WWI Digest 1572 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) more thoughts on the Hanriot tail... by Ernest Thomas 2) Re: OT Politics. was Re: Eduard new releases by Allan Wright 3) Re: Dumping Airfixes by Allan Wright 4) Re: "Comic" classification by "Andy Kemp" 5) Re: I Finished One!!!!!! by "richard eaton" 6) Woolett's Camel (was Bertrab D.III yet again) by "Andy Kemp" 7) Re: "Comic" classification by "Bob Pearson" 8) Re: more thoughts on the Hanriot tail... by bucky@ptdprolog.net 9) DECALS & BOOKS WANTED by "david lazarus" 10) Re: Spring 1999 OTF by KarrArt@aol.com 11) Re: more thoughts on the Hanriot tail... by Ernest Thomas 12) Re: DECALS & BOOKS WANTED by "Lee J Mensinger" 13) Re: more thoughts on the Hanriot tail... by "David Vosburgh" 14) Re: more thoughts on the Hanriot tail... by Matthew E Bittner 15) Re: I Finished One!!!!!! by REwing@aol.com 16) Re: I Finished One!!!!!! by REwing@aol.com 17) Re:Blue Max QC by "Karl K. Juelch" 18) Re: Hanriot comments/was I Finished One!!!!!! by REwing@aol.com 19) Re: Hanriot comments/was I Finished One!!!!!! by REwing@aol.com 20) Re: Hanriot comments/was I Finished One!!!!!! by REwing@aol.com 21) Re: Blue Max QC by Albatrosdv@aol.com 22) Re: Eduard new releases by KarrArt@aol.com 23) Re: Eduard new releases by Albatrosdv@aol.com 24) Re: Blue Max QC by KarrArt@aol.com 25) Re: Eduard new releases by KarrArt@aol.com 26) Re: Blue Max QC by Ernest Thomas 27) Re: Hanriot comments/was I Finished One!!!!!! by Ernest Thomas 28) Re: Rogues by Mick Fauchon 29) Re: Eduard new releases by Mick Fauchon 30) Re: I Finished One!!!!!! by Matthew E Bittner 31) Re: Blue Max new releases by "Paul Schwartzkopf" 32) Re: Blue Max new releases by "Robert M. Farrar" 33) Rogues Gallery by Allan Wright 34) Re: Rogues Gallery by "Paul Schwartzkopf" 35) Alb DII # D1773 by "Diego Fernetti" 36) RE: Rogues Gallery by "Diego Fernetti" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 11:31:37 -0500 From: Ernest Thomas To: multiple recipients of list Subject: more thoughts on the Hanriot tail... Message-ID: <3735B869.6CA0@bellsouth.net> After thinking it over some more while mowing the lawn, I came up with this idea. Dry fit the fuselage and stab. Trace the outline of the fuselage onto the underside of the stab. After the fuselage is assembled and the end piece is cut off, attach the stab and then build the open structure onto that. This will give you solid surfaces to build on which should solve any problems of a flimsey-wimsey structure and will take all the guess work out of getting the open structure the right size/length. Again, this is all just speculation with no kit or references in front of me. The tail skid could be the wench in the works. Ymmv. If anyone tries it this way, let us know how it works out. E. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 13:05:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Allan Wright To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: OT Politics. was Re: Eduard new releases Message-ID: <199905091705.NAA05494@pease1.sr.unh.edu> Hasn't this thread woven a bit off topic? Let's get back to WWI modeling talk please...... =============================================================================== Allan Wright Jr. | You fell victim to one of the 'classic' blunders! University of New Hampshire+--------------------------------------------------- Research Computing Center | WWI Modeling mailing list: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Internet: aew@unh.edu | WWI Modeling WWW Page: http://pease1.sr.unh.edu =============================================================================== ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 13:17:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Allan Wright To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Dumping Airfixes Message-ID: <199905091717.NAA05590@pease1.sr.unh.edu> > Sopwith Pup (2 kits) > Albatros D.Va > SPAD VII > Roland C.II > deH. D.H. 4 I don't know about the other stuff but the in-print stuff retails around $5.00 a kit. $6.00 average might be a trifle high. You'd probably do well trying to sell thest individually. -Al =============================================================================== Allan Wright Jr. | You fell victim to one of the 'classic' blunders! University of New Hampshire+--------------------------------------------------- Research Computing