chain as well I hope? Oh, no! she's there only to stop the bikini-clad girls to kidnap me! ;-) D. Pierce Brosnan impersonator _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:53:11 +0000 From: Nigel Cheffers-Heard To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Tamiya & Future was Ceramcoat Acrylics Message-ID: I seem to recall that Tamiya "acrylics" are in fact latex based. Wouldn't tend to mix too well with "real" acrylics... N -- Nigel Cheffers-Heard photography + design tel: +44 (0)1392 87 58 57 fax: +44 (0)1392 87 74 97 mobile: 0771 261 4514 nigelch@cheffers.co.uk www.cheffers.co.uk Laburnums, Bridge Hill Topsham, Exeter EX3 0QQ, UK ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 20:18:43 -0000 From: "Nigel Rayner" To: Subject: Help with Richtofen's "unknown" DV Message-ID: <000101c1a5dd$7c3fdc80$983bedc1@w1o0t3> Hi all, I'm going to be building the Eduard 1/72 Albatros DV as Richtofen's mount in which he was shot down on July 6, 1917 (serial unknown). This is for a (physical) club display on the battle of Cambrai, and Richtofen apparently was flying this machine (which had been repaired by this time) as the new Fokker DrIs had been withdrawn and he returned to using this machine. I have the DF Special on the Flying Circus, which has a scheme and photos of this machine at the time of the crash in July. My questions are: - has anyone seen any photos of this machine around the time of Cambrai? I was wondering if it had the short strengthening struts added. - has anyone built this machine? If so, are pics on the site? I'd like to take a look at your interpretaion of the colour scheme. Cheers, Nigel R ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:33:51 -0600 From: "Mark Shannon" To: Subject: Re: Tamiya 'Acrylics' vs. 'Latex' Message-ID: Just to clarify terms, 'Acrylic' is a chemical term that means a derivative of acrylic acid (2-propenoic acid). 'Latex' is a marketing term from an old tradename for raw rubber that duPont extended to all kinds of non-vulcanized elastomeric polymers and pre-polymers. A paint can be an 'acrylic latex', as you will see written on many cans of Sears 'Weatherbeater' brand housepaints. I am not sufficiently up on the industry to determine whether this means: 1. An acrylic pre-polymer plastic plus a rubber (natural or synthetic) in a soluble blend, 2. A pre-formed acrylic-butadiene or acrylic-neoprene copolymeric blend, or 3. An acrylic based elastomer derivative used in all acrylic paints. What I do know is that methyl acrylate is a hard plastic - common in clear plastic decorative or 'artwork' type plastic items like paperweights and mod-look chess sets. Methyl methacrylate is even harder. Butyl and octyl acrylate and similar long-chain esters are used in paint formulations to allow 'breathing' (flexibility with expansion-contraction cycles of the painted surface) - but it is still a rather 'hard' film, as in the case of Future. Different paint formulations can be built on many variations of the molecule which forms the backbone of the paint layer. To say that one paint is an 'Acrylic' vs another being a 'Latex' really does not clarify matters. What is obvious is that the film vehicle in Tamiya paints is not as hard and tough as that in Testors and Ceramcoats brands, and the Tamiya paints do not appear to be very compatible with other manufacturers' formulations. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 20:34:51 +0000 From: "Brian & Iva Smith" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: web site Message-ID: Do you have a web site?? Address?? Thanks..Brian _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 15:50:22 -0500 From: "Brian Nicklas" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: web site Message-ID: Do you have a web site?? Address?? Thanks..Brian ------------------------------------- For this rowdy group? http://www.wwi-models.org/ ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 15:14:55 -0600 From: "Jim Pliml" To: Subject: Tamiya Paint Message-ID: <003001c1a5e5$576c6560$d3928ece@default> Hey folks. I have found that you have to use Tamiya thinner with Tamiya paint ( almost 50/50 mix for me). Sprays really nice, and sticks well. I love the stuff ! I think the Tamiya web site has some info on paint. De-Lurking after a long time Jim Pliml ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 16:33:23 EST From: GRBroman@aol.com To: Subject: Re: Nigels mortars: Message-ID: <15e.7b33080.29832923@aol.com> In a message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:43:08 AM Eastern Standard Time, "Lee M." writes: > I was around the 4.2 model in