WWI Digest 3856

Topics covered in this issue include:

  1) RE: windsock mag
	by "Lee M." <lemen@x25.net>
  2) Re: virtual morane
	by Mark Miller <albatros1212@altavista.com>
  3) RE: windsock mag
	by "Diego Fernetti" <dfernet0@rosario.gov.ar>
  4) Pegasus Hanriot HD 1
	by "a.casirati@cornali-trasporti.it" <a.casirati@cornali-trasporti.it>
  5) RE: Ex-works Early Fok. D.VII Finish?
	by "StefenK" <StefenK@netzero.net>
  6) RE: Pegasus Hanriot HD 1
	by "Diego Fernetti" <dfernet0@rosario.gov.ar>
  7) RE: Scale Models International rises from the dead
	by Jan Vihonen <jan.vihonen@helsinki.fi>
  8) RE: Scale Models International rises from the dead
	by Crawford Neil <Neil.Crawford@volvo.com>
  9) Nov. Air Classics
	by "Lee M." <lemen@x25.net>
 10) RE: windsock mag
	by "iban" <ibancorp@yahoo.com>
 11) re: Belcal Decal Systems
	by Karen Rychlewski <krychski@earthlink.net>
 12) Re: Easy list
	by "Muth and Zulick" <muzu@ptd.net>
 13) RE: Armour - A7V - Another can of worms
	by "Nigel Rayner" <nigel@rosnar.demon.co.uk>
 14) RE: WWI digest 3854
	by "Nigel Rayner" <nigel@rosnar.demon.co.uk>
 15) Modeling Madness Review of ....
	by "Ross Moorhouse" <rossm@froggy.com.au>
 16) new url
	by LEONARDPeterL@aol.com
 17) Re: Modeling Madness also has ......
	by "Ross Moorhouse" <rossm@froggy.com.au>
 18) Re: Modeling Madness Review of ....
	by "Matt Bittner" <tbittners@sprintmail.com>
 19) Re: Easy list
	by "Matt Bittner" <tbittners@sprintmail.com>
 20) Modeling Madness Review of ....
	by "Grzegorz Mazurowski" <grzem@yahoo.com>
 21) Re: Modeling Madness Review of ....
	by "Ross Moorhouse" <rossm@froggy.com.au>
 22) RE: Scale Models International rises from the dead
	by Shane Weier <sdw@qld.mim.com.au>
 23) Re: Easy list
	by Todd Hayes <thayes_52601@yahoo.com>
 24) nice photo from list site
	by "Grzegorz Mazurowski" <grzem@yahoo.com>
 25) UNH Network downtime.
	by Allan Wright <aew>
 26) Re: Change of email address
	by Allan Wright <aew@mustang.sr.unh.edu>
 27) Is the list down?
	by "Diego Fernetti" <dfernet0@rosario.gov.ar>
 28) Is the WWI Site down ??? 
	by "Ross Moorhouse" <rossm@froggy.com.au>
 29) 
	by =?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_H=E9ctor_AFFLITTO_ECHAG=FCE?= <mhae@fibertel.com.ar>
 30) Re: new url
	by "Tom Plesha" <plesha3@home.com>

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 08:13:30 -0600
From: "Lee M." <lemen@x25.net>
To: wwi@wwi-models.org
Subject: RE: windsock mag
Message-ID: <3BE0070A.A2F5FAFF@x25.net>

D.,  Hate to tell you.   But....

I just clicked the URL in your message and it was only seconds I had the
"Rolls" rolling Logo on screen.  There must be an online problem at your end.

Lee M.

Diego Fernetti wrote:

> Hi iban!
> > I checked the links page as you suggested, but I get a 404 not found on
> the
> > http://www.rollmodels.com/ link given there.  Does anyone know an
> alternate
> > link perhaps, or have an email address for Mr. Roll?
>
> Curious, it works for me OK from here. Anyway, write to John Roll to:
> Customer Service orders@rollmodels.com or phone to:  763-545-0399 fax:
> 763-545-0899
> D.


