WWI Digest 4092 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) Re: Nearly OT Russian Ship Site by "Brent Theobald" 2) Telephones by "ZELNICK, KENNETH T" 3) Re: I had to tell somebody... by "Diego Fernetti" 4) Re: the carpet monster really bites by KarrArt@aol.com 5) Re: Tidying up was RE: RE: New addition by KarrArt@aol.com 6) Re: control surface positioning by "Diego Fernetti" 7) Re: Hue IDs from B&W photos, was: Lozenge color help by KarrArt@aol.com 8) Re: Telephones by "Diego Fernetti" 9) Re: the carpet monster really bites by "Diego Fernetti" 10) Re: Tidying up was RE: RE: New addition by "Matt Bittner" 11) One more update by "Matt Bittner" 12) Re: the carpet monster really bites by KarrArt@aol.com 13) Re: Kingston Vac Machine/again by "Tom Plesha" 14) Re: control surface positioning by "Thomas Solinski" 15) Change of email address by "Thomas Solinski" 16) by "Thomas Solinski" 17) Re: control surface positioning by Steve Cox 18) Re: control surface positioning by "ot811" 19) Reply to Jan's question about JB Weld: by Robert Horton 20) Re: control surface positioning by "Thomas Solinski" 21) Re: control surface positioning by CAUhlir@aol.com 22) RE: Brass tubes and boring corks was Roundels and painting by Shane Weier 23) Re: More Eduard Nieuport Questions by Shane Weier 24) RE: Pegasus decals? by Shane Weier 25) RE: I had to tell somebody... by Shane Weier ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 17:43:41 +0000 From: "Brent Theobald" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Nearly OT Russian Ship Site Message-ID: Howdy! Todd gave out this address to visit a Russian ship modelers site: http://modelyard.narod.ru/catalog.htm It has some interesting pre-OT and post OT ships. What I found is this translation site does a great job so you can understand what's in the Russian web site: http://babelfish.altavista.com After accessing this I was able to understand most of what they posted to the web site. Cool huh? Later! Brent _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 12:02:04 -0600 From: "ZELNICK, KENNETH T" To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: Telephones Message-ID: <15888960D28CD211AD1900105A24907803EC9549@ano-exs02.ano.entergy.com> Diego, there are some things about telephones you need to learn: 1. By having a telephone, you have a bell in your house that anyone in the world can ring. 2. If it's important, they'll call back. 3. If it's not important, they'll usually call back. If you weigh these against the importance of finding that dropped part, you'll realize you don't need to jump up from what you're doing to answer the phone. Hope this helps, and keep on modeling! Ken Zelnick ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 18:08:56 +0000 From: "Diego Fernetti" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: I had to tell somebody... Message-ID: Lance wrote: >After 16 months of work -snip- >"That's nice, dear." > Been there too... when I finished the stormtrooper figure wich is portrayed on the ww1 modelling page, I was so glad that first time Wanda arrived home I showed it to her. Her response was: "so, where he's going to throw that bottle?" (meaning the grenade). Enough! However, when I demonstrated her how worked the wing-positioning-jig she was more interested in this instrument and tought it was an ingenious device. I guess that Wanda would have demonstrated more interest in the Felixstowe! D. _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:09:15 EST From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: the carpet monster really bites Message-ID: <18f.21c80cf.297db34b@aol.com> In a message dated 1/21/02 4:59:55 AM Pacific Standard Time, d_fernetti@hotmail.com writes: << After a bit of judicious searching I finally find it in the junction of two tiles and I extracted from this hiding place with tweezers. Then the phone rang, I tried to stand up but I was under a shelf with lots of books and when I moved, I hit my spine against the corner of the shelf, wich made me a painful cut, and about the 25 tomes of an encyclopaedia fell on my back. No wonder, I lost the piece again, this time for ever... >> You never have a camera ready when you need it! Sounds like a scene from a bad sitcom. Sorry about the pain though. RK ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:09:13 EST From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Tidying up was RE: RE: New addition Message-ID: <148.8272f5d.297db349@aol.com> In a message dated 1/21/02 7:45:11 AM Pacific Standard Time, muzu@ptd.net writes: << > That's...uh......."preservative powder"...........keeps daylight off all the > valuables? Er....better be careful. Some of my clients tried that as a defense in a case and it