WWI Digest 3829 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) Re: german rib tapes by "Michael Kendix" 2) Re: Today in history - The Italian front by Peter Fedders 3) RE: MICRO SOL & SET by "Michael Kendix" 4) RE: MICRO SOL & SET by Balzer Mr Gregory P 5) RE: MICRO SOL & SET by "Laskodi" 6) RE: Eduard 1/48 Nieuport 11 by "Laskodi" 7) RE: MICRO SOL & SET by Balzer Mr Gregory P 8) RE: show report by Crawford Neil 9) Re: WW1 modeler's hell and heaven by "Brian Nicklas" 10) Re: More gads by "Hans Trauner" 11) RE: show report by "Michael Kendix" 12) re:Another Fe2b question... by "Lance Krieg" 13) Re: german rib tapes by "Hans Trauner" 14) Re: Good news - mixed with "egads" for Tom S. by "Grzegorz Mazurowski" 15) RE: New kits by "Grzegorz Mazurowski" 16) Re: german rib tapes by "Michael Kendix" 17) Re: Eric's Gotha WAS : I'm Finally Back by "Brent Theobald" 18) Airport Memorial aircraft. Jenny by Ray Boorman 19) Formaplane by "Grzegorz Mazurowski" 20) Re: Formaplane by "Michael Kendix" 21) Re: Eduard 1/48 Nieuport 11 by CAUhlir@aol.com 22) Back in the Saddle by "Lance Krieg" 23) Re: Model Photos for Gallery by Allan Wright 24) Re: Model Photos for Gallery by Allan Wright 25) RE: Back in the Saddle by "Graham Hunter" 26) Re: Addition to the site by Steve Cox ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 13:49:51 From: "Michael Kendix" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: german rib tapes Message-ID: Witold: I am not the list expert on German rib tapes but as I understand matters, all that you say is correct sometimes: namely, blue upper, pink lower, and upper and lower lozenge tapes respectively. Yes, I believe the tape goes on both the leading and trailing edges. I use pale or light blue for the tapes and a pink that is in the lilac rather than the salmon coloured range. But, I think some aeroplanes had pink rib tapes on the upper and lower surfaces, similarly with blue rib tapes. So I think there is no definitive answer. I suppose the only thing you can do is decide which particular scheme you are doing and check the references. If the references are not definitive, suit yourself; i.e. "Dicta Ira". Michael >From: Witold Kozakiewicz >Reply-To: wwi@wwi-models.org >To: Multiple recipients of list >Subject: [WWI] german rib tapes >Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 08:55:09 -0400 (EDT) > >Hi, > >few simple questions. > >There were three types of rib tapes, blue, pink and lozenge. > >Lozenge is quite simple - upper on uper lower on lower surfaces >but I have some problems with blue and pink. >Eduard generaly suggests blue on upper and pink on lower surfaces. Is it >correct? Or it should be only blue or only pink? >Blue is quite dark - shouldn't it be lighter? If so what colour do you >suggest? and what for pink? Any paint equivalent or FS number? >And last question - was rib tape on leading edge of wing? I think it >should be but I'm not sure. >Thanks > >-- >Witold Kozakiewicz > _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 08:47:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Peter Fedders To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Today in history - The Italian front Message-ID: The noteworthy thing about the battle of Caporetto was the losses. The Italians lost about 10,000 killed and 30,000 wounded. Plus 300,000 taken prisoner and 400,000 deserted!! At the battle the Central Powers had 35 divisions (7 German and 28 Austrian) and the Italians had 41 divisions. (a division is usually 15-18,000 men). Thus the Italians lost more men by capture and desertion than the Central Powers had at the battle. This was not becasue the Italioans were cowards. They had fought bravely on that front under the most incredibly stupid leadership imaginable - they had finally had enough. After the battle *with British and French pressure) the Italians replace their commander in chief. For the air war see the articles by Kerr in OTF (prob 1987 and 1988). peter On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, a.casirati@cornali-trasporti.it wrote: > Today is a very special day for Italian WW1 enthusiasts, as it marks the > beginning of two extremely important battles: > > - 24th October 1917: the battle of Caporetto begins. It will end on the > 26th November 1917, when the Italian forces stopped the Central Powers > divisions on the Piave - Grappa mountain - Asiago plateau line. It was the > last truly successful offensive of the Central Powers on the Italian front. > > - 24th October 1918: the second battle of the Piave begins. It will lead to > final victory over the A-H empire. > > Alberto Casirati > > > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 13:56:38 From: "Michael Kendix" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: MICRO SOL & SET Message-ID: >From: Balzer Mr Gregory P >A general question to the