Center | WWI Modeling mailing list: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Internet: aew@unh.edu | WWI Modeling WWW Page: http://pease1.sr.unh.edu =============================================================================== ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 18:56:44 +0100 From: "Andy Kemp" To: Subject: Re: "Comic" classification Message-ID: <000901be9a45$50b34760$03000004@675> The night-fighter variant of the Strutter was (I believe) the first machine christened "Comic". I think it just looked silly - or was deemed a silly idea. The night-fighter Camel was of the same style - ie the cockpit was far too far back to look like a serious aeroplane! And it shared the name. The reasons for the rear-located cockpit were twofold - 1. to get the pilots' eyes away from the flash of the twin Vickers, which caused night-blindness. The flash from the Lewis' was shielded by the top wing. 2. To give better visibility upwards and in-front - important when you're climb-chasing high-flying Gothas etc. However its handling characteristics were poor(er), and it was difficult to re-load the top-wing mounted Lewis guns), so it was phased out of service as a night-fighter in favour of the standard Camel. Makes a good-looking conversion though ... Andy K PS: anyone read Mick Davis' book "Sopwith Aircraft", out last week? Damn fine in my view!!! Some cracking detail drawings, and lots of good, well-produced photos. ----- Original Message ----- From: Matthew E Bittner To: Multiple recipients of list Sent: 07 May 1999 22:00 Subject: "Comic" classification > Can anybody enlighten me why the night-fighting versions of aircraft > (like the Strutter and Camel) were given the name "Comic"? > > > Matt Bittner > ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 12:57:53 -0500 From: "richard eaton" To: Subject: Re: I Finished One!!!!!! Message-ID: <199905091757.MAA06070@sierra.onr.com> Great Rick! Congratulations. It is a nice feeling isn't it. I wanted to have a cigarette after my last one. Ket's see some scans! Regards, Richard ---------- > From: REwing@aol.com > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: I Finished One!!!!!! > Date: Sunday, May 09, 1999 12:37 AM > > I finished the Eduard Hanriot tonight!! This is a big deal, since it is > the first model I've finished in a long time. The quality is of the kit is > very nice, but the craftsmanship of the builder has a lot to be desired. I > will probably use it to try out a couple of things, so I suppose it can be > called a prototype. > The kit went together very well straight out of the box. I also have > the Profipack versions of the HD.1/HD.2 and the HD.2 floatplane. Both are > just that much better with the little extras of PE and resin. Highly > recommended. > Next up? Ah...ah...um...so many kits, so little time! > > -Rick- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 19:06:03 +0100 From: "Andy Kemp" To: Subject: Woolett's Camel (was Bertrab D.III yet again) Message-ID: <00bb01be9a48$46004c20$03000004@675> The shot is well-known, but interesting none the less. The Camel is Woolett's which he flew quite a bit. The idea of the blobs was camouflage for balloon-busting runs, but I can't imagine any Hun ground gunner worth his salt would be fooled for long! A Camel always looks like a Camel ... The blobs didn't last long as his mates mistook him for a Hun in a brawl, and took pot-shots at him! Hey ho, back to PC10 ... Andy K >Also scanned an interesting Camel from 43 Sqn with white > blobs all over it. Caption reads it was flown by Woolett and > camou'ed for a balloon mission. Dont know if it is a common pic > or not but is interesting none the less. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 13:38:10 -0700 From: "Bob Pearson" To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: "Comic" classification Message-ID: <199905092047.NAA09635@mail.rapidnet.net> Andy writes . . . >PS: anyone read Mick Davis' book "Sopwith Aircraft", out last week? >Damn fine in my view!!! Some cracking detail drawings, and lots of >good, well-produced photos. Tell me more, tell me more Bob ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 17:20:49 -0400 From: bucky@ptdprolog.net To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: more thoughts on the Hanriot tail... Message-ID: <3735FC31.8C601C6B@ptdprolog.net> Thanks E. I was thinking of using the wire that