WWI Digest 3257 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) RE: Gotha review by "Bittner, Matthew E. (KTR)~U" 2) Re: Apology by "Lee J. Mensinger" 3) RE: A little something to break the fun we are having by Crawford Neil 4) RE: Gotha review by "Michael Kendix" 5) RE: Gotha review by Brent Theobald 6) Re: A little something to break the fun we are having by "Hans Trauner" 7) Accurate UFAG by "Robert Norgren" 8) RE: Gotha review by Dennis Ugulano 9) Re: Accurate UFAG by MAnde72343@aol.com 10) Re: Gotha review by MAnde72343@aol.com 11) Contests wasRE: John Impenna's AMS comments by Crawford Neil 12) Re: Boxkite by "Sandy Adam" 13) Re: A little something to break the fun we are having by "Hans Trauner" 14) Merrill's Figure Comments by Andreikor@aol.com 15) Re: Contests wasRE: John Impenna's AMS comments by "Michael Kendix" 16) Re: Was YOU GUYS and Drawing Accuracy. by KarrArt@aol.com 17) Re: You guyes are beginning to really scare me was( Windsock GA Drawings Accu... by KarrArt@aol.com 18) Re: No Subject by KarrArt@aol.com 19) Hans' figure comments by Andreikor@aol.com 20) Re: Humbrols (was: A little something....) by "Mark Shannon" 21) Re: A little something to break the fun we are having by "DAVID BURKE" 22) Gotha glee by Mark Vaughan-Jackson 23) Allan's comments on Barry and Rosemont Hobby by Andreikor@aol.com 24) Re: trust nothing wasRe: Windsock GA Drawings Accuracy by KarrArt@aol.com 25) RE: Gotha glee by "Bittner, Matthew E. (KTR)~U" 26) MIME by "Bittner, Matthew E. (KTR)~U" 27) RE: MIME by "dfernet0" 28) Re: MIME by Allan Wright ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 14:52:36 -0000 From: "Bittner, Matthew E. (KTR)~U" To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: RE: Gotha review Message-ID: <850CD1B940F1D31181590000929B19DA0154C243@mail3.stratcom.mil> > -----Original Message----- > From: Dennis Ugulano [mailto:Uggies@compuserve.com] > Consider Brent offer of putting a build and review on > their web > site. Hey, untold fame and free stuff at the same time is > not a bad offer. > Well, free stuff anyway. I may be reaching a little on the > untold fame. Well, even with Brent's offer, please don't forget Internet Modeler. Matt Bittner ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 09:53:15 -0500 From: "Lee J. Mensinger" To: wwi@wwi-models.org, TOM PLESHA Subject: Re: Apology Message-ID: <3ACDD85B.10A51F8@x25.net> Glad to see you didn't get tapped by the "ouster Fairy". It can happen suddenly and it is mean. I am not sure which portionof the message attracts the people that do the "shutting down" so it is best to not forward it or return it. Chances are great that you can refer to the subject in the text of your message. The Subject Line and full text should be dropped (best) or changed, a lot, to be non-invasive to the program that checks it I watch the list messages and look at them all so I usually send a note when someone does a thing like that. Hope it did not upset you.. Good thoughts cause me to do it. Lee M. TOM PLESHA wrote: > Hi Everyone- > I apologize for sending the SPAM back. Thank you Lee, Allen, et al, for the > words of warning and explanation. > I will certainly be cautious about sending/re-sending. > Again, I apologize. > Tom ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 16:56:33 +0200 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: A little something to break the fun we are having Message-ID: Nor me neither/Neil > > Damn Hans! > > You're making me feel like a retard! I didn't know a > single one of > them! > > > DB > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 15:09:38 From: "Michael Kendix" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: Gotha review Message-ID: >From: "Bittner, Matthew E. (KTR)~U" > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dennis Ugulano [mailto:Uggies@compuserve.com] > >> Consider Brent offer of putting a build and review on >>their web site. Hey, untold fame and free stuff at the same time is >>not a bad offer. Well, free stuff anyway. I may be reaching a >>little on >>the untold fame. > >Well, even with Brent's offer, please don't forget Internet Modeler. .... which, by the way, also contains Mr. Hustad's Roden Gotha II/III review (see the March 2001 issue). Michael _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 10:11:42 -0500 From: Brent Theobald To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: RE: Gotha review Message-ID: <4B9386E83999D411997100508BAF206A01608EE5@stamail.telecom.sna.samsung.com> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0BEAB.E2EC0EA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Howdy! Ditto what Matt said. Send a review into IM too. There's enough to go around. Heck, I still have reviews I am doing for IM. After I get back home I'm taking some time off just to finish a few models I've been meaning to get to. Two of which will appear in IM. Later! Brent -----Original Message----- From: Bittner, Matthew E. (KTR)~U [mailto:BITTNERM@stratcom.mil] Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 9:59 AM To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: RE: Gotha review > -----Original Message----- > From: Dennis Ugulano [mailto:Uggies@compuserve.com] > Consider Brent offer of putting a build and review on > their web > site. Hey, untold fame and free stuff at the same time is > not a bad offer. > Well, free stuff anyway. I may be reaching a little on the > untold fame. Well, even with Brent's offer, please don't forget Internet Modeler. Matt Bittner ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0BEAB.E2EC0EA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: Gotha review

