WWI Digest 2064 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) Re: Short 184 by Michael Kendix 2) RE: Short 184 by Shane Weier 3) Re: I completed a model! by Suvoroff@aol.com 4) Re: Short 184 by "Richard Eaton" 5) Re: Happy 2000 was Re: unsubbed by KarrArt@aol.com 6) Re: Short 184 by Michael Kendix 7) Re: Short 184 by Ernest Thomas 8) Re: Short 184 by "Len Smith" 9) Alb D.V - D.Va by "Leonard Endy" 10) Re: Alb D.V - D.Va by "Dale Beamish" 11) Re: Alb D.V - D.Va by Albatrosdv@aol.com 12) Gotha info by John Huggins 13) Re: Gotha info by "Lee Mensinger" 14) Re: Gotha info by John Huggins 15) Re: Tommy needs tiny lettering by Pedro e Francisca 16) Re: Tommy needs tiny lettering by "David C. Fletcher" 17) Re: Gotha info by "Lee Mensinger" 18) Re: Tommy needs tiny lettering by "Steve Cox" 19) RE: Alb D.V - D.Va by Shane Weier 20) a couple of ???'s by Ernest Thomas 21) ALB DV - DVa by "Dale Beamish" 22) Re: a couple of ???'s by "Dale Beamish" 23) Re: a couple of ???'s by Brent & Tina Theobald 24) Re: ALB DV - DVa by "Peter Leonard" 25) Re: a couple of ???'s by Ernest Thomas 26) Re: Gotha info by REwing@aol.com 27) Re: 2000 Most Wanted (1/48th) by DavidL1217@aol.com 28) Re: FMP Books by DavidL1217@aol.com 29) Re: newest Chandelle available by bucky@ptdprolog.net 30) Web Site URL Change and Update by "Richard Eaton" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2000 20:50:26 EST From: Michael Kendix To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Short 184 Message-ID: <20000101.205003.4447.1.mkendix@juno.com> Len: I also saw a Sierra Scale Models' "Short 184 Bomber" for $21.95. Barry Stettler at Rosemont Hobby has them. Has anyone built this kit or seen it and could say something about it. I believe it has decals and metal parts. Sounds alright. A more general issue; male versus female molded vacuforms. I assume that female molds are preferable for certain components. Which? Are female molds more difficult to make? Michael ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 11:59:18 +1000 From: Shane Weier To: "'wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu'" Subject: RE: Short 184 Message-ID: <65C968E11318D311B0BD0060B06865CDBD1B7D@mimhexch.mim.com.au> Michael, > A more general issue; male versus female molded vacuforms. I > assume that > female molds are preferable for certain components. Which? All**. Because the detail on the master is then impressed onto the proper (outer) surface of the part and will be much sharper than if impressed from behind. ** Except the sort of parts which should never be vacformed anyway. > Are female > molds more difficult to make? Yes. Make a master. Cut it in halves (usually the master is made to facilitate this) Cast the female mould from the male. Drill a bunch of holes in it for the vacuum. Then make models Costs more, more steps, needs higher vacuum, but much more sophisticated results are possible. Shane ************************************************************** The information contained in this E-Mail is confidential and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you receive this E-Mail in error, any use, distribution or copying of this E-Mail is not permitted. You are requested to forward unwanted E-Mail and address any problems to the MIM Holdings Limited Help Desk. E-Mail: helpdesk@mim.com.au or phone: Australia 07 3833 8042. ************************************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 21:07:43 EST From: Suvoroff@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: I completed a model! Message-ID: <0.15feb312.25a00cef@aol.com> Roger; Yes, the photograph is mandatory. Yours, James D. Gray ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 20:26:24 -0600 From: "Richard Eaton" To: Subject: Re: Short 184 Message-ID: <004501bf54c8$c50e3be0$ad305d18@austin.rr.com> Hey Mike, I have just started on this kit. The parts are very good for a vac as Sierra does use female molds. Clean and crisp. FYI the kit comes with metal wheels and a plastic gun and prop. It does not include decals (or struts for that matter.) One should scratch the undercarriage, exhausts, and replace the gun. I can update you as things come together. Regards, Richard ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Kendix To: Multiple recipients of list Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000 7:54 PM Subject: Re: Short 184 > > Len: > > I also saw a Sierra Scale Models' "Short 184 Bomber" for $21.95. Barry > Stettler at Rosemont Hobby has them. > > Has anyone built this kit or seen it and could say something about it. I > believe it has decals and metal parts. Sounds alright. > > A more general issue; male versus female molded vacuforms. I assume that > female molds are preferable for certain components. Which? Are female > molds more difficult to make? > > Michael > > ________________________________________________________________ > YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! > Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! > Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 