Europe and it went up pretty fast and > far. But that was 1944 and a bit later, but I was never around the ones > used by the Chemical people. Only heavy Infantry stuff. > > I am sure they have loads suitable for virtually everything. Remember I > retired with 25.5 in 1969 way before there was a Gulf to have a war > about. I chased Germans...and their helpers. > > Lee M. > > GRBroman@aol.com wrote: > > > > --part1_13.5759e50.29822941_boundary > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > In a message dated 1/23/2002 7:39:08 PM Central Standard Time, lemen@x25.net > > writes: > > > > > Now realizing the size of the projectile and after seeing "screaming > > > Mimis" and the huge railroad shells flying thru the air I do not doubt > > > they were visible. > > > > > > I just know the mortar shells in WW II were not. > > > > > > > > > > Hey Lee, you must never have spent any time around the ole four deuce mortar. > > It served from before WWII to the Gulf War. They were assigned to Chemical > > Mortar battalions early in the war. They were a direct development of a WWI > > model. Believe me, you could see those puppies in flight. Amazing how this > > came back to OT. :) > > Glen ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 17:10:14 -0500 From: "Muth and Zulick" To: Subject: Re: Tamiya Paint Message-ID: <000401c1a5ed$11599400$0100005a@ptd.net> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Pliml" To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Friday,January 25,2002 4:12 PM Subject: [WWI] Tamiya Paint > Hey folks. I have found that you have to use Tamiya thinner with Tamiya > paint ( almost 50/50 mix for me). Sprays really nice, and sticks well. I > love the stuff ! I think the Tamiya web site has some info on paint. > > > De-Lurking after a long time > > Jim Pliml > > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:52:09 -0800 From: "Bob Pearson" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Tamiya Paint Message-ID: <101199913703@smtp.vphos.net> I used to just use water when I sprayed Tamiya paints Bob ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 23:24:57 +0000 From: "Brent Theobald" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: First Look Mac Fokker D.VII Message-ID: Howdy Gang! I picked up my copy of the Fokker D.VII from Mac today. My first impressions are favorable tempered with disappointment. (Note: I haven't really sat down to check this out yet. These impressions were made while fondling the kit in the car on the way back to work from lunch.) Good: Clean molding, nice rib detail on the wings. The pe set is going to go a long way to spice up the interior. P/e consists of instrument panels, seat belts etc. Zero flash, nice resin radiator and killer lozenge decals. The decals are a leap forward for a kit manufacturer. I like the colors and the lozenged rib tapes are pre-sized in scale! No more trying to cut tiny strips of decal. I forgot the Jasta markings. Red and white fuselages marked with black stripes and chickens/falcons. Ring a bell? Bad: Top wing still has dihedral (which is odd because the supplied drawings show it flat), machine guns have no detail, no rib detail on the fuselage. The Roden engine beats the Mac engine hands down. Neutral: Cost - I thought it was kinda pricey at $21+ (non-Roll Models' price) but I figure you get a lot more than Roden and Pegasus kits. No lozenge supplied for the upper surface of the top wing. This is only a problem if you decide to build something other than the kit supplied schemes. I like it better than the Roden kit so far. However, I am going to miss the nice fuselage detail Roden had on their D.VII. Everthing else can be resolved easily by parts from the spares bin. I'll try and submit a first look review to Bob this weekend for IM. Hopefully he'll have time to post it. Later! Brent _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 18:35:37 -0500 From: "ot811" To: "wwi-list" Subject: eduard fokker dvi Message-ID: <00f001c1a5f9$0227b140$0800010a@cyberelan.com> Saw in same local hobby shop, 1:48 eduard Fokker D.VI, (that is 6) missing the pe parts, all else seemed to be okay. USD 8.00 any interest? regards SSH ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 18:34:18 -0500 From: "ot811" To: "wwi-list" Subject: Sopwith 1 B1 Message-ID: <00ef01c1a5f9$01bfc7b0$0800010a@cyberelan.com> Saw in local hobby shop, Flashback 1:72 kit for Sopwith 1 B1. It is missing the resin parts for the engine and the gun. Price is usd 6.00 Just to let you all know. regards SSH ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 18:46:29 -0500 From: "Tom