WWI Digest 2299 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) Re: Fokker DR-1..... MVR by smperry@mindspring.com 2) Your Grammarian-ship, was, Re: Roland CII by skarver@banet.net 3) Re: Roland CII "Accessories"? by "DAVID BURKE" 4) 1/48 to 1/28th percentage by "Charles and Linda Duckworth" 5) Re: 1/48 to 1/28th percentage by Henrik.Andersson@simr.se 6) Re: 1/48 to 1/28th percentage by "laskodi" 7) Re: What is available? by Steve Cox 8) Americals for sale by "Matthew Bittner" 9) Re: Fokker DR-1..... MVR by "Matthew Bittner" 10) Re: Fokker DR-1..... MVR by Ernest Thomas 11) Re: 1914,U.S. & the Zimmerman Note by Albatrosdv@aol.com 12) DML Triplane for sale cheap! by THOMAS SOLINSKI 13) Re: Roland CII "Accessories"? by Albatrosdv@aol.com 14) Re: Fokker DR-1..... MVR by Albatrosdv@aol.com 15) Re: Your Grammarian-ship, was, Re: Roland CII by Albatrosdv@aol.com 16) Re: Roland CII "Accessories"? by Ernest Thomas 17) looking for OT t-shirts by Ernest Thomas 18) I've got the DF!, was Re: Roland CII "Accessories"? by skarver@banet.net 19) Re: I've got the DF!, was Re: Roland CII "Accessories"? by Ernest Thomas 20) Re: I've got the DF!, was Re: Roland CII "Accessories"? by skarver@banet.net 21) Re:calculations by Sixmilfigs@cs.com 22) Roland Color Quandra by skarver@banet.net 23) Re: calculations by Otisgood@aol.com 24) Re: Your Grammarian-ship, was, Re: Roland CII by Otisgood@aol.com 25) Re: What is available? by Brent_A_Theobald@notes.seagate.com 26) Re: looking for OT t-shirts by "Brad & Merville" 27) BTW, where are those fisch-y Wals? by skarver@banet.net 28) Re: looking for OT t-shirts by Ernest Thomas 29) Re: looking for OT t-shirts by Ernest Thomas 30) Re: Your Grammarian-ship, was, Re: Roland CII by Albatrosdv@aol.com 31) Re: looking for OT t-shirts by "Michael Kendix" 32) Re: looking for OT t-shirts by Ernest Thomas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 10:52:57 -0400 From: smperry@mindspring.com To: Subject: Re: Fokker DR-1..... MVR Message-ID: <001801bfb1ea$9fa1ade0$0a0b56d1@default> > Looks good Peter. > E. Hey E, he sure nailed thar !@#$Y*&^%$% red, didn't he sp ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 11:15:38 -0400 From: skarver@banet.net To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Your Grammarian-ship, was, Re: Roland CII Message-ID: <390AFC99.AC62DECC@banet.net> I don't think there is really a split, dangling, misplaced language element here (certainly none that would confuse the recipient, as attested to by the appropriate responses), but might you care to illumine further? Ever the humble mumbler, SK Otisgood@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 4/28/00 10:47:57 PM Central Daylight Time, > skarver@banet.net writes: > > > Aside from the MGs, would > > the C.II have carried > > bombs? Recon camera? > > TIA, > > Stef > > I didn't know the MGs carried bombs. Maybe that's why Booker T is not with > them anymore. > > OG ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 10:29:41 -0500 From: "DAVID BURKE" To: Subject: Re: Roland CII "Accessories"? Message-ID: <001601bfb1ef$beef09e0$9e83aec7@dora9sprynet.com> -----Original Message----- From: Otisgood@aol.com To: Multiple recipients of list Date: Saturday, April 29, 2000 8:04 AM Subject: Re: Roland CII "Accessories"? >In a message dated 4/28/00 10:47:57 PM Central Daylight Time, >skarver@banet.net writes: > >> Aside from the MGs, would >> the C.II have carried >> bombs? Recon camera? >> TIA, >> Stef > >I didn't know the MGs carried bombs. Maybe that's why Booker T is not with >them anymore. > >OG Oh, that's BAD. DB ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 10:45:40 -0500 From: "Charles and Linda Duckworth" To: "ww1FAQ" Subject: 1/48 to 1/28th percentage Message-ID: <005501bfb1f2$0df49d00$ac2c57d8@cnlduckwor> Does anyone know the copier percentage to take a general arrangement drawing from 1/48th up to 1/28th? I finally located the FSM Revell Fokker DVII article from January 99 and want to get some decent drawing to begin chopping this kit up into something I can dogfight David's Camel with 8^). Thanks, Charlie nb: DML Triplane Jasta 32b; 98% completed needs rigging and access panels on the cowling sides. nu: It's a toss up between the Fokker and Eduards Roland (believe the Roland will win) ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 17:42:09 +0100 From: Henrik.Andersson@simr.se To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: 1/48 to 1/28th percentage