22:07:53 EST From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Happy 2000 was Re: unsubbed Message-ID: <0.99ab531.25a01b09@aol.com> In a message dated 1/1/00 3:02:07 PM Pacific Standard Time, thegreatlandoni@hotmail.com writes: << Just finished looking at the 4 new paintings ... and downloading them to my hard drive for future reference. They are fantastic! Even my wife, who has no interest in wwi bipes said "He's really good". If I ever build the Guillows Nie 11 and Guillows SW Camel that I have on my shelf, maybe I'll use these paintings for reference. >> aw shucks, and tell your wife "thanks" for me! RK ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2000 22:38:36 EST From: Michael Kendix To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Short 184 Message-ID: <20000101.223814.4447.2.mkendix@juno.com> Richard: Thanks. What about interior bits? Could you possibly list each part, if it's not too many? Michael On Sat, 1 Jan 2000 21:30:03 -0500 (EST) "Richard Eaton" writes: >Hey Mike, > >I have just started on this kit. The parts are very good for a vac as >Sierra does use female molds. Clean and crisp. FYI the kit comes with metal >wheels and a plastic gun and prop. It does not include decals (or struts for >that matter.) >One should scratch the undercarriage, exhausts, and replace the gun. > >I can update you as things come together. > >Regards, > >Richard ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2000 21:53:36 -0600 From: Ernest Thomas To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Short 184 Message-ID: <386ECBBF.EACDDA84@bellsouth.net> Michael Kendix wrote: > Are female > molds more difficult to make? > Anything 'female' will always be more difficult. :) E. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 08:52:24 -0000 From: "Len Smith" To: Subject: Re: Short 184 Message-ID: <009201bf54ff$ce252e00$89867ed4@mesh> Michael, The Sierra kit is for the Short Bomber, not the 184. The Bomber was developed from the 184 as a stop gap measure pending the arrival of the Handley Page 0/400. Originally the wing span was increased from 63'6" to 72'0" and the cockpit positions were reversed. In this form the aircraft was not powerful enough to lift the full bomb load, so the span was again increased to 84'0", but the a/c was unstable in pitch and yaw so the fuselage was lengthened by 8'6". Plus, of course, the floats had been removed and a four wheel undercarriage substituted. It would be an interesting job converting the Bomber back to the184 !! Regards Len. lensmith@clara.net http://home.clara.net/lensmith ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Kendix To: Multiple recipients of list Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2000 1:54 AM Subject: Re: Short 184 > > Len: > > I also saw a Sierra Scale Models' "Short 184 Bomber" for $21.95. Barry > Stettler at Rosemont Hobby has them. > > Has anyone built this kit or seen it and could say something about it. I > believe it has decals and metal parts. Sounds alright. > > A more general issue; male versus female molded vacuforms. I assume that > female molds are preferable for certain components. Which? Are female > molds more difficult to make? > > Michael > > ________________________________________________________________ > YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! > Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! > Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. > > ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2000 09:10:37 -0500 From: "Leonard Endy" To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Alb D.V - D.Va Message-ID: First a Happy New Years to all ! Second, what was the difference between the Alb D.V and the D.Va ? I have the Eduards D.V but want to do a particular scheme from a D.Va, which I don't have. And by the way...the Pfalz D.IIIa did not get finished in time. I was going to paint it Friday night and discovered that I did not have the color I needed. Maybe today...at least that would be a good start for the New Year. BTW - another great IM and Bob's paintings at his site are absolutely gorgeous ! Len ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 07:29:17 -0700 From: "Dale Beamish" To: Subject: Re: Alb D.V - D.Va Message-ID: <004b01bf552d$c3ead6a0$03000004@darcy> Len The difference between the two is the control wires. The Alb DV had them running through the top wing and the DVa had them running through the bottom. Dale ----- Original Message ----- From: Leonard Endy To: Multiple recipients of list Sent: 02 January, 2000 7:16 AM Subject: Alb D.V - D.Va > First a Happy New Years to all ! Second, what was the difference > between the Alb D.V and the D.Va ? > > I have the Eduards D.V but want to do a particular scheme from a D.Va, > which I don't have. > > And by the way...the Pfalz D.IIIa did not get finished in time. I was > going to paint it Friday night and discovered that I did not have the > color I needed. Maybe today...at least that would be a good start for > the New Year. > > BTW - another great IM and Bob's paintings at his