comes with the Lindberg Jenny...too thick for rigging, but I thought ok for the fuselage...then again, aren't the longerons made of wood? Hmm I better rethink this some more. Mike Muth Ernest Thomas wrote: > After thinking it over some more while mowing the lawn, I came up with > this idea. Dry fit the fuselage and stab. Trace the outline of the > fuselage onto the underside of the stab. After the fuselage is assembled > and the end piece is cut off, attach the stab and then build the open > structure onto that. This will give you solid surfaces to build on which > should solve any problems of a flimsey-wimsey structure and will take > all the guess work out of getting the open structure the right > size/length. > ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 14:31:43 PDT From: "david lazarus" To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: DECALS & BOOKS WANTED Message-ID: <19990509213143.82617.qmail@hotmail.com> Hi, do we have to be subscribers to post messages? how do we unsubscribe? i'm getting too big a volume of postings, & i'm not making sense out of the instructions for unsubbing. thanks, Dave L. Am looking for french, belgian, italian, imp. russian, & brit national emblems, 1/48-1/24. also these books, used: Data File # 5, 7, 16, 21, 25, 40, 41. Squadron: Fok D VII, nieuports. Osprey: Zouaves ACW. Men at Arms Army of N. Virginia, Army of Potomac, ACW Armies 1,2,4,5. Thanks, all. please send your prices + post, in $$ US. Dave L. _______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 18:07:03 EDT From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Spring 1999 OTF Message-ID: In a message dated 5/8/99 7:59:55 PM Pacific Daylight Time, JohnGlaser@worldnet.att.net writes: << Actually, after writing this to the list, I went to my mailbox this afternoon and there it was. - JG (suffering from jet lag or is that RK separation syndrome?) >> I guess I have that effect on people. Kinda the same thing as pulling a wad of gum off one's shoe. RK ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 17:45:44 -0500 From: Ernest Thomas To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: more thoughts on the Hanriot tail... Message-ID: <37361018.704F@bellsouth.net> bucky@ptdprolog.net wrote: > > Thanks E. I was thinking of using the wire that comes with the Lindberg > Jenny...too thick for rigging, but I thought ok for the fuselage...then > again, aren't the longerons made of wood? Hmm I better rethink this some > more. I would use maybe .025sq or .030sq Evergreen strip. And you'll be able to make it strong with plastic to plastic joints. Plastic to metal will require ca, and I've found that, while ca will bond metal to metal, or metal to plastic, it doesn't really provide any kind of structural integrity. Nothing really works on metal but solder. And you DON'T want to be soldering around your Hanriot. :) Hth, E. 'I fear nothing but treachery.' Jehanne le Pucell ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 19:56:32 -0500 From: "Lee J Mensinger" To: adibuddha@hotmail.com, wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: DECALS & BOOKS WANTED Message-ID: <37362EC0.A8D7B921@wireweb.net> TRY usubscribe wwi Should work. Yes you must bea list member to post. Why have a list if everyone/antone can wander in and out at will? Lee david lazarus wrote: > Hi, do we have to be subscribers to post messages? how do we unsubscribe? > i'm getting too big a volume of postings, & i'm not making sense out of the > instructions for unsubbing. thanks, Dave L. Am looking for french, > belgian, italian, imp. russian, & brit national emblems, 1/48-1/24. also > these books, used: Data File # 5, 7, 16, 21, 25, 40, 41. Squadron: Fok D > VII, nieuports. Osprey: Zouaves ACW. Men at Arms Army of N. Virginia, Army > of Potomac, ACW Armies 1,2,4,5. Thanks, all. please send your prices + > post, in $$ US. Dave L. > > _______________________________________________________________ > Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 20:52:29 -0400 From: "David Vosburgh" To: Subject: Re: more thoughts on the Hanriot tail... Message-ID: <002601be9a7f$635fcf20$8fd690d0@Pvosburg> -----Original Message----- From: Ernest Thomas Date: Sunday, May 09, 1999 7:27 PM Subject: Re: more thoughts on the Hanriot tail... >...Nothing really works on metal but solder. And you DON'T want >to be soldering around your Hanriot. :) >Hth, >E. Why