------------------------------

Date: 31 Oct 2001 06:09:24 -0800
From: Mark Miller <albatros1212@altavista.com>
To: wwi@wwi-models.org
Subject: Re: virtual morane
Message-ID: <20011031140924.15539.cpmta@c012.sfo.cp.net>

Thanks Neil
I agree my albatros IS nicer

BUT....
This Morain model is an entirely different thing.
They say you can fly that it in a game!!
which must mean an amazing ecomomy of modeling and maps (or skins as they like to call it), or a game engine unlike anything we've seen before. or you need a monstous PC to run it
or all of the above.

I contacted the people at that site, they say the Morain is not finished and they intend to add a lot more detail - particularly in the cockpit. Should be interesting. 
I've been contacted by these game types before and was never interested, but this one looks too good to pass up. I will have to find out what they are using to generate the models.

 
as for my Albatros
It took 100s of hours to model and the file size is in the 30 meg range and that doesn't even count the maps.
My goal from the beggining was to model every last nut and bolt without any shortcuts. I knew it would take a long time and that the file sizes would be huge, but I wanted to see how far I could take it. 
well... I did that 
now my goal is to find the optimal balance bettween effort and results. 
Obvious first step is to ignore the structural stuff which is hidden. i like the nuts and bolts, but lets face it - there are only about 3 different types of WW1 AC construction:
boxframe, monocoque, and tube aluminum (?)
Once you've seen one example of each - you've seen them all (although a bomber might be fun)
second thing is to reduce modeling and increase the role of the maps.
This is how I'm approaching the N17 initialy. 
But I don't think i can resist the internal structure and the Nieuport pages contain almost all the neccesary info - thank you Mike F  :-)

In any case
i'm going to look into this Wings and Wires thing.
by far the best WW1 AC game models I've seen

mark

On Wed, 31 October 2001, Crawford Neil wrote:

> 
> Wow, but ........I finally got time to look at Marks Albatri, 
> they're even nicer. 
> /Neil C.


Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping!
http://www.shopping.altavista.com

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 11:19:56 -0300
From: "Diego Fernetti" <dfernet0@rosario.gov.ar>
To: <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Subject: RE: windsock mag
Message-ID: <032e01c16217$1dba4100$4640a8c0@ssp.salud.rosario.gov.ar>

It work for me as well, Lee!
It was "iban" who didn't got it workin'
D.
----- Original Message -----
From: Lee M. <lemen@x25.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:09 AM
Subject: [WWI] RE: windsock mag


> D.,  Hate to tell you.   But....
>
> I just clicked the URL in your message and it was only seconds I had the
> "Rolls" rolling Logo on screen.  There must be an online problem at your
end.
>
> Lee M.
>
> Diego Fernetti wrote:
>
> > Hi iban!
> > > I checked the links page as you suggested, but I get a 404 not found
on
> > the
> > > http://www.rollmodels.com/ link given there.  Does anyone know an
> > alternate
> > > link perhaps, or have an email address for Mr. Roll?
> >
> > Curious, it works for me OK from here. Anyway, write to John Roll to:
> > Customer Service orders@rollmodels.com or phone to:  763-545-0399 fax:
> > 763-545-0899
> > D.
>


------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:17:42 +0100
From: "a.casirati@cornali-trasporti.it" <a.casirati@cornali-trasporti.it>
To: "Wwi Modeling List (Posta elettronica)" <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Subject: Pegasus Hanriot HD 1
Message-ID: <43EB244779F3D411966E0060082C59E906F22D@SERVER1>

After the Formaplane vac, I am planning to build another Hanriot Hd.1 in 
1772nd scale, starting from a different kit.

Since the already announced kit from Eduard is not yet released (and 
possibily will not be released before 2002), I am looking for a Pegasus 
kit.

I am starting this search in advance, as I have to finish another couples 
of projects before, which will take several months to be completed.

Anyone wishing to sell or swap his Pegasus kit ?

Please reply off-list.

Thanks very much in advance to you all,

Alberto Casirati



------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 09:29:15 -0500
From: "StefenK" <StefenK@netzero.net>
To: "WWI Modeling List" <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Cc: <davew@wattstrainshop.com>
Subject: RE: Ex-works Early Fok. D.VII Finish?
Message-ID: <3BD49780001E4083@mail.san.yahoo.com> (added by postmaster@mail.san.yahoo.com)

G'day, Dave W.--

Thank you for your considered response of Tue, 30 Oct 2001 to my post and
for the kind words about the results of my obssesive-compulsive reading of
the details of photographs.