Howdy!

Ditto what Matt said. Send a review into IM too. = There's enough to go around. Heck, I still have reviews I am doing for = IM.

After I get back home I'm taking some time off just = to finish a few models I've been meaning to get to. Two of which will = appear in IM.

Later!

Brent

-----Original Message-----
From: Bittner, Matthew E. (KTR)~U [mailto:BITTNERM@stratcom.mil]<= /FONT>
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 9:59 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: RE: Gotha review


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis Ugulano [mailto:Uggies@compuserve.com]<= /FONT>

>         = Consider Brent offer of putting a build and review on
> their web
> site.  Hey, untold fame and free stuff at = the same time is
> not a bad offer.
>  Well, free stuff anyway.  I may be = reaching a little on the
> untold fame.

Well, even with Brent's offer, please don't forget = Internet Modeler.


Matt Bittner

------_=_NextPart_001_01C0BEAB.E2EC0EA0-- ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 17:21:04 +0200 From: "Hans Trauner" To: Subject: Re: A little something to break the fun we are having Message-ID: <001b01c0bead$32455c80$6ea272d4@FRITZweb> Ha! Got you! Watch your bux, pilots! Huns :-) ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 11:27:26 -0400 From: "Robert Norgren" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Accurate UFAG Message-ID: >Shon Howell wrote: To: "wwi@wwi-models.org" Subject: RE: Gotha review Message-ID: <200104061031_MC2-CB84-3D12@compuserve.com> Matt, >> Well, even with Brent's offer, please don't forget Internet Modeler. << May that never happen. I am committed to IM and enjoy looking at all of the reviews and builds. IM has been very good to me and I will never forget that. Since we are all linked together, I think it's a great way of spreading the wealth and getting our message out. The more people we reach, the more fun we have. Dennis Ugulano email: Uggies@compuserve.com http://ronnieuggie.com/uggie/dju.htm Page Revised 3/10/01 "Each modeler will rise to their own level of masochism." ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 11:36:33 EDT From: MAnde72343@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Accurate UFAG Message-ID: --part1_d.12b3f393.27ff3c81_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bob, everyone I know loves your stuff, it's the best; if anyone made any negative comments, they were 'for example' not a criticism of your very fine work. Merrill --part1_d.12b3f393.27ff3c81_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bob, everyone I know loves your stuff, it's the best; if anyone made any
negative comments, they were 'for example' not a criticism of your very fine
work.
Merrill --part1_d.12b3f393.27ff3c81_boundary-- ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 11:38:15 EDT From: MAnde72343@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Gotha review Message-ID: --part1_c0.124203ee.27ff3ce7_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dennis how's the Roden Gotha coming? Have you posted more photos? (or did I miss it?) Merrill --part1_c0.124203ee.27ff3ce7_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dennis how's the Roden Gotha coming? Have you posted more photos? (or did I
miss it?)
Merrill --part1_c0.124203ee.27ff3ce7_boundary-- ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 17:45:26 +0200 From: Crawford Neil To: "'wwi@wwi-models.org'" Subject: Contests wasRE: John Impenna's AMS comments Message-ID: I like the "open" system too, but I also agree with Dave Flemmings comment about people who take the trouble of entering, and are lucky enough or clever enough to be in an easy class, they're also worth a prize. I've said it before and I'm pretty certain to say it again, I dislike the negative kind of judging that is becoming common at IPMS-contests. I think it's because the more formalized types of judging leave "finding mistakes" as the only thing left for the judges to do. Up here in Sweden, we're not allowed to look at historical accuracy, or how much work there is in a model, so that just leaves basic modelling, and paintwork to judge, we all know that we musn't be influenced by flashy modelling, or by one model being of a subject we like/dislike, of by someone we know/don't know. This means we're being so politically correct and fair in every direction , at the same time trying to have time to judge every model, even the bad ones, that we lose focus on which models are really good, and end up just looking for mistakes, because it's easiest. All the above hassle causes a lot of good modellers to give up judging, they much prefer kit-shopping, and we have inexperienced judges who go by the book, and don't even know a good model, but they do know a good mistake. For me the only system that works, is 3 experienced modellers walking around and choosing the 3 best models in each class, without rules. Sorry about the rant,I got carried away. /Neil > -----Original Message----- > From: Andreikor@aol.com [mailto:Andreikor@aol.com] > Sent: den 5 april 2001 23:55 > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: John Impenna's AMS comments > > > Very nicely put, John... > wish I had said that myself. I too, have always tried to look > on the positive > side of things, particularly when judging. Nothing irks me > more than the > critic who rips apart someone's labor of love, just to make > themselves feel > important or more knowledgeable, or even to influence the > judges! Yes, I have > seen this at IPMS contests and others, but in all fairness to > IPMS, I have to > say that the system itself is very fair and diplomatic > (although I am a > proponent of the 'open' system vs. 1st, 2nd, 3rd). It only > takes one or two > individuals to spoil it for everybody, though, unless > everybody does what I > do... just ignore them... they go away :) > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 16:42:47 +0100 From: "Sandy Adam" To: "AAA - WWI Modelling List" Subject: Re: Boxkite Message-ID: <004101c0beb0$fe0c14a0$0fe8b094@sandyada> To Hans' refs I'd add the old Harleyford Bristol Aircraft volume which contains 3-view plans and some pics of Boxkites. Also the Putnam Bristol book and Penrose vol1. I'd also have to check Hulton-Getty "Aviation" as I seem to remember Boxies in that? Sandy >Witold, >tell hom he should built it OOB. All the reference I have is from Peter Lewis 'British Aircraft 1809 - 1914' , Putnam, 1962. ( 1809, that's correct: Caley's first attempt to construct a glider). Life-Like's kit represents a Bristol Military Boxkite which did have a larger span than the 'standard' Boxkite. Several engines where used, the kit looks like to have 50 h.p. or 70 h.p. Gnome, but I am not sure. Shuttleworth does still run the replica from 'Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines', take a look at http://www.op.dlr.de/FF-DR/dr_fs/staff/krueger/PICS/bristol_box.jpg Caution: Short wing! Hans ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 17:55:08 +0200 From: "Hans Trauner" To: Subject: Re: A little something to break the fun we are having Message-ID: <003f01c0beb1$f484b300$6ea272d4@FRITZweb> 99,8 % perfect, Volker! To be honest, I have to check the answers myself. The questions simple come to my mind reading the first question list... > Hans asked: > 1. In which direction does a Fokker DR 1 engine rotate ( from the pilot's > view)? > right/clockwise O.K 2. How many rounds does a standard Lewis drum hold? > 47 O.K. > 3. Which brake system does a Roland C. II use? > claw type, mounted centrally on the spreader bar O.K. > 4. How many WWI colours are available from Humbrol? > None at this time, originally 6 (HB15/16, HG 7 to 10) O.K. > 5. What was the first WWI a/c kit in plastic? > Heck, I guess there was a Penguin "baked plastic WW I kit - was that the > Camel. Definitely the original Penguin Camel was wood/metal... According to my listings, it was a AVRO 504, available trough 1938 / 1940. > 6. Was there ever a 1/100 scale Fokker DR I? Who did it make? > Faller (their only WW I kit), reissued recently by Deichmann O.K. > 7. What is the smallest scale WWI a/c kits (injection moulded) which ever was available? > 1/200 Mercator (just guessing - the smallest I´ve ever seen) O.K. > 8. What does your kids have for breakfast when they found a tiny Fokker D VIII in the package? > Kellogs (Coco Pops, IIRC) - what else? O.K. plus 'Puffa Puffa Rice', but maybe these where available in the U.K. only, I suspect. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 11:53:11 EDT From: Andreikor@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Merrill's Figure Comments Message-ID: <2b.1384de92.27ff4067@aol.com> Thank you for kind words, Merrill! Merrill wrote: I did a Stormtrooper a while back that I hope to post some photos of just as soon as I can get the time to take some pics. I'm constantly torn between figures and aircraft... right now I'm in aircraft mode :), but in the meantime, if you're requesting some OT pilot figures and such, say 1/48 for dioramas, It's really Mike Good (Jaguar) that you want to do them! He's done a few (and they're extraordinary!) but maybe if we all bug him, he'll do some more... of course, he has to convince Jaguar to produce them. I have a few Hecker and Goros figures and they're great (like a/c kits, I buy more than I'll ever build!) Cheers, Andrei ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 16:16:02 From: "Michael Kendix" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Contests wasRE: John Impenna's AMS comments Message-ID: >From: Crawford Neil > >For me the only system that works, is 3 experienced modellers walking > >around and choosing the 3 best models in each class, without rules. Neil: Just the kind of post to get things going on a dreary Friday - at least in DC it is. This subject reminds me of the stuff we did in Economics, where people try to design rules for optimizing social happiness. All systems lay down some sort of subjective system at the outset. In