didn't work ;-)) Mike Muth, whose work area got tidied up by a fire 2 months ago, but will soon be back with a vengeance after the repairs are done...hopefully within the next week or so. White walls are to be painted today...then some white linoleum on the floor. No, I'm not going for a Goering motiffe, just figure it'll be easier to spot the fallen fiddlybits with a white floor. >> A few years ago I bought a cheap 7' door and two steel saw horses for a work bench. Didn't help. No matter how I try, the work area eventually shrinks down to one corner of a small clipboard in my lap. At least the "preservative dust" can be washed off this.....when it REALLY needs it. RK ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 18:16:06 +0000 From: "Diego Fernetti" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: control surface positioning Message-ID: Mark! AFAIK, during a turn the ailerons must be kept near neutral position, just starting a turn the ailerons must be deflected. I guess that in the Albatros the full deflection of the ailerons must have been around the ten degrees, and so the rudder. The turning angle must not be too steep as perpendicular to the floor, as these airplanes didn't had enough power/speed to keep flying that way without a nasty spin. The tail should have been kept neutral during a normal turn as well, if the aircraft was well trimmed and coordinately flown. D. >From: Mark Miller >Reply-To: wwi@wwi-models.org >To: Multiple recipients of list >Subject: [WWI] control surface positioning >Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 12:09:50 -0500 (EST) > >Hi >I have finaly gotten around to re-working my Virtual DVa model so that i >can reposition the control surfaces, and it occures to me that, not being a >pilot, I don't have a very good idea where they should go > >first - how much range of motion did the different control surfaces have. I >have one image with 10 degrees up on one aerleron 10 degrees down on the >other. > >when executing a tight turn - >was it common practice to go into a 90 degree bank. >and would you give "up elevator" to tighten the turn. > >and would you need to use the rudder to maintain attitude during the turn. > >or, how about typical errors non-pilots make when depicting aircraft in >flight? > >Any input would be appreciated >Mark Miller > > >Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping! >http://www.shopping.altavista.com _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:20:35 EST From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Hue IDs from B&W photos, was: Lozenge color help Message-ID: <197.161f5e1.297db5f3@aol.com> In a message dated 1/21/02 9:48:41 AM Pacific Standard Time, StefenK@netzero.net writes: << A photographic print can manage only a much narrow brightness range, perhaps 1 to 50, from the deepest developable black to the fixed brightness of the particular paper substrate. >> One problem also to consider is that most of us are working a lot of the time from printed material and not even real photos. The same photo printed in different publications usually varies quite a bit. Even in the same publication there can be variation.I've got two copies of the Sopwith Triplane Datafile (no......the extra one is not available!....one's a "work" one and the other is a spare for the day the other finally decomposes). One's overall lighter. Them there tiny ink dots don't always behave according to what was on the original negative or a "good"print from it. RK ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 18:22:31 +0000 From: "Diego Fernetti" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Telephones Message-ID: Thanks Ken! I'll try to remember your advice. For some days, the cut in my back will remind me that! D. >From: "ZELNICK, KENNETH T" >Reply-To: wwi@wwi-models.org >To: Multiple recipients of list >Subject: [WWI] Telephones >Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:04:21 -0500 (EST) > >Diego, there are some things about telephones you need to learn: > >1. By having a telephone, you have a bell in your house that anyone in the >world can ring. >2. If it's important, they'll call back. >3. If it's not important, they'll usually call back. > >If you weigh these against the importance of finding that dropped part, >you'll realize you don't need to jump up from what you're doing to answer >the phone. > >Hope this helps, and keep on modeling! > >Ken Zelnick _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 18:24:32 +0000 From: "Diego Fernetti" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: the carpet monster really bites Message-ID: Robert the K wrote: >You never have a camera ready when you need it! Sounds like a scene from a >bad sitcom. I