not? I just built the very Hanriot-like tail section of my 1:72 Airfix Pup by soldering 3 pieces of brass wire together, sticking on another piece of brass with a bit of hypo tubing slid over it, and topping (or bottoming, as it were) it all off with a tailskid made of thin basswood strip. Total elapsed time, maybe two hours, tops. RK it ain't, but it doesn't look half bad. Brass really isn't that hard to use, and it's actually easier to work with than styrene in a lot of ways, particularly with small assemblies which need a lot of adjustment, fitting, or general handling. Just a thought FWIW, DV ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 21:36:07 -0500 From: Matthew E Bittner To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: more thoughts on the Hanriot tail... Message-ID: <19990509.213609.-931381.0.mbittner@juno.com> On Sun, 9 May 1999 22:19:19 -0400 (EDT) "David Vosburgh" writes: > Why not? I just built the very Hanriot-like tail section of my 1:72 > Airfix > Pup by soldering 3 pieces of brass wire together, sticking on > another piece > of brass with a bit of hypo tubing slid over it, and topping (or > bottoming, > as it were) it all off with a tailskid made of thin basswood strip. > Total > elapsed time, maybe two hours, tops. I for one would like to see this! Matt Bittner ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 23:03:06 EDT From: REwing@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: I Finished One!!!!!! Message-ID: Matt and Cyg wrote: << Pictures, then! >> Sorry guys. There won't be any pictures of this brute. It may not even make it to the IPMS meeting this Wed. My skills are pretty poor at the moment. The main thing was to finish it and sit back and say GOOD, bring on the next one! I'm going to try the guitar string method for rigging as soon as I get to a music store. The only problems I had with the kit was the join between the lower wing and fuselage. It is a tight fit and there needs to be a bit of sanding on the rear part of the wing, otherwise a slight step will occur. Thanks for the encouragement!! I hope to improve to the high standards of the group. -Rick- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 23:16:06 EDT From: REwing@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: I Finished One!!!!!! Message-ID: Hi Mike, I built this straight out of the box. I thought about doing the rear fuselage and figured if I started messing with it, it wouldn't get done. On the two profipack versions I probably will. It doesn't look easy, but I figure I'll need to do it to the Sopwith Pup and Triplanes down the road. I was going to use the Datafile as a pattern and trim the back off. Then use some Evergreen plastic and HSP to finish it. It will probably more difficult than that, though! Rigging is a different story. I'm going to try to use the guitar string method since I don't know of an easy way to do the double wires in a consistant manner. Do you have an easier method? Love to hear about it! Good luck with yours and love to hear any more ideas. -Rick- << Rick How did you handle the rear of the fuselage where the fabric was removed? The kit leaves it solid. I have cut moine, but haven't figured out how to put in the stuff to make it look like the tail skid source, end of framing, etc. I just started painting mine and am looking forward with a little bit of dread to the rigging, since I haven't rigged a Hanriot before. Congrats on getting it dome....photos??? Mike Muth >> ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 23:28:37 -0400 From: "Karl K. Juelch" To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re:Blue Max QC Message-ID: <37365261.7DC56239@earthlink.net> Hello Sandy! Thanks for reporting your good experiences with Chris Gannon with the list. Perhaps mine is just a case of "slipping through the cracks". I was reluctant to make such a negative posting, but after the call for an e-mail campaign I thought my comments would be appropriate. It seems all too often negative threads such as this erupt into "flame wars", and that would truly be an injustice here, as Blue Max kits on balance are quite nice (as are Pegasus, which I've been collecting and building far longer than the BM kits). Though it was not my intention to enlist a third party's intervention, I do appreciate your concern and effort on my behalf. Happy modeling! Karl >...Chris Gannon is usually red-hot