Message-ID: <412568D0.005B99F7.00@nt.simr.se> Quick calc: 171% should be the closest. (171.43% actually) Henrik Does anyone know the copier percentage to take a general arrangement drawing from 1/48th up to 1/28th? I finally located the FSM Revell Fokker DVII article from January 99 and want to get some decent drawing to begin chopping this kit up into something I can dogfight David's Camel with 8^). Thanks, Charlie nb: DML Triplane Jasta 32b; 98% completed needs rigging and access panels on the cowling sides. nu: It's a toss up between the Fokker and Eduards Roland (believe the Roland will win) ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 08:55:15 -0700 From: "laskodi" To: Subject: Re: 1/48 to 1/28th percentage Message-ID: <001901bfb1f3$5016bd20$433819d0@laskodi> To calculate scale percentages simply divide the two numbers (ie., 48/28 = 1.71) which is 171% on your copier/scanner. HTH --------Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles and Linda Duckworth" To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2000 8:42 AM Subject: 1/48 to 1/28th percentage > Does anyone know the copier percentage to take a general arrangement drawing > from 1/48th up to 1/28th? I finally located the FSM Revell Fokker DVII > article from January 99 and want to get some decent drawing to begin > chopping this kit up into something I can dogfight David's Camel with 8^). > > Thanks, Charlie > > nb: DML Triplane Jasta 32b; 98% completed needs rigging and access panels > on the cowling sides. > nu: It's a toss up between the Fokker and Eduards Roland (believe the > Roland will win) > > ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 16:55:04 +0100 From: Steve Cox To: Subject: Re: What is available? Message-ID: There's also the Joystick vacform Ago CII, which makes up into an unusual little model, well I think it will, mine is only cut out so far. Regards Steve =========================================== steve@oldglebe.freeserve.co.uk http://www.oldglebe.freeserve.co.uk/steveshome.html If I didn't spend so much time on line ‹‹ I'd get some models finished ================ >>> As far as pushers go, I can only speak for 1/72nd. You have/had >>> available: Otto C.I Doppeldecker by Blue Rider; a couple of British >>> jobs by Blue Rider (why can't I remember what those are?); FE2b in vac >>> by a couple of companies; Voisin 3 by Flashback; Caudron G.3 by >>> Roseplane; Caudron G.4 by Blue Rider; Farman F.40 by Roseplane; Farman >>> F.11 by Blue Rider and HR (how I wish I could find a Blue Rider >>> example...); Breguet V horribly done by Veterans 72; I'm sure I'm >>> leaving a bunch out. >> ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 11:12:05 -0500 From: "Matthew Bittner" To: "wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu" Subject: Americals for sale Message-ID: <200004291614.JAA00435@magpie.a001.sprintmail.com> I have two 1/48th sheets of Americal crosses I'm looking to get rid of. They are sheets #32 and #33, Ubergangsformige Balkenkreuze I and II. I would prefer a trade, but willing to negotiate. :-) Matt Bittner http://www.geocities.com/~ipmsfortcrook http://pease1.sr.unh.edu/misc/FrenchWW1 ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 11:16:31 -0500 From: "Matthew Bittner" To: "wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu" Subject: Re: Fokker DR-1..... MVR Message-ID: <200004291619.JAA02313@magpie.a001.sprintmail.com> On Sat, 29 Apr 2000 10:11:44 -0400 (EDT), Peter Crow wrote: > Also up-loaded pics of the "Blue Max" Pfalz D-XII > that I did about a year ago... and the "Toko" Snipe. Excellent as always, Peter. Good to see you haven't completed forgotten 1/72nd. :-) Matt Bittner http://www.geocities.com/~ipmsfortcrook http://pease1.sr.unh.edu/misc/FrenchWW1 ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 12:22:47 -0500 From: Ernest Thomas To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Fokker DR-1..... MVR Message-ID: <390B1A66.D638EF73@bellsouth.net> smperry@mindspring.com wrote: > Hey E, he sure nailed thar !@#$Y*&^%$% red, didn't he I don't know..... I would have added a tad more #$, with a smidge less ^%. E. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 13:26:05 EDT From: Albatrosdv@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: 1914,U.S. & the Zimmerman Note Message-ID: <90.3a7085f.263c752d@aol.com> In a message dated 4/28/00 9:50:17 PM EST, ethomas6@bellsouth.net writes: << Mexican Latino music has a very heavy German influence. >> It's called "banda," and if you live in a neighborhood with a significant Latino population (like I do here in LA) you can get oom-pah-pahed" to death on a warm Sunday afternoon when all the campesinos are outside. Tom Cleaver ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 12:27:09 -0500 From: THOMAS SOLINSKI To: WW-I List Subject: DML Triplane for sale cheap! Message-ID: <390B1B6D.BCBB5B2C@home.com> Hi Listers!! I'm whittling down my 600+ kit collection on eBay. But I've saved the OT stuff for you good folks. To start with I have a NEW but opened in the original wrapper a DML Fokker DR-1 that I'll part with for $9.00 U.S plus mailing. That's $3.20 US domestic, and actual cost to the rest of the world ( that usually is $3.00 to virtually everyone, and an arm and a leg and your firstborn to the UK and it's former colonies) :-) PLEASE only contact me OFF LIST as I am currently UN SUBSCRIBED and answering to the list only takes up Alan's bandwidth and I won't read it in the near future either!! Thanks, Tom Solinski, Oklahoma City ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 13:34:57 EDT From: Albatrosdv@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Roland CII "Accessories"? Message-ID: <13.49048e4.263c7741@aol.com> In a message dated 4/28/00 10:42:52 PM EST, skarver@banet.net writes: << Aside from the MGs, would the C.II have carried bombs? Recon camera? >> Both, but not on the same mission. BTW: I have been peering at the drawings in the Datafile, and staring at the photos, and comparing all to the kit, and I think the kit is an early-production C.II/C.IIa - it has the long-span wings. Now don't hold me to this, because there is only the one photo in the book, and it's at a bad angle, but the best I can figure from looking at the photo of the airplane that's the "boxart airplane" is that it might be a late-production C.IIa - the wings appear to be shorter, and I can't see the aileron control wires from the lower wing (this is the big giveaway between early and late visually). All that means is it isn't a very good photo, and it just might be as the kit is. Me personally, I am thinking of doing the airplane on the cover of the datafile, though you have to do a lot of fiddling with the inspection panels on the cowling between the first production C.II and the first production C.IIa - those checkerboards are almost as cool as fish scales, and nobody can say it isn't black checkerboards. Past all that, it is sure one very nice kit and however you do it it's going to look nice. Cheers, Tom Cleaver ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 13:45:32 EDT From: Albatrosdv@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Fokker DR-1..... MVR Message-ID: <7e.4335265.263c79bc@aol.com> In a message dated 4/28/00 6:03:23 PM EST, Otisgood@aol.com writes: << Of course, Ashley Judd lives just a few miles from me, and she's in the movie biz. Dream on, Otis! >> ROTFLMAO! Tom C ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 13:52:40 EDT From: Albatrosdv@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Your Grammarian-ship, was, Re: Roland CII Message-ID: <5a.47dcf36.263c7b68@aol.com> In a message dated 4/29/00 10:21:20 AM EST, skarver@banet.net writes: << > I didn't know the MGs carried bombs. Maybe that's why Booker T is not with > them anymore. >> LOL "Booker T and the MGs" - likely "before your time" Stef. Tom C. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 12:58:02 -0500 From: Ernest Thomas To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Roland CII "Accessories"? Message-ID: <390B22A9.F6514283@bellsouth.net> Albatrosdv@aol.com wrote: > Me personally, I am thinking of doing the airplane on the > cover of the datafile, I'm thinking about maybe doing the same. What's yer guess on that one odd wing that doesn't have the check? I was thinking maybe the original was damaged and replaced with one from another bird. E. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 13:08:46 -0500 From: Ernest Thomas To: "11111qqqqqqsd'f'dc]v" Subject: looking for OT t-shirts Message-ID: <390B252E.64D4E58F@bellsouth.net> Hi All,(and especially those who may have had a hand in Aerodrome'92/'94) On top of all the other great things about Aerodrome was the pile of on topic t-shirts I was able to buy there. Really cool ones, like the Nungesser black heart, PlM, Dr.1, Laf.Esc., etc... Well, after 6 or 8 years of wear, they're all worn out and getting holes and swmbo is giving me cross looks everytime I put on one of these old holy t-shirts. She's threatening to buy me some new t-shirts. I'd really like to replace these OT t's that have been my fav attire for all these years. Does anyone know who it was selling these, or how I could contact said t-shirt vendors? Tia, E. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 14:33:22 -0400 From: skarver@banet.net To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: I've got the DF!, was Re: Roland CII "Accessories"? Message-ID: <390B2AF2.8FD096A9@banet.net> Ernest Thomas wrote: > [big snip] Not sure where the pipes go from there. > If this isn't clear, get the Datafile. It isn't that clear in the stinkin' DF. When DFs resemble a Maru Mechanic--ah, when pigs fly! StefK BTW, what do you make of those cable pulleys--set on a vertical spindle/axle? ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 13:53:48 -0500 From: Ernest Thomas To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: I've got the DF!, was Re: Roland CII "Accessories"? Message-ID: <390B2FBB.DF55EDD9@bellsouth.net> skarver@banet.net wrote: > BTW, what do you make of those cable pulleys--set on a vertical spindle/axle? If you're talking about the pulleys labled #6 in the drawing on page 30, those are the pulleys for the rudder cable. Are those the ones you mean? E. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 15:00:11 -0400 From: skarver@banet.net To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: I've got the DF!, was Re: Roland CII "Accessories"? Message-ID: <390B313B.D8AD5290@banet.net> Yes, sir. SK Ernest Thomas wrote: > skarver@banet.net wrote: > > > BTW, what do you make of those cable pulleys--set on a vertical spindle/axle? > > If you're talking about the pulleys labled #6 in the drawing on page 30, those > are the pulleys for the rudder cable. > Are those the ones you mean? > E. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 15:15:14 EDT From: Sixmilfigs@cs.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re:calculations Message-ID: In a message dated 4/29/00 10:53:22 AM US Eastern Standard Time, laskodi@launchnet.com writes: << To calculate scale percentages simply divide the two numbers (ie., 48/28 = 1.71) which is 171% on your copier/scanner. >> Let's assume the copier I am using does not go up to 171%. What intermediate percentage copies can be used to create the final corrected image. Once upon a time I found such a chart, but it has been long lost. Does anyone know of this link, or can help out the math inept? Is there a simple formula? thanks Shawn ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 15:15:14 -0400 From: skarver@banet.net To: "wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu" Subject: Roland Color Quandra Message-ID: <390B34C2.34B9584F@banet.net> OK, I'll admit it, I'm stumped, bothered & bewildered again. Color profiles and notes of Rimell (DF) and Eduard (kit 8040) are in serious contradiction with each other with respect to the highlighted sharkmouth aircraft--and with the DF's own photo evidence, at least to this observer. But first, a digression, what is the interior color--specifically the inner fuselage sides and formers? Our Eduard's instructions annotate 'wood,' and the DF is silent on this point (unless I have missed something.) However, the photos of the observer/gunner's position in the DF strongly suggest a painted interior because of the uniform tonality, without a hint of grain, of various major wooden interior members--ship-lapped skinning, formers, stringers, and window framing (as well as some other smaller fitments that may well not even be wood--the antenna wire guide, for instance). In contrast, there are clear examples of varnished 'natural' wood elements such as various instrument panels, seat members, and special fitments, such as the wooden antenna spool and its mounting plate, which only highlight the different quality of the other, 'painted,' components. If it is agreed that the interior was. therefore, largely painted, the next question, of course, is what color? Could it be the same 'hellblau' as the exterior is said to have been painted? Comparing exterior shots with the interior ones suggests that perhaps it is similar to the green of the two-tone camo schemes. Gray? Now on to the outer skin. First, Eduard's call-outs for 'lilac' should probably be discounted on the basis of probabilities. Grosz suggests that since C.II's served