finally understood how Kramer from "Seinfeld" must feel everyday... D. _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 10:00:23 -0600 From: "Matt Bittner" To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" Subject: Re: Tidying up was RE: RE: New addition Message-ID: On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 10:43:18 -0500 (EST), Muth and Zulick wrote: > Mike Muth, whose work area got tidied up by a fire 2 months ago, but will > soon be back with a vengeance after the repairs are done...hopefully within > the next week or so. White walls are to be painted today...then some white > linoleum on the floor. No, I'm not going for a Goering motiffe, just figure > it'll be easier to spot the fallen fiddlybits with a white floor. Except those fiddly bits you make from white Evergreen or Plastruct... ;-) Matt Bittner ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 12:49:34 -0600 From: "Matt Bittner" To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" Subject: One more update Message-ID: Just uploaded Alberto's last of the "new" Nieuport images, that of his Triplane. Enough words have been said. There really are no adjectives to describe his work adequately. Matt Bittner WW1 Modeling Page Assistant Editor ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:19:52 EST From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: the carpet monster really bites Message-ID: <25.21b6bebe.297dc3d8@aol.com> In a message dated 1/21/02 10:29:30 AM Pacific Standard Time, d_fernetti@hotmail.com writes: << I finally understood how Kramer from "Seinfeld" must feel everyday... D. >> Hey- you ought to do a self portrait cartoon showing this incident! RK ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:48:27 -0500 From: "Tom Plesha" To: Subject: Re: Kingston Vac Machine/again Message-ID: <001301c1a2b4$990466a0$2cfdfa18@mcmb1.mi.home.com> Hi Candice- Egads, I ordered one on Saturday! Oh well!!!!!! He asked me for a review after I used it, do you mind if I share your comments with him? Later Tom ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:35 PM Subject: [WWI] Kingston Vac Machine > Hi All, > I noticed a post on Kingston vacs on the list last week so I decided to finally fire mine up and try it out. The good news is that I got two pretty good casts of my 1/48 Vimy engine eggs out of three tries. I am very pleased. > > The bad news is the overall construction needs work. First up I had to tape all the edges of the box to stop air leaks. Easy but something I shouldn't have to do. > The more troublesome is their connection port to the vacuum source. They use a PVC fitting that is attached to the box via a screw and collar arrangement. My collar fell off inside the box when I was removing the vacuum source. The collar was just tightened down without any use of a sealant of any type. It appears impossible to reattach it without taking the box apart. Now I am faced with rigging up a rubber based friction fitting of my own design. > > the box is servicable...Kingston just needs to put a bit more thought into the overall construction integrity. > > Candice > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:10:23 -0600 From: "Thomas Solinski" To: Subject: Re: control surface positioning Message-ID: <001801c1a2b7$a8c85260$a6a20d41@okcnc1.ok.home.com> AHHH a topic worthy of the the green/yellow can of worms! ----- Original Message ----- > first - how much range of motion did the different control surfaces have. I have one image with 10 degrees up on one aerleron 10 degrees down on the other. Simple answer is it depends on the aircraft. There were some Short torpedo bombers and some Farmans that the ailerons only went down, there were no cables in the system to pull them up. At rest they hung straight down. Other aircraft may have had the more modern effect of differential ailerons, more throw up than down or vice versa to eliminate advers yaw. > when executing a tight turn - was it common practice to go into a 90 degree bank. > and would you give "up elevator" to tighten the turn. Theoretically you can't go into a sustained 90 degree bank. Since the wings are now perpendictular to the force of gravity, there no longer is any lift to keep the plane up. You must start to fall. Also a 60 degree bank gives you a 2G turn, anything above this gives you and the plane loading problems. If you want to maintain the same altitude in any turn, even 5 degrees, you must add some up elevator. > and would you need to use the rudder to maintain attitude during the turn. Again depends on the airplane. At bank angles beyond 45 degrees some airplanes use "top rudder" or rudder opposite to the turn ie left rudder in a right turn, because the rudder is now functioning