WWI Digest 1760 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) Re: I'lya back on the bench by Ernest Thomas 2) Re: A resurgence in WW1? by ERIC HIGHT 3) Re: Interesting site to check out by roguerpj 4) Good joke by Albatrosdv@aol.com 5) Re: Nats pics, was Re: Generous offer, by Albatrosdv@aol.com 6) Re: Interesting site to check out by Albatrosdv@aol.com 7) RE: A resurgence in WW1? by Shane Weier 8) Early Aviatrix WAS: Interesting site to check out by Shane Weier 9) Re: Nats pics, was Re: Generous offer, by Ernest Thomas 10) Strutter question, was Re: Site Update by Ernest Thomas 11) Flying women - was: re: interesting site etc.... by Zulis@aol.com 12) Re: Matt's Nieuports/ was: Eduard 1/48th Albatros D.V by Matthew E Bittner 13) Cool jackets WAS: Ribs by "dfernet0" 14) More help please by "techcess" 15) Re: Strutter question, was Re: Site Update by "PETER LEONARD" 16) Re: Strutter question, was Re: Site Update by Dennis Ugulano 17) Re: More help please by Ernest Thomas 18) Voisons & Halberstadts by Jesse Thorn 19) Hansa Brandenburg Pic's by THENRYS@aol.com 20) Re: Strutter question, was Re: Site Update by "richard eaton" 21) Re: Voisons & Halberstadts by "PETER LEONARD" 22) Re: More help please by "techcess" 23) Re: More help please by Allan Wright 24) Pfalz DIII by "Tom Werner Hansen" 25) Re: Voisons & Halberstadts by Modelhound@aol.com 26) Re: Flying women - was: re: interesting site etc.... by "Brad Gossen" 27) Re: Voisons & Halberstadts by "Bob Pearson" 28) work bench ergonomics by "Bob Pearson" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 08 Aug 1999 22:27:08 -0500 From: Ernest Thomas To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: I'lya back on the bench Message-ID: <37AE4A8C.6586@bellsouth.net> John Glaser wrote: > > I thought that was Chalmations. That would make the town Chalmatte E. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 08 Aug 1999 20:39:35 -0700 From: ERIC HIGHT To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: A resurgence in WW1? Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19990808203935.00697760@pop.amug.org> i am chiming in with that's all i've heard on the revellogram 1/28 kits. but it's whining like this that scares manufacturers off. we are not perfect do have screw ups occaisionaly. i agree with ernie, it's a kit done up to japanese molding standards, at least you don't have to spend all your time cleaning up bad moldings. well that's my 2 cents worth. eric ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 08 Aug 1999 22:57:07 -0500 From: roguerpj To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Interesting site to check out Message-ID: <37AE5193.E1034E4F@black-hole.com> THENRYS@aol.com wrote: > > There also is a gentleman here in Spartanburg,SC named Ed Hall who recently > co-authored what has been a fairly well received book on Ms. Quimby. I'll > try to find out more. I know that there was recently a seminar and lecture > here in Spartanburg. Ed is a great guy and friend to pilots everywhere. He > recently gave the eulogy at the services for Col. Robert Johnson. > > Todd Henry Imagine my shock to find I am DEAD and a COL. I thought I must be the cold medication I am having to take :) Seriously though, post more information. I am always looking for a good subject and this certain is. Any one know of other early Woman Avatars. the undead/un-col. Robert Johnson ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 00:34:46 EDT From: Albatrosdv@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Good joke Message-ID: <9de0a7bd.24dfb466@aol.com> I'm sure the British branch of the list will laugh harder at this one: Tom C The presidents of Miller, Coors, Anheuser-Busch, and Guinness were at an international beer conference. They decided to all go to lunch together and the waitress asked what they want to drink. The president of Miller said without hesitation, "I'll have a Miller." The president of Coors smiled and said, "I'll have a Coors, brewed from pure mountain water!" The guy from Anheuser-Busch proudly said, "I'll have a Budweiser, the King of Beers!" The guy from Guinness glanced at his lunch mates and sayd, "I'll have a Coke." The others looked at him like he had sprouted a new head. He just shrugged and said, "If you guys aren't drinking beer, then neither will I." ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 00:38:12 EDT From: Albatrosdv@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Nats pics, was Re: Generous offer, Message-ID: <60db293e.24dfb534@aol.com> In a message dated 99-08-08 23:02:02 EDT, you write: << Ok, who can I send it to for scanning? E. >> With a worthwhile scanner like the Mustek 600 III EP Plus down to around $75 at places like Frye's, I am surprised you're not prepared for self-production, E. It's so easy to do once you get one, even *I* managed to figure it out. :-) Tom C ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 00:44:49 EDT From: Albatrosdv@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Interesting site to check out Message-ID: In a message dated 99-08-08 23:46:54 EDT, you write: << Any one know of other early Woman Avatars. >> Well, there are these New Age guru-esses out here.... :-) Women Aviators does in fact get covered with more than Ms. Quimby at the Quimby site I mentioned. It turns out, according the yesterday's educational lecture, that there were quite a few pre-WW1 women aviators. (One reporter called them "flyesses") The only ones who would not teach women to fly were the Wrights. Glenn Curtiss would teach anyone who would plunk down money. Something like 30% of the licensed pilots in 1914 in the USA were women. That was information I had not heard before. Sounds like it was almost easy in those days, unlike the stories the ladies from the WASP who spoke at the museum had to put up with in WW2. Tom ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 14:49:59 +1000 From: Shane Weier To: "'wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu'" Subject: RE: A resurgence in WW1? Message-ID: <65C968E11318D311B0BD0060B06865CD475998@mimhexch.mim.com.au> Eric, > i am chiming in with that's all i've heard on the revellogram > 1/28 kits. > but it's whining like this that scares manufacturers off. we are not > perfect do have screw ups occaisionaly. i agree with ernie, > it's a kit > done up to japanese molding standards, at least you don't > have to spend all > your time cleaning up bad moldings. well that's my 2 cents worth. Whilst I agree entirely that manufacturers are human, I suggest that you'd better be prepared for a great deal of what you may characterise as "whining" here. Happily, most of it will be constructive criticism, not carping complaints. There is a place in this hobby, and on this list, for both the "It looks okay to me" modeller and the micrometer crowd, and to exclude any of them is to unfairly apply a set of rules to what is, after all, a hobby with all that implies about doing ones own thing. Shane ************************************************************** The information contained in this E-Mail is confidential and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you receive this E-Mail in error, any use, distribution or copying of this E-Mail is not permitted. You are requested to forward unwanted E-Mail and address any problems to the MIM Holdings Limited Help Desk. E-Mail: helpdesk@mim.com.au or phone: Australia 07 3833 8042. ************************************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 14:53:25 +1000 From: Shane Weier To: "'wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu'" Subject: Early Aviatrix WAS: Interesting site to check out Message-ID: <65C968E11318D311B0BD0060B06865CD475999@mimhexch.mim.com.au> > Women Aviators does in fact get covered with more than Ms. > Quimby at the Quimby site I mentioned. Another woman entirely, but I had the good fortune yesterday to receive a "souvenir" flier from a local newspaper with a number of photos of the arrival here (Brisbane) of Amy Johnson. Old and a little tatty, my late grandmother had saved it since the 30's and my Aunt discovered it in her stuff just recently Shane ************************************************************** The information contained in this E-Mail is confidential and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you receive this E-Mail in error, any use, distribution or copying of this E-Mail is not permitted. You are requested to forward unwanted E-Mail and address any problems to the MIM Holdings Limited Help Desk. E-Mail: helpdesk@mim.com.au or phone: Australia 07 3833 8042. ************************************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 00:17:21 -0500 From: Ernest Thomas To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Nats pics, was Re: Generous offer, Message-ID: <37AE6461.4E10@bellsouth.net> Albatrosdv@aol.com wrote: > With a worthwhile scanner like the Mustek 600 III EP Plus down to around $75 > at places like Frye's, I am surprised you're not prepared for > self-production, E. Scanners are that cheap these days, huh? Well, I'm still gonna hold off a bit. Sooner or later, someone either very generous or very stupid will come along and give me one for nothing. Don't believe me? I got my very first computer(a 386) for free when some friends up-graded to the new 486. And they still had about $200.00 left to pay on the 386. And then, one of my neighbors was telling me about his new printer he just bought. Seems his BJ-100 quit working on him. I took his old BJ home, stuck a new cartridge in it and voila`, I had me a printer. And for the sake of getting this back on topic, the only thing I ever did with that 386 was play Red Baron on it. As for the nats pics, like most pleas for help to this list, I've been swamped with offers of help. So I've got it covered. Thanks to all who came forward though. E. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 00:30:08 -0500 From: Ernest Thomas To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Strutter question, was Re: Site Update Message-ID: <37AE6760.4A40@bellsouth.net> richard eaton wrote: > > Well folks I was almost hesitant about updating the old site given the > great things everyone has bee putting on the web but............... Nice looking models Dude. So tell me, did you(or anyone else) have any trouble with the cabanes on the strutter? I have a pile of Tokos and a couple of Flashbacks I have to build for a war gammer and I'm building the single seat bomber version from Toko as a test run before I set up the assembly line. The cabanes gave me hell last night. When I lined up the top wing on the center points, the starboard side fit right into the holes, but the port side struts are too long. (or the holes in the wing are too far inboard) Anyone else have this problem? What did I do wrong? The wings all look to be straight and lined up, but those damned port side cabanes just don't meet the holes. HELP!!! E. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 01:59:47 EDT From: Zulis@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Flying women - was: re: interesting site etc.... Message-ID: << < Any one know of other early Woman Avatars. > >> In Cross & Cockade Vol.16, No.4 there is an article about Russian aviatrices, including Lydia Zvereva who was the first Russian aviatrix to loop an airplane, may well have been the first woman to perform this feat anywhere. Another neat item: "During an air meet at Riga, Latvia, on 19 April, 1912, Lyubov Golanchikova was flying exhibition and stunts with her Farman airplane. While attempting to land, some hooligans threw sticks at the descending aircraft and Golanchikova lost control of her Farman. The aircraft collided with a fence and the aviatrix was hospitalized with minor injuries." [pg.378] Then - hooligans. Now - bird strikes. Dave Z ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 04:57:58 -0500 From: Matthew E Bittner To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Matt's Nieuports/ was: Eduard 1/48th Albatros D.V Message-ID: <19990809.050609.-171177.1.mbittner@juno.com> Michael, > OK, so now we know that 20 Revell Nieuport 17 kits is enough for > anyone, > even you:) But, how much are you willing to wager that you will be > able > to resist either chopping bits off or adding bits on to the next > 1/72nd > kit's fundamental parts - wings or fusleage?:) Har har. If the next Nie.11/17 to come out is *not* accurate, then I won't be buying it. I have too many Revell and Toko's that I can be chopping up. :-) Matt ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 07:50:49 -0300 From: "dfernet0" To: Subject: Cool jackets WAS: Ribs Message-ID: <005d01bee18b$e0daec20$4640a8c0@ssp.salud.rosario.gov.ar> ----- Original Message ----- From: Matthew E Bittner > nb: Still the Jacobs D.VII. Glossed and waiting for decals. I used - > for the first time ever on 1/72nd - photoetch Spandau jackets by Copper > State. Verdict still out on those. I started with Fotocut, but only had > one set and accidentally crunched a jacket. > As a matter of fact, yesterday I felt corageous, and started a set of PE Spandaus just for the fun of it. From Tom's Modelworks in 1/72. Now I lost my arrogance again. D. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 12:22:28 +0100 From: "techcess" To: Subject: More help please Message-ID: <005201bee259$876a2600$f359cfc2@f3u3u8> German Underside Blue 1915 - instructions suggest Methuen 24B4, FS25414 or Xtracolour X243. Which is the closest Humbrol? Could it be 89 or 122? Please let it be 122. Ian ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 04:40:09 PDT From: "PETER LEONARD" To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Strutter question, was Re: Site Update Message-ID: <19990809114012.49046.qmail@hotmail.com> It's not you Ernest, I had exactly the same trouble with the TOKO Strutter. I have a build article on my "l'Escadrille" page, but basicaly I cut off the outer sections and replaced them with Evergreen rod. Peter Leonard IPMS UK Lancashire & Cheshire Branch http://www.storks.cwc.net http://www.escadrille.mcmail.com PeterL@cwcom.net ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 07:54:01 -0400 From: Dennis Ugulano To: "wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu" Subject: Re: Strutter question, was Re: Site Update Message-ID: <199908090754_MC2-8052-5626@compuserve.com> E, I finished my Strutter by TOKO recently and the cabanes were hell. I finally had to scrap them and build them one piece at a time. Mine just would not fit. Dennis Ugulano email: Uggies@compuserve.com http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/uggies Page Revised 7/2/99 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 06:57:19 -0500 From: Ernest Thomas To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: More help please Message-ID: <37AEC21F.4C58@bellsouth.net> techcess wrote: > > German Underside Blue 1915 - instructions suggest Methuen 24B4, FS25414 or > Xtracolour X243. > > Which is the closest Humbrol? Could it be 89 or 122? > > Please let it be 122. 24B4? That's odd. that would be more in the green range than blue. And more like a lt.kelly green. (at least in my bootlegged copy) Sorry, but I don't have either 89 or 122 on hand. Fwiw, I like Hum.65 for german undersides. hth E. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 12:52:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Jesse Thorn To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Voisons & Halberstadts Message-ID: Greetings, After a long hiatus I have resubscribed to the list and am going to give a try at model building again. I have been looking at the Flashback Voison 3 and the Blue Max Halberstadt CL.II kits and am looking for reviews/advice on building either one. I have compared the Voison to the drawings in the FMP French AC book and while the cockpit tub matches fairly well, the wings and tail assemblies seem to be really off. Is that truly the case? On the other hand, the Blue Max kit looks spot on when compared to the Datafile drawings and seems to be an easy build. Thanks, Jesse Thorn Still in Raleigh, NC ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 13:07:11 EDT From: THENRYS@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Hansa Brandenburg Pic's Message-ID: <9ba50d4b.24e064bf@aol.com> Now that these pic's are on the WWI website, I'm ashamed at the quality of the photos relative to the others on the site. I took them with a coworker's digital camera, and even on the highest resolution and under natural lighting, I couldn't get the fuzziness out. I'll try to take some actual photos and scan them when I have time. Thankfully, I am a far better modeler than I am a photographer. Come to think of it, photography is probably pretty far down on the 'Things I do not suck at' list. Anyway, hope you like the model, even if the pics are not The Dog's Bollocks. Todd Henry (Boy that felt good to say) ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 12:21:08 -0500 From: "richard eaton" To: Subject: Re: Strutter question, was Re: Site Update Message-ID: <199908091720.MAA13431@sierra.onr.com> Thanks E I did have a fit with the Strutter cabanes. I did a good bit of dry fitting and trimming. Being basically lazy, I wound up filling the holes and just attaching them to the wing as best I could. But remember I make three footers as apposed to Dennis who scratched his for a good fit. This is really my only complaint about the kit. Regards, Richard ---------- > From: Ernest Thomas > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: Strutter question, was Re: Site Update > Date: Monday, August 09, 1999 12:31 AM > > richard eaton wrote: > > > > Well folks I was almost hesitant about updating the old site given the > > great things everyone has bee putting on the web but............... > > Nice looking models Dude. So tell me, did you(or anyone else) have any > trouble with the cabanes on the strutter? I have a pile of Tokos and a > couple of Flashbacks I have to build for a war gammer and I'm building > the single seat bomber version from Toko as a test run before I set up > the assembly line. The cabanes gave me hell last night. When I lined up > the top wing on the center points, the starboard side fit right into the > holes, but the port side struts are too long. (or the holes in the wing > are too far inboard) Anyone else have this problem? What did I do wrong? > The wings all look to be straight and lined up, but those damned port > side cabanes just don't meet the holes. HELP!!! > E. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 10:29:51 PDT From: "PETER LEONARD" To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Voisons & Halberstadts Message-ID: <19990809172951.3919.qmail@hotmail.com> The Halberstadt is, as you say, a perfect fit on the Datafile drawing, but I think the tail on both is undersize. If memory serves there is a contemporary dimensioned drawing also in the Datafile so it's easy enough to check. And if I'm right it's an error which first crops up in an Aeroplane Monthly at the back end of the seventies and has been perpetuated ever since. Apart from checking that you shouldn't have a problem. Peter Leonard IPMS UK Lancashire & Cheshire Branch http://www.storks.cwc.net http://www.escadrille.mcmail.com PeterL@cwcom.net ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 18:27:21 +0100 From: "techcess" To: Subject: Re: More help please Message-ID: <002d01bee28c$70d41a80$df59cfc2@f3u3u8> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002A_01BEE294.D1B6AE00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks Ernest. 65 would probably be a very good choice if the contents of my tin were not a solid chunk. I must have at least 1 of every Humbrol tin and 65 is one of the few duffers. It's 6:30 pm and no hope of getting any for tonight. It has to be tonight - I've started a model so I must finish it! I gather attaching files to emails is not encouraged. However, Father Ted Crilly sums up my feelings in the most appropriate way so here goes. Ian ------=_NextPart_000_002A_01BEE294.D1B6AE00 Content-Type: audio/wav; name="bollox.wav" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="bollox.wav" UklGRrIoAABXQVZFZm10IBIAAAABAAEAESsAABErAAABAAgAAABmYWN0BAAAAIAoAABkYXRhgCgA AICAgICAgICAgICAgIKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKAgoKCgICAgICAgICAgICAgICCgoCAgoCCgoKC goKCgoCCgoCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIKAgoKCgoCCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgICAgICAgICAgICAgoCC gICAgICCgoKCgoCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgoCCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoCAgICAgICAgICA gICAgoKCgIKAgICCgoKCgoKAgIKCgIKAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIKCgoCCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKC goCAgIKAgICCgoKAgICCgICCgoKCgoKCgoKAgICCgoCAgICCgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICA goKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKAgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKAgICAgICAfn5+fn5+foCAgoKCgIKCgoCAgoKC goKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKEhoiKjIqKiIaCfnx6eHR0dHRycnR0dnp+gISGhoaEhISEhISGhoaG hISEhoaIioqKioiGhIJ+fHx8fHp6enp6enp8fn6AgoKCgoKAgIB+fn6AgoSGhIJ+enh2dnh6fH6C goKCgoKEhoiKjIyKiIiGhISGhoqMjIqIhoKCgoKEhIJ+eHBoZGJkanB2en6AgICCgoSIjpCSkpCM ioaEhIaIjI6QkI6MiIJ+fHx6eHh6enRwamhkZGhudHyCiIyMioiIiIqMjI6OjoqIhISCgoaIioqM ioiEgn58fHx8fH6AgoaEhIKAgICAgH52bmpqZGBmcHZ6gIiKioyKioyQkI6OjoqEfnx+gIKGjJKU lpSOioiEgHx+fnp2dnRwbm5ydnp+goSGhoSCgoKCgIKCgoKCgICCgoKEhIaGhIKCgH58fHx8fHx6 enp6enp4eHp+goiMkJSYmJSKgn56cm5yen58foKEhIKEiIySkpCQjoh+dnJycnZ6goiKioiGhIKA gIKGiISAfnp0cG5wdnp+gISGhoKAgICAgIKChIJ+fHx6enx+goaIiIiGhIJ+fn6AgoKEhISEgoKC hISEhISEhIKAfn6AgIKEhoiIhoSEgoKAgIB+fn58enp6enx+gIKEhoaGhoaEgoKCgICAgH5+fHx8 fH5+gIKEhISCgoCAfn5+fn6AgICAgICAgICCgoKCgICAgH5+foCCgoKCgoKCgICCgoSEhISEgoKA gICAgIKCgoKCgoCAfn5+gICCgoKCgIB+fHx8fH5+gIKGkqiwppqUiGhMRkhKVGJwfIaGgHyEjJCU oK6wppiKfGpeXGRyhpagpKailIR+gICAhIqKhnxwYlpaWmBsfoyUlpaSin52dHZ6foKCgoB8dHB0 eH6EjpaYlpCIgHp0cnR6goaKjIyIgn56enp8foKEhoaEgoSEhIaKjpCQkIyIhIB6eHh4eHh6fH58 enp6enp8gIqarrKmlo5+Xjw0OkJMXnKCjJCMhoqSlJSerrKqnI5+alpUXGqAlqausrCikISAfnh8 hIiEfnJkWlhWWmh8ipSanJiOgHZwbnB0en6EhIB4eHh4eoKOlJiYlI6GfHRubnR6gIaOkpCKhH56 dnJyeICEhoiMjIiGhoiKjI6QkI6Kgn56dnRydHZ6fH6AgISIkqKysqicjnJSOjAyPkxaanyIioqM kJCSmKKoqKCWiHZmXFpicoSWprC0rqCUiH54dnh+goB6cmhgWlhgbHqIlJyemI6Adm5sbHJ6goaG hIJ+enh8goiOkpSSjIR6cnBydnyEjpKQjIaAeHJydHqAhIiKjIiGhIaGiIqOjo6KhoB8enh2enx+ fn5+fHp+hI6YpKiono54Yk5AOEBMWmh4hoyOjo6QkpaanqKglop8cGZgZG5+kKCssK6mmoyAdnJy dHp8fHhyamRiZGp2go6WmpqUin5ybGhqcHZ+hIiIhoSCgIKEiIqMjIiCfHh0cnR6gIiOkpKQjIR+ enh2eHyAhIaKioqKioiIiIaEgoB+fHx+goqUnJ6clIh2ZFhMSExYYm58hoqMjoyIiIyQkJSUkIaA eHBscHiCjpykqKiimIyAeHRydHp+gIB+eHJubG5yeoSKjpKOhn52bmpqbnR8hoyQkJCKhH56eHh6 fH6AgoCAfn6AgoSIjpCQjoqGgHp2dHZ6foSKjpCSkI6IhIB+fHx8fH6AgoSKkJaYlpCGdmhcUkxQ WmJueoSKjJCQjIyOkJCSko6Ignx0cnJ2foiUmqCioJiQiIB4dnZ2eHp8enh0cm5wcnh+hIqOjoqE fHRuampudn6Eio6OjIiCfnp4enyAhIaGhIKAfn6AhIiMjo6MiIJ8eHZ2eHyCiIyQkI6MiISAfn5+ gIKGhoaIjpKSkIyGeGxiWlJUWmBodn6EipCQjpCSkpCSkIqEgHhycnR2fIiSmJ6inpqUjIJ8enh2 eHp6dnZ0cHBydHh+hIiKioiCfHZybm5yeH6EiIyKiIaCfnx6enyAgoSGiIaEhoaGiIqKioiGgn56 eHh4fIKGipCQkI6KhoJ+fHp8foCChoySlJSSjIJ0aF5WUlZcZG54foSKjo6QkpSUlJaSjIaAeHBw cnR8hpCWnJ6clpKKhH58enh6fHx6eHZ0cm5wcnZ8goiKjIqGgHp0cG5wdHqAhoqKioiEgHx8fHx+ goSEhoaEhISGhoqMjIyMiISAfHp4en6AhIiMjIyKiISCgoCChoyQlpiUjIJyYlhOTE5YZHB8iI6Q kpCMioyMjI6QjIaCenJwcnR6hpKaoKSimpKIfnZ0cnR2en5+fnx4dHR0eHyCiIyMioZ+dnBsamxw dn6GjI6OjIiEgHx6enx8foCAgICAgIKEhoqMjoyKiIKAfHp8foKGiIyOjoyKiIaCgH5+fn6AgoaK kJSWkoyCdGZYUE5SWGJueoKIjJCQkJCSkpSUkoyIgHZwbnB0fIaSmqCgnpiQiH56eHh4enx8enh0 cnBydnyCiIyMjIiAeHBsamxweICGio6MioaAfnx8foCChISCgHx8fH6CiIyQkpCMiIJ8eHZ4eoCG io6QkIyKhoKAfn5+gICAgIB+foKEipKYmJSMfmxcTkZGTFhmdoSOlJiamJaUkpKSkIyIgnhwbGxw doKQnKSoqKSakIZ8dnBwcHJ0dHJwbm5ucniAiJCUlJKMgnhwamZobHR6goiKioqIhIKChIaIioqI hIB6eHZ4fICIjJCQjoqEfnp4eHqAhoqMjoyKiISCgIKChIaGhoJ+fHh2dnh8goaIioyOjo6Ignpy aF5YWFheZG54gIaMkpaYmJqcmpiUkIqCfHZ0dHZ8hIyUlpiYlI6Ignx4dnR0dHJwbm5sbm5yeH6E io6QkIyIgn54dHJydHZ4fICChISGiIqKjI6OjIqIhIB+enp6enx+goKEhISEhISEhoiKioqKiIaE goKAfn5+fn5+fn6AgIKEhIiMkI6MiIB2amBYVFRYXmh0fIKKkJSUlpqcnp6enJaQiIB4dHBwdHyC hoyQkI6MioaCgoB+fnx6dHBsaGZmam50fISKjpCQjIqGgn5+fnx+fn58enh4eHp+goaKjpCQkIyK iISCgH5+fHx6enp6fH6ChoqOkJCQjoyKhoSAfnx8enp6enp6en6AgoSIioyKioiAenRuamZmZmhs cHJ2fICChoqOkpSYmpyampiUkIyIhoSCgH58fHp6eHh4eHh6fH6AgICAgH58fHx6enp8fHx+fn5+ gICAgICAgIKCgoCAgICCgoKChISGhoaIiIiGhoSEgoKAgH5+fn5+gICCgoSEhoaIhoaGhoSEhIKC gICAfn5+fn5+fn5+foCAgICAgIB+fnx8fHp6enp6enp6fHx+foCAgoKEhoaIiIiIiIiGhoaGhoiI iIqKioiIhoaEhIKCgoCAfn58enp4eHh4eHp6enp4eHh4eHh4enx8fn5+gICCgoSGhoiKioqKioiI hoaGhoaGhoaGhoSEhISCgoKCgoCAgH5+fn5+foCAgIKChISEgoKAgICAgICAgH5+fn58fH5+foCA gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgH5+fn5+fn6AgIKEhISEhISEhoaIiIiKioqIiIiGhoaE hISCgoCAfnx6enp4eHh4eHh6enp6enp6enx8fHx+fn6AgICCgoSEhoaIiIiIhoaGhoaEhISEhIaG hoSEhISEgoKAgICAgICAgH5+fn5+fn5+gICAgoKCgoKCgICAgICAgICAfn5+fH5+foCAgoKCgoKC goCAgICAgICAgIB+fn58fH5+foCAgIKCgoKCgoSEhIaGiIiIiIaGhoaGhoaGhoaGhISCgoCAfn5+ fHx8fHp6enp6enp6enp6fHp8fHx8fH5+foCAgoKEhIaGhoaIiIiIiIaGhoaEhISEgoKCgoKCgoSE goKCgoCAgH5+fn5+foCAgICAgoKCgoKCgoCAgICAgH6AgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICCgoKCgoCA gICAgICAgIB+fn6AgICAgICAgICAgIKCgoKChISGhoiIiIqKiIiIiIaGhISCgoKAgIB+fn5+fHx8 fHx8enp6enp6eHp6enp6fHx+fn6AgICCgoSEhIaGhoaGhoaGhoaGhoaGhoaEhIKCgoKCgoKCgoKC goKAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICCgoKCgoCAgH5+fnx8fHx+fn5+foCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICC gIKCgoKCgoKAgoKCgoKCgoSEhISEhIaGhoaGhoaGhoaEhISEgoKCgICAgH5+fnx8fHp6enp6enp8 fHx8fHx8fH5+fn6AgICAgoCCgoKEhIaGhoiIiIaGhoaGhISEhISEhIKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKAgICA gICAgICAgICAgICAfn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+fn6AgICAgICAgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKA gICCgoKCgoKCgoSEgoKCgoKChIKEhISEhISEhISEhISCgoKAgH5+fnx8fHx8fHx8fHx8fHx8fH5+ fn5+foCAgICAgoKEhISGhoaGhoaGhoaGhoaGhoaGhISEgoKCgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIB+ fn5+fn5+gICAgICAgICAgICAfn5+fn5+foCAgICAgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKA gICAgICAgICAgICAgICCgoKCgoKEhISEhISEhISEhISEhISCgoKAgICAfn5+fn58fHx8fHx+fn5+ fn5+fn5+fn6AgICCgoKChISEhISEhISEhISEhISEhISEhISEhISCgoKCgoCAgICAgICAgICAgICA gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICCgoCCgoKC goKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKAgICAgICAgICAgIKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKAgICA gICAgICAfn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+fn6AgICAgICAgoKCgoKCgoKEhISEhISEhISEhISEhISEgoKC goKCgIKCgoKCgoKAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIB+gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICA gIKCgoKCgoKCgoSChIKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICCgoKC goKCgICAgoCCgoCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKC goCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKC goCCgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICCgoKCgIKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgIKCgICAgICA gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIKAgIKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKEhISEgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKC goKCgIKAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIKA gIKCgIKAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIKCgoKAgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgICA gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoCAgICA gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICCgICAgICAgICAgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoCA gICAgICAgICCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICA gICAgICAgICAgICAgICCgICAgICAgIKCgIKCgIKCgoKCgIKCgoKAgoCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICA gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgoCAgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgICAgICAgICAgICA gICAgICAgICAgICCgICGhHh8gHp+hIZ6foJ+gISCgoSEgoSEhISGhoSEhIKAgoKAgIB+fHx8enp8 fHp8fHp6enx8foKAgoSCgISGhoaIiIaGiIaIhoaGhISCgIKCgH6AgH58fn5+gH5+fnx2dHh0dHh8 foCAgoSEhIaIjo6MjIyIhISEgoSEhIaEgoCAgH5+gIKAfn58enp6enx8fHx+fnx8foCAgoKCgoKC gICCgoCCgoKEiIiIioyKjJKYmIp8empOSlZSWmp4goiEiI6QkpaeqKaYlpJ6bG5sbHiCjpyenJyY joiEiIqCgIZ+cGpmYGBkbHiCiI6SkIqCfnx2cnZ4dnZ2dnZ2dnyChoyQlJSOioZ8dHJycnR8goiM kJCQjoqGhIB+fICAfoKEhISEhoaIio6QkJKUkJCUlop8enBSRkxEQlJkcn6OnqSkpKCYkpCEgIaA dHh6cG52foKKlqKkpKSekIh8cGpsamp0enp+goB6fICAgISKioiGgHhwamRmam52goySlJaUjIJ8 dnBucHR4gISIjo6OkJCMioqIhoKAfnx6enx+gISIjpKUlpaUkIyOkox+enhiTE5ORExgcHyKmqSk pKCYkoyEfn58cG50cG54hIqSoKimpKCWiHxyamhobHB4fn6AhISChIqKio6OiIJ6cmpmZmhudn6G jpCQjoqCfnp4dnZ4enx+gIKEhoaIjI6Ojo6KhIB8eHZ4en6ChoySlJKSkIyIjJCWlo6EfGhORkhE TmJ0gpCcoKCalpKMiIiGhIB4cG5qaHJ+iJakqqiknI6Adm5qbHByeHx8eHp6enyEipCSkpCIgHhw bGxudHqChIiIiISEgoCAgH58enh2dnh8gIaKjI6MjIqGgoKCgH5+fn5+foCEhoqMjpCQjIqKjIyO lJaMfnRmTEJKSlRsfoqUmpyakpCOjIyMiISAdGpqamx6ipairKykmo6AdG5sbnR4enx+enh6fH6E io6MjIZ+dnJubnB2eoCEhoSEhISEhoaEgn54cG5sbnR+iI6SkpCMiISCgoSEhoSAfHp4eHqCiIyQ kpCOjoiEhIqOkpieln5wZk46QlBWZoCSlpaaloyOjoyOkoqCenBkYGhwepCkrK6sopKCeHBqbnR4 en58enh4eoCIjJCSkIh+dm5qam50eoCEhoaEhIKEhoiKiIR+dm5mZmpweoaQlJaUkIyGhIKAfn58 enh4fICEipCSkpKOioaEhIKAgoaIjJCUkoZ4cGJSTFJaYGx8iIiKkJKQkJKWlJCOioB4cm5wdHqE jJKYmpaUjoiCgICAgICAfnp2cGxsbHB4gIaMkJCOiISAenp6enp6enp2dnR2eH6ChoqMioaEgH58 foCEhoaGhIJ+fHx8foCChoaIioqKioqMjIyKiIaCfnp6enx+gISKjpCQkpKQhn54bmZgXl5gXmJo am50fIaOlJ6kpqiknpqSioiCfnx6dnZ0cnR2eH6EiI6SkpCOioaCfnx4dnZ0cnJwcHJ0dnh8foKE hISEhoSGhoaGhIKCfnx6enp6fH6AgoKEhIaIioqMjIqIhoKCgICAgoSEhISGhoaGiIqKiIaGhIJ+ fHx+foCCgoSEgHx4dHBsbG5ucG5wcG5wcnh+hIqSmJqampiWlJKSkpCOjIiEgHx6enp8fn6Afn56 enh4eHp8foCAgH5+fHx8fHx8fHx6enp6enp8fn6AgoKChISEhIaGhoaGhoaGhoaEhIKAgH5+gICA goSEhoaGhoaGhoaIiIaGhoaEgICAgIB+fnx6enp6enx8fn5+fnx6enp4enp4eHZycnJwdHh8goaM kJKUlpaWmJiYmJaUko6KiISCgH58enh0cnBwbnBwcnR4enp8foCAgoKChISCgoCAfn5+fn58fn5+ fn6AgIKEhoaIiIiIiIiIhoaEhIKAgH5+fHx+foCChIaGiIiKioiGhoaEhIKAgIKAgICAfn5+fHx8 fHp6eHp6fH6AhIaGhIKAfHp4dnZ2dHR0cnJ2eoCGjJKUlpiYlpaWlJSSjoqEgHx4dnZ2eHp6enp8 foCCgoSEgoB+fHp4eHh4eHh4eHh6fH6ChoaGhoaEhIKCgoKCgIB+fn6AgoSGiIqKioqIhoSCgoCA fnx8enp8fICChIaIiIiKioqKioiGhIKAfn58fHp6enx8foCAfoCAfn6AgIKEhoiGfHZyamZobnR2 dnp8fICGkJqcoKCalIyGhIJ+gIB8enh6fH6EiIyMjIqIhICAgHx4dnJubm5ydnqAhIaGhoaGhoaG hIB8eHR0cnR4fH6AhIaIioyOjo6MiIaCfn58fH5+fnx8fH6AhIaKioqKiIaGhIKCgoKAgIB+fn6A gIKChISCgICCfn5+fn58fHx+fn6Afn5+fn5+gH5+fn6AgIKEhISCgICChoqQkIqCeHJubHJ4fHx6 eHZ2eoSOlJaWkoyIhISGhoaCfnp2dnqAhoiIiIaCgIKEhoSCgHx4dHR2eHp8fn58fICChoaIiISA fn5+fn6AgIB+fH6AgIKGhoaEhISEhISEhIKCgICCgICAfn58fHx+gIKChISEhISEhISEhISCgIB+ fn5+fn5+gICCgoSEhISCgoKCgoCAgH5+fHx8fn6AgICAgoKCgoSCgoKCgICAgIB+fn5+gICAgoKC goKAgoKCgoCAfn5+foCAgIKCgoSEhISEhISCgoCAgICAgICAgoCAgoCCgoKCgoKCgoKCgICCgoKC goKCgICAgICAgICAgIB+gICCgICAgoKChISEgoKCgICAgICAgIB+fn5+gICAgICAgoKCgoKAgICA gICAgICCgICAgIKEhISEhISEgoKCgoKAgIB+fn5+gIB+fn5+foCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICCgoKC goSEhISEgoKCgoCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgoKCgoKCgIKAgICAgIKCgoKCgoKC goKCgoKCgoCAgICAgICAgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAfn5+ fn5+fn5+foCAgIKCgoKCgoKEhISEgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKAgICAgICA gICAgICAfoCAfn5+fn5+fn6AgICAgIKCgoKCgoKCgoCAgICAgIKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKC goKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgoKCgoKCgoCAgoKC gIKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKAgoKCgoKCgoKCgIKCgoCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIKCgoKCgoKCgoKC gICAgICAgICAgIKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICCgoKCgoCAgICAgICA gICAgICAgIKCgoKCgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIKAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICCgoKCgIKCgoKCgoKC goKCgoKAgoKAgICAgICAgIKCgoKCgoKCgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKA gICAgICCgoKCgoKCgoKCgoKCgICAgICAgICAgICAgoKAgoKCgoKCgoKCgoCAgICAgoKAgICAgoKA gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIKCgoKCgoKCgoKEhISCfnp4eoCGiIaCfn6ChIiIhoKCgoSEgoB8 foCCgH5+goiIfnRydnp8foCAfn5+hIiKioaCgIKEioqKhoJ+gIKEgHx8gIB+fHx+gIB8enqAhoqM iIJ8enx+goSGhIJ+foCChIKEioh8eHqAgIKCgoB+gICCfoCChoiGhoaCenJyfIaIhH58fH6CgoKA goSGioSAgn6ChH6Agn6AgHp2eICEhIJ+eoSKjIyEhJCIfnp0eoiMhH50dICKhIB8fIaIiH58hoSA hH6AiH56hn58hHyCgniCgoCChH5+hIaCeoKAeoCGgICCfoKGgoJ+goSCgoCEhnaChoCCgH56goKA gn5+fn6EgIKCfoZ+gIKKeoCIdH6AfoB8goJ+hIB+hIh8gIR6ioCEhH6CfICCgH6AhoKAhHp8jIh4 gH6AiIR+gIJ+gISEhH56hoJ8hIB+iIB6iISChnp+iIJ8goKAgIKAgoR8fISAhIKAdnyGdISKgH6C hICGinh+inyEhnZ+hHJ8iHqAgn6GhIKEgIiCeoiCgIZ4gISAhH6MhHCIgHiEen56foB+hIKEgniA gIJ+gpJ+gIyAioR2iIaChoJ2iIZ8hoiEeoiEeI6GcoKIfICEfoSIgnp+gnqAgoSIeoKCfoZ8eoZ+ en6AfICEfnyEgIiCfIyCeI56epB4fIR8gHp+gICAfniIhnaChHyAgnyEin6AgICEhoKGiH6EhH6I hH6EgIB+hH5+iHx6jIR0iIJ2inh8iHp4hIKAgIB+gIp2goJ4gIh8en5+hoSEioKChoCEhoKGgICI foSCeIZ8foR8hoR+goKAgox+doqAfIaAfIZ6goR2hICAiHiKhHSEfnyEgn6Cgn5+hoSAgIiAfoh4 hoR4gop8fICCgoCAfHx6fIiGeoKGeoyEeIaCfn6AgoJ8goh8hIRyhIh6hnx4gHp+in6CgICMfH6I doKGfoKCgISEgoR+foKAiIKAhHx8gIaGfoKCfoaEfoiEeoh+gIx8eoKCfoaCgHyAhIZ8hn58hn6C hoJ6fn6CfoKCdoqEfIyAfoJ+iIJ6ioJ2hIB+goKAfIR+goJ+gIKAfoR8hIx8foqAeop+fIh+foSA foCAfoKAfIJ+gIR+gIx8eoh8hIyAfIaAfoCAfISCfICEfoB+iIJ6hoCAhoJygICEiHqEfHyKhH6K doaAfJB0gIZ0ioR+in6AhHqEioCChoCGgoKEgIh4hIJ6iIB8hIKEgISCen56iHx+iHyCgoCIfH6E eoCCgoKAhoR4gIZ8gIR8jH56ioJ0iop6hniAfnyGgnqIhHyAhICAgHx8gIKAhICGgICEgnyEinaI hnaMhn6MeICEeIZ+fIyIfnqKgnKEfHqGfnaOfnSEfoaCfoR+foaAgJR+gIZ0gn5+joB8iIKAhIKI gn6GgHyCgn6EgH6Ceop+doh2foZ4iIh8hISAgHiGeoKCfoKCgoKEfoSCfISGdoCMcIaKdoZ8goR8 goZ+go50gIx2hoyCgHyGgoCEhnp+hniIgoR8doiIdH6MeoKAfIKEen56gIB6lIJ8knx4jHx8hoJ8 foCIfoKCdoaEdoaKeIaEdIyEeo58gIZ8hIKAhnx8hHqAiH6AgnyEgn6GhHaEgICEhHx6hHyAgoJ2 fHx6in58gox0fIZ6jHqAioCAin5+ioB+iIJ+hoZ+ioJ6hoKCfoSCgoB+gICCgoCIgnyGgHyEhICA eoR8gox2hoh2foh4goB8goR4gIqCen6IfICKgHqAhHiChHqIhHqAhoJ8ioh6hIh6hIh+foh+eoh6 goZ2hIZ8hIh6goCCfoKEeISGdoKKcISGdIaKeICGgoCAhICAgoCGgnqGgoaAhIJ+inx+jnx2jIR4 iIZ8goKCgISCfIKEeIaGfHyEgoCAfn6EgH6AgH5+gIKCfIaEeIiAdoqAfISAhHh+jHp8iIB+gIh8 gIh2hoZ6gIKIeoKEeoKGeICMfH6IgoKEgICGhnyEhHyChICGdoKCgH6EiHp+hH5+in58hHyCgICC fICEgoKGfICEfoSCfoKGfH6CiIB6iH6Egn6EgoCEfoKEeoSKfn6EhH58iHaIhHiGgIJ+foaCeoR+ iIR2iIB8fop6eoSEfHaMfnyAgoB6hIh6fIR8hIJ8jHp2ioJ2hoSCgICGeoaCgoR8hIaAhoCEhnp+ iIaEfnqIhnx+hn6GfIKEdI6CdoSEeH6ChHZ+jHh+iICAfIB6goqCeoKCfoSAgn56gICIiHaAjHp4 koJyjIRyhox+fIiEfHyGhn6AgoCEgICKfn6IfIKCfIKIeH6OeIKEeoSCfH6IfnaMhHSKiHSAjnxy kn5qjIZ0iIZ0hIx2epSEcoSKeIaIeIKKdn6MfoCGfIKChHx4jnp6jIh0jIx2hoB2iIB6hHqGhniI gIKIcoCIcoCQdnqKen6GhH6Agn6EgICCgn5+iH6ChoCChn6IinCAjn52jIB2hIaAgoiEfn6EhIZ4 gIx4eIx8foKChHqGhHiGfn6EgIKEgn5+goCEgIJ+doiEeIiAeIiAeo56eIyEeIaEfoaAhIR+gIqA eIyAdIqCfISAfISGeoqEdoSGeoCKfniGgniGjnqAgnSMiHqCiH52ioR6iHx2iIB4gox4eIh+eoyA eIqAeISIfoSEdISMeH6OfnaEinqCgnqGhHh8in52hoh+gIB+goh+fIiAgIJ8ioJ8foKGfHiAiH58 iH54goZ+gIZ8fIKIgnp+iIR0gI58fIaGfoCAgIB+foiEeoSEeoqGeIKIfnqIhHqEhnqAinx6iIB6 hIB+hoCAgIJ8eIqEeHyEgnyEhHyEiHSAjH5+iIR8eoSEeoZ8coyMeHyOiHSEin5+jHp2koB2iIh6 gIZ4hIx0fJB8doaEeoaKeoCKenqOfnSGiH6CioR+hoZ0gIp4fIZ+fIKEgIB+fICCgISEeoCGfnyI hnqChH6CiH6AgHaChHqChnh6hIiCgoiAeIaIeoSKfHqGhnx8gIB2gIZ6hoZ8gIaCen6KfHiKgniE