WWI Digest 3954 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) OT aircraft in the Austrailan War Memorial by =?iso-8859-1?Q?Volker_H=E4usler?= 2) ... and the Butler Bristol M 1 by =?iso-8859-1?Q?Volker_H=E4usler?= 3) Re: OT aircraft in the Austrailan War Memorial by "Ross Moorhouse" 4) Re: Hazards of Modelling by Bob Pearson 5) Re: Hazards of Modelling by "quango" 6) Re: Hazards of Modelling by "John & Allison Cyganowski" 7) Re: Hazards of Modelling by KnnthS@aol.com 8) Question on Gotha Upper Wing by "diaphus" 9) Re: Uniforms, was:1/72 Figure by "ibs4421" 10) Re: Question on Gotha Upper Wing by KarrArt@aol.com 11) Re: Question on Gotha Upper Wing by "diaphus" 12) Fonck Spad 12 by Crawford Neil 13) re: eBay alert by "Grzegorz Mazurowski" 14) Re: Fonck Spad 12 by "Diego Fernetti" 15) Re: Fonck Spad 12 by "Matt Bittner" 16) Polish Book (was Re: re: eBay alert) by "Matt Bittner" 17) Re: Fonck Spad 12 by Crawford Neil 18) Re: Fonck Spad 12 by "Diego Fernetti" 19) Jacobs dilemma by "Matt Bittner" 20) RE: Jacobs dilemma by Crawford Neil 21) RE: Jacobs dilemma by "Matt Bittner" 22) Polish Book (was Re: re: eBay alert) by "Grzegorz Mazurowski" 23) re: Jacobs dilemma by "Grzegorz Mazurowski" 24) RE: the strange ways of Tony Fokker by "Grzegorz Mazurowski" 25) RE: Jacobs dilemma by Shane Weier 26) Re: Jacobs dilemma by "Tom Plesha" 27) RE: Gotcha! OAW Fokkers/Udet by "Grzegorz Mazurowski" 28) RE: Jacobs dilemma by "Tom Plesha" 29) Waldhausen's D.V/ was Fonck Spad 12 by "Michael Kendix" 30) RE: Waldhausen's D.V/ was Fonck Spad 12 by Shane Weier 31) RE: Waldhausen's D.V/ was Fonck Spad 12 by "Michael Kendix" 32) Discovery: new WWI Fighter by "Grzegorz Mazurowski" 33) RE: Discovery: new WWI Fighter by Crawford Neil 34) RE: Discovery: new WWI Fighter by Crawford Neil 35) RE: Discovery: new WWI Fighter by Volker Haeusler ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 09:43:30 +0800 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Volker_H=E4usler?= To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: OT aircraft in the Austrailan War Memorial Message-ID: <004001c17ec0$931a9ce0$236e160a@CSP00> A question (maily) to our Aussie listees: I'm leaving on Monday for a trip to Oz, and this time (compared to my January trip - Shane will remember that) I'll have some more time and will also make it to Canberra and the AWM. Now I have 2 questions: 1. Are the OT aircraft on display this time. It seemed they were not accessible in January. 2. Does anybody know an address to contact in order to possibly get permission to access the aircraft nonetheless? 3. Especially: What's the status and condition of the Pfalz D XII at this moment? TIA Volker ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 09:45:52 +0800 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Volker_H=E4usler?= To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: ... and the Butler Bristol M 1 Message-ID: <004401c17ec0$e7810ee0$236e160a@CSP00> Well, further on the trip through Southern Australia, Adelaide (or should I say: the Barossa?) is also on the list. IIRC, the Butler M 1C is somewhere on display over there. IS this so, and *where* actually is that? TIA Volker ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 12:20:40 +1100 From: "Ross Moorhouse" To: Subject: Re: OT aircraft in the Austrailan War Memorial Message-ID: <004701c17ebd$63b96e20$aa0ececb@umber> Try this link mate... http://www.awm.gov.au/contact/index.htm cheers Ross ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 17:31:32 -0800 From: Bob Pearson To: Subject: Re: Hazards of Modelling Message-ID: > Peter says: >> I once built a Merlin kit > > Bloody hell. I can't top THAT..... > > Shane I can. . I've built THREE Merlin kits ... DH5, Ni.11 and the Canuck. Drat .. I just noticed Dennis did 5/6 Merlins .. but that's okay .. he isn't human anyway .. so my three win. Bob ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 20:48:56 -0600 From: "quango" To: Subject: Re: Hazards of Modelling Message-ID: <006c01c17ec9$b74715e0$1c4e1c18@austin.rr.com> Maybe it's an odd thing to brag about, but I've done four . . .DH5, Roland D II, Pfalz Dr I, Fokker D VIII. And I've spent a lot of time brooding over the Gunbus. You know, if you replace the wings and scratch build the nacelle, it had some promise. Fortunately the latest Pegasus will prevent that experiment. Tom > > Peter says: > > >> I once built a Merlin kit > > > > Bloody hell. I can't top THAT..... > > > > Shane > > > I can. . I've built THREE Merlin kits ... DH5, Ni.11 and the Canuck. > > Drat .. I just noticed Dennis did 5/6 Merlins .. but that's okay .. he isn't > human anyway .. so my three win. > > Bob > ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 22:23:23 -0500 From: "John & Allison Cyganowski" To: Subject: Re: Hazards of Modelling Message-ID: <000401c17ece$87a8bd70$7138183f@cyrixp166> Yeah, but that counts for only 2 in the correct scale. Cyg. > > Drat .. I just noticed Dennis did 5/6 Merlins .. but that's okay .. he > isn't > > human anyway .. so my three win. > > > > Bob > > > > > ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 22:36:09 EST From: KnnthS@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Hazards of Modelling Message-ID: In a message dated 6/12/01 7:24:08 pm, janah@worldnet.att.net writes: << > Drat >> guys, I think Shane was playin' golf...and, that basis, think he won..... ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 22:45:13 -0500 From: "diaphus" To: Subject: Question on Gotha Upper Wing Message-ID: <003b01c17ed1$9412a8c0$1b652241@tampabay.rr.com> All, I am working on the beautiful CSM Gotha G III and have a question about the upper wing center point connection. Eric's detail plans show a gap between the wing with the attachment points being two spars, and he confirms that this is his interpretation from drawings and photos. For some reason (probably reinforced by the old Aurora Gotha model), I always pictured the upper wing as solid all the way across. Eric suggested I throw the question to the list and see what responses surface. So, any definitive answer to solid or gap? TIA Jack Gartner diaphus@tampabay.rr.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 21:58:47 -0600 From: "ibs4421" To: Subject: Re: Uniforms, was:1/72 Figure Message-ID: <00d201c17ed3$79d22920$963dfad1@ibs4421> Folks, Would someone please direct me to the source stating that Imp. German Air Service mechanics wore, or were issued a special set of black coveralls like those issued to WWII Luft. mechanics/ground crew? I have not seen or run across this. To the best of my very limited knowledge, there were no specialized/standardized air crew uniforms as such. Since pilots wore the uniform of their prior unit affiliation, I always assumed that enlisted ground personnel wore the standard M1910 uniform tunic early in the war, along with the so-called transitional model. When the M1915 tunics began to be issued army-wide, I assume that ground crew were issued those as well. Every German soldier of this time period was issued a set of "fatigues" consisting of a simple tunic and trousers made of either unbleached cotton or linen, I forget which. These were to be used for dirty details such as mucking horse stalls, etc. in order to preserve his nice, wool, feldgrau uniform. No doubt, the average a/c mechanic, rigger, etc. found these fatigues of great use and value. Incidentally, later in the war, corduroy trousers were somewhat popular. IIRC, various shades of brown and blue, along with black were common on these. Issue shirts, to the best of my knowledge were white, but again, civilian shirts from home were not uncommon. As to the color of the band on the feldmutze and associated cockades, I used to have all of that information around here somewhere when i was putting an impression together for living history, etc., but it has since been buried, or lost. When you hang around a bunch of militaria collectors and living history types for a few years you pick up all kinds of weird historical trivia. Warren ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 23:17:44 EST From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Question on Gotha Upper Wing Message-ID: <17.1fc736a2.29419ce8@aol.com> In a message dated 12/6/01 7:42:53 PM Pacific Standard Time, diaphus@tampabay.rr.com writes: << So, any definitive answer to solid or gap? TIA Jack Gartner diaphus@tampabay.rr.com >> wing in halves with resultant slight gap. Heck, I can never remember the address to my own $#$%$% site, just do a search on "Robert Karr" or "karrart", find where I'm at, scroll around, and you'll see my 1/32 scratchbuilt model. It may be a model, but it's got alot of research in it (not just the datafile special) RK ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 23:47:29 -0500 From: "diaphus" To: Subject: Re: Question on Gotha Upper Wing Message-ID: <005c01c17eda$46a9fbc0$1b652241@tampabay.rr.com> RK, Thanks, the gap it is then, and WOW, by the way. Spectacular job! Jack Gartner diaphus@tampabay.rr.com ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:18 PM Subject: [WWI] Re: Question on Gotha Upper Wing > In a message dated 12/6/01 7:42:53 PM Pacific Standard Time, > diaphus@tampabay.rr.com writes: > > << So, any definitive answer to solid or gap? > > TIA > > Jack Gartner > diaphus@tampabay.rr.com > >> > > wing in halves with resultant slight gap. > Heck, I can never remember the address to my own $#$%$% site, just do a > search on "Robert Karr" or "karrart", find where I'm at, scroll around, and > you'll see my 1/32 scratchbuilt model. It may be a model, but it's got alot > of research in it (not just the datafile special) > > RK > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:56:20 +0100 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: Fonck Spad 12 Message-ID: I was looking at the pics of Foncks Spad 12 no.445 in the Squadron Signal leaflet this morning, and the thought struck me that the engine cowlings look like they are natural metal! That would be really cool, I've never heard of a polished aluminium nosed Spad, but if anyone would have one it would be Fonck. Opinions? /Neil C. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 12:12:26 +0100 From: "Grzegorz Mazurowski" To: Subject: re: eBay alert Message-ID: <006401c17f10$0e113ea0$0200a8c0@x.pl> > In addition to what Grzes noted, the book includes 16 full pages of color > profiles and many more pages of line drawings--all the color is Polish > planes, but the line drawings include all appropriate countries. Tiny correction - that's true that great majority of full-colour profiles are Polish, but there are 6 Albatrosen in original AH painting from Flik 3/j and 61/j (flown by Poles), one Italian Ansaldo, 2 Czech and 3 US SPADs in full colour too. And maaaaanyyyyy line drawings showing painting of planes from "all appropriate countries", as Karen wrote, including such exotic schemes like Russian SPAD, civil post-war D.III or Sweedish D.VII. Grzes -- Tego nie znajdziesz w zadnym sklepie! [ http://oferty.onet.pl ] ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 11:28:17 +0000 From: "Diego Fernetti" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Fonck Spad 12 Message-ID: Neil wrote: >I've never heard of a polished aluminium nosed Spad, >but if anyone would have one it would be Fonck. >Opinions? No foncking way! ;-) D. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 05:29:46 -0800 From: "Matt Bittner" To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" Subject: Re: Fonck Spad 12 Message-ID: On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 03:58:14 -0500 (EST), Crawford Neil wrote: > I was looking at the pics of Foncks Spad 12 no.445 > in the Squadron Signal leaflet this morning, and the > thought struck me that the engine cowlings look like > they are natural metal! That would be really cool, > I've never heard of a polished aluminium nosed Spad, > but if anyone would have one it would be Fonck. > Opinions? Why not? If not polished, then maybe the paint came off due to the hot gases, and just general wear and tear? Just a thought. Matt Bittner ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 05:30:52 -0800 From: "Matt Bittner" To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" Subject: Polish Book (was Re: re: eBay alert) Message-ID: Okay, everyone has me intrigued now. If not bidding on ebay, does anybody know where to purchase this Polish book? Matt Bittner ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 12:38:46 +0100 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: Re: Fonck Spad 12 Message-ID: It looks well kept, and shiny, so I was thinking it was polished. No I can't see why not either, after all the cowlings were made of aluminium. And after the war, when Fonck was in upper management many french a/c had polished metal cowlings, it was the vogue, someone had to be first, Fonck was a natty dresser, so I guess he needed polished cowlings too, even more than I do! /Neil C. Ps. and thanks for the foncking crack D, but now just be serious and tell me the answer;-) > Why not? If not polished, then maybe the paint came off due > to the hot > gases, and just general wear and tear? Just a thought. > > > Matt Bittner > > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 11:48:47 +0000 From: "Diego Fernetti" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Fonck Spad 12 Message-ID: Neil! >It looks well kept, and shiny, so I was thinking it was polished. >No I can't see why not either, after all the cowlings were made >of aluminium. I agree with you. And as some aircraft were done "tailored" for the aces, it can be possible that he would have asked a custom scheme. D. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 05:51:00 -0800 From: "Matt Bittner" To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" Subject: Jacobs dilemma Message-ID: As most know, I'm building one of the three Fokker Triplanes I'm working on into Jacobs' "backup" Triplane with the white crosses. Unfortunately little is known about this machine. While none of the text says for sure, I'm going to add a Clerget engine to it just to be different, and am having difficult deciding on a prop. Should I use a "standard" prop that comes with whatever was behind the Clerget? Or should I go German? I recall a photo of Jacobs (can't remember where I saw it now) that has him standing next to the nose of his Dr.I and the prop is definitely *not* German. I would like to keep it with the non-standard prop, but am not 100% sure. Plus, if I do go with a non-German prop, what company makes a prop that I need in 1/72nd? I can tell everyone one thing - after I finish these Triplanes I doubt I'll build another for quite a long time! ;-) Matt Bittner ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 12:55:40 +0100 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: Jacobs dilemma Message-ID: Yeah, I sympathise, it must be terrible;-) /Neil C. > > I can tell everyone one thing - after I finish these Triplanes I doubt > I'll build another for quite a long time! ;-) > > > Matt Bittner > > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 06:00:56 -0800 From: "Matt Bittner" To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" Subject: RE: Jacobs dilemma Message-ID: On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 06:58:04 -0500 (EST), Crawford Neil wrote: > Yeah, I sympathise, it must be terrible;-) Definitely! I keep thinking of SPADs and MoS'... :-) Matt Bittner ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 13:44:19 +0100 From: "Grzegorz Mazurowski" To: Subject: Polish Book (was Re: re: eBay alert) Message-ID: <00da01c17f1c$e40f3be0$0200a8c0@x.pl> Matt! See this: http://www.aviationusk.com/books/bksalen.html -- Tego nie znajdziesz w zadnym sklepie! [ http://oferty.onet.pl ] ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 13:53:07 +0100 From: "Grzegorz Mazurowski" To: Subject: re: Jacobs dilemma Message-ID: <00f401c17f1e$21afcb80$0200a8c0@x.pl> Matt! http://204.83.160.230/archive/a/images/Jacobs470_17.jpg but watch upper wing crosses - very thin outline, so what plane it really is? For sure not this: http://204.83.160.230/archive/w/images/Dr1_45017_jacobs4.jpg Grzegorz -- Tego nie znajdziesz w zadnym sklepie! [ http://oferty.onet.pl ] ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 13:56:10 +0100 From: "Grzegorz Mazurowski" To: Subject: RE: the strange ways of Tony Fokker Message-ID: <00fa01c17f1e$8bb92e40$0200a8c0@x.pl> Gaston! And this one you know? http://204.83.160.230/archive/images3/fokkerE4.jpg http://204.83.160.230/archive/a/images/Fok_Eiv_cockpit.jpg Grzes -- Tego nie znajdziesz w zadnym sklepie! [ http://oferty.onet.pl ] ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 23:01:15 +1000 From: Shane Weier To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: Jacobs dilemma Message-ID: <7186131CB805D411A60E0090272F7C7102BCD899@MIMHEXCH1> Matt asks, > I'm going to add a Clerget engine to it just to be > different, and am having difficult deciding on a prop. Should I use a > "standard" prop that comes with whatever was behind the Clerget? Or > should I go German? I suspect that yopu'll find two things. 1. Props have to be matched to engines to get proper performance, so an appropriate British prop is maybe best ..and if that don't work for you.... 2. Different size and spacing of mounting holes. Be a beggar trying to get a German prop on if there are less/more holes or they're centred closer/further from the crankshaft centreline Shane ********************************************************************** The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you receive this e-mail in error, any use, distribution or copying of this e-mail is not permitted. You are requested to forward unwanted e-mail and address any problems to the MIM Holdings Limited Support Centre. e-mail: supportcentre@mim.com.au phone: Australia 1800500646 International ++61 7 38338042 ********************************************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 08:05:14 -0500 From: "Tom Plesha" To: Subject: Re: Jacobs dilemma Message-ID: <002d01c17f1f$cfe6aec0$2cfdfa18@mcmb1.mi.home.com> British Prop! Later Tom ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Bittner" To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 6:53 AM Subject: [WWI] Jacobs dilemma > As most know, I'm building one of the three Fokker Triplanes I'm > working on into Jacobs' "backup" Triplane with the white crosses. > Unfortunately little is known about this machine. While none of the > text says for sure, I'm going to add a Clerget engine to it just to be > different, and am having difficult deciding on a prop. Should I use a > "standard" prop that comes with whatever was behind the Clerget? Or > should I go German? I recall a photo of Jacobs (can't remember where I > saw it now) that has him standing next to the nose of his Dr.I and the > prop is definitely *not* German. I would like to keep it with the > non-standard prop, but am not 100% sure. Plus, if I do go with a > non-German prop, what company makes a prop that I need in 1/72nd? > > I can tell everyone one thing - after I finish these Triplanes I doubt > I'll build another for quite a long