WWI Digest 3860 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) 中国最大最全的企业黄页网站开通 by lee@tom.com 2) Re: New Roden Fokker D.VII's by "Brent Theobald" 3) Harleyford Marine Acft of the 1914-1918 War by "Ken Acosta" 4) Re : New Roden Fokker DVII's by "cameron rile" 5) RE: Sopwith for a newbie by mflake@tarrantcounty.com (Flake, Marc) 6) Re: New Windsock? by "Lance Krieg" 7) Re: New Windsock? by "Brian Nicklas" 8) RE: Australian army badge by "Diego Fernetti" 9) Re: Roden Fokker D.VII by "Kenneth Hagerup" 10) RE: More Newbie Questions by "John J. Ernst" 11) Re : New Roden Fokker DVII's by john@huggins-leahey.com (John Huggins) 12) Dawn Patrol - The Movie by "Graham Hunter" 13) RE: Re : New Roden Fokker DVII's by "Diego Fernetti" 14) Re: Re : New Roden Fokker DVII's by Jan Vihonen 15) Re: Re : New Roden Fokker DVII's by "Diego Fernetti" 16) Lower Wing attachment ... was New Roden Fokker DVII's by "Lance Krieg" 17) Frog and aurora kits by Sanjeev Hirve 18) Re: Lower Wing attachment ... was New Roden Fokker DVII's by "Brent Theobald" 19) RE: australian army badge by Shane Weier 20) RE: New Pegasus kits and a request by Shane Weier 21) hi by popvr@21cn.com 22) Re: New Windsock? by "David R. Crowell" 23) RE: More Newbie Questions by "Lee M." 24) RE: More Newbie Questions by "Lee M." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 23:31:50 From: lee@tom.com To: wwible@joymail.com Subject: 中国最大最全的企业黄页网站开通 Message-ID: <200111021534.XAA15032@scosysv.minmetals.com.cn> KTY58.com
   


2001-2005 KTY58.COM Corp.
Designed by inCartoon



------------------------------ Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 15:41:27 +0000 From: "Brent Theobald" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: New Roden Fokker D.VII's Message-ID: Howdy, Yup, I noticed that too. I broke the same engine parts twice getting them off the sprue. Good luck! Brent >From: "Steven Perry" >Reply-To: wwi@wwi-models.org >To: Multiple recipients of list >Subject: [WWI] Re: New Roden Fokker D.VII's >Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 10:01:19 -0500 (EST) > >I'm working on a dual build of Roden D.VIIs, One early, kit #025, and one >late, kit 031. The early will be Willie Gabriel's (I'm working with Stef to >match his interpertations of the colors from B&W photos.) and the late one >will be in the Soviet markings that come in the kit. Both have PART detail >sets appropriate to the kit. (Different radiator screens and engine >panels.) > >The PART set is a brass bender's delight. The big parts are fiddly, the >little ones..... > >What I noticed about the kits outside the oft mentioned mold flaws and >somewhat rough edges to some parts was the quality of the plastic. I found >the finely molded detail parts very succeptable to breaking. I'm deft >enough >to enjoy lots of brass parts and work well with them, but even with the >utmost care, the same parts broke on both kits. The plastic isn't hard and >brittle like the old Revell 1/72 kits. The plastic seems slightly soft on >the larger parts, but the litttle ons are very fragile. > >Anyone else noticed this. >sp > _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 10:03:00 -0600 From: "Ken Acosta" To: Subject: Harleyford Marine Acft of the 1914-1918 War Message-ID: This is a MIME message. If you are reading this text, you may want to consider changing to a mail reader or gateway that understands how to properly handle MIME multipart messages. --=_AEF47ADC.13723230 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hey- Just surfing on AddAll Used Books and found this: http://dogbert.abebooks.com/abe/BookDetails?bi=3D81808278 At 94 bucks, I'm not interested, but I recall some of you talking last = week about how rare it is so I thought I'd pass it along. KA (jumping out of the way of the stampede) --=_AEF47ADC.13723230 Content-Type: TEXT/HTML Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="TEXT.htm" PCFET0NUWVBFIEhUTUwgUFVCTElDICItLy9XM0MvL0RURCBIVE1MIDQuMCBUcmFuc2l0aW9uYWwv L0VOIj4NCjxIVE1MPjxIRUFEPg0KPE1FVEEgY29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PWlz