partially as an elevator, keeping the nose up in the turn. Let's watch this one cook the rest of the day Tom S ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:39:13 -0600 From: "Thomas Solinski" To: , "Tom Campbell" , Subject: Change of email address Message-ID: <003801c1a2bb$cf118320$a6a20d41@okcnc1.ok.home.com> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002D_01C1A289.65431940 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry to send sorta spam. But you are a friend, or I have done business = with you on eBay, and this note is to advise you that due to the failure = of excite.com my email is changing from tskio4@home.com to=20 tskio4@cox.net The old address will function until the last day in February=20 Thank you for your patience ------=_NextPart_000_002D_01C1A289.65431940 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sorry to send sorta spam.  But you are a = friend, or I=20 have done business with you on eBay, and this note is to advise you that = due to=20 the failure of excite.com my email is changing from
tskio4@home.com
to
 
The old address will function until the last day in = February=20
 
Thank you for your patience
 
------=_NextPart_000_002D_01C1A289.65431940-- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:40:03 -0600 From: "Thomas Solinski" To: Message-ID: <003901c1a2bb$cf5c47c0$a6a20d41@okcnc1.ok.home.com> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0035_01C1A289.82C2AC60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subscribe Thomas_Solinski ------=_NextPart_000_0035_01C1A289.82C2AC60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subscribe Thomas_Solinski
------=_NextPart_000_0035_01C1A289.82C2AC60-- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 20:45:11 +0000 From: Steve Cox To: Subject: Re: control surface positioning Message-ID: from what I recall of learning to fly a glider, and like the 11th September pilots I never learnt take-off and landings, when you went into a turn you pulled back on the stick a little, or the nose dropped. Whether this would be done on a powered plane, and whether it would be enough to show I don't know. I'm sure there are others on the list who would. regards Steve =========================================== steve@oldglebe.freeserve.co.uk http://www.oldglebe.freeserve.co.uk/steveshome.html http://www.bramptonscalemodelclub.fsnet.co.uk If I didn't spend so much time on line ‹‹ I'd get some models finished ================ > From: "Diego Fernetti" > Reply-To: wwi@wwi-models.org > Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:16:42 -0500 (EST) > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: [WWI] Re: control surface positioning > > Mark! > AFAIK, during a turn the ailerons must be kept near neutral position, just > starting a turn the ailerons must be deflected. I guess that in the Albatros > the full deflection of the ailerons must have been around the ten degrees, > and so the rudder. The turning angle must not be too steep as perpendicular > to the floor, as these airplanes didn't had enough power/speed to keep > flying that way without a nasty spin. The tail should have been kept neutral > during a normal turn as well, if the aircraft was well trimmed and > coordinately flown. > D. > > >> From: Mark Miller >> Reply-To: wwi@wwi-models.org >> To: Multiple recipients of list >> Subject: [WWI] control surface positioning >> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 12:09:50 -0500 (EST) >> >> Hi >> I have finaly gotten around to re-working my Virtual DVa model so that i >> can reposition the control surfaces, and it occures to me that, not being a >> pilot, I don't have a very good idea where they should go >> >> first - how much range of motion did the different control surfaces have. I >> have one image with 10 degrees up on one aerleron 10 degrees down on the >> other. >> >> when executing a tight turn - >> was it common practice to go into a 90 degree bank. >> and would you give "up elevator" to tighten the turn. >> >> and would you need to use the rudder to maintain attitude during the turn. >> >> or, how about typical errors non-pilots make when depicting aircraft in >> flight? >> >> Any input would be appreciated >> Mark Miller >> >> >> Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping! >> http://www.shopping.altavista.com > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. > > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 15:49:01 -0500 From: "ot811" To: Subject: Re: control surface positioning Message-ID: <00e501c1a2bd$1394c4c0$0800010a@cyberelan.com> Tom, I understand everything you said here, except for one thing: > If you want to maintain the same altitude in any turn, even 5 degrees, you > must add