hnh8ioR+goaAfoSIfoCGgnqEjn54iIR6iIZ6gIiAeoiKeHaKfniEfHaEgHKAhHp6hoSAiIJ+goiC fIaGfoSIfoCIfnyEiIKAhIKAgICAhIZ8eoKCgoKAfH58eoKIhoSCgoSEhoSEgn58hISAfn56dnp+ fICCfoSKgICGhIKEhIB+gnh6hHx+iIR6foSAgIaIgHyCgISKgnp8hIR8hIp+eoaKgoSGgoCEfHyC fHR6hIKChISEgoKCiIiAgIZ+eHx+gH58gIKAfoCAhISAgoKCfn5+fH5+gn6AhICAhISAgoSCgIKC gIB6foJ+foCChIKChIKCgoSEgn5+goKAgoJ+fn5+foKEgIKAgICAgn6AgoCAgoCChIKAgoKCgoKA foB8fICCgICCgoSEhIaCgICCgn5+foCCgoKCgn6AhIKChoaCgoJ+foB8fICChISEgHx8foCAgIKC gICCgIKEgoCCgICCgoKAgIB+foCAgIKChISCgoKCgICAgIB+fn6AgH6AgICChISEhoR+gIKCgIB+ fn5+fn6AgoB+hIKCgoR+fICCgICCfoCEhIaEgoCAgn5+goB+fn58gICCgoSEhISEgoCAfg== ------=_NextPart_000_002A_01BEE294.D1B6AE00-- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 13:35:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Allan Wright To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: More help please Message-ID: <199908091735.NAA15759@pease1.sr.unh.edu> Ian, You are right, please do NOT post attachments to the list. -Allan > I gather attaching files to emails is not encouraged. However, Father Ted > Crilly sums up my feelings in the most appropriate way so here goes. =============================================================================== Allan Wright Jr. | You fell victim to one of the 'classic' blunders! University of New Hampshire+--------------------------------------------------- Research Computing Center | WWI Modeling mailing list: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Internet: aew@unh.edu | WWI Modeling WWW Page: http://pease1.sr.unh.edu =============================================================================== ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 22:05:21 +0200 From: "Tom Werner Hansen" To: Subject: Pfalz DIII Message-ID: <199908091807.UAA21733@golf.dax.net> In regards to the Pfalz D.III. Make sure that the outer struts are long enough. When I fitted my wings to the Eduard I may have shortened the little pins that protrude below the horizontal piece of the wing struts. When the wings came together that induced a dihedral of definitely more than 1 degree, maybe as much as 5, but there was little I could do about it at that stage. With i trial fit I might have discovered this and shortened the cabane struts. Tom ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 15:19:26 EDT From: Modelhound@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Voisons & Halberstadts Message-ID: In a message dated 8/9/1999 9:54:04 AM Pacific Daylight Time, jsthorn@mindspring.com writes: << Greetings, After a long hiatus I have resubscribed to the list and am going to give a try at model building again. >> I write: Please allow me to welcome you back to the asylum. Mike from Bellingham ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 15:54:29 -0400 From: "Brad Gossen" To: Subject: Re: Flying women - was: re: interesting site etc.... Message-ID: <199908092000.QAA16324@mail6.globalserve.net> I recall reading somewhere recently of a Russian countess (seems all Russian women were countesses) who used to sneak out and fly combat in a Nieuport. Matt? Riordan? Brad ---------- > From: Zulis@aol.com > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: Flying women - was: re: interesting site etc.... > Date: Monday, August 09, 1999 1:59 AM > > > > << < Any one know of other early Woman Avatars. > >> > > In Cross & Cockade Vol.16, No.4 there is an article about Russian aviatrices, > including Lydia Zvereva who was the first Russian aviatrix to loop an > airplane, may well have been the first woman to perform this feat anywhere. > > Another neat item: > "During an air meet at Riga, Latvia, on 19 April, 1912, Lyubov Golanchikova > was flying exhibition and stunts with her Farman airplane. While > attempting to land, some hooligans threw sticks at the descending aircraft > and Golanchikova lost control of her Farman. The aircraft collided with a > fence and the aviatrix was hospitalized with minor injuries." [pg.378] > > Then - hooligans. Now - bird strikes. > > Dave Z ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 12:16:50 -0700 From: "Bob Pearson" To: ww1 mailing list Subject: Re: Voisons & Halberstadts Message-ID: <199908092008.NAA23797@mail.rapidnet.net> Hi Jesse, Welcome back and I hope all is well with you. The Blue Max Halberstadt can be found in the May Internet Modeler (along with lots of other WW1 content) http://www.internetmodeler.com/may99/contents.htm Regards, Bob Pearson Visit my WW1 Aviation page http://members.xoom.com/Sopwith_5F1 Managing Editor / Internet Modeler http://www.internetmodeler.com ---------- >From: Jesse Thorn >To: Multiple recipients of list >Subject: Voisons & Halberstadts >Date: Mon, Aug 9, 1999, 9:52 AM > > Greetings, > > After a long hiatus I have resubscribed to the list and am going to give a > try at model building again. > > I have been looking at the Flashback Voison 3 and the Blue Max Halberstadt > CL.II kits and am looking for reviews/advice on building either one. > > I have compared the Voison to the drawings in the FMP French AC book and > while the cockpit tub matches fairly well, the wings and tail assemblies > seem to be really off. Is that truly the case? > > On the other hand, the Blue Max kit looks spot on when compared to the > Datafile drawings and seems to be an easy build. > > > Thanks, > Jesse Thorn > Still in Raleigh, NC > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 12:55:50 -0700 From: "Bob Pearson" To: ww1 mailing list Subject: work bench ergonomics Message-ID: <199908092008.NAA23806@mail.rapidnet.net> > THIS MESSAGE IS IN MIME FORMAT. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --MS_Mac_OE_3017048151_303020_MIME_Part Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Greetings all, This was in the SMML this morning in response to a query on why would it be more comfortable to work on the floor ... and I thought many here could also make use of it Bob ------------------------------------- From: "Richard - Charlotte Marelius" Subject: Re: work bench ergonomics Hi Greg and all, My husband pointed out your work-bench-to-chair ratio question, knowing that bad workstation ergonomics have long since gone from a pet peeve to an obsession with me-- but not to an education or a degree. I have peripheral neuropathy, and I must keep a sharp eye out on things like this because repetitive discomforts can cause quite a bit of damage to me. Sad to say, there is no absolute answer on this, as people and tasks require constant adjustability. However, there are some pretty steadfast guidelines. Your most important asset is a chair in which these parameters can be adjusted (each independent of the other): seat height; tilt fore and aft of back; height of back up and down so lumber cushioning fits right in the small of your back; if you want arms, they also need to be height adjustable, and an angling arm cushion is an excellent feature. The contour of the back should not push your head or shoulders forward -- a surprising number do. If