by04ODU5LTEiIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9Q29udGVudC1UeXBlPg0KPE1FVEEgY29udGVudD0iTVNIVE1M IDUuMDAuMzMxNS4yODcwIiBuYW1lPUdFTkVSQVRPUj48L0hFQUQ+DQo8Qk9EWSBzdHlsZT0iRk9O VDogOHB0IFRhaG9tYTsgTUFSR0lOLUxFRlQ6IDJweDsgTUFSR0lOLVRPUDogMnB4Ij4NCjxESVY+ PEZPTlQgc2l6ZT0xPkhleS08L0ZPTlQ+PC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPjxGT05UIHNpemU9MT5KdXN0IHN1 cmZpbmcgb24gQWRkQWxsIFVzZWQgQm9va3MgYW5kIGZvdW5kIHRoaXM6PC9GT05UPjwvRElWPg0K PERJVj4mbmJzcDs8L0RJVj4NCjxESVY+PEZPTlQgc2l6ZT0xPjxBIA0KaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL2Rv Z2JlcnQuYWJlYm9va3MuY29tL2FiZS9Cb29rRGV0YWlscz9iaT04MTgwODI3OCI+aHR0cDovL2Rv Z2JlcnQuYWJlYm9va3MuY29tL2FiZS9Cb29rRGV0YWlscz9iaT04MTgwODI3ODwvQT48L0ZPTlQ+ PC9ESVY+DQo8RElWPiZuYnNwOzwvRElWPg0KPERJVj48Rk9OVCBzaXplPTE+QXQgOTQgYnVja3Ms IEknbSBub3QgaW50ZXJlc3RlZCwgYnV0IEkgcmVjYWxsIHNvbWUgb2YgeW91IA0KdGFsa2luZyBs YXN0IHdlZWsgYWJvdXQgaG93IHJhcmUgaXQgaXMgc28gSSB0aG91Z2h0IEknZCBwYXNzIGl0IA0K YWxvbmcuPC9GT05UPjwvRElWPg0KPERJVj48Rk9OVCBzaXplPTE+PC9GT05UPiZuYnNwOzwvRElW Pg0KPERJVj48Rk9OVCBzaXplPTE+S0EgKDwvRk9OVD48Rk9OVCBzaXplPTE+anVtcGluZyBvdXQg b2YgdGhlIHdheSBvZiB0aGUgDQpzdGFtcGVkZSk8L0ZPTlQ+PC9ESVY+PC9CT0RZPjwvSFRNTD4N Cg== --=_AEF47ADC.13723230-- ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 11:17:39 -0500 From: "cameron rile" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re : New Roden Fokker DVII's Message-ID: <871134EE489077A4FA8833A3BB314EB4@cameron.prontomail.com> Marcio, >I've just recieved both new Fokker D.VII's >from Roden A good write up. I might have to buy the earlier one too soon. I am doing the late version as the Dutch machine. One thing I noticed is, the parts are very small and detailed and should be snipped or clipped from the sprue. I generally drag a sharop X-acto knife across the parts where the meet the sprue, but because of a mixture of thinness, fine detail and brittler plastic at those diameters, I broke several items sush as the machine gun, strut and an engine part. est to either cut the smaller parts far back from the snip or snip them. The parts i broke all glued back together perfectly, so no worries there. I am enjoying this kit. It makes the Esci DVII look like a bag full of spanners. cam ______________________________________________________________ Get Your Free E-mail at http://www.prontomail.com ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 10:32:12 -0600 From: mflake@tarrantcounty.com (Flake, Marc) To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: Sopwith for a newbie Message-ID: <5F4636CE02C4D511B0D600065B04EA091FD417@ITCREX002> My vote is for the Airfix Sopwith Pup, too. The TOKO/Eastern Express 1 1/2 strutters have cabane strut problems that may frustrate a newbie. If you want to build one of these Strutters, you will have to cut away the outer struts, glue in the inverted "V" then get the appropriate Evergreen rod size to replace the outer struts. Marc Flake ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 10:37:31 -0600 From: "Lance Krieg" To: Subject: Re: New Windsock? Message-ID: Matt observes: "But who cares anyway? ;-)" Matt, Matt, Matt... Has living in Nebraska during football season done this to you? Anyway, next year's Central Powers Datafiles are, in addition to the Albatros B.II, the Zeppelin Stakken, and the Fokker E.I-II. I suppose the 1/48 Stakken plans will take up most of the book! Lance ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 11:52:55 -0500 From: "Brian Nicklas" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: New Windsock? Message-ID: I suppose the 1/48 Stakken plans will take up most of the book! Lance ********************************* Nah, they left them out, nobody really builds in that scale anyway! (now doing my John Cleese impression - sprinting across the restaurant and diving behind the potted palm for cover...) Brian ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 15:31:50 -0300 From: "Diego Fernetti" To: Subject: RE: Australian army badge Message-ID: <004801c163cc$a6c6a900$4640a8c0@ssp.salud.rosario.gov.ar> Thanks a lot, Keith! Very interesting militaria website, I would have liked to have seen this before. I would have bought myself a white topee helmet instead of the hat! :-) The rising sun badge has a very interesting story as well. Best regards D. ----- Original Message ----- From: Karen & Keith Fainges To: Multiple recipients of list Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:30 AM Subject: [WWI] RE: Australian army badge > Diego > > It is called the Rising sun badge (Not bad for an ex Naval Type > :) ) > > Try the Australian War Memorial for a start > http://www.awm.gov.au/encyclopedia/slouch_hat.htm > > or here > http://www.anzacday.org.au/education/tff/risingsun.html > > This place sells them > http://www.lawranceordnance.com/hat.html > > But will look here first instead of USD 20-00 > > Keith Fainges > > > -----Original Message----- > From: wwi@wwi-models.org [mailto:wwi@wwi-models.org]On Behalf Of > Diego > Fernetti > Sent: Friday, 2 November 2001 9:36 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: [WWI] australian army badge > > > Hey australian contingent (and why not kiwies!) > Some days ago I bought myself a neat slouch hat for this summer > (my old > sailor cap is reduced to a greasy bleached shred and people > frowns when see > it). I'm interested to add a "conversational piece" to the hat, > in the form > of an australian or New Zealander army badge to pin on its side. > Do you know > where I can get a repro badge or an original one that's not too > expensive? > TIA > D. > No, signing in for a tour with the Australian army is out oif the > question > for the time being. > > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 12:33:06 -0600 From: "Kenneth Hagerup" To: Subject: Re: Roden Fokker D.VII Message-ID: <001001c163cc$d12c3ca0$3bb0fcd1@hppav> sp wrote: > What I noticed about the kits outside the oft mentioned mold flaws and > somewhat rough edges to some parts was the quality of the plastic. I found > the finely molded detail parts very succeptable to breaking. I'm deft enough > to enjoy lots of brass parts and work well with them, but even with the > utmost care, the same parts broke on both kits. The plastic isn't hard and > brittle like the old Revell 1/72 kits. The plastic seems slightly soft on > the larger parts, but the litttle ons are very fragile. > > Anyone else noticed this. > sp I've had much the same problem. I've resorted to sawing the smaller parts with a razor saw instead of using the sprue nippers. Ken ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 14:51:54 -0500 From: "John J. Ernst" To: "WWI Digest" Subject: RE: More Newbie Questions Message-ID: I seem to remember a location on the WWI modeling page or similar, that had an outline of the steps to follow when building a WWI plastic model - great for beginners. It had tips, techniques, tools etc.. I can't remember where it is. Can someone point me in the right direction? Of course, I could be completely imagining this resource - I hope not. Thanks john ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 13:55:09 -0600 From: john@huggins-leahey.com (John Huggins) To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re : New Roden Fokker DVII's Message-ID: >Marcio, > >>I've just recieved both new Fokker D.VII's > >from Roden Thanks for the heads up on the small parts. Have any of you come up with a fix for the lower wing attachment. The distance between the wings is smaller than the width of the fuselage. Also, the opening in the fuselage is narrower than the width if the corresponding part of the lower wing. The latter problem is not going to be that hard to fix, but the distance between the wings will present a bigger challenge. JP ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 14:03:04 -0600 From: "Graham Hunter" To: Subject: Dawn Patrol - The Movie Message-ID: <000501c163d9$62ade0a0$fa0101c0@grahamh> Borrowed the 1938 movie Dawn Patrol with Errol Flynn, Davic Niven and Basil Rathbone from the