on customer back-up and has always very quickly >replaced any bits I've had problems with. He sent me a new Pfalz DXII wing within >two days. >I met him at UK Nats last year and, in the middle of a busy scrum of >customers, told him one of my Camels had the wrong engine crankcase. He >wrote my name down on an envelope and I thought I'd be lucky to hear any >more - but no - a few days later in came the replacement part >If you don't mind, I'll copy this reply to Chris and think you will find >you will get a response. (They may have been on holiday or somesuch if there >has been a delay) >HTH >Sandy Adam ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 23:21:32 EDT From: REwing@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Hanriot comments/was I Finished One!!!!!! Message-ID: <39f950fb.2467aabc@aol.com> << OK Rick, the ball is yours! Mike Muth >> Oops, I answered before I got through all the posts. Read all, then answer!! I keep forgetting that. -Rick- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 23:26:08 EDT From: REwing@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Hanriot comments/was I Finished One!!!!!! Message-ID: Okay, I'm really getting worried now!! Even scared!! Ernest and I having similar thoughts!! I don't know how much more of this I can take!!! ;^) -Rick- << Btw, from what I saw on the HD-1 specimen at NMNA in Pensacola, the cut out on the tail should just be a simple matter of a few Evergreen strips and guitar strings. Of course, this is only what's going on in my head, which is often very different from reality. :) E. >> ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 23:30:59 EDT From: REwing@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Hanriot comments/was I Finished One!!!!!! Message-ID: Okay, now I'm getting very worried!! Even scared!! Ernest and I having similar thoughts!!! No body warned me this could happen. ;^) RtH, no, I mean Rick. Yeah, just -Rick- << Btw, from what I saw on the HD-1 specimen at NMNA in Pensacola, the cut out on the tail should just be a simple matter of a few Evergreen strips and guitar strings. Of course, this is only what's going on in my head, which is often very different from reality. :) E. >> ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 00:58:51 EDT From: Albatrosdv@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Blue Max QC Message-ID: <883e017b.2467c18b@aol.com> I just want everyone thinking of contacting Blue Max on the question of Quality Control to be very clear that a flame war is the last thing I would advocate. If these guys were a bunch of jerks, I would say don't wate your time and money, go get something else. The fact is Chris Gannon chooses interesting subjects - some of which like the Junkers D.1, no one else even considers - and puts real effort into the design. What I want to see is production that is worthy of that. And not on a hit-and-miss basis. their design isn't hit and miss, and the production should not be either. The only other limited-run company in Blighty deserving of mention at the same time is Aeroclub - I just wish Chris would go ask John (who is an engineer where Chis is an artist) what the secret it. I mean, any time you buy an Aeroclub kit, you don't have to worry about whether you have to sand off half of it to make it look like what it purports to represent. I don't know if he listens. It would be nice to know just how many people are on this list, and how many of them buy his kits. I rather suspect we are at least a good third of his buyers, which means he should listen. I know for a fact he can do it right, because I am looking at his SE.5a, and he did it right. TC ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 00:58:55 EDT From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Eduard new releases Message-ID: In a message dated 5/8/99 5:29:14 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ethomas6@bellsouth.net writes: << > << ROBSOTALMFDIAPOBRAO >> > > Say this quickly three times and your biplanes will rig themselves. > Robert K. WOW! It really works. E. >> I'm trying to learn to say it backwards so I can go to contests and whisper it over the competition. RK ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 01:06:25 EDT From: Albatrosdv@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Eduard new releases Message-ID: <1f848812.2467c351@aol.com> In a message dated 