list. I am quickly approaching the point >when I >will be applying decals to my Dr. 1. First time I will be >using Future. >My previous experience has always been with Micro Sol. >What setting >solution is recommended so as not to stain the Future >base coat? Greg: To reduce the probability of "clouding" due to Microsol, give the Future as much time to dry as you can. If you can leave it for a week that's great, otherwise a couple of days will have to do:). If you get impatient, start another kit - rescribing the raised panel lines on some such will do the trick. But, when this clouding hashappened to me, I simply re-apply Fuureover the top and it disappears. I usually want to put another layer of Future on regardless since that protects the decals. Best, Michael P.S. Greg, IPMS Northern Virginia has its monthly meeting on Wednesday, November 7. >-----Original Message----- >From: Tom Plesha [mailto:plesha3@home.com] >Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 6:26 PM >To: Multiple recipients of list >Subject: [WWI] MICRO SOL & SET > >Hi- >Anyone know what will take the micro-sol and/or micro-set stains off of >future, before I re-coat it with Future? Poly-S Plastic prep will not, >water will not! >I had to use some of it on the Pup for some decals that went over some >scribed lines. >TIA >Tom _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:20:34 -0400 From: Balzer Mr Gregory P To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: MICRO SOL & SET Message-ID: <47637867E285D5118FAE00B0D0D1C976BF970E@TECOM03E> Thanks Michael, I've heard about giving Future and other acrylics ample time to "cure," or face the prospect of the glazed, shattered-glass effect. I've been allowing things to sit for a number of days between bouts. This serves the purpose of allowing me time to dry fit, to get my next step fully planned before I wade in a botch everything up, and forces me to practice a certain amount of patience. My plan has been to sink the decals in a coat of Future, and then seal them with a top coat as well, covered with a final coat of Polly S satin, unless someone recommends otherwise. Thanks, Greg -----Original Message----- From: Michael Kendix [mailto:mkendix@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:59 AM To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: [WWI] RE: MICRO SOL & SET >From: Balzer Mr Gregory P >A general question to the list. I am quickly approaching the point >when I >will be applying decals to my Dr. 1. First time I will be >using Future. >My previous experience has always been with Micro Sol. >What setting >solution is recommended so as not to stain the Future >base coat? Greg: To reduce the probability of "clouding" due to Microsol, give the Future as much time to dry as you can. If you can leave it for a week that's great, otherwise a couple of days will have to do:). If you get impatient, start another kit - rescribing the raised panel lines on some such will do the trick. But, when this clouding hashappened to me, I simply re-apply Fuureover the top and it disappears. I usually want to put another layer of Future on regardless since that protects the decals. Best, Michael P.S. Greg, IPMS Northern Virginia has its monthly meeting on Wednesday, November 7. >-----Original Message----- >From: Tom Plesha [mailto:plesha3@home.com] >Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 6:26 PM >To: Multiple recipients of list >Subject: [WWI] MICRO SOL & SET > >Hi- >Anyone know what will take the micro-sol and/or micro-set stains off of >future, before I re-coat it with Future? Poly-S Plastic prep will not, >water will not! >I had to use some of it on the Pup for some decals that went over some >scribed lines. >TIA >Tom _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 07:29:01 -0700 From: "Laskodi" To: "WWI List Post" Subject: RE: MICRO SOL & SET Message-ID: <000d01c15c98$3a54b9a0$573819d0@f4hn201> <<>> EVERY setting solution will stain Future. To minimize the problem do the following and your last clear coat will cover up most minor do-do's. Let Future cure fully, a minimum of 24 hrs, 48 is better, and more is best (if you have no deadlines!). Apply as little as necessary to only the decal portions and after a few minutes carefully blot up the excess. The best base coat for decals is Testors Metalizer Sealer. Smells like $%^&, cures very fast, safe over most types of paint, does not react with setting solutions. HTH ---------Bob ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 07:34:14 -0700 From: "Laskodi" To: "WWI List Post" Subject: RE: Eduard 1/48 Nieuport 11 Message-ID: <001501c15c98$f493dd00$573819d0@f4hn201> <<>> It is very lovely when built and an easy build. See mine in the gallery here for a few pics. Eduard's best effort to date (but soon to be surpassed by the Albie D.II when I get it finished!). HTH ------Bob ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:36:28 -0400 From: Balzer Mr Gregory P To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: MICRO SOL & SET Message-ID: <47637867E285D5118FAE00B0D0D1C976BF9715@TECOM03E> Even Better - Thanks Bob. Greg -----Original Message----- From: Laskodi [mailto:laskodi@launchnet.