library last night. Very comical in regards to facts. Starts out saying RFC, France 1915 and goes into an airial fight with the Brits flying biplanes equiped with twin Vickers. Turns out (when they land) that they are Neiuport 28's and I think Tom Morses. Still cool to see these beasties flyng though... I watched it to just past the bombing of the German aerodrome - Home of Von Ritterman (or something like that). This movie looks like a hoot. Graham ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 17:10:13 -0300 From: "Diego Fernetti" To: Subject: RE: Re : New Roden Fokker DVII's Message-ID: <010c01c163da$619416c0$4640a8c0@ssp.salud.rosario.gov.ar> John I'd separate the lower wings at the roots from the central area, replace central part with a styrene scrap under the fuselage and later glue the lower wings separately, including some internal wire reinforcement if necessary. D. ----- Original Message ----- From: John Huggins To: Multiple recipients of list Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:59 PM Subject: [WWI] Re : New Roden Fokker DVII's > >Marcio, > > > >>I've just recieved both new Fokker D.VII's > > >from Roden > Thanks for the heads up on the small parts. Have any of you come up > with a fix for the lower wing attachment. The distance between the > wings is smaller than the width of the fuselage. Also, the opening in > the fuselage is narrower than the width if the corresponding part of > the lower wing. The latter problem is not going to be that hard to > fix, but the distance between the wings will present a bigger > challenge. > JP > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 22:16:34 +0200 From: Jan Vihonen To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Re : New Roden Fokker DVII's Message-ID: <3BE2FF22.DB1624E7@helsinki.fi> While I have been mulling over the thing a friend of mine spend some minutes with a file removing material from the wing (mind you, it's not much you need to remove) and he has now neatly assembled, painted and lozenged fuselage and lower wing in one piece. And no matter how hard I tried to find faults, I couldn't. Originally I was going to do it like Diego said, but now... Back to mulling over the benefits of the two methods. ;-) Jan > Thanks for the heads up on the small parts. Have any of you come up > with a fix for the lower wing attachment. The distance between the > wings is smaller than the width of the fuselage. Also, the opening in > the fuselage is narrower than the width if the corresponding part of > the lower wing. The latter problem is not going to be that hard to > fix, but the distance between the wings will present a bigger > challenge. > JP ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 17:29:59 -0300 From: "Diego Fernetti" To: Subject: Re: Re : New Roden Fokker DVII's Message-ID: <014a01c163dd$24b8d620$4640a8c0@ssp.salud.rosario.gov.ar> Certainly this is much easier than making things complicated, as i usually do. However the most challenging part of this model is IMHO, making a new undercarriage "wing" since the provided is way too narrow. D. ----- Original Message ----- From: Jan Vihonen To: Multiple recipients of list Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 5:20 PM Subject: [WWI] Re: Re : New Roden Fokker DVII's > While I have been mulling over the thing a friend of mine spend some > minutes with a file removing material from the wing (mind you, it's not > much you need to remove) and he has now neatly assembled, painted and > lozenged fuselage and lower wing in one piece. And no matter how hard I > tried to find faults, I couldn't. Originally I was going to do it like > Diego said, but now... Back to mulling over the benefits of the two > methods. ;-) > > Jan ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 14:32:28 -0600 From: "Lance Krieg" To: Subject: Lower Wing attachment ... was New Roden Fokker DVII's Message-ID: As long as wing configuration is accurate, I would always prefer to leave the lower wing with its integral fuselage portion in one piece. When