Your caveat with respect to the main planes of 353 is well taken.  The
reproduction is not sufficiently resolving on this point, although the
wings appear more than usually uniformly dark and without evidence of light
rib tapes.  Still, the apparent absence of the latter  isn't always
diagnostic, and it is probably correct to err on the side of printed
fabric.  One detail oddity (at least to me) not mentioned previously is the
light (white?) fuselage stenciling.

With respect to 507/18, I certainly do not have the answer about what was
so interesting to the Fokker team about this airframe.  However, never one
to shy away from speculation, I will offer the suggestion that it might
have been the airframe supplied to Albatros as the copy model.  Whatever
the reason, I cannot see the justification for photographing what seems to
be an otherwise completed machine and then pulling the metal areas off to
paint them up to specification.  Such a sequence doesn't seem like a
particularly rational work process.  Those few images of the Fokker factory
floor that I have seen suggest a fairly orderly assembly line with
prefinished components being added as appropriate to the work flow.  

Speaking of Alb D.VII's, I came across a poor Web scan of 541/18 (perhaps
you know the source?), which is nonetheless seems clear enough to me to
indicate dark center section strutting and, perhaps a little more
ambiguously, an unpainted forward area based on the  tonal difference
between the light N-strut and the much lighter metal areas.

Your own observation that Dr. I's and D.VII's were in production at the
same time is of particular interest and relevance.  Certainly finishing
practice on these two types if in co-production might be expected to be
very similar.  I am a little puzzled, however, since the production and
acceptance data reported in the Albatros Dr. I Special and DF 9 suggest
there was minimal overlap in these two types.  Perhaps you can clarify this
point?

In any event, by the evidence of the photograph of 353/18 at least, it
would appear that perhaps the first hundred or more Fokker-built D.VIIs
were finished a bit differently than prevailing opinion suggests?  I know
that I should have been keeping up on this, but on what exactly is this
prevailing opinion based?
Thanks again and best regards,
Stefen

PS. The Anthologies are now on my book buy-list, but what I really wish was
that I could get hold of copy prints of original photographs!

----------------------------------------------------
Sign Up for NetZero Platinum Today
Only $9.95 per month!
http://my.netzero.net/s/signup?r=platinum&refcd=PT97

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:27:37 -0300
From: "Diego Fernetti" <dfernet0@rosario.gov.ar>
To: <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Subject: RE: Pegasus Hanriot HD 1
Message-ID: <033a01c16220$92397880$4640a8c0@ssp.salud.rosario.gov.ar>

Alberto!
I have one as I mentioned. Is the meanest chunk of plastic I've seen being
comparable somehow to a Merlin kit. It's good only for experimenting, as I
did. Wait until 2002, I'd say!
D.

----- Original Message -----
From: <a.casirati@cornali-trasporti.it>
To: Multiple recipients of list <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:28 AM
Subject: [WWI] Pegasus Hanriot HD 1


> After the Formaplane vac, I am planning to build another Hanriot Hd.1 in
> 1772nd scale, starting from a different kit.
>
> Since the already announced kit from Eduard is not yet released (and
> possibily will not be released before 2002), I am looking for a Pegasus
> kit.
>
> I am starting this search in advance, as I have to finish another couples
> of projects before, which will take several months to be completed.
>
> Anyone wishing to sell or swap his Pegasus kit ?
>
> Please reply off-list.
>
> Thanks very much in advance to you all,
>
> Alberto Casirati
>
>


------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:49:32 +0200
From: Jan Vihonen <jan.vihonen@helsinki.fi>
To: wwi@wwi-models.org
Subject: RE: Scale Models International rises from the dead
Message-ID: <3BE01D8C.18FE9894@helsinki.fi>

Neil,

Isn't he the editor of Scale Aviation Modeler International?

Jan 

> Has Richard Franks edited any other mags? Recognize the
> name but can't place him.
> /Neil C.