it has an integral foot rest, it should be independently height adjustable irrespective of the seat height. The chair should have an odd number of legs (five is most common) as a safety feature to lessen the chance of tipping over. The structural seat pan, underneath all the upholstery and cushioning foam, should be roughly flat on the sitting side with a curled down front edge; there are many that have seat pans made of plastic basins; once the cushioning gets crushed down in these chairs, the edges dig into the back of your thigh or knee. There are lots of people who sell really sexy looking chairs for very high prices so you can't go by price when selecting a chair. A good chair will cost you US$300 (so will a lousy one), and a really good chair will set you back US$600. If you don't have just tons of money to burn, minimum seating requirement is height adjustable chair, a small pillow to pad the small of your back (lumbar spine) and a foot stool, even if it's a pile of old phone books or a cardboard box. The things to measure and consider in establishing a "correct" station: * How much of your time is spent in 'microscopic, only the fingers move work' vs 'fine, close work requiring reasonably careful hand and forearm activity' vs 'whole arm and torso work' done. Consider also whether you work while standing. Why? These data influence the optimum height of the bench surface and whether or not multi-level surfaces would be the best/only way to go or can you just adjust the height of your chair for this range of work. Working height difference from micro to macro work is many inches -- if memory serves, it's in the 7 inch to 11 inch range of adjustability required. * Have someone assess your seated position, in terms of joint to joint to joint. When talking about parallels and right angles here, I'll be referring to the bone, not the entire body part. When I make reference to a specific degree, i'm assuming 0 degrees is at 3:00 o'clock and increases anticlockwise. Here are some of the measurements you need to take into account to set the interface between you, your chair, and your bench. 1. from hip to knee joints including foot position: with your feet settled nicely flat on the floor, the knee joint should be a bit above hip joint level, say 1/2 inch to an inch. Reason: this prevents or at least diminishes the uneven, squeezing (tiddly-wink type) pressure on the discs in the lumbar spine, and helps set up the spine to balance the shoulders. No matter how high you adjust your chair to sit, maintain this hip-knee-foot relationship. This may mean you need to have two or three different height foot rests; many people find a foot stool that tilts up a bit at the toe side (as far up as 15 degrees) to be most comfortable. Word of caution: foot support rings are not usually a replacement for foot rests in my opinion, because they pull your knee joint below your hip joint and are seldom height adjustable themselves. Many people do find them quite satisfactory, though, my opinion notwithstanding. Second word of caution: avoid sitting and supporting your legs by raising your heels off the floor and resting just on your toes. Reason: this causes long term, repetitive tensing of the plantar fascia tendon (goes from the toes to the heel), and the achilles tendon, and the calf muscles. Before long, this costs you the ability to flex your foot fully and walk comfortably up inclines, and increases your chances of tearing the plantar fascia (ouch). 2. Some work benches are height adjustable, but most are built for the normal guy. In other words, the bench won't fit you, anybody in your family, or anybody you know or have ever seen. Your work bench surface for doing average accuracy and detail of work should be at a height that allows you to have your forearms, when bent at ninety degrees from the upper arm which falls straight from the shoulder, roughly parallel to the floor, from big first knuckles through wrist to elbow. Finer work is done at a higher (relative to your chair) bench level; coarse work is done at a relatively lower bench level. Resting your forearms or elbows on the bench should not cause your shoulders to rise up in a hunch. Leaning your body weight on forearms or elbows is not good for you (can cause briuising of bone and nerves). It shows your chair is at the wrong height and/or indicates you sit too far away, inevitable for some of us plumper people. Pull out shelves (or a board you can slide toward you) come in handy in situtations where you're too far away part of the time. Whenever you find yourself sitting with your chin jutted forward, your neck extended, looking out the bottom half of your eyes, and your mouth slightly open, you have proof that you've got the chair seat to bench surface height wrong. 3. Using your posture in a relaxed (neutral) seated position to check bench/human/chair alignment and positioning: if you have everything set up right -- chair height, feet positioned at the right height, bench height, and lumbar support, you can just about draw an imaginary line up to the ceiling, perpendicular to the floor, and it will (in a side view of you), pass through your hip joint, your shoulder joint and the opening in your ear. 4. For exercises to reduce or elimnate the stiff back and neck and shoulders, look in physical therapy or rehablitation therapy books on treating carpal tunnel syndrome, as it's the same group of muscles and abuses to them that are involved here. Ask wife/husband to give neck massage by rubbing neck and shoulders with you lying face up, being careful to maintain equal pressure simultaneously on both sides of the spine. Doing this with you face up adds your weight to the massage, and it's much more effective. Also, while standing, press down firmly on the big muscle that runs from the base of your neck (back side) to the shoulder joint while moving your arm, bent at the elbow, gently fore and aft about ten times per arm. 5. Why does sitting on the floor at the coffee table work? Your knees are above your hips, you tend to rock and readjust when sitting on the floor, and the table is close to you with the weight of your arms supported. It fails to support your lumbar spine, but all in all it's not all that bad -- ergonomically speaking. (Ergonomics: what a poplular word, eh?!) May I recommend a ten-week old kitten for you, too. Any impulse to build on the coffee table is quickly scuttled without ever having to figure out spouses at all! When working at a work bench, you tend to stop and relax far more often to watch the kitten show. Adult cat's whiskers (naturally shed, now) sure look like they'd make good aerials, don't you think? And the kitten would almost surely absorb spousal attention and increase the air of tolerance. Works on me! Apologies for such a long response. Like I said, obsession. Charlotte Marelius --MS_Mac_OE_3017048151_303020_MIME_Part Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable work bench ergonomics Greetings all,