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:31 AM To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: [WWI] RE: MICRO SOL & SET <<>> EVERY setting solution will stain Future. To minimize the problem do the following and your last clear coat will cover up most minor do-do's. Let Future cure fully, a minimum of 24 hrs, 48 is better, and more is best (if you have no deadlines!). Apply as little as necessary to only the decal portions and after a few minutes carefully blot up the excess. The best base coat for decals is Testors Metalizer Sealer. Smells like $%^&, cures very fast, safe over most types of paint, does not react with setting solutions. HTH ---------Bob ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 16:53:55 +0200 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: show report Message-ID: Shane, It's not that well-detailed models don't always win that upsets me. I've seen plenty of overdetailed models that aren't really very good, they can have basic faults, and uneven detailing. It's when a guy has spent a lot of time and effort on a model, and gets beaten by someone who's just shaken his Tamiya kit together, maybe added som PE stuff, and then done a good paintjob. It's difficult to make a mistake on something like that, whereas the guy who tries to do something better, is opening the door wide open for the whole gammet of mistakes, nearly all of us on this list know about mistakes! I just feel that too much emphasis is put on finding them, and too little into looking at what really constitutes a good model. /Neil C. > -----Original Message----- > From: Shane Weier [mailto:sdw@qld.mim.com.au] > Sent: den 24 oktober 2001 00:56 > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: [WWI] RE: show report > > > Pedro, answered by Neil, > > > > Seems the judges prefer the buy it all > > > rather than the do it yourself method... > > > > This drives me nuts, seems like it's a worldwide disease, but I've > > gone off the deep end about this before, I'll try and calm down. > > Maybe it happens but...... > > I've been a judge for many years, sometimes a chief judge, > and more recently > President of the committee organising our main model show and > contest for > this State. And I can tell you that in that time I've seen *many* > beautifully detailed models which (at arms length, and given > 15 minutes > examination) I thought *must* win a contest section, but > which *didn't* > > In virtually every case a dispassionate review of the judging > showed that I > was wrong. All too often, one set of eyes (mine) will miss a > fault which > three sets will not. All too often my own biases will prefer > one model over > another - while the reduction of that bias by using a judging > team will give > a better (whilst never "perfect") result. > > I don't believe that judges never make mistakes, but the "buy > it all" method > doesn't work worth damn in these parts, and I don't believe > it works all > that well anywhere that the organisers take the contest seriously. > > (thinking of a massively opened up FW-19* using multiple > detail sets, which > was expected by many to win the BoS a couple of years back, > but was beaten > comprehensively by a model with no detail sets in it at all) > > > Shane > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ********************************************************************** > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is > intended only for the use of the addressee(s). > If you receive this e-mail in error, any use, distribution or > copying of this e-mail is not permitted. You are requested to > forward unwanted e-mail and address any problems to the > MIM Holdings Limited Support Centre. > > e-mail: supportcentre@mim.com.au > phone: Australia 1800500646 > International ++61 7 38338042 > ********************************************************************** > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:54:44 -0400 From: "Brian Nicklas" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: WW1 modeler's hell and heaven Message-ID: P.S. Exorcisms off-list are a possibility too. Fr. Craig, Got a small one of these for a part-eating floor? (yes, it is also a "PART" eating floor.) Makes the building of all these nice Eduard and Roden kits diffcult when there are hungry bits of supposedly inanimate objects around - and they don't care what scale, only that they are fed.... ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 17:39:43 +0200 From: "Hans Trauner" To: Subject: Re: More gads Message-ID: <004f01c15ca2$1a3dce40$baa272d4@FRITZweb> Here the results from a altavista search: Take a look at: http://www.locksley.com/6696/swastick.htm http://history1900s.about.com/library/holocaust/aa120699a.htm?once=true& http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/sw/ http://india.coolatlanta.com/GreatPages/sudheer/book2/omkar.html. And there where american pilots and german pilots of jewish birth , both using the swastika as a simple sign of luck.... Hans ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Bittner" To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:52 AM Subject: [WWI] More gads > Okay, sorry to continue this off topic post. However, does anyone know > where I can go for information on the swastika prior to nazi Germany? > > > Matt Bittner > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 15:47:03 From: "Michael Kendix" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: show report Message-ID: Neil: This is a never-ending debate about the judging criteria: namely, whether "Degree of difficulty" should be taken into account. I'm not saying you're wrong and I have great sympathy with your view but satisfactory alternatives do not abound. There is also the so-called "Absolute standard" type criteria used by AMPS and to some extent by the UK folks with their various "Commended", "Highly commended", "Deserving of the VC" etc. I don't know which is best and the drawback of entrants sticking to higher end quality kits is one problem with US IPMS criteria. Just go to the show, have a yakkety-yak with people, meet and shake hands with John Alcorn, Steve Hustad and the like etc. Just have a good time. If victory or defeat are going to determine your final level of enjoyment, you're going ot be disappointed most of the time. Michael >From: Crawford Neil >Shane, It's not that well-detailed models don't always win >that upsets me. I've seen plenty of overdetailed models > that aren't really very good, they can have basic faults, and >uneven detailing. It's when a guy has spent a lot of time and effort >on a model, and gets beaten by someone who's just shaken his Tamiya >kit together, maybe added som PE stuff, and then done a good paintjob. >It's difficult to make a mistake on something like that, whereas >the guy who tries to do something better, is opening the door wide >open for the whole gammet of mistakes, nearly all of us on this >list know about mistakes! I just feel that too much emphasis is put >on finding them, and too little into looking at what really >constitutes a >good model. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:57:39 -0500 From: "Lance Krieg" To: Subject: re:Another Fe2b question... Message-ID: Sanjeev and Paul conclude: "So, warning bands are more likely then." Sorry, guys, but I'm not buying this. Warning bands inside the boom arrangement? Why bother? The only guy in there to worry about it is the poor bastard swinging the prop, and I'll bet he didn't need reminding, with all those wires to trip over. Which brings to mind that there is no 90 degree bracing wire on the bottom between the two forward booms-struts. I'd guess this was sacrificed precisely because of the increased danger of tripping and falling into the prop; it gave the prop-swinger a little room to back up into. Of course, the chance to add a little color (colour) to a British plane should probably be taken every time it is offered. Lance ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 18:13:29 +0200 From: "Hans Trauner" To: Subject: Re: german rib tapes Message-ID: <00aa01c15ca6$d214f580$baa272d4@FRITZweb> The rip proplem will follow me forever, I feel. My last knowledge comes from too many sources to remember them all. The Great Dan-San had done several statements on the 'other forum' and unluckily I can't tell the details. a) Lozenge tapes seemed to be the norm. Top lozenge with top lozenge tapes, lower lozenge with lower lozenge tapes. But there where examples of 5-color-tapes on 4-color-wings ( or vice versa). b) I never could find any proof of blue tape = top and pink = bottom. I would say that the bird was covered in only one colour. Pink seems to be used rarely. DSA stated somewhere ( and if I remember correctly) that it depends on the firm and time. For example, "Albatros OAW used pink in the DVa-Series from 4567/17 up to 8999/17". Not to taken literally, please! I really can't remember the details! c) All Not-lozenge-tapes looks quite light on the photographs. All blue tape decals are far too dark. I never found a good decal. d) Conclusion: IRA DICTA!!!!!! Hans ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 18:19:52 +0200 From: "Grzegorz Mazurowski" To: Subject: Re: Good news - mixed with "egads" for Tom S. Message-ID: <00ed01c15caa$3d6f8900$0200a8c0@x.pl> I wrote: > That's true that in XVIIth century we lost > millons, but due to combined effort of Turkey, Sweeden, Russia and > Cossacks, and also diseases that their armies brought. It was realy > terrible century for Poland, but comparable to WWII. But of course I had to write: 'NOT comparable to WWII' Sorry, G. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 18:25:04 +0200 From: "Grzegorz Mazurowski" To: Subject: RE: New kits Message-ID: <00ee01c15caa$3f333200$0200a8c0@x.pl> We'll live, we'll see! (old Polish saying) G. > That made me suspicious as well, but it says so in the excel file that they > send. > D. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 16:40:38 From: "Michael Kendix" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: german rib tapes Message-ID: >From: "Hans Trauner" > >c) All Not-lozenge-tapes looks quite light on the photographs. All >blue >tape decals are far too dark. I never found a good decal. Hans: My solution is to cut my own rib tapes using decal paper sprayed with whatever colour you want. The advantage is that touch-ups can be done using the same colour matched paint, especially useful for trailing or leading edge tapes. Michael _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 16:49:42 +0000 From: "Brent Theobald" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Eric's Gotha WAS : I'm Finally Back Message-ID: Hey Shane, I don't think anyone has actually completed one yet. I know of a few that have been started (and damaged). It will go togther. Once I get thru detailing the fuselage I figure the model will fly together. Later! Brent >From: Shane Weier >Reply-To: wwi@wwi-models.org >To: Multiple recipients of list >Subject: [WWI] Eric's Gotha WAS : I'm Finally Back >Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 19:02:37 -0400 (EDT) > >Brent says: > > > My tour de force, Eric's Gotha, has been > > neglected for far too > > long. I have fondled the resin a few times lately but am unable to do > > anything to it. > >Which brings me to asking - has anyone on list finished one of these >wonderfull kits yet? > >I don't recall, and I'm hanging out to see what it looks like in the >finished state. > >Shane > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >********************************************************************** >The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is >intended only for the use of the addressee(s). >If you receive this e-mail in error, any use, distribution or >copying of this e-mail is not permitted. You are requested to >forward unwanted e-mail and address any problems to the >MIM Holdings Limited Support Centre. > >e-mail: supportcentre@mim.com.au >phone: Australia 1800500646 > International ++61 7 38338042 >********************************************************************** > _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:13:00 -0700 From: Ray Boorman To: Subject: Airport Memorial aircraft. Jenny Message-ID: <20011024171856.VHWJ14333.priv-edtnes15-hme0.telusplanet.net@ray> I just got back from a business trip that took me through Denver. If anyone is going through that airport try to get to Concourse B around gate 50. They have a fully restored Curtiss Jenny hanging from the ceiling. Its hung so its undersurface is about 15ft above ground. Very impressive aircraft. (I had never seen a Jenny before). Its all done in a shade like PC10 (All under surfaces are the same colour)and wears OT Air Service markings. Definitely a nice restoration and close enough so you can actually see a lot of detail. For example I noticed that where the fabric has shrunk around the frame of the ailerons it leaves gaps between the wing and aileron. In fact if you built a Jenny with Ailerons like that I'm willing to bet you'd get criticised. Are there other OT monuments in different airports like this? Ray (btw it was way weird to see MP's with rifles patrolling the airport) ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 19:36:05 +0200 From: "Grzegorz Mazurowski" To: "wwi lista" Subject: Formaplane Message-ID: <015e01c15cb2$5cd3c100$0200a8c0@x.pl> Hi list! What do you think about Formaplane? (please, more than in Diego's vacu list, which I've already read) I've got Albatros D.XI prototype, very cheap, but very bad too. Set contains bad vacu sheet, some nice strut material, and details in white metal, not very good and accurate, except wheels which are just OK (seat is for example exact copy of Airfix SPAD VII seat). That model can be only inspiration, as almost everything should be thrown away and made from scratch. Bye G. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 17:52:10 From: "Michael Kendix" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Formaplane Message-ID: Grzegorz: I have the FE2, Caudron G-4. They both have indentations for the upper surface ribs. Why they did that, I have no idea since they'll have to be filled in and rib material glued on. Realistically, they have little chance of being built. Michael >From: "Grzegorz Mazurowski" >Reply-To: wwi@wwi-models.org >To: Multiple recipients of list >Subject: [WWI] Formaplane >Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 13:34:39 -0400 (EDT) > >Hi list! >What do you think about Formaplane? (please, more than in Diego's >vacu list, which I've already read) >I've got Albatros D.XI prototype, very cheap, but very bad too. Set >contains bad vacu sheet, some nice strut material, and details in >white metal, not very good and accurate, except wheels which are just >OK (seat is for example exact copy of Airfix SPAD VII seat). >That model can be only inspiration, as almost everything should be >thrown away and made from scratch. >Bye >G. > > >_________________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 13:56:38 EDT From: CAUhlir@aol.com To: Subject: Re: Eduard 1/48 Nieuport 11 Message-ID: <4c.9e1983.29085ad6@aol.com> I just built the Nieport 21 and have 3 Nieuport 17s going at the same time (hi Matt!). I looked at the kit and it should be the same kind of build..great!! Candice ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 13:26:41 -0500 From: "Lance Krieg" To: Subject: Back in the Saddle Message-ID: After a six month hiatus, I'm back to modeling this evening. Now where did I put that Felixstowe wing? I'm so excited, I had to tell someone, and my wife seemed pretty indifferent when she got the news. Thanks for listening. Lance ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 15:18:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Allan Wright To: mannock@iprimus.com.au (Neil Eddy) Cc: wwi Subject: Re: Model Photos for Gallery Message-ID: <200110241918.PAA69205@mustang.sr.unh.edu> Neil, Thanks for your contribution to the website. Your image gallery is here: http://www.wwi-models.org/Images/Eddy/CP/index.html Nice models! Al =============================================================================== Allan Wright Jr. | Without love life's just a long fight - Southside University of New Hampshire +-------------------------------------------------- Research Computing Center | WWI Modeling mailing list: wwi@wwi-models.org Internet: aew@unh.edu | WWI Modeling WWW Page: http://www.wwi-models.org =============================================================================== ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 15:24:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Allan Wright To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Model Photos for Gallery Message-ID: <200110241924.PAA69323@mustang.sr.unh.edu> Whoops! That's only part of it - your MAIN gallery is here: http://www.wwi-models.org/Images/Eddy/index.html Thanks again, Al > Neil, > > Thanks for your contribution to the website. Your image gallery is > here: > > http://www.wwi-models.org/Images/Eddy/CP/index.html > > Nice models! > Al =============================================================================== Allan Wright Jr. | Without love life's just a long fight - Southside University of New Hampshire +-------------------------------------------------- Research Computing Center | WWI Modeling mailing list: wwi@wwi-models.org Internet: aew@unh.edu | WWI Modeling WWW Page: http://www.wwi-models.org =============================================================================== ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:40:47 -0500 From: "Graham Hunter" To: Subject: RE: Back in the Saddle Message-ID: <000701c15cc3$c93730a0$fa0101c0@grahamh> So we can expect the finished Felixstow in what, ah say 2 weeks?? :-) Graham ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 20:40:39 +0100 From: Steve Cox To: Subject: Re: Addition to the site Message-ID: > That was me. Thanks Matt. Encouraged me to dig mine out. Now, who's for a > Morane cookup (ducking...........) > > Dave > Yes good idea, I've just finished a model for this cook-up , as opposed to never finishing a model for any of the actual cook-ups Regards Steve nb =========================================== steve@oldglebe.freeserve.co.uk http://www.oldglebe.freeserve.co.uk/steveshome.html If I didn't spend so much time on line ‹‹ I'd get some models finished ================ > From: David Fleming > Subject: [WWI] Re: Addition to the site > > Matt Bittner wrote: > >> Well, I was reading the Hyperscale forum when someone asked about the >> EE/Temeks MoS Type I. One of the listees (sorry, can't remember who) >> replied about my built one, but also mentioned that the link to the >> review doesn't work because IM took their older reviews off line. So, >> I uploaded the EE MoS Type I review that was originally on IM into the >> French pages for now, and may move them to another section at some >> (much) later date. LMK what everyone thinks. >> > > ------------------------------ End of WWI Digest 3829 **********************