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:00:09 +0100
From: Crawford Neil <Neil.Crawford@volvo.com>
To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Subject: RE: Scale Models International rises from the dead
Message-ID: <E1E573FB5D0AD41195CF00508BCF882A077DFAED@vsegn335.it.volvo.se>

That would explain the groan!
/Neil C.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Vihonen [mailto:jan.vihonen@helsinki.fi]
> Sent: den 31 oktober 2001 16:57
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: [WWI] RE: Scale Models International rises from the dead
> 
> 
> Neil,
> 
> Isn't he the editor of Scale Aviation Modeler International?
> 
> Jan 
> 
> > Has Richard Franks edited any other mags? Recognize the
> > name but can't place him.
> > /Neil C.
> 

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 10:21:38 -0600
From: "Lee M." <lemen@x25.net>
To: wwi@wwi-models.org
Subject: Nov. Air Classics
Message-ID: <3BE02512.33819BEC@x25.net>

A. C. Vol 37, # 11 has an eight page dissertation, (pages 44 thru 51),
on the, (present) Vickers Vimy complete with good photos.

Good visible details.

It also has a nice ad, on page 57,  for FMP and the two volume set on OT
DeHavilands. It includes most of the OT book list as well.

Lee M.
New Braunfels, Tx.


------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:19:57 -0500
From: "iban" <ibancorp@yahoo.com>
To: <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Subject: RE: windsock mag
Message-ID: <01f601c16230$44541d40$4a3f21a2@s0023853809>

...and this morning it works fine for me too.  hmm, odd, eh??

Sorry to bother you, Diego, and thanks for your help.  I emailed Mr. Roll
last night.

cheers

iban.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Diego Fernetti" <dfernet0@rosario.gov.ar>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:15 AM
Subject: [WWI] RE: windsock mag


> It work for me as well, Lee!
> It was "iban" who didn't got it workin'
> D.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Lee M. <lemen@x25.net>
> To: Multiple recipients of list <wwi@wwi-models.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:09 AM
> Subject: [WWI] RE: windsock mag
>
>
> > D.,  Hate to tell you.   But....
> >
> > I just clicked the URL in your message and it was only seconds I had the
> > "Rolls" rolling Logo on screen.  There must be an online problem at your
> end.
> >
> > Lee M.
> >
> > Diego Fernetti wrote:
> >
> > > Hi iban!
> > > > I checked the links page as you suggested, but I get a 404 not found
> on
> > > the
> > > > http://www.rollmodels.com/ link given there.  Does anyone know an
> > > alternate
> > > > link perhaps, or have an email address for Mr. Roll?
> > >
> > > Curious, it works for me OK from here. Anyway, write to John Roll to:
> > > Customer Service orders@rollmodels.com or phone to:  763-545-0399 fax:
> > > 763-545-0899
> > > D.
> >


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 13:39:25 -0500
From: Karen Rychlewski <krychski@earthlink.net>
To: wwi@wwi-models.org
Subject: re: Belcal Decal Systems
Message-ID: <3BDEF3DE.4C29A742@earthlink.net>

Guys

I bought some of the clear and white Belcal paper a few weeks ago, but
haven't tried it yet. I don't remember (should check the website...) if
I ordered the 'system', but the two packages of paper came with an 11
oz. can of Krylon High-Gloss Crystal Clear Acrylic spray--that may be
one thing boosting the shipping cost. I didn't know I was getting the
can with the order; this stuff is widely available in art supply stores
in the US and there's probably a non-US version available overseas.
Maybe if you tell them to 'hold the acrylic', the shipping might be
cheaper.

Dame Karen



Todd Hayes wrote:

> Very expensive international shipping charges.  $30,
> but that is via Express Priority Mail.


------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:11:19 -0500
From: "Muth and Zulick" <muzu@ptd.net>
To: <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Subject: Re: Easy list
Message-ID: <00dd01c1623f$d2a0cda0$0100005a@ptd.net>


> Was wondering this evening what do you guys and ladies feel is an
> easy/relaxing model to get into to.  I build 1/48th what comes to mind is
the DML Fokker
> triplane, Eduard Albatros DIII and Eduard Nieuport 17.  Other candidates
> that should hit the easy list (and why)?
Charlie
    I still like the Testor's Nieuport 17 in 1/48, You have to substitute
the inverted V cabane and there is no cockpit detail (this could be a good
thing for the purposes of quick & fun). The SMER Nieuport is also pretty
easy and looks OK when done.
Mike Muth



------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 20:03:06 -0000
From: "Nigel Rayner" <nigel@rosnar.demon.co.uk>
To: <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Subject: RE: Armour - A7V - Another can of worms
Message-ID: <000001c16247$0e577fe0$983bedc1@w1o0t3>

Keith asked:
>Have all the A7Vs made off Bellona's
> drawings wrong - I have got to check my Tauro kit - But I know
> the Sagatech 1/76th one has the inaccurate (I think) 3 slots

FWIW the Milicast 1/76 A7V has two rows of four slots.