This was in the SMML this morning in response to a query on why would it be= more comfortable to work on the floor ...  and I thought many here cou= ld also make use of it

Bob
-------------------------------------
From: "Richard - Charlotte Marelius" <rcmarelius@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: work bench ergonomics

 Hi Greg and all,

 My husband pointed out your work-bench-to-chair ratio question, knowi= ng
that bad workstation ergonomics have long since gone from a pet peeve to an=
obsession with me-- but not to an education or a degree. I have peripheral<= BR> neuropathy, and I must keep a sharp eye out on things like this because
repetitive discomforts can cause quite a bit of damage to me. Sad to say, there is no absolute answer on this, as people and tasks require constant adjustability. However, there are some pretty steadfast guidelines.
 
 Your most important asset is a chair in which these parameters can be=
adjusted (each independent of the other): seat height; tilt fore and aft of=
back; height of back up and down so lumber cushioning fits right in the
small of your back; if you want arms, they also need to be height
adjustable, and an angling arm cushion is an excellent feature.

 The contour of the back should not push your head or shoulders forwar= d --
a surprising number do. If it has an integral foot rest, it should be
independently height adjustable irrespective of the seat height. The chair<= BR> should have an odd number of legs (five is most common) as a safety feature=
to lessen the chance of tipping over. The structural seat pan, underneath all the upholstery and cushioning foam, should be roughly flat on the
sitting side with a curled down front edge; there are many that have seat pans made of plastic basins; once the cushioning gets crushed down in these=
chairs, the edges dig into the back of your thigh or knee.  There are = lots
of people who sell really sexy looking chairs for very high prices so you can't go by price when selecting a chair. A good chair will cost you US$300=
(so will a lousy one), and a really good chair will set you back US$600.
 If you don't have just tons of money to burn, minimum seating require= ment
is height adjustable chair, a small pillow to pad the small of your back (lumbar spine) and a foot stool, even if it's a pile of old phone books or<= BR> a cardboard box.

 The things to measure and consider in establishing a "correct&qu= ot; station:

* How much of your time is spent in 'microscopic, only the fingers move
work' vs 'fine, close work requiring reasonably careful hand and forearm activity' vs 'whole arm and torso work' done. Consider also whether you
work while standing. Why? These data influence the optimum height of the bench surface and whether or not
multi-level surfaces would be the best/only way to go or can you just
adjust the height of your chair for this range of work. Working height
difference from micro to  macro work is many inches -- if memory serve= s,
it's in the 7 inch to 11 inch range of adjustability required.

 * Have someone assess your seated position, in terms of joint to join= t to
joint.  When talking about parallels and right angles here, I'll be referring to the bone, not the entire body part. When I make reference to a=
specific degree, i'm assuming 0 degrees is at 3:00 o'clock and increases anticlockwise. Here are some of the measurements you need to take into
account to set the interface between you, your chair, and your bench.

 1.  from hip to knee joints including foot position: with your f= eet
settled nicely flat on the floor, the knee joint should be a bit above hip<= BR> joint level, say 1/2 inch to an inch. Reason: this prevents or at least
diminishes the uneven, squeezing (tiddly-wink type) pressure on the discs in the lumbar spine, and helps set up the spine to balance the shoulders.
 No matter how high you adjust your chair to sit, maintain this hip-kn= ee-foot
relationship. This may mean you need to have two or three different height<= BR> foot rests; many people find a foot stool that tilts up a bit at the toe side (as far up as 15 degrees) to be most comfortable. Word of caution:
foot support rings are not usually a replacement for foot rests in my
opinion, because they pull your knee joint below your hip joint and are
seldom height adjustable themselves. Many people do find them quite
satisfactory, though, my opinion notwithstanding.

 Second word of caution: avoid sitting and supporting your legs by rai= sing
your heels off the floor and resting just on your toes. Reason: this causes=
long term, repetitive tensing of the plantar fascia tendon (goes from the toes to the heel), and the achilles tendon, and the calf muscles. Before long, this costs you the ability to flex your foot fully and walk
comfortably up inclines, and increases your chances of tearing the plantar<= BR> fascia (ouch).

 2. Some work benches are height adjustable, but most are built for th= e
normal guy.  In other words, the bench won't fit you, anybody in your<= BR> family, or anybody you know or have ever seen. Your work bench surface for<= BR> doing average accuracy and detail of work should be at a height that allows=
you to have your forearms, when bent at ninety degrees from the upper arm which falls straight from the shoulder, roughly parallel to the floor, from=
big first knuckles through wrist to elbow. Finer work is done at a higher (relative to your chair) bench level; coarse work is done at a relatively lower bench level. Resting your forearms or elbows on the bench should not<= BR> cause your shoulders to rise up in a hunch.

 Leaning your body weight on forearms or elbows is not good for you (c= an
cause briuising of bone and nerves). It shows your chair is at the wrong height and/or indicates you sit too far away, inevitable for some of us
plumper people. Pull out shelves (or a board you can slide toward you) come=
in handy in situtations where you're too far away part of the time.

 Whenever you find yourself sitting with your chin jutted forward, you= r neck
extended, looking out the bottom half of your eyes, and your mouth slightly=
open, you have proof that you've got the chair seat to bench surface height=
wrong.

 3. Using your posture in a relaxed (neutral) seated position to check=
bench/human/chair alignment and positioning: if you have everything set up<= BR> right -- chair height, feet positioned at the right height, bench height, and lumbar support, you can just about draw an imaginary line up to the
ceiling, perpendicular to the floor, and it will (in a side view of you), pass through your hip joint, your shoulder joint and the opening in your ea= r.

 4. For exercises to reduce or elimnate the stiff back and neck and shoulders, look in physical therapy or rehablitation therapy books on
treating carpal tunnel syndrome, as it's the same group of muscles and
abuses to them that are involved here. Ask wife/husband to give neck
massage by rubbing neck and shoulders with you lying face up, being careful=
to maintain equal pressure simultaneously on both sides of the spine. Doing=
this with you face up adds your weight to the massage, and it's much more effective. Also, while standing, press down firmly on the big muscle that runs from the base of your neck (back side) to the shoulder joint while
moving your arm, bent at the elbow, gently fore and aft about ten times per=
arm.

 5. Why does sitting on the floor at the coffee table work? Your knees= are
above your hips, you tend to rock and readjust when sitting on the floor, and the table is close to you with the weight of your arms supported. It fails to support your lumbar spine, but all in all it's not all that bad --=
ergonomically speaking. (Ergonomics:  what a poplular word, eh?!)

 May I recommend a ten-week old kitten for you, too. Any impulse to bu= ild
on the coffee table is quickly scuttled without ever having to figure out spouses at all!   When working at a work bench, you tend to stop = and relax
far more often to watch the kitten show. Adult cat's whiskers (naturally shed, now) sure look like they'd make good aerials, don't you think? And the kitten would almost surely absorb spousal attention and increase the air of tolerance. Works on me!

 Apologies for such a long response.  Like I said, obsession.

 Charlotte Marelius --MS_Mac_OE_3017048151_303020_MIME_Part-- ------------------------------ End of WWI Digest 1760 **********************