Plesha" To: Subject: Re: eduard fokker dvi Message-ID: <001901c1a5fa$84ae3160$2cfdfa18@mcmb1.mi.home.com> I'd certainly pick it up for that price. Later Tom ----- Original Message ----- From: "ot811" To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 6:35 PM Subject: [WWI] eduard fokker dvi > Saw in same local hobby shop, 1:48 eduard Fokker D.VI, (that is 6) missing > the pe parts, all else seemed to be okay. USD 8.00 > any interest? > regards > SSH > > ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 11:07:01 +1100 From: "Ross Moorhouse" To: Subject: Re: First Look Mac Fokker D.VII Message-ID: <008c01c1a5fd$61065b40$3b482dcb@nsw.bigpond.net.au> Thanks for leting us know about this kit Brent. Hopefully Earl will get them soon at NKR. Interesting what you have said about the lozenge decals as I bought the Roden D.VII for the lozenge decals. They look ok to me but then again being colour blind I wouldnt have a clue. So will have to take your word on the decals in the Mac one. Cheers Ross ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brent Theobald" To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 10:27 AM Subject: [WWI] First Look Mac Fokker D.VII > Howdy Gang! > > I picked up my copy of the Fokker D.VII from Mac today. My first impressions > are favorable tempered with disappointment. (Note: I haven't really sat down > to check this out yet. These impressions were made while fondling the kit in > the car on the way back to work from lunch.) > > Good: Clean molding, nice rib detail on the wings. The pe set is going to go > a long way to spice up the interior. P/e consists of instrument panels, seat > belts etc. Zero flash, nice resin radiator and killer lozenge decals. The > decals are a leap forward for a kit manufacturer. I like the colors and the > lozenged rib tapes are pre-sized in scale! No more trying to cut tiny strips > of decal. I forgot the Jasta markings. Red and white fuselages marked with > black stripes and chickens/falcons. Ring a bell? > > Bad: Top wing still has dihedral (which is odd because the supplied drawings > show it flat), machine guns have no detail, no rib detail on the fuselage. > The Roden engine beats the Mac engine hands down. > > Neutral: Cost - I thought it was kinda pricey at $21+ (non-Roll Models' > price) but I figure you get a lot more than Roden and Pegasus kits. No > lozenge supplied for the upper surface of the top wing. This is only a > problem if you decide to build something other than the kit supplied > schemes. > > I like it better than the Roden kit so far. However, I am going to miss the > nice fuselage detail Roden had on their D.VII. Everthing else can be > resolved easily by parts from the spares bin. > > I'll try and submit a first look review to Bob this weekend for IM. > Hopefully he'll have time to post it. > > Later! > > Brent > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. > ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 01:20:34 +0100 From: a.r.martin@t-online.de (Rita) To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: RGB values for French 5-color? Message-ID: <16UGaA-0vWnNQC@fwd03.sul.t-online.com> Hi guys, Windsock gives the following dates for indroduction of the French color patterns: The so called yellow scheme where used from mid 1916 until to early 1918 The five-color scheme started in October 1917. Regards Andreas tbittners@sprintmail.com schrieb: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:49:43 -0500 (EST), StefenK wrote: > > > BTW, might the L'aerophile author's use of 'beige' to describe Fokker > > Eindeckers have been in its technical aviation sense--that is, as a > > specific reference to the French camo color? The RGB values certainly > > result in a color that bears a resemblance to unbleached linen. Can one of > > the French experts let me know when the Aviation Militaire began using > > Beige and/or the 5-color scheme? > > I believe it was either early or mid 1917 that five-color was in use. > > > Matt Bittner > Working on more with five-color. Patience, all (and I have another question > for Tomasz...) ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:58:44 -0500 From: "John & Allison Cyganowski" To: Subject: Re: goodies in the mail Message-ID: <007d01c1a604$9bc6c6a0$5738183f@cyrixp166> Hmmm...Don't lose the day job. {;-) > Oh, no! she's there only to stop the bikini-clad girls to kidnap me! ;-) > D. > Pierce Brosnan impersonator > > _________________________________________________________________ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 10:16:07 +0900 From: "Mordecai Sheftall" To: Subject: Andreas Martin Message-ID: <003801c1a607$085a44c0$354f07d3@computer> Holy cow! Did you get a look at this guy's models and photograph techniques? Three words: stunning, humbling, inspiring. This yanks the bar up a good three feet, y'all. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 02:22:38 +0100 From: "Grzegorz Mazurowski" To: "wwi lista" Subject: leaving for a week! Message-ID: <00dc01c1a607$f3136140$0200a8c0@x.pl> Hi folks! Two things: I haven't got any single list message since 24th Jan. noon. and I'm leaving saturday for a week. Be back with you soon, I hope! :-) Grzegorz (maybe I'll be able to check my onet.pl mail account in a mid-week once) _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 20:41:30 -0600 From: "Matt Bittner" To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" Subject: Background ideas Message-ID: Now that I have this nifty digital cam, I want to mimic a bunch of listees, and shoot my models against a "scenic" background. Ideas? TIA! Matt Bittner ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 22:14:55 -0500 From: "Steven Perry" To: Subject: Re: Background ideas Message-ID: <00c401c1a617$a13a5da0$0fe82341@tampabay.rr.com> > Now that I have this nifty digital cam, I want to mimic a bunch > of listees, and shoot my models against a "scenic" background. > Ideas? TIA! If you have access to an old copy of Windows, there is a file called Clouds.bmp that is blue sky & clouds. This printed up on as large a sheet of paper as your printer will take makes a good areial background. In your neck of the woods it probably isn't a far drive and you can get a shot across a tree lined pasture with maybe still a two wire phone line or a barn on the horizon. A color print of this or maybe a panoramic of two or three shots taped together can make a realistic background for a western front airfield scene. sp ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 21:25:10 -0600 From: "ibs4421" To: Subject: RE: ARRRRGH Message-ID: <008701c1a619$0ff82b40$7b3dfad1@dwfjv01> Alvie, I am interested in possibly doing this with my laser printer. Please let me know how it works out. Warren ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hans Trauner" To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:33 PM Subject: [WWI] RE: ARRRRGH > By the way thanks for the font info in a short while I will be using it to > > make serial decals for my Albatros D.II. > > > > Alvie > > What font did you select at last? Laserprint on clear decal paper? > > Hans > > > > ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 14:26:47 +1100 From: "Ross Moorhouse" To: Subject: Re: decals Message-ID: <001201c1a619$49246640$3b482dcb@nsw.bigpond.net.au> Well the below message took 20 days to get to the list.. Very strange. Ross ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ross Moorhouse" To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 4:24 PM Subject: [WWI] Re: decals > I cant find them listed on any of the major on-line retailers. :-( > > Ross > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rory Goodwin" > To: "Multiple recipients of list" > Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 4:18 PM > Subject: [WWI] Re: decals > > > | If memory serves, the 14-18 aspect has been covered by AG... > | > | Ross Moorhouse wrote: > | > | > Well I would love to see a Turkish set for 1914 to 1918 and a set for > 1921 > | > to 1922 . in both 1/72 and 1/48 scale please. > | > > | > Cheers > | > > | > Ross > | > ----- Original Message ----- > | > From: "Bob Pearson" > | > To: "Multiple recipients of list" > | > Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 9:45 AM > | > Subject: [WWI] decals > | > > | > | Hi all, > | > | > | > | I feel inspired right now, so I am wondering would people rather > choose > | > | individual markings or buy sets of a theme .. ie USAS squadron > insignias, > | > | Jasta 15 etc etc ... > | > | > | > | Regards, > | > | Bob > | > > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:28:18 -0800 From: "Bob Pearson" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: decals Message-ID: <101201570801@smtp.vphos.net> Not to the list .. just to you :-) Bob ---------- >From: "Ross Moorhouse" >To: Multiple recipients of list >Subject: [WWI] Re: decals >Date: Fri, Jan 25, 2002, 7:26 pm > > Well the below message took 20 days to get to the list.. Very strange. > > Ross > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ross Moorhouse" > To: "Multiple recipients of list" > Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 4:24 PM > Subject: [WWI] Re: decals > > >> I cant find them listed on any of the major on-line