WWI Digest 4085 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) Re: R: Re: Ni 17 front fuselage panels by "Thomas Solinski" 2) RE: How Many Times? by "Diego Fernetti" 3) RE: Magic Flight 2002 - the new Fokker Dr I from Revell by Crawford Neil 4) RE: Magic Flight 2002 - the new Fokker Dr I from Revell (an by "Ross Moorhouse" 5) totally ot, but defiant by Crawford Neil 6) RE: Lozenge color help please (long) by KnnthS@aol.com 7) Re: Another update by "Diego Fernetti" 8) RE: Magic Flight 2002 - the new Fokker Dr I from Revell by Volker Haeusler 9) RE: Magic Flight 2002 - the new Fokker Dr I from Revell by Crawford Neil 10) Re: Another update by Crawford Neil 11) Re: The Revell 1/48 D VII by KnnthS@aol.com 12) Re: The Revell 1/48 D VII by Volker Haeusler 13) RE: Magic Flight 2002 - the new Fokker Dr I from Revell by Volker Haeusler 14) R: Re: R: Re: Ni 17 front fuselage panels by "a.casirati@cornali-trasporti.it" 15) R: Re: Another update by "a.casirati@cornali-trasporti.it" 16) RE: Lozenge color help please (long) by Mark Miller 17) Re: Engine Drawings by "Graham Hunter" 18) Re: Fokker DRI - 1/48 by "ibs4421" 19) Re: Fokker DRI - 1/48 by CoolSpadLuke@aol.com 20) Re: The Revell 1/48 D VII by CoolSpadLuke@aol.com 21) Re: Hobbyshop.cz (ex VAMP) is opened now by "Courtney Allen" 22) New SRAM by tbittners@sprintmail.com 23) Re: Don't you hate it when..... by "ot811" 24) Re: The Revell 1/48 D VII by "Hans Trauner" 25) RE: Fokker DRI - 1/48 by "Graham Hunter" 26) Re: The Revell 1/48 D VII by KnnthS@aol.com 27) Re: Tidying up was RE: RE: New addition by KarrArt@aol.com 28) RE: Lozenge color help please (long) by KarrArt@aol.com 29) Re: Revell Fokker D.VII release by "Mark Shannon" 30) Voice of Reason - Magic Flight 2002 by "Brent Theobald" 31) Re: The Revell 1/48 D VII by "Graham Hunter" 32) Re: Tidying up was RE: RE: New addition by "Bob Pearson" 33) Re: Revell Fokker D.VII release by "Hans Trauner" 34) Re: Revell Fokker D.VII release by KnnthS@aol.com 35) Re: The Revell 1/48 D VII by KnnthS@aol.com 36) Re: Tidying up was RE: RE: New addition by KnnthS@aol.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 06:24:00 -0600 From: "Thomas Solinski" To: Subject: Re: R: Re: Ni 17 front fuselage panels Message-ID: <000c01c1a01b$026f6320$a6a20d41@okcnc1.ok.home.com> > One more example of this is when you compare Laetitia Casta (french > manufacture) to Maria Grazia Cuccinotta (italian manufacture) Wich one is > better? > D. >Sounds like that one is best answered by a futbol match! Diving for the green/yellow cloud. TomS ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 12:30:06 +0000 From: "Diego Fernetti" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: How Many Times? Message-ID: Shane wrote: > > from abroad... >Does Wanda know about her? yer gonna get me killed mate... D. Chez Wanda again _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 13:30:13 +0100 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: Magic Flight 2002 - the new Fokker Dr I from Revell Message-ID: Do you think it would work from a Magic Flight base, I presume that the diorama that Volker mentioned was a parked Dr1, which means 2-3cm away from the wind source. Magic flight would perhaps need a more powerful compressor? Also it would need to spin the complete engine and prop. /Neil C. > -----Original Message----- > From: KnnthS@aol.com [mailto:KnnthS@aol.com] > Sent: den 18 januari 2002 13:24 > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: [WWI] RE: Magic Flight 2002 - the new Fokker Dr I from Revell > (an > > > Volker: > > << with the needle pointing towards the prop. this made the > prop spin like > the real thing >> > > this is just about the coolest thing I have ever heard of.... > very clever > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 23:36:00 +1100 From: "Ross Moorhouse" To: Subject: RE: Magic Flight 2002 - the new Fokker Dr I from Revell (an Message-ID: <008801c1a01c$aff0b200$3b482dcb@nsw.bigpond.net.au> You should walk around a hobby shop with Volker. I took him to HobbyCo when he was here. Of course I only ever go to the planes and afv sections. But Volker took me to the railway section and with his engineers eye showed me all these bits of plastic that can be used for all