Cheers,

Nigel

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 20:03:07 -0000
From: "Nigel Rayner" <nigel@rosnar.demon.co.uk>
To: <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Subject: RE: WWI digest 3854
Message-ID: <000101c16247$0f194940$983bedc1@w1o0t3>

Charlie asked:
>Was wondering this evening what do you guys and ladies feel is an
>easy/relaxing model to get into to.  Not a "...well you have to rebuild the
>rib stations" or "redefine the undercarriage..."  but what was a
>straight-forward kit that for someone wanting to finish a kit that's
>accurate OOB.  Since I build 1/48th what comes to mind is the DML Fokker
>triplane, Eduard Albatros DIII and Eduard Nieuport 17.  Other candidates
>that should hit the easy list (and why)?

No question - it has to be Eduard, as they are high quality, readily
available and reasonably priced, especially if you go non-Profi. I know the
Nie 17 is easy to build as I am just building it, and if I can do it without
any major issues, it must be easy (I'm not a particularly good builder!). I
did the Profi version, not sure what the non-Profi is like. I have the Nie
11 non-Profi and this looks great - I would recommend that. Also, there's
hardly any rigging on a Nie 11/17 (compared to a SPAD).

Cheers,

Nigel R


------------------------------

Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 08:05:40 +1100
From: "Ross Moorhouse" <rossm@froggy.com.au>
To: <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Subject: Modeling Madness Review of ....
Message-ID: <001201c1624f$cd593ac0$8815cecb@umber>

Todays Issue of Modelimng Madness has a reveiw of Toko's 1/72 Nieuport 16c

http://m2reviews.cnsi.net/scotts/ww1/n16cpreview.htm

But there are not that many of us on the list that like Nieuports are
there?? ;)

Ross





------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:14:38 EST
From: LEONARDPeterL@aol.com
To: wwi@wwi-models.org
Subject: new url
Message-ID: <13c.3b8d34d.2911c3be@aol.com>

I had to move my sites to a new URL thanks to ISP trouble. It seems a little 
slow to me but fingers crossed

http://www.wwimodeler.com

same old rubbish with a few little tweaks

cheers

Peter L

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 08:44:23 +1100
From: "Ross Moorhouse" <rossm@froggy.com.au>
To: <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Subject: Re: Modeling Madness also has ......
Message-ID: <002601c16255$38daf360$8815cecb@umber>

& there is also a review of Blue Rider BR 245 for Jasta11 & 27 Fokker Dr.I
decals http://m2reviews.cnsi.net/scotts/decals/br245.htm

http://www.modelingmadness.com/

Ross


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Moorhouse" <rossm@froggy.com.au>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 8:03 AM
Subject: [WWI] Modeling Madness Review of ....


| Todays Issue of Modelimng Madness has a reveiw of Toko's 1/72 Nieuport 16c
|
| http://m2reviews.cnsi.net/scotts/ww1/n16cpreview.htm
|
| But there are not that many of us on the list that like Nieuports are
| there?? ;)
|
| Ross
|
|
|
|
|


------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:40:48 -0800
From: "Matt Bittner" <tbittners@sprintmail.com>
To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Subject: Re: Modeling Madness Review of ....
Message-ID: <E15z3F4-0002Mh-00@falcon.prod.itd.earthlink.net>

On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:03:35 -0500 (EST), Ross Moorhouse wrote:

> Todays Issue of Modelimng Madness has a reveiw of Toko's 1/72 Nieuport 16c
> 
> http://m2reviews.cnsi.net/scotts/ww1/n16cpreview.htm
> 
> But there are not that many of us on the list that like Nieuports are
> there?? ;)

Not a one. ;-)

Actually, this is the problem of a "mainstream" review site/magazine
reviewing kits they know nothing of the subject of.  MM failed to
mention *any* of the problems with the kit.  Lack of proper sweep back
in the upper wing (although that's my foible ;-); lower wing too short
in span; Johnson's markings incorrect; LePrieur rockets a bit anemic;
etc.  So, people will build it and think "look, finally, an accurate
Nieuport 11/16!".  Not so.