IPMS-USA, it is "The basics are most important - i.e. basic alignment, paint job, lack of glue blobs. It is subjectively assumed that these are most important; maybe that's reasonable, maybe not. After the basics, there is haggling among judges about whether one problem is worse than another etc. Someone always wins. Biggest problem is that the more complex material contains more mistakes and fewer of this more interesting stuff shows up. Under AMPS, they subjectively assign fixed point values to different aspects of the kit. You add them up and voila - you're at a given standard. Those reaching the standard get a prize. Sometimes nobody gets a prize. Sometimes everyone gets a prize. Biggest problem here is for the competive folks; there's no best or worst - everything is supposed to be judged on its own. Not really a competition then since I could do it at home. At some point, there is always a large dose of subjectivity - in assigning the criteria or comparing criteria across different models. I am uncertain what is meant by "Judging without rules". Do you mean the kit that wins is the one which appeals most tot he judges' sense of aesthetics? Best part of these events, regardless of judging methods, is to meet other modellers and empty your wallet at the vendors. Michael _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 12:22:09 EDT From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: Was YOU GUYS and Drawing Accuracy. Message-ID: <6a.cd2b9ae.27ff4731@aol.com> In a message dated 4/5/01 8:18:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time, tskio4@home.com writes: << And now as penance, I promise to burn my soapbox, and remove the w from my keyboard and keep my editorials confined to the R/C scale world. at least till my birthday on Thursday! >> If it's too late and the thing is just a pile of hot ash....build another one! The list would gey boring pretty quickly if it was filled with nothing but "please advise on color of Camel nuts". RK ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 12:22:13 EDT From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: You guyes are beginning to really scare me was( Windsock GA Drawings Accu... Message-ID: In a message dated 4/5/01 9:19:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time, mkendix@hotmail.com writes: << "A fish without a bicycle is like a gnome without a matchstick... or something...." >> world class collection of cheese and leather animal sculptures? RK ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 12:22:11 EDT From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: No Subject Message-ID: In a message dated 4/5/01 2:59:30 PM Pacific Daylight Time, Andreikor@aol.com writes: << Excellent point, Neil... scale modelling has to be a balance of 'accuracy' and 'aesthetics'. Sometimes things need to be purposely exaggerated just to make them more appealing. I like to think of my miniatures like pieces of intricate jewelry... something people will want to get real close to and look at for a long time; you have to give them lots of little goodies to discover. Cheers, Andrei >> THAT'S what I like- a model that looks good from across a room yet reveals more and more the closer you get to it- and I've seen both super-detailed scratchbuilt models that do this and also great OOB ones too. RK ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 12:25:35 EDT From: Andreikor@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Hans' figure comments Message-ID: <57.140bf8b1.27ff47ff@aol.com> With apologies to the rest of the list for this being off-topic, but I have to defend my figure-painting brethren :) Hans wrote: Hans, there is no one way one 'has' to paint a figure, just as there is no one way one 'has' to paint an airplane. Granted, the majority of figures at a show will have an overall 'same style' look to them (as will models), but there are many individuals with unique styles that stand out and others do try to emulate! I find this true of modellers as well. What I find particularly interesting is the variety of style from one country to the next! This has been born out since the advent of the first truly international show in 1993... the French, Spanish, British and Americans can all be pretty much recognized by their style of painting... pretty curious, I think... all works of art, but all quite different! It all boils down to personal preference... what may win a Gold medal in the U.S., sometimes gets a Bronze in Britain. Yes, I know Steve's work... beautiful. Cheers, Andrei Andrei Koribanics II 8 Falcon Place Wayne, NJ 07470 Voice/Fax: 973-696-9378 email: andreikor@aol.com ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 11:28:53 -0500 From: "Mark Shannon" To: Subject: Re: Humbrols (was: A little something....) Message-ID: > 4. How many WWI colours are available from Humbrol? > None at this time, originally 6 (HB15/16, HG 7 to 10) O.K. Not quite - #74 Linen is identical to the old 'HB16 Clear Doped Linen' in the Authentics line, and #94 Yellow