sorts of useful things. I would never of even thought of 3/4 of what he pointed out to me. So the friend of his with the needle air jet falls into this line of thinking too. I think too much PC time is dulling what little of my brain I have left. ;-) Cheers Ross ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 11:24 PM Subject: [WWI] RE: Magic Flight 2002 - the new Fokker Dr I from Revell (an | Volker: | | << with the needle pointing towards the prop. this made the prop spin like | the real thing >> | | this is just about the coolest thing I have ever heard of.... | very clever | ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 13:35:04 +0100 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: totally ot, but defiant Message-ID: Saw this on Hannants hot list, and about time too. Anyone know if it is good? /Neil C. (Defiant lover) PAVLA PAV72032 1:72 Boulton-Paul Defiant Mk.IF/Mk.1NF. The kit contains: plastic styrene parts - 44 pcs, photo-etched metal sheet, resin parts: 3 kind of exhaust, mainwheel, control column, main udercarriage wheel bay, pilot seat with safety harness, gun turret ring. Sure to be one of this years best selling kits Ģ12.00 Ģ10.21 ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 07:35:45 EST From: KnnthS@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: Lozenge color help please (long) Message-ID: <10c.b739387.297970a1@aol.com> Shane: << I *know* I'll regret this but here goes... >> No regrets-it is appreciated. 'ope it's 'eard. Ken ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 12:50:15 +0000 From: "Diego Fernetti" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Another update Message-ID: That's another jewel. How did you do the cheek fairings on that N11, Alberto? I've lost one of the pieces of my Toko kit... D. nb: Albatros D.II (almost there!) Nieuport 28,and tinkering around with the LVG "Wanda" on request of Wanda. There's no vacations for me, after all! >From: "Matt Bittner" >Added another re-shot from Alberto. Nieuport, naturally. :-) >Absolutely stunning. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:17:14 +0800 From: Volker Haeusler To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: Magic Flight 2002 - the new Fokker Dr I from Revell Message-ID: Neil, "Do you think it would work from a Magic Flight base, I presume that the diorama that Volker mentioned was a parked Dr1, which means 2-3cm away from the wind source. Magic flight would perhaps need a more powerful compressor? Also it would need to spin the complete engine and prop." Absolutely right, the thing was sitting oon the ground, and it was only the prop rotating (surprisingly enough, *very* few people are aware why rotaries are called rotaries - just look on the front and back covers of the "In Action" volume on Sopwith fighters... No idea what was the optimum range of that device - maybe no better than that of an F/A 18 (oops - ot again...) Then again, whether itīs only the prop or the engine as well does not rally matter that much, if the friction between the moving and the stationary parts is brought down to the absolute minimum... Volker ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:04:26 +0100 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: Magic Flight 2002 - the new Fokker Dr I from Revell Message-ID: > Then again, whether itīs only the prop or the engine as well > does not rally > matter that much, if the friction between the moving and the > stationary > parts is brought down to the absolute minimum... > > Volker > > True, if you can get the cowling walls thin enough to actually make the engine spinable. I failed on the Schneider, had to cut off all the valves of the top 5 cylinders, that baby has a siezed engine! /Neil C. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:10:55 +0100 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: Re: Another update Message-ID: They're lovely aren't they, Thanks Alberto and Matt for sharing. /Neil C ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 08:22:44 EST From: KnnthS@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: The Revell 1/48 D VII Message-ID: <35.20ace21d.29797ba4@aol.com> Volker: << the wingspan and length are shown as 185 and 145 mm respectivly >> The length of the DML D VII checks out @ 145mm and wing @ 185mm, if you include ailerons, 173 if you do not. z'at help? Ken ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:47:38 +0800 From: Volker Haeusler To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: The Revell 1/48 D VII Message-ID: Sounds like a "near definitve" proof for me - anybody got the old Monogram D VII wingspan and length? on Kenīs measurement: "<< the wingspan and length are shown as 185 and 145 mm respectivly >> The length of the DML D VII checks out @ 145mm and wing @ 185mm, if you include ailerons, 173 if you do not. z'at help? Ken" Volker ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:51:40 +0800 From: Volker Haeusler To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: Magic Flight 2002 - the new Fokker Dr I from Revell Message-ID: "True, if you can get the cowling walls thin enough to actually make the engine spinable. I failed on the Schneider, had to cut off all the valves of the top 5 cylinders, that baby has a siezed engine!" While slightly complicating the affair, that definitely asks for a vacform cowling copy. Good point, Neil... Volker ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:42:59 +0100 From: "a.casirati@cornali-trasporti.it" To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: R: Re: R: Re: Ni 17 front fuselage panels Message-ID: <43EB244779F3D411966E0060082C59E90F0400@SERVER1> Well, in my view a comparison is possible only as far as Laetitia keeps his mouth shut.... Sorry, could not resist this... Alberto Casirati -----Messaggio originale----- Da: Diego Fernetti [SMTP:d_fernetti@hotmail.com] Inviato: venerdi 18 gennaio 2002 13.21 A: Multiple recipients of list Oggetto: [WWI] Re: R: Re: Ni 17 front fuselage panels Alberto wrote: >As for Italians continuing the French practice, I seriously doubt this, as >A-H inspection technicians reported that Italian-built Nieuports were >definitley better built than French ones. Of course, this does not imply >that Italians used different techniques (they may simply have built better >using the same methods), but Italian firms which built French designs under >license often departed from French practices in various ways. One more example of this is when you compare Laetitia Casta (french manufacture) to Maria Grazia Cuccinotta (italian manufacture) Wich one is better? D. _________________________________________________________________ Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:48:17 +0100 From: "a.casirati@cornali-trasporti.it" To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: R: Re: Another update Message-ID: <43EB244779F3D411966E0060082C59E90F0401@SERVER1> All I did was: - cutting two triangles from 0.1 mm plasticard sheet; - wrapping them around a cocktail stick; - bending them to follow the engine cowling contours; - glueing them in place after the engine cowling was glued. A few attempts were necessary before an acceptable result was achieved, but it really is worth the effort. Ciao ! Alberto -----Messaggio originale----- Da: Diego Fernetti [SMTP:d_fernetti@hotmail.com] Inviato: venerdi 18 gennaio 2002 13.52 A: Multiple recipients of list Oggetto: [WWI] Re: Another update That's another jewel. How did you do the cheek fairings on that N11, Alberto? I've lost one of the pieces of my Toko kit... D. nb: Albatros D.II (almost there!) Nieuport 28,and tinkering around with the LVG "Wanda" on request of Wanda. There's no vacations for me, after all! >From: "Matt Bittner" >Added another re-shot from Alberto. Nieuport, naturally. :-) >Absolutely stunning. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. ------------------------------ Date: 18 Jan 2002 06:11:55 -0800 From: Mark Miller To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: Lozenge color help please (long) Message-ID: <20020118141155.10614.cpmta@c016.snv.cp.net> On Thu, 17 January 2002, Shane Weier wrote: > I'm afraid you've fallen right into a trap. My guess is that the photo was taken on ortho film. Ochre is *approximately* yellow and therefore has less effect on ortho emulsion than the brightness would suggest - so clear film, > so darker on the print. Yea I expected something like this I have little understanding of ortho film I found a simple curve