Yes, there are people out there who don't care, but I feel reviews
should point out as much as possible about the kit.

Okay, enough of my Nieuport diatribe! ;-)


Matt Bittner



------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:34:37 -0800
From: "Matt Bittner" <tbittners@sprintmail.com>
To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Subject: Re: Easy list
Message-ID: <E15z3F0-0002Mh-00@falcon.prod.itd.earthlink.net>

On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 07:31:02 -0500 (EST), Michael Kendix wrote:

> No doubt, but not the easiest.

But he asked what we (as in "me") thought the easiest kit was.  My kit
- from what I can recall - was one of the very first kits to come from
the mold, hence the "useless struts".

Even still, I thought it was an easy build, of all the kits I have
built so far.  I have not finished the Eduard Dr.I nor the D.V yet, so
I can't count those. ;-)


Matt Bittner



------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 23:03:10 +0100
From: "Grzegorz Mazurowski" <grzem@yahoo.com>
To: <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Subject: Modeling Madness Review of ....
Message-ID: <00fc01c16257$d5491d60$0200a8c0@x.pl>

> But there are not that many of us on the list that like Nieuports
are
> there?? ;)
I like it!!!
BTW, that review is not very good one, has mistakes. I wrote to Scott
van Aken about it.
Grzes


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


------------------------------

Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 09:22:08 +1100
From: "Ross Moorhouse" <rossm@froggy.com.au>
To: <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Subject: Re: Modeling Madness Review of ....
Message-ID: <003f01c1625a$7c31c620$8815cecb@umber>

shuffles feet and keeps head hung low.... "I wouldn't of known that the kit
had probs"..... runs away real fast ...

Thanks for pointing the probs out guys..

Ross


----- Original Message -----
From: "Grzegorz Mazurowski" <grzem@yahoo.com>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:00 AM
Subject: [WWI] Modeling Madness Review of ....


| > But there are not that many of us on the list that like Nieuports
| are
| > there?? ;)
| I like it!!!
| BTW, that review is not very good one, has mistakes. I wrote to Scott
| van Aken about it.
| Grzes
|
|
| _________________________________________________________
| Do You Yahoo!?
| Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
|
|


------------------------------

Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 08:21:13 +1000 
From: Shane Weier <sdw@qld.mim.com.au>
To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Subject: RE: Scale Models International rises from the dead
Message-ID: <7186131CB805D411A60E0090272F7C7102BCD6E3@mimhexch1.mim.com.au>

Neil and Jan say:
 

> > > > First issue of the "new" magazine (now edited by <groan> 
> > > > Richard Franks) includes the following OT content....

> > > Has Richard Franks edited any other mags? Recognize the
> > > name but can't place him.
> > > /Neil C.
> > 
> > 
> > Isn't he the editor of Scale Aviation Modeler International?
> > 
> > Jan 
>
> That would explain the groan!
> /Neil C.

Both correct!

Shane
















**********************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is
intended only for the use of the addressee(s).
If you receive this e-mail in error, any use, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is not permitted. You are requested to
forward unwanted e-mail and address any problems to the 
MIM Holdings Limited Support Centre.

e-mail: supportcentre@mim.com.au
phone: Australia 1800500646
            International ++61 7 38338042
**********************************************************************


------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:23:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Todd Hayes <thayes_52601@yahoo.com>
To: wwi@wwi-models.org
Subject: Re: Easy list
Message-ID: <20011031222324.75767.qmail@web11104.mail.yahoo.com>

How about a CSM Gotha?!  Or the Gavia Bristol.