some up elevator. Mine is pure book knowledge, but isnt it true that in theory, there are more than one ways of increasing lift force a) changing wing incidence, b) increasing speed, c) changing angle of engine thrust/pull a and c are normally achieved together with elevator, though a could be done with flap alone. In a turn you *must* increase engine power which will result in increased speed if the elevator is not raised. So wont this by itself suffice ? (must = to retain altitude and speed) I remain, Your enquiringly, SSH ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 15:01:00 -0600 From: Robert Horton To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Reply to Jan's question about JB Weld: Message-ID: <3C4C818B.C006DEF5@netexpress.net> Hi gang...rather then post this off line, thought others might be interested and Jim Landon, jump in here too please...I think from the JB Weld pictures it is the automotive "mix." It comes in two tubes, one ounce each...red cap and black cap. Red cap is labeled "hardener" and black cap is labeled "steel." Cost approximately $ 4.00 US. From several automobile buffs I know, that swear by it, it can work as an adhesive and/or sealant and probably only limited by your imagination. I would tend to think that you could even leave it in an unthinned gob and mold around a thin wire and then file into shape of whatever....anyway hope that helps....Bob Horton ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 15:16:56 -0600 From: "Thomas Solinski" To: Subject: Re: control surface positioning Message-ID: <001801c1a2c0$f4a59f40$a6a20d41@okcnc1.ok.home.com> >> Mine is pure book knowledge, but isnt it true that in theory, there are more > than one ways of increasing lift force a) changing wing incidence, b) > increasing speed, c) changing angle of engine thrust/pull > a and c are normally achieved together with elevator, though a could be > done with flap alone. > In a turn you *must* increase engine power which will result in increased > speed if the elevator is not raised. So wont this by itself suffice ? > (must = to retain altitude and speed) > I remain, > Your enquiringly, > SSH > Let;s start with the assumption that our airplane is in balanced straight and level flight. If we have a 1000 unit of weight aircraft (pounds, stone, tons , tonnes, or kilos) then the total 1000 unit lift vector is straight up acting directly opposite the 1000 unit weight of the airplane. Lift always acts perpendicular to the top wing, Weight always points straight down at the center of the earth. Now view the airplane from the tail looking forward, and put it in a degree bank. The 1000 units of lift is now tilted to one direction by 5 degrees. It is also the hypotenuse of a right triangle. the vector analysis of that triangle now results in 87 units of lift pulling into the turn and only 996 units of lift actually lifting the airplane. We have a 4 unit loss of lift resulting in 996 pointing straight up and 1000 pointing straight down. Gravity is winning we will start to descend. Now back to your statement how do we get more lift? by increasing wing incidence, you pull up on the elevator to fly the wing at a higher angle of attack and get more lift. Yes, given a fixed power setting airspeed will decrease slightly too. But the airplane will stabilize in a 5 degree banked turn. In the case of a airplane trimmed to fly at 100 units of speed, in most cases, unless there is a large amount of down thrust. If I add power to the aircraft will initially accelerate to a new airspeed. But because it is trimmed to fly at 100 it will eventually start to climb, and will stabilize in a climb at 100 the trimmed forces on the wing and stabilizer will seek the state (speed) they are trimmed for. HTH Tom S ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:24:18 EST From: CAUhlir@aol.com To: Subject: Re: control surface positioning Message-ID: <181.26b5b49.297de103@aol.com> Very true about keeping altitude during a turn needing some up elevator. The steeper the turn the more nose up you need. I did 60 degree turns that are needed for a commercial license and always had to add nose up via elevator at the start of a turn in addition to adding power to keep altitude to +- 50' in a 360 turn. After the bank is stabilized I had the power tweaked so I could just about not worry about the nose drifting too much. Since many WWI airplanes only had a blip switch that would translate to nose up with the stick alone. ALso...it depends on the direction of the turn due to the prop torque. I think it was less nose up going left in a Cessna, more going right. I can't remember because after a bit it got to be pretty natural. Candice ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 