cut off and reattached, even with pins, the joint is weaker and the alignment a little trickier. Sometimes it unavoidable, of course, but why introduce complications? Naturally, IMHO Lance ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 15:43:15 -0500 From: Sanjeev Hirve To: "Wwi-List (E-mail)" Subject: Frog and aurora kits Message-ID: <5F935CCBFB73D511BA2000B0D079E11E01C89A@cyberexch01.internal.evincible.com> Hi List, While browsing through the local hobby shop, I notice 3 "oldish" looking kits for sale. I have no interest in these kits, and I have no clue if they are rare or whatever, but I thought I might let the list know. Please contact me off-list for details, as I am in digest mode. 1- Frog Vickers Vimy 1:72. Cat # 163, price usd 24. Box is open, contains instruction sheet, sprue parts, a round display base, some weird pieces, no decals. Many sprue parts have been taken off the sprue. I have no idea if anything is missing, but am willing to go back and look carefully if there is an interest. 2- Aurora 1/4" British SE5. Cellophane wrapped box. Price usd 40. Cat # 102-79 (I think) 3- Aurora 1/4" Sopwith Camel. Cellophane wrapped box. Price usd 20. Annotated "Rudder missing". Cat # 103-79 (I think) regards SSH ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 21:03:25 +0000 From: "Brent Theobald" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Lower Wing attachment ... was New Roden Fokker DVII's Message-ID: Howdy! I agree with Lance. Leave the lower wing in one piece. I was able to remove enough material using a razor saw and a file. I figure if I can do it, anyone can. Besides, extending the wing to adjust for the too wide fuselage will change the lower mounting point of the struts. This change in strut geometry could make life even more difficult when it comes time to mount the top wing. Good luck! Brent ot content... Did ya'll hear about the 80 year old woman who was escorted off an airliner for having knitting needles? Apparently the crew was concerned she was planning to crochet an Afghan.... _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 07:05:52 +1000 From: Shane Weier To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: australian army badge Message-ID: <7186131CB805D411A60E0090272F7C7102BCD6F8@mimhexch1.mim.com.au> Diego asks: > Do you know > where I can get a repro badge or an original one that's not > too expensive? I am assuming you mean the rising sun badge (which is actually a representation of an array of swords and bayonets). It's worn underneath the left brim of the hat! I am also assuming you know that the Kiwis don't bash their hats the same as us - ours have a single deep crease front to back, theirs have four indentations, like "smokey the bear" or a Mountie. (Kiwis call their hats "lemon squeezers") I should have a few of the badges in my garage. It may take a little while to find them - leftovers from those I swapped with various, mainly US servicemen for items of *their* equipment in my soldiering days. Give me a few days, your smail address and I'll see what I can do Shane ********************************************************************** The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you receive this e-mail in error, any use, distribution or copying of this e-mail is not permitted. You are requested to forward unwanted e-mail and address any problems to the MIM Holdings Limited Support Centre. e-mail: supportcentre@mim.com.au phone: Australia 1800500646 International ++61 7 38338042 ********************************************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 07:14:16 +1000 From: Shane Weier To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: New Pegasus kits and a request Message-ID: <7186131CB805D411A60E0090272F7C7102BCD6F9@mimhexch1.mim.com.au> Diego comments: > The Spad VII certainly reflects good taste and a delicate > savoir faire. > Let's hope that Chris don't forget to make it with > alternative noses for british and french machines! For CG's sake, let's hope all our prayers