time! ;-) > > > Matt Bittner > > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 14:11:59 +0100 From: "Grzegorz Mazurowski" To: Subject: RE: Gotcha! OAW Fokkers/Udet Message-ID: <012601c17f20$c45a0740$0200a8c0@x.pl> Marcio!!! See this: http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1674709753 or ask someone on list, who has that Windsock! And let me know, what turned out! Grzegorz -- Tego nie znajdziesz w zadnym sklepie! [ http://oferty.onet.pl ] ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 08:13:58 -0500 From: "Tom Plesha" To: Subject: RE: Jacobs dilemma Message-ID: <000501c17f21$07dc2200$2cfdfa18@mcmb1.mi.home.com> Hi Matt- Forgot a couple of things in my response, Based on photo I would say a Camel Prop and you can get one thru CSM carved by Digmeyer. Later Tom ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 13:14:00 From: "Michael Kendix" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Waldhausen's D.V/ was Fonck Spad 12 Message-ID: Matt Bittner writes: >Why not? If not polished, then maybe the paint came off due to the hot >gases, and just general wear and tear? Just a thought. I made the mistkae of simply looking at the profile in the Albatros Aces book of Waldhausen, and thinking the engine cowl looked metal/silver. I gather from the explanation in the book that it was grey - light grey presumably - any views as to whether the engine cowl should be grey (I have to re-spray) or aluminium (I don't). Michael _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 23:22:41 +1000 From: Shane Weier To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: Waldhausen's D.V/ was Fonck Spad 12 Message-ID: <7186131CB805D411A60E0090272F7C7102BCD89A@MIMHEXCH1> Michael, > I made the mistkae of simply looking at the profile in the > Albatros Aces > book of Waldhausen, and thinking the engine cowl looked > metal/silver. I > gather from the explanation in the book that it was grey - light grey > presumably - any views as to whether the engine cowl should > be grey (I have > to re-spray) or aluminium (I don't). IMO? Get the airbrush.... Shane > ********************************************************************** The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you receive this e-mail in error, any use, distribution or copying of this e-mail is not permitted. You are requested to forward unwanted e-mail and address any problems to the MIM Holdings Limited Support Centre. e-mail: supportcentre@mim.com.au phone: Australia 1800500646 International ++61 7 38338042 ********************************************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 13:33:17 From: "Michael Kendix" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: Waldhausen's D.V/ was Fonck Spad 12 Message-ID: >From: Shane Weier >Get the airbrush.... Shane: OK, I have to do some airbrushing anyhow. What about the various panel access thingies of various eliptical and trapezoidal shape, on the fuselage fore of the cockpit? Michael _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 14:58:08 +0100 From: "Grzegorz Mazurowski" To: "wwi lista" Subject: Discovery: new WWI Fighter Message-ID: <014201c17f27$3673dee0$0200a8c0@x.pl> This one you know? http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1672530532 G. -- Tego nie znajdziesz w zadnym sklepie! [ http://oferty.onet.pl ] ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 15:03:36 +0100 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: Discovery: new WWI Fighter Message-ID: Thats, the DH8-3 ,thus DH5 ;-) /Neil C. > -----Original Message----- > From: Grzegorz Mazurowski [mailto:Grzegorz_Mazurowski@poczta.onet.pl] > Sent: den 7 december 2001 15:01 > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: [WWI] Discovery: new WWI Fighter > > > This one you know? > http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1672530532 > G. > > > > -- > > Tego nie znajdziesz w zadnym sklepie! > [ http://oferty.onet.pl ] > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 15:08:48 +0100 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: Discovery: new WWI Fighter Message-ID: Have to correct myself here, it's a DH8-2 so a DH6, so it was wrongly marked as a fighter, it's a trainer /Neil C. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:48:58 +0800 From: Volker Haeusler To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: Discovery: new WWI Fighter Message-ID: -----Original Message----- From: wwi@wwi-models.org [mailto:wwi@wwi-models.org]On Behalf Of Crawford Neil Sent: 07 December 2001 22:10 To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: [WWI] RE: Discovery: new WWI Fighter Have to correct myself here, it's a DH8-2 so a DH6, so it was wrongly marked as a fighter, it's a trainer /Neil C. ------------------------------ End of WWI Digest 3954 **********************