Brown is identical to the HG7 German Pale Yellow. Based on the examples I have of each, these are full matches. While #30 Dark Green is listed as an exact match to HG8 'German Green', I find it more a meta-match ¯ it seems to differ in relative color with light source versus the old color. HG9 'German Purple' and HB15 'RFC Green' had exact matches in the new series in #107 WWI Purple and #108 WWI Green. While #109 was listed as the 'WWI Blue', it was not the same as the old HG10 'German Light Blue' ¯ it is somewhat darker than the 'Authentics' line color, and quite a bit too dark and blue for the 'true' colors, given Rimell's values. The German Purple and RFC Green matches were discontinued in the Humbrol 'SuperEnamel' revanche. Formulas can be found at the IPMS Stockholm site http://www.hotel.wineasy.se/ipms/stuff_eng_colorcharts.htm from Humbrol's 'Color Mix Binder' I do not know the exact copywrite situation on these, but the binder itself is hard to find on these shores. Those mixes I have tried have matched the chips I painted years ago from the Authentics versions, though some are still meta-matches. The color comparison are from my Mk.I ver. XY eyeball and my wife's Mk.I ver. XX equipment under sunlight, incandescent, fluorescent, mixed (one of each turned on to provide the light in the area), and one of the new Ott lights that are supposed to match outdoors light better. .Mark. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 11:25:28 -0500 From: "DAVID BURKE" To: Subject: Re: A little something to break the fun we are having Message-ID: <003201c0beb6$b6192380$bef91c3f@oemcomputer> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hans Trauner" To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 10:21 AM Subject: Re: A little something to break the fun we are having > Ha! Got you! Watch your bux, pilots! > > Huns :-) > Curse You, Red Baron!!! DB ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 14:11:49 +0100 From: Mark Vaughan-Jackson To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Gotha glee Message-ID: Well the local plastic palace finally got a Roden Gotha in, which I plucked from the shipping box myself (startling the sales staff) before retreating to a corner to drool - gnashing my teeth and snarling at any who dared try to touch it. Suffice to say they're hanging on to it for my until the wallet expands to the point I can buy it. Here's the question. I know jadar has the Part sets available, but has this PE reached a North American site/store/distributor yet?? For that matter I don't think I've seen anyone quoting a price for this set. Anyone know how much one of these will cost?? MVJ TGIF - looking forward to a quiet beer in front of the TV as I put a Camel interior together from basswood bits. (Darn you DB anyway. . .now I have a 1:28 Camel of my own I can't resist following your masterful, though slightly crazed, footsteps. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 12:37:00 EDT From: Andreikor@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Allan's comments on Barry and Rosemont Hobby Message-ID: <67.12309e9c.27ff4aac@aol.com> Allan wrote: Couldn't agree with you more, Allan. In fact, I hold Barry personally responsible for my being 'born again' into WWI modelling. He helps host a really nice show each year in September, too. Maybe those of us who can should try to make it this year! As for off limits, I found that to be true, too... until I asked Sandy out to lunch... :) Cheers, Andrei Andrei Koribanics II 8 Falcon Place Wayne, NJ 07470 Voice/Fax: 973-696-9378 email: andreikor@aol.com ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 12:55:13 EDT From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: trust nothing wasRe: Windsock GA Drawings Accuracy Message-ID: In a message dated 4/5/01 5:08:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time, Neil.Crawford@volvo.com writes: << I usually check carefully if I'm scratchbuilding otherwise Dicta-Ira within reason. /Neil >> That's when I get all itchy/scratchy about drawings- scratchbuilding. If it's a kit, I go more for overall shape and "sit".......as for being "within reason"........reason????? I guess my portion of Dicta Ira involves going for the pleasurable psychotic brain burn! RK ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 16:55:51 -0000 From: "Bittner, Matthew E. (KTR)~U" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: RE: Gotha glee Message-ID: <850CD1B940F1D31181590000929B19DA0156A571@mail3.stratcom.mil> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0BEBA.6F98C010 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Vaughan-Jackson [mailto:mvj@thetelegram.com] > For that matter I don't think I've seen anyone quoting a > price for this > set. Anyone know how much one of these will cost?? Roll Models has it, for either $11 or $15. I can't remember. Matt Bittner ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0BEBA.6F98C010 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" RE: Gotha glee