which seems to indicate that blue comes in light from the UV side then darkens as it goes to green - then green spikes up and then falls off rapidly toward yellow then just drops off the chart before it gets to red. am I interpreting this right? This sounds like an effect which should be reproducable in photoshop, if you are starting with a color photo and want to see how ortho film would interpret it. Although I can't imagine how you could go the other way and extrapolate color from the b&W film But I understand that this film is also sensative to UV - not sure what to do with that in any case - I would like to see your data. I have accepted the fact that I will not be able to determine which colors are "right" but at least i can present a LOT of different options ;-) also occurs to me that I might be able to get some proffesional help at work. imaging, cameras and sensors are what we do. although - I might need a diferent sort of "proffesional help" if I don't just let this go.:-) thanks Mark Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping! http://www.shopping.altavista.com ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 08:30:16 -0600 From: "Graham Hunter" To: Subject: Re: Engine Drawings Message-ID: <000001c1a02c$a6800ee0$770101c0@ghunter> It would help if there were no typo's it should be http://mars.ark.com/~mdf/motor.html f and j are not even beside each other on the keyboard :-( Graham << http://mars.ark.com/~mdj/motor.html >> The link doesn't work Graham Peter L ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:02:22 -0600 From: "ibs4421" To: Subject: Re: Fokker DRI - 1/48 Message-ID: <001701c1a031$24eae4e0$873dfad1@dwfjv01> Tom, I may have a DML Dr.I to trade you. Contact me off-list. Warren ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 10:17:08 EST From: CoolSpadLuke@aol.com To: Subject: Re: Fokker DRI - 1/48 Message-ID: <17d.2434825.29799675@aol.com> Tom, Kingkit's online catalog lists the Dragon Fokker Dr.I at 19.00 BP, a tad pricey perhaps but then the scarcer kits seem to get that way. Catalog no. is 5901. Website is: http://www.kingkit.co.uk/ HTH, Mike Kavanaugh In a message dated Fri, 18 Jan 2002 6:21:00 AM Eastern Standard Time, Tom Gourdie writes: > > In the absence of the Dragon DRI (scarce as hen's teeth nowadays) does > anyone know of any decent alternative in 1/48? > > I have an old unbuilt SMER at home which looks hideous but it seems to be > the only offering there is and it isn't even 1/48 - its 1/44 or something > equally odd. > > Tom > > > Tom Gourdie > Regional Group Coordinator > Outreach Department > Universities and Colleges Admissions Service > (UCAS) > Registered Office Address : Rosehill > New Barn Lane > Cheltenham > Gloucestershire > GL52 3LZ > UK > E-mail : t.gourdie@ucas.ac.uk > Direct telephone number: +44 (0) 1242 544 878 > Direct fax number: +44 (0) 1242 544 963 > Registered Company No: 2839815 > Registered Charity No: 1024741 > Website: www.ucas.com > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 10:24:06 EST From: CoolSpadLuke@aol.com To: Subject: Re: The Revell 1/48 D VII Message-ID: <7a.20d25b73.29799816@aol.com> I measure the Monogram D.VII kit (no. 5203) wingspan at 194mm including ailerons and 186mm without. HTH, Mike Kavanaugh In a message dated Fri, 18 Jan 2002 8:33:45 AM Eastern Standard Time, Volker Haeusler writes: > Sounds like a "near definitve" proof for me - anybody got the old Monogram D > VII wingspan and length? > > > on Kenīs measurement: > > "<< the wingspan and length are shown as 185 and 145 mm respectivly >> > > The length of the DML D VII checks out @ 145mm > and wing @ 185mm, if you include ailerons, 173 if you do not. > > z'at help? > > Ken" > > Volker ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 08:00:47 -0800 From: "Courtney Allen" To: Subject: Re: Hobbyshop.cz (ex VAMP) is opened now Message-ID: <004001c1a039$4b9ac9e0$7857510c@worldnet.att.net> Great job Lubos! I'm putting an order together today. Courtney ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 4:10 AM Subject: [WWI] Hobbyshop.cz (ex VAMP) is opened now > Hi all > > I'm very happy to inform you that HOBBYSHOP.CZ (VAMP mail order service in > the past) is opened now. You can visit our new shop on the URL > http://www.hobbyshop.cz > > I look forward to you. > > Best regards > Lubos Vinar > lubos@vinar.cz > http://www.hobbyshop.cz > > > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:30:37 -0500 (EST) From: tbittners@sprintmail.