08:25:12 +1000 From: Shane Weier To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: Brass tubes and boring corks was Roundels and painting Message-ID: <7186131CB805D411A60E0090272F7C7102BCDA87@mimhexch1.mim.com.au> Neil, > I've been meaning to ask about this, it's a very good > idea. Where do you get your brass tubing? > Alternatively, are these cork borer sets expensive > and difficult to find? Model shops - there are five in Brisbane that I look into which have the K&S brand brass rod/sheet/tube assortments, and that excludes the two model railroad specialists who almost certainly have an even larger range. Shane (who is lucky to live in a city with so many model shops) ********************************************************************** The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you receive this e-mail in error, any use, distribution or copying of this e-mail is not permitted. You are requested to forward unwanted e-mail and address any problems to the MIM Holdings Limited Support Centre. For general enquires: ++61 7 3833 8000 Support Centre e-mail: supportcentre@mim.com.au Support Centre phone: Australia 1800500646 International ++61 7 38338042 ********************************************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 08:37:05 +1000 From: Shane Weier To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: Re: More Eduard Nieuport Questions Message-ID: <7186131CB805D411A60E0090272F7C7102BCDA89@mimhexch1.mim.com.au> Ken says: > They are not even present in non-profi Noop. > You are better off w/Aeroclub and a paint pot for said pipe. > Ed's non-profi Kit gives you jugs and no plumbing. Nice > enough, given the > mold, but not the accuracy you seek. > No PE and No PE seat characteristic. You'll need after-market > to detail a non-profi. ??? However, the "aftermarket" can be plastic rod, solder, copper wire, aluminium wire, fuse wire, carefully manipulated wet noodles etc. Shane ********************************************************************** The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you receive this e-mail in error, any use, distribution or copying of this e-mail is not permitted. You are requested to forward unwanted e-mail and address any problems to the MIM Holdings Limited Support Centre. For general enquires: ++61 7 3833 8000 Support Centre e-mail: supportcentre@mim.com.au Support Centre phone: Australia 1800500646 International ++61 7 38338042 ********************************************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 08:40:42 +1000 From: Shane Weier To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: Pegasus decals? Message-ID: <7186131CB805D411A60E0090272F7C7102BCDA8A@mimhexch1.mim.com.au> Neil says: > So first they go brown, then washed out red? I don't > get this, where did that brownish colour come from? > Both Pegasus, Blue Rider and many profile painters > do them brown, if I'd been french in WW1 I'd have complained! I wonder if someone, somewhere, actually did some primary research and discovered the original pigments? Or whether they all speculated on whether the pigments faded/darkened (take your pick, depending on your favourite theory) over the years the way we do? Shane ********************************************************************** The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you receive this e-mail in error, any use, distribution or copying of this e-mail is not permitted. You are requested to forward unwanted e-mail and address any problems to the MIM Holdings Limited Support Centre. For general enquires: ++61 7 3833 8000 Support Centre e-mail: supportcentre@mim.com.au Support Centre phone: Australia 1800500646 International ++61 7 38338042 ********************************************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 08:41:41 +1000 From: Shane Weier To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: I had to tell somebody... Message-ID: <7186131CB805D411A60E0090272F7C7102BCDA8B@mimhexch1.mim.com.au> Lance, > "That's nice, dear." > That's nice mate..... Shane ********************************************************************** The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you receive this e-mail in error, any use, distribution or copying of this e-mail is not permitted. You are requested to forward unwanted e-mail and address any problems to the MIM Holdings Limited Support Centre. For general enquires: ++61 7 3833 8000 Support Centre e-mail: supportcentre@mim.com.au Support Centre phone: Australia 1800500646 International ++61 7 38338042 ********************************************************************** ------------------------------ End of WWI Digest 4092 **********************