and requests to *Eduard* now go unanswered long enough for him to at least break even on our suggestion. I have a feeling that if his kit hit the "What's New" page and Eduard announced a competitor the same day he would have some problems selling it - and I wouldn't wish that on someone who has done a great deal for us and this hobby Shane ********************************************************************** The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you receive this e-mail in error, any use, distribution or copying of this e-mail is not permitted. You are requested to forward unwanted e-mail and address any problems to the MIM Holdings Limited Support Centre. e-mail: supportcentre@mim.com.au phone: Australia 1800500646 International ++61 7 38338042 ********************************************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 05:50:16 From: popvr@21cn.com To: wwi@mustang.sr.unh.edu Subject: hi Message-ID: <200111022146.QAA04309@mustang.sr.unh.edu> hi,您好！ 北京全景数字媒体为适应众多网站和客户的需要，更好的普及三维技术，现隆重推出3D互动模型制作软件"环视专家"2.0，和360度整球型场景制作软件"观景专家"1.0,我们的软件使用采用先进的数字成像技术,结合跨平台JAVA语言支持,不需任何插件即可浏览,所显示既为场景和物体本身,更具真实感.,拥有该软件可为您节省大量成本,您可独立开展此项业务,为客户制作360度整球型全景和物体全景服务. 我们的全景软件具有以下特点: ★ 使用简单,不需任何专业技术即可掌握 ★ 操作简易，无需下载任何软件即可观赏 ★ 购买后免费得到该软件的升级版本 ★ 免费技术培训，掌握拍摄技巧 "观景专家"1.0售价：12800 元人民币 "环视专家"2.0售价：6800 元人民币 咨询热线 010-84584520转6907 13501115973 陆先生 彭小姐 sales@popvr.com 详情请见 http://www.c-vr.com http://www.popvr.com ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 17:16:43 -0500 From: "David R. Crowell" To: Subject: Re: New Windsock? Message-ID: <000a01c163f5$fed083e0$25f102d1@e5gr6> ----- Original Message ----- From: Brian Nicklas To: Multiple recipients of list Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:53 AM Subject: [WWI] Re: New Windsock? > > I suppose the 1/48 Stakken plans will take up most of the book! > Lance > ********************************* > Nah, they left them out, nobody really builds in that scale anyway! Too true! that scale is so tiny you can't see any details, you can barely even tell one plane from another. Everybody knows that serious modelers model in 1/28 or larger.... > > (now doing my John Cleese impression - sprinting across the restaurant > and diving behind the potted palm for cover...) > Brian > (Now demonstrating "How Not to be Seen)> > --dave ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 18:08:47 -0600 From: "Lee M." To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: More Newbie Questions Message-ID: <3BE3358F.1A70B54D@x25.net> Try to contact www.hyperscale.com http://www.airwaves.org.uk/ http://www.internetmodeler.com/ These ae all good for many things. If you try them and don't like them. Just delete. You will find the Hyperscale Photo section in "multiple chapters" to be highly instructive. They now have a connection with Squadron Shop Lee M. New Braunfels, TX "John J. Ernst" wrote: > I seem to remember a location on the WWI modeling page or similar, that had > an outline of the steps to follow when building a WWI plastic model - great > for beginners. It had tips, techniques, tools etc.. > > I can't remember where it is. Can someone point me in the right direction? > > Of course, I could be completely imagining this resource - I hope not. > > Thanks > > john ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 18:16:48 -0600 From: "Lee M." To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: More Newbie Questions Message-ID: <3BE33770.3B57529D@x25.net> I forgot to include the one for ourvery own site. http://www.wwi-models.org/ Lee M. "John J. Ernst" wrote: > I seem to remember a location on the WWI modeling page or similar, that had > an outline of the steps to follow when building a WWI plastic model - great > for beginners. It had tips, techniques, tools etc.. > > I can't remember where it is. Can someone point me in the right direction? > > Of course, I could be completely imagining this resource - I hope not. > > Thanks > > john ------------------------------ End of WWI Digest 3860 **********************