operationally up to June '17, and the change from red-brown to lilac was specified in April, some a/c might have worn the later scheme. Although some will doubtless take 'dicta Ira' (the modeler's 'Fifth'), and demand to be proved wrong, they can be shown to be probably wrong on the low likelihood that the photo basis of their documentation was taken in the time frame specified *and* that that a/c as one of the few that was re-painted to conform to ne edicts from central command. OK Eduard is, however, closer to the mark in showing this a/c with a two-tone fuselage paint job. Seeming to ignore the photo evidence before him in the DF, Rimell paints an all-green (sorta) fuselage with a notation that the upper wing surfaces are two tone (green and brown). Photo 63 shows what appears to be the typical fuselage application of this scheme, dark fore and aft sections,, with the observer's in the lighter. If red-brown and green are accepted as the standard colors called for (over a hellblau in a practice foreshadowing the early Luftwaffe RLM 70/71/65 scheme), photo 94's aerial view of a Roland so painted flying over broken farm country shows the dark color matching the earth-brown of newly plowed field and the lighter cultivated plots (in confirmation of Grosz's statement that the brown would be rendered darker than the green on period film). Although somewhat difficult to see in photo 95, 'number 2 sharkmouth' actually appears to adhere to the typical painting scheme. Regards, StefK ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 15:49:27 EDT From: Otisgood@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: calculations Message-ID: <7c.4d4e565.263c96c7@aol.com> In a message dated 4/29/00 2:16:39 PM Central Daylight Time, Sixmilfigs@cs.com writes: > Let's assume the copier I am using does not go up to 171%. What intermediate > > percentage copies can be used to create the final corrected image. Once > upon > a time I found such a chart, but it has been long lost. Does anyone know of > > this link, or can help out the math inept? Is there a simple formula? > thanks > Shawn > Assuming your copier goes to 150%, copy at that size. Then divide 171 by 150 (171/150). That yields 1.14%. So then copy it at 114%. That should give you the size you need (close enough for govt work). Otis ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 15:53:51 EDT From: Otisgood@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Your Grammarian-ship, was, Re: Roland CII Message-ID: <50.4b19124.263c97cf@aol.com> In a message dated 4/29/00 10:22:33 AM Central Daylight Time, skarver@banet.net writes: > I don't think there is really a split, dangling, misplaced language element > here (certainly none that would confuse the recipient, as attested to by the > appropriate responses), but might you care to illumine further? > Ever the humble mumbler, > SK I knew what you intended. Just saw a small (very small) opening to insert some nostalgic humor. Booker T and the MG's, a 60's Motown (I assume?) group. Otis ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 14:46:30 -0500 From: Brent_A_Theobald@notes.seagate.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: What is available? Message-ID: Howdy! > What I want to ask about is paint colors, I have looked through the > FAQ lists on a few sites and have not found any references for WWI colors on > the different aircraft such as Linen, PC10 let alone that French five color > scheme, and then some of the German colors like the streaky Green, well I do > need some help. Is such a list available or will I have to question the list > each time I start a new ship? I like to use Russian Armour Green from X-Tra Color for the browner end of the PC-10 spectrum. I'll be painting the Aero Club Re-8 as well as the Pegasus DH-2 this color eventually. Later! Brent ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 15:59:47 -0400 From: "Brad & Merville" To: Subject: Re: looking for OT t-shirts Message-ID: <001c01bfb215$80b276a0$978c5ad1@The_Grenade.Workgroup> E. Funny you should mention this. I was just looking at the site for The Aerodrome and noting that they have a great selection of OT shirts listed for sale. I was thinking of the Bishop and maybe a Voss. The one with the 209 Camel chasing MvR might be cool. Sorry E. I don't remember where I got the link. I can't find it in Al's link page. Any one else have it? Brad -----Original Message----- From: Ernest Thomas To: Multiple