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: New SRAM Message-ID: <20020118163037.72D3E46833@eclipse.qis.net> Since it appears the SRAM has "cleaned up their act", I thought I would pass on what the new VAMP site has listed for 1/144th models. A resin Zeppelin Staaken R.VI!! Most awesome. Matt Bittner ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:34:46 -0500 From: "ot811" To: Subject: Re: Don't you hate it when..... Message-ID: <00a801c1a03e$0c9d5aa0$0800010a@cyberelan.com> Mark, Lee, John, et al, Thanks for the help. To close the story, I managed to completely clean the countertop and salvage most of the nozzle parts without setting the house on fire. I pried out the parts with my fingers and shook them real good in a glass bottle full of lacquer thinner. The countertop I scrubbed with a paper towel soaked in the same. All the while holding my breath. Thanks SSH ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 18:09:35 +0100 From: "Hans Trauner" To: Subject: Re: The Revell 1/48 D VII Message-ID: <007401c1a042$e801c3c0$03aa72d4@FRITZweb> Monogram D.VII wingsspan is........ 193mm !!! Yipeeh! H. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Volker Haeusler" To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:33 PM Subject: [WWI] Re: The Revell 1/48 D VII > Sounds like a "near definitve" proof for me - anybody got the old Monogram D > VII wingspan and length? > > > on Kenīs measurement: > > "<< the wingspan and length are shown as 185 and 145 mm respectivly >> > > The length of the DML D VII checks out @ 145mm > and wing @ 185mm, if you include ailerons, 173 if you do not. > > z'at help? > > Ken" > > Volker > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:16:28 -0600 From: "Graham Hunter" To: Subject: RE: Fokker DRI - 1/48 Message-ID: <000101c1a043$de142640$770101c0@ghunter> I believe this are still readily available in North America. My local plastic pusher has the Jacob's Dr.I available for only $22 CAN. Also Sopwith Hobbies list it on their catalogue. Graham ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 12:18:37 EST From: KnnthS@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: The Revell 1/48 D VII Message-ID: <3d.17cffd20.2979b2ed@aol.com> Hans & Volker: << Monogram D.VII wingspan is........ 193mm !!! Yipeeh! >> So which is 48 and which is Revell doing? Pardon me being thick, but is this good or bad? somebody connect the dots for dis chile. -Dummy ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 12:21:54 EST From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Tidying up was RE: RE: New addition Message-ID: <110.bd8df13.2979b3b2@aol.com> In a message dated 1/18/02 3:09:54 AM Pacific Standard Time, Neil.Crawford@volvo.com writes: << How often do people tidy up their modelling area? If at all! I usually do it when I've finished a major step in a project, like sanding, or painting, or decalling. Most of the time it's middling pigish, I've seen worse. /Neil C. >> Tidying up? RK ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 12:21:53 EST From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: Lozenge color help please (long) Message-ID: <62.197f2614.2979b3b1@aol.com> In a message dated 1/18/02 6:13:56 AM Pacific Standard Time, albatros1212@altavista.com writes: << I have accepted the fact that I will not be able to determine which colors are "right" but at least i can present a LOT of different options ;-) also occurs to me that I might be able to get some proffesional help at work. imaging, cameras and sensors are what we do. although - I might need a diferent sort of "proffesional help" if I don't just let this go.:-) thanks Mark >> My advice is get some colors in an overall range, then move on, lest you find yourself at age 92, alone, muttering to yourself, and dithering away at finding the "exact" colors! RK ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:31:34 -0600 From: "Mark Shannon" To: Subject: Re: Revell Fokker D.VII release Message-ID: KnnthS, What is going on is that everyone is taking the evidence at hand. 1. The website indicates a higher skill level for the D.VII than for the Se5a - suggests source of D.VII is the DML kit and not the previous Monogram/Aurora kit. 2. The website gives stated dimensions that fit the DML D.VII kit, but do not agree with the dimensions for the Monogram kit. Ergo, There is joy at the very strong hope that the longed for re-release of the DML Fokker D.VII is at hand. .Mark. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 17:37:24 +0000 From: "Brent Theobald" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Voice of Reason - Magic Flight 2002 Message-ID: Howdy Gang! >Magic flight would perhaps need a more powerful compressor? I have this vision of you blowing the tethered model all over the place. Won't it bob around? I think we are getting too clever by far with the introduction of compresors and magnets. One or the other. Not both... Later! Brent (Who makes a living over-engineering things.) _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:46:21 -0600 From: "Graham Hunter" To: Subject: Re: The Revell 1/48 D VII Message-ID: <000201c1a048$0b0bd9a0$770101c0@ghunter> Great News!! Now Doc Tom can't hold his extra DML D.VII's as ransom any more. Now if Eduard would only re-release their Hannover C.IIIa and Albatros C.III Graham ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:47:31 -0800 From: "Bob Pearson" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Tidying up was RE: RE: New addition Message-ID: <101137615301@smtp.vphos.net> Heehee .. for those who haven't seen it, RK's model room is/was currently under a layer of airbrush dust thick enough to be considered part of Pompeii. . truly a wonder to behold seeing various models and tools in their protective cocoons awaiting discovery by future generations. Bob ---------- >From: KarrArt@aol.com > << How often do people tidy up their modelling area? If at all! > I usually do it when I've finished a major step in a project, > like sanding, or painting, or decalling. Most of the time > it's middling pigish, I've seen worse. > /Neil C. >> > > Tidying up? > RK ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 19:27:56 +0100 From: "Hans Trauner" To: Subject: Re: Revell Fokker D.VII release Message-ID: <001101c1a04d$d9e6ebc0$f2a172d4@FRITZweb> Yeah. Good evidence to expect the Dragon/DML kit. I asked Revell, but did not get any answer yet. Toy Fair is beginning on Jan 31th and if I found time and access ( not sooo easy) I'll go and take a closer look. H. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Shannon" To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 6:32 PM Subject: [WWI] Re: Revell Fokker D.VII release > KnnthS, > > What is going on is that everyone is taking the evidence at hand. > > 1. The website indicates a higher skill level for the D.VII than for the Se5a - suggests source of D.VII is the DML kit and not the previous Monogram/Aurora kit. > > 2. The website gives stated dimensions that fit the DML D.VII kit, but do not agree with the dimensions for the Monogram kit. > > Ergo, There is joy at the very strong hope that the longed for re-release of the DML Fokker D.VII is at hand. > > .Mark. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 13:41:35 EST From: KnnthS@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Revell Fokker D.VII release Message-ID: <96.2093bdd4.2979c65f@aol.com> Mark, Volker & Hans: << Ergo, There is joy >> thot as much but wanted exactly this consideration of each. sometimes I understand things too quickly and this gave me pause... many thanks! Ken ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 13:42:44 EST From: KnnthS@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: The Revell 1/48 D VII Message-ID: <150.76bf7f1.2979c6a4@aol.com> In a message dated 18/1/02 9:46:05 am, mbpw0220@mts.net writes: << Hannover C.IIIa and Albatros C.III >> heard that ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 13:44:20 EST From: KnnthS@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Tidying up was RE: RE: New addition Message-ID: <115.b145ecb.2979c704@aol.com> Bob writes: << Tidying up? >> my kinda guy, all round. = D Ken ------------------------------ End of WWI Digest 4085 **********************