retailers. :-( >> >> Ross >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Rory Goodwin" >> To: "Multiple recipients of list" >> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 4:18 PM >> Subject: [WWI] Re: decals >> >> >> | If memory serves, the 14-18 aspect has been covered by AG... >> | >> | Ross Moorhouse wrote: >> | >> | > Well I would love to see a Turkish set for 1914 to 1918 and a set for >> 1921 >> | > to 1922 . in both 1/72 and 1/48 scale please. >> | > >> | > Cheers >> | > >> | > Ross >> | > ----- Original Message ----- >> | > From: "Bob Pearson" >> | > To: "Multiple recipients of list" >> | > Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 9:45 AM >> | > Subject: [WWI] decals >> | > >> | > | Hi all, >> | > | >> | > | I feel inspired right now, so I am wondering would people rather >> choose >> | > | individual markings or buy sets of a theme .. ie USAS squadron >> insignias, >> | > | Jasta 15 etc etc ... >> | > | >> | > | Regards, >> | > | Bob >> | >> >> > ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 14:39:23 +1100 From: Shane & Lorna Jenkins To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: decals Message-ID: <3C5224EB.E4FC4CF1@tac.com.au> Bob Pearson wrote: > > Not to the list .. just to you :-) Hi Bob, Naw, same happened here ;-) Shane ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 23:31:28 EST From: VMA324Vagabonds@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Background ideas/! Message-ID: <12e.b64246d.29838b20@aol.com> --part1_12e.b64246d.29838b20_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Matt. Here's a tip a most noted Armor modeler and writer (SZ) passed on to me once. He uses scenes from old Calendars & new ones to I'm sure, some of his stuff makes you wonder just how the heck he does it, as they just knock your socks off. Heck I bet if you go to a good book store they may have 50 different calendars, I'm sure you'll find something that strikes you as they usually only use their best pictures in those pages. He even adds smoke at time to look like fog which really adds to the effect and contributes depth too the scene. Best Regards, Jon --part1_12e.b64246d.29838b20_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Matt. Here's a tip a most noted Armor modeler and writer (SZ) passed on to me once. He uses scenes from old Calendars & new ones to I'm sure, some of his stuff makes you wonder just how the heck he does it, as they just knock your socks off. Heck I bet if you go to a good book store they may have 50 different calendars, I'm sure you'll find something that strikes you as they usually only use their best pictures in those pages. He even adds smoke at time to look like fog which really adds to the effect and contributes depth too the scene.

Best Regards,
Jon 


             

--part1_12e.b64246d.29838b20_boundary-- ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 20:53:38 -0800 From: "Bob Pearson" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: decals Message-ID: <101202082801@smtp.vphos.net> Must just be the Aussies .. I got that message when it originally was sent, and not today. . That's what you get for trying to be in the future all the time Bob ---------- >From: Shane & Lorna Jenkins >To: Multiple recipients of list >Subject: [WWI] Re: decals >Date: Fri, Jan 25, 2002, 7:34 pm > > Bob Pearson wrote: >> >> Not to the list .. just to you :-) > > Hi Bob, > > Naw, same happened here ;-) > > Shane ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 23:54:56 -0500 From: "Michael and Sharon Alvarado, NSWCC" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: ARRRRGH Message-ID: <3C52369F.43554E33@verizon.net> I'll let you know what font I use and how it works out. This is my primary project for the weekend aside from painting my Albie D.II. Alvie ibs4421 wrote: > Alvie, > I am interested in possibly doing this with my laser printer. > Please let me know how it works out. > > Warren > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Hans Trauner" > To: "Multiple recipients of list" > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:33 PM > Subject: [WWI] RE: ARRRRGH > > > By the way thanks for the font info in a short while I will be using it to > > > make serial decals for my Albatros D.II. > > > > > > Alvie > > > > What font did you select at last? Laserprint on clear decal paper? > > > > Hans > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 12:55:59 +0800 From: zyf5435@163.com To: 尊敬的客户@163.com Subject: 欢迎光临山译网站 Message-ID: <20020126045525.F1B311C6DBFCA@sm4.163.com> ------------------------------ End of WWI Digest 4108 **********************