site are absolutely > gorgeous ! > > Len > > ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 12:20:48 EST From: Albatrosdv@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Alb D.V - D.Va Message-ID: <0.45010f8f.25a0e2f0@aol.com> In a message dated 00-01-02 09:31:47 EST, you write: << Len The difference between the two is the control wires. The Alb DV had them running through the top wing and the DVa had them running through the bottom. Dale >> The D.Va was a more "beefed up" airplane, to deal with the lack of structural integrity in the lower wing. IIRC, the main visual clue is the brace strut to the forward strut of the outer "V" struts. Whatever, it's a simple conversion, and you have already spent 100 times longer worry about it that it will take to fix it. :-) Tom Cleaver ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 12:05:02 -0600 From: John Huggins To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Gotha info Message-ID: To start, Happy New Year to everyone on the list. I have a paper card model of the Gotha, and from the looks it would not be that difficult to use it as a pattern for a scratch build model. After scaling the card model to (or very close to) 1/72 scale, I started looking for reference material and discovered that I do not have the Data File on the bird. Does the list Liberian have the book in the files. If not, could one of you provide me with copies of the scale drawings in the book (1/72 if they are there). Also, I can't find the info on making wing blanks. Are they kept in an archive somewhere on the server? Thanks John -- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2000 12:28:25 -0600 From: "Lee Mensinger" To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Gotha info Message-ID: <386F98C9.89CE5C61@wireweb.net> Which Gotha. The Gotha list in German Aircraft of the First World War has 38 aircraft listed. 9 as GIII, IV,V, Vb,VI,VII, VIII, IX, and X... 7 as LD, 4 as LE, 3 as Ursinus,and 15 as WD 1 to 27 There are most likely more far less well known. Lee John Huggins wrote: > To start, Happy New Year to everyone on the list. > > I have a paper card model of the Gotha, and from the looks it would > not be that difficult to use it as a pattern for a scratch build > model. After scaling the card model to (or very close to) 1/72 scale, > I started looking for reference material and discovered that I do not > have the Data File on the bird. > Does the list Liberian have the book in the files. If not, could one > of you provide me with copies of the scale drawings in the book (1/72 > if they are there). > Also, I can't find the info on making wing blanks. Are they kept in > an archive somewhere on the server? > Thanks > John > -- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 12:40:28 -0600 From: John Huggins To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Gotha info Message-ID: >Which Gotha. The Gotha list in German Aircraft of the First World War has >38 aircraft listed. 9 as GIII, IV,V, Vb,VI,VII, VIII, IX, and X... 7 as >LD, 4 as LE, 3 as Ursinus,and 15 as WD 1 to 27 There are most likely >more far less well known. Lee The model is a G IV with the 77ft 9.5in wing span. -- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2000 08:55:53 +0000 From: Pedro e Francisca To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Tommy needs tiny lettering Message-ID: <386F1299.E2B28E10@mail.telepac.pt> Jim Landon wrote: I redid the big numerals > with a frisket stencil and a brush, but I need a way to do the little tiny > lettering (like the word "LIFT" above the lifting rods, etc.). > > Jim > _ Jim, You could try rub on transfers. Art stores usually have them. They come in many fonts and sizes. You can use them either directly onto the surface or onto clear decal film. The second option is probably the best since you can better align the letters and if you goof it's just a question of doing it again. HTH and hapy new year Pedro ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2000 10:04:15 -0800 From: "David C. Fletcher" To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Tommy needs tiny lettering Message-ID: <386F931F.FE8C0DAE@mars.ark.com> Pedro e Francisca wrote: "You could try rub on transfers. Art stores usually have them. They come in many fonts and sizes. You can use them either directly onto the surface or onto clear decal film. The second option is probably the best since you can better align the letters and if you goof it's just a question of doing it again." The best bet when using rub-on transfers is to cut the letters out and stick them individually onto invisible tape or 3M 8-11 tape (Post-It cement on clear tape). The letters can be aligned properly before being positioned on the model and will still rub down well. That saves your blank decal stock for other uses. I've found dozens of uses for 8-11 tape, by the way, and always have a roll on the workbench (where I can seldom find it...) Dave -- Visit us at our Home Page: ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2000 13:20:24 -0600 From: "Lee