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Vaughan-Jackson [mailto:mvj@thetelegram.com]

> For that matter I don't think I've seen anyone quoting a
> price for this
> set. Anyone know how much one of these will cost??

Roll Models has it, for either $11 or $15.  I can't remember.


Matt Bittner

------_=_NextPart_001_01C0BEBA.6F98C010-- ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 17:04:27 -0000 From: "Bittner, Matthew E. (KTR)~U" To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: MIME Message-ID: <850CD1B940F1D31181590000929B19DA0156A582@mail3.stratcom.mil> Sorry about the MIME in the last message. I'm seeing if I have it licked now. Matt Bittner ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 14:06:26 -0300 From: "dfernet0" To: Subject: RE: MIME Message-ID: <00d601c0bebb$eabeaba0$4640a8c0@ssp.salud.rosario.gov.ar> How does MIME taste? D. ----- Original Message ----- From: Bittner, Matthew E. (KTR)~U To: Multiple recipients of list Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 2:08 PM Subject: MIME > Sorry about the MIME in the last message. I'm seeing if I have it licked > now. > > > Matt Bittner > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 13:12:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Allan Wright To: wwi@wwi-models.org Subject: Re: MIME Message-ID: <200104061712.NAA08368@pease1.sr.unh.edu> > Sorry about the MIME in the last message. I'm seeing if I have it licked > now. Houston - we have no problem..... =============================================================================== Allan Wright Jr. | Without love life's just a long fight - Southside University of New Hampshire +-------------------------------------------------- Research Computing Center | WWI Modeling mailing list: wwi@wwi-models.org Internet: aew@unh.edu | WWI Modeling WWW Page: http://www.wwi-models.org =============================================================================== ------------------------------ End of WWI Digest 3257 **********************