recipients of list Date: Saturday, April 29, 2000 2:15 PM Subject: looking for OT t-shirts >Hi All,(and especially those who may have had a hand in >Aerodrome'92/'94) >On top of all the other great things about Aerodrome was the pile of on >topic t-shirts I was able to buy there. Really cool ones, like the >Nungesser black heart, PlM, Dr.1, Laf.Esc., etc... >Well, after 6 or 8 years of wear, they're all worn out and getting holes >and swmbo is giving me cross looks everytime I put on one of these old >holy t-shirts. She's threatening to buy me some new t-shirts. I'd really >like to replace these OT t's that have been my fav attire for all these >years. Does anyone know who it was selling these, or how I could contact >said t-shirt vendors? >Tia, >E. > > > ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 16:27:02 -0400 From: skarver@banet.net To: "wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu" Subject: BTW, where are those fisch-y Wals? Message-ID: <390B4596.3455F59E@banet.net> That about says it. While everyone waits for someone to provide Roland scaly skin, who has limned the likenesses of those inimitable ichthyoids? TIA & regards, StefK ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 15:38:32 -0500 From: Ernest Thomas To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: looking for OT t-shirts Message-ID: <390B4847.1A66705B@bellsouth.net> Brad & Merville wrote: > Funny you should mention this. I was just looking at the site for The > Aerodrome and noting that they have a great selection of OT shirts listed > for sale. The Aerodrome, you say? Well that's a start. I'll do a search... E. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 16:05:10 -0500 From: Ernest Thomas To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: looking for OT t-shirts Message-ID: <390B4E84.A1A80170@bellsouth.net> Brad, Ah HA! Found it. That's not the shirts I was talking about, but those are very cool and I think I'll have to start ordering some. Maybe a Boelcke, a Luke, a MvR, a Brumowski, a Voss, a Nungesser, And that #3 shirt with the D-VII. Hell, that's seven. One for each day of the week. :) Now if Cyg would make some shirts with the Passchendaele logo, or at least print up some iron-ons so I can make my own shirts. E. Oh, for those interested in these, go to; http://www.theaerodrome.com/store/t-shirts/index.html ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 17:33:21 EDT From: Albatrosdv@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Your Grammarian-ship, was, Re: Roland CII Message-ID: <29.46d9a5e.263caf21@aol.com> In a message dated 4/29/00 2:56:07 PM EST, Otisgood@aol.com writes: << Booker T and the MG's, a 60's Motown (I assume?) group. >> Not hardly. Obviously, Otis is a mere childe, also. Tom Cleaver ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 14:35:34 PDT From: "Michael Kendix" To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: looking for OT t-shirts Message-ID: <20000429213534.81496.qmail@hotmail.com> E.: One thing I considered was to make my own t-shirt. I was going to use photos that I'd taken of my kits, go to the Mall where they make t-shirts with photos' images on them; for example, people have pictures of their grandkids or something. I thought I'd get the Il'ya on my front and a Fokker D.VII on the back. Unfortuantely, the vendors disappeared from the Mall after Christmas, but next year.... Michael >From: Ernest Thomas >Reply-To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu >To: Multiple recipients of list >Subject: Re: looking for OT t-shirts >Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 16:42:02 -0400 (EDT) > >Brad & Merville wrote: > > > Funny you should mention this. I was just looking at the site for >The > > Aerodrome and noting that they have a great selection of OT shirts >listed > > for sale. > >The Aerodrome, you say? Well that's a start. I'll do a search... >E. > > ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 17:17:20 -0500 From: Ernest Thomas To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: looking for OT t-shirts Message-ID: <390B5F6F.AE10DE15@bellsouth.net> Michael Kendix wrote: > E.: > > One thing I considered was to make my own t-shirt. That's not a bad idea either. But I've never liked the heavily pixelated images those guys produce. I think I've found what i'm looking for. Thanks for the tip though. E. ------------------------------ End of WWI Digest 2299 **********************