Mensinger" To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Gotha info Message-ID: <386FA4F8.71205187@wireweb.net> Sorry my plans are less than 1/72 (maybe half that) and they skip from G-III to G-V. they are in the old Harleyford "Reconnassaince and Bomber Aircraft of 1914-1918" by Lamberton and Cheesman.. Check with Robert Karr at KarrArt@aol.com He is a big fan of the Gotha bombers and may have a something. He might miss you note on the list. Write him direct. If I do run into anything I will surely let you know. I have promised him one of my last Gothas' from Aurora. They have been packed in one of the cartons of models for more than ten years, but it is still there along with 1199 other models. John Huggins wrote: > >Which Gotha. The Gotha list in German Aircraft of the First World War has > >38 aircraft listed. 9 as GIII, IV,V, Vb,VI,VII, VIII, IX, and X... 7 as > >LD, 4 as LE, 3 as Ursinus,and 15 as WD 1 to 27 There are most likely > >more far less well known. Lee > > The model is a G IV with the 77ft 9.5in wing span. > > -- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2000 15:19:20 +0000 From: "Steve Cox" To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Tommy needs tiny lettering Message-ID: Jim Landon asks > What was the "film"? I'm confused. At least you know you're confused :-) There is no 'film'. The acrylic paint becomes the film. The more coats of paint on the paper the thicker the film is and the stronger it is. I used this method because I needed a decal with a white base colour, impossible on a CYMK printer, for tail art on a TR1A. I have an nagging suspicion that there's an easier method of doing this. Can you print onto decal film? OOPS-- just read Stephen Sundberg's mail, that answers that question. HTH Regards Steve =========================================== steve@oldglebe.freeserve.co.uk If I didn't spend so much time on line ‹‹ I'd get more models finished ================ ---------- >From: "Jim Landon" >Subject: Tommy needs tiny lettering >Date: Sat, Jan 1, 2000, 11:18 pm > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 07:43:31 +1000 From: Shane Weier To: "'wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu'" Subject: RE: Alb D.V - D.Va Message-ID: <65C968E11318D311B0BD0060B06865CDBD1B7E@mimhexch.mim.com.au> Tom, > The D.Va was a more "beefed up" airplane, to deal with the > lack of structural > integrity in the lower wing. IIRC, the main visual clue is > the brace strut > to the forward strut of the outer "V" struts. Whatever, it's > a simple > conversion, and you have already spent 100 times longer worry > about it that it will take to fix it. :-) Dale is correct in so far as externally visible differences being to do with controls. The control wires on a D.V run up into the top wing from between the gun butts and actuate the ailerons via horns covered by triangular fairings above and below the upper wing. On a D.Va the wires run through the lower wing, and a pair of actuating wires exit near the foot of the V struts and connect to the rear of the aileron, and to the front of a horn set in a slot forward of the aileron. There are also small access panels beneath the bottom of the wires and an extra pair at the wing roots which are not on the D.V. On the D.V there is an extra access panel on the top centre section. If you are REALLY pernickety, the control columns are different (see pics of mine on the web site) Tom is also correct in so far as the D.Va being beefed up. But.... The auxiliary strut is not proof of a D.Va since a) Introduced after the D.Va was in action, so not all were fitted b) Could be fitted to the D.V, so some of them are fitted. IMHO the easiest external indication is the aileron horn fairings. If you can't see them, or the aileron wires, you can't be sure. Shane ************************************************************** The information contained in this E-Mail is confidential and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you receive this E-Mail in error, any use, distribution or copying of this E-Mail is not permitted. You are requested to forward unwanted E-Mail and address any problems to the MIM Holdings Limited Help Desk. E-Mail: helpdesk@mim.com.au or phone: Australia 07 3833 8042. ************************************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2000 16:43:37 -0600 From: Ernest Thomas To: multiple recipients of list Subject: a couple of ???'s Message-ID: <386FD498.6C1F978A@bellsouth.net> Hi All, I'm getting ready to put a top wing and lg on the Toko Pfalz D-XII. Which struts are gonna give me trouble? Also, can anyone tell me about these; http://www.aviation-models.com/menu.html Are these paper models? Pre-painted and assembled wood models? A new line of large scale resin or injectd kits that I've never heard of? Tia, E. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 15:52:50 -0700 From: "Dale Beamish" To: "List" Subject: ALB DV - DVa Message-ID: <002001bf5575$aa307420$03000004@darcy> I was always under the impression that the auxiliary strut that ran from the V-strut to the front edge of the lower wing was a field modification. Were they in fact applied to every Alb after a certain point in production? Dale ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 16:02:35 -0700 From: "Dale Beamish" To: Subject: Re: a couple of ???'s Message-ID: <002101bf5575$ad4cf660$03000004@darcy> E. They are hand carved wood replicas carved from mahogany and then painted. The Pfalz DIII was $179.95! Way out of my league. Dale ----- Original Message ----- From: Ernest Thomas To: Multiple recipients of list Sent: 02 January, 2000 3:47 PM Subject: a couple of ???'s > Hi All, > I'm getting ready to put a top wing and lg on the Toko Pfalz D-XII. > Which struts are gonna give me trouble? > Also, can anyone tell me about these; > http://www.aviation-models.com/menu.html > Are these paper models? Pre-painted and assembled wood models? > A new line of large scale resin or injectd kits that I've never heard > of? > Tia, > E. > > ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2000 17:16:10 -0600 From: Brent & Tina Theobald To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: a couple of ???'s Message-ID: <386FDC3A.E14E1A2@airmail.net> Hey E. Can't help you with the Toko struts, but I did enjoy the question! > Also, can anyone tell me about these; > http://www.aviation-models.com/menu.html Go here: http://www.aviation-models.com/about.html Later! Brent ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2000 23:24:08 GMT From: "Peter Leonard" To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: ALB DV - DVa Message-ID: <20000102232408.88581.qmail@hotmail.com> AFAIK it was a field fit. You even see it on some DIII's Peter ----Original Message Follows---- From: "Dale Beamish" Reply-To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: ALB DV - DVa Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 18:09:29 -0500 (EST) I was always under the impression that the auxiliary strut that ran from the V-strut to the front edge of the lower wing was a field modification. Were they in fact applied to every Alb after a certain point in production? Dale ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2000 17:31:39 -0600 From: Ernest Thomas To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: a couple of ???'s Message-ID: <386FDFDA.5CF736E4@bellsouth.net> Brent & Tina Theobald wrote: > Hey E. > > Can't help you with the Toko struts, but I did enjoy the question! huh??? Anyway, thanks for the link, and thanks Dale for confirming what I suspected. E. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 18:35:56 EST From: REwing@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Gotha info Message-ID: <0.f3da5acd.25a13adc@aol.com> John asks, << Does the list Liberian have the book in the files. If not, could one of you provide me with copies of the scale drawings in the book (1/72 if they are there). >> The list library doesn't have "Gotha!", but I do. The library does have some information from other sources that I will look up for you. I will send out what I have on the G.IV if you send me an address. -Rick- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 18:45:20 EST From: DavidL1217@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: 2000 Most Wanted (1/48th) Message-ID: <0.dc5bd17f.25a13d10@aol.com> I would like to see: Rumpler CIV Voisin L Albatros CVII Dorand AR1 LVG CV ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 18:50:33 EST From: DavidL1217@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: FMP Books Message-ID: <0.38a1bb56.25a13e49@aol.com> Not to be disrespectful of folks looking for out of print FMP books, however, I am glad to see them sell these. More likely we will see FMP survive. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2000 18:59:08 -0500 From: bucky@ptdprolog.net To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: newest Chandelle available Message-ID: <386FE64C.70D4F341@ptdprolog.net> I didn't have any problem getting into Chandelle, but when I sent an email to compliment Rob, it was returned. I'd repost it here, except I lost it.(Literally and figuratively). Hoping for a better millennium, Mike Muth Albatrosdv@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 00-01-01 16:40:53 EST, you write: > > << http://www.concentric.net/~Rojo1/ >> > > I go to this URL, the title Chandelle comes up at the top, but on-screen I > get "Unknown Host," that the titlpage doesn't work. > > Help??? > > Tom Cleaver ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 18:50:41 -0600 From: "Richard Eaton" To: Subject: Web Site URL Change and Update Message-ID: <003601bf5584$90136f20$ad305d18@austin.rr.com> Well, for the new year, I have a new ISP and have moved my humble site. I have also updated it with a few even more humble kits. Pegasus Etrich Taube Pegasus Macchi M.5 Toko Hansa Brandenburg DI Star Strutter Toko Nieuport XVIc Take a break from 1/48 land and stop by if you get a chance. http://home.austin.rr.com/reaton/ Regards, Richard reaton@austin.rr.com ------------------------------ End of WWI Digest 2064 **********************