Todd


--- Matt Bittner <tbittners@sprintmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 07:31:02 -0500 (EST), Michael
> Kendix wrote:
> 
> > No doubt, but not the easiest.
> 
> But he asked what we (as in "me") thought the
> easiest kit was.  My kit
> - from what I can recall - was one of the very first
> kits to come from
> the mold, hence the "useless struts".
> 
> Even still, I thought it was an easy build, of all
> the kits I have
> built so far.  I have not finished the Eduard Dr.I
> nor the D.V yet, so
> I can't count those. ;-)
> 
> 
> Matt Bittner
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 23:30:51 +0100
From: "Grzegorz Mazurowski" <grzem@yahoo.com>
To: "wwi lista" <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Subject: nice photo from list site
Message-ID: <011301c1625b$b36262c0$0200a8c0@x.pl>

Hi!
That photo I have as background (I don't know exact name in English)
in Windows on my laptop, for more than year:
http://www.wwi-models.org/Photos/Fre/SPAD13/eps13_ckpt.jpg

Fits perfectly!
Thanks, Eric!

Grzegorz


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


------------------------------

Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 08:29:07 -0500 (EST)
From: Allan Wright <aew>
To: wwi, fnf, cci, conspiracy
Subject: UNH Network downtime.
Message-ID: <200111011329.IAA35756@mustang.sr.unh.edu>

The network to the subnet that my computer lives on here at UNH was down from
6pm EST Wed. October 31st until you receive this message. This downtime was
due to an unexpected networking failure beyond my control.

If you receive this the problem has been resolved.

Allan

===============================================================================
Allan Wright Jr.            | Without love life's just a long fight - Southside
University of New Hampshire +--------------------------------------------------
Research Computing Center   | WWI Modeling mailing list: wwi@wwi-models.org
Internet: aew@unh.edu       | WWI Modeling WWW Page: http://www.wwi-models.org
===============================================================================

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 08:30:29 -0500 (EST)
From: Allan Wright <aew@mustang.sr.unh.edu>
To: wwi@wwi-models.org
Subject: Re: Change of email address
Message-ID: <200111011330.IAA35884@mustang.sr.unh.edu>

Fixed.

> 
> Hi all,
> 
> My ISP has just changed their name yet again, therefore my new email will be
> bpearson@kaien.net   the rapidnet address will continue to work, but the
> official address is now kaien.net
> 
> Regards,
>        Bob Pearson
> 


===============================================================================
Allan Wright Jr.            | Without love life's just a long fight - Southside
University of New Hampshire +--------------------------------------------------
Research Computing Center   | WWI Modeling mailing list: wwi@wwi-models.org
Internet: aew@unh.edu       | WWI Modeling WWW Page: http://www.wwi-models.org
===============================================================================

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 07:02:42 -0300
From: "Diego Fernetti" <dfernet0@rosario.gov.ar>
To: "ww1 list" <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Subject: Is the list down?
Message-ID: <007101c162bc$592ed660$4640a8c0@ssp.salud.rosario.gov.ar>

Hey!
I don't have more messagess after Grzergorz's message from yesterday. Is the
list down?
Good news: finally I got the delayed windsock. Yipeee!
D.


------------------------------

Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 13:12:00 +1100
From: "Ross Moorhouse" <rossm@froggy.com.au>
To: <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Subject: Is the WWI Site down ??? 
Message-ID: <009f01c1627a$98732660$8815cecb@umber>

Or am I having a routing prob ??? 

Ross




------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 20:58:51 -0300
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_H=E9ctor_AFFLITTO_ECHAG=FCE?= <mhae@fibertel.com.ar>
To: "WWI List" <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Message-ID: <001001c16267$fea40480$b70de818@fibertel.com.ar>

Hi Diego:
Hi List

Hollewen has hit you hard!!!!!!
nobody has written a letter yet!!!!!
Hello! ! !! Hello !!!!    is there anybody???


Martin



------------------------------

Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 20:52:29 -0500
From: "Tom Plesha" <plesha3@home.com>
To: <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Subject: Re: new url
Message-ID: <000501c16277$ddcb4100$2cfdfa18@mcmb1.mi.home.com>

Superb!!!!!!!
Great site, great models!  Worked just fine, at least for me.
Later
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: <LEONARDPeterL@aol.com>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <wwi@wwi-models.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:17 PM
Subject: [WWI] new url


> I had to move my sites to a new URL thanks to ISP trouble. It seems a
little
> slow to me but fingers crossed
>
> http://www.wwimodeler.com
>
> same old rubbish with a few little tweaks
>
> cheers
>
> Peter L
>


------------------------------

End of WWI Digest 3856
**********************