99-05-10 01:02:47 EDT, you write: << I'm trying to learn to say it backwards so I can go to contests and whisper it over the competition. RK >> Uh-oh, watch out! The ever-so-nice RK seems to be falling prey to the dread Pothunteritis disease!! RK - say it ain't so!! Restore my faith in humanity! TC ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 01:13:18 EDT From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Blue Max QC Message-ID: In a message dated 5/9/99 10:00:54 PM Pacific Daylight Time, Albatrosdv@aol.com writes: << The fact is Chris Gannon chooses interesting subjects - some of which like the Junkers D.1, no one else even considers - and puts real effort into the design. What I want to see is production that is worthy of that. And not on a hit-and-miss basis. ........... I know for a fact he can do it right, because I am looking at his SE.5a, and he did it right. TC >> Yeah, the SE5a is a bit expensive for my wallet, but because of the subject matter, I'm tempted- I may squuuueeeezzzzee the budget some if I knew I could get my hands on a good one, hassle free. Robert K. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 01:18:06 EDT From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Eduard new releases Message-ID: <83c32a1f.2467c60e@aol.com> In a message dated 5/9/99 10:09:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time, Albatrosdv@aol.com writes: << Uh-oh, watch out! The ever-so-nice RK seems to be falling prey to the dread Pothunteritis disease!! RK - say it ain't so!! Restore my faith in humanity! TC >> Nah, it's just that the competition is gettin' better and better! Never a pot hunter- but contests can provide that extra little aaaaaaaaaaaoooOoOoOoOOOOOPH to improve one's work some! Robert K. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 01:19:49 -0500 From: Ernest Thomas To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Blue Max QC Message-ID: <37367A85.5438@bellsouth.net> Albatrosdv@aol.com wrote: > > I just want everyone thinking of contacting Blue Max on the question of > Quality Control to be very clear that a flame war is the last thing I would > advocate. I never would've guessed that from the amount of lead you've let fly. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 01:20:38 -0500 From: Ernest Thomas To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Hanriot comments/was I Finished One!!!!!! Message-ID: <37367AB6.188D@bellsouth.net> REwing@aol.com wrote: > > Okay, now I'm getting very worried!! Even scared!! Ernest and I having > similar thoughts!!! No body warned me this could happen. ;^) Quit whining and deal with it. :) E. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 18:51:47 +1000 (EST) From: Mick Fauchon To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Cc: Multiple recipients of list Subject: Re: Rogues Message-ID: Al & all, One more [hairy one] to be added as soon as I can get to my son's scanner [which he's going to get for his birthday to-morrow 80) ] Mick. -- -- Mick Fauchon | Internet: ulmjf@dewey.newcastle.edu.au Reference Section, Auchmuty Library | Ph (intl+61+49) 215861 University of Newcastle, AUSTRALIA | Fax (intl+61+49) 215833 MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM M M M Tasmanian Devil: "#@%!&^*%%...!#@!&**%^@@#$#-+*+*&##@...!!" M M M M Yosemite Sam : "Cut out that Army talk!..Yer in the Navy now!" M M M MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 19:48:28 +1000 (EST) From: Mick Fauchon To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Cc: Multiple recipients of list Subject: Re: Eduard new releases Message-ID: Matt, > Don't worry, my wife would beat me up if I started buying a whole load of > new scale kits. Neither threats nor beatings from that redoubtable source have broken me of the habit yet.......ask her 80( Mick. -- -- Mick Fauchon | Internet: ulmjf@dewey.newcastle.edu.au Reference Section, Auchmuty Library | Ph (intl+61+49) 215861 University of Newcastle, AUSTRALIA | Fax (intl+61+49) 215833 MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM M M M Tasmanian Devil: "#@%!&^*%%...!#@!&**%^@@#$#-+*+*&##@...!!" M M M M Yosemite Sam : "Cut out that Army talk!..Yer in the Navy now!" M M M MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 04:44:37 -0500 From: Matthew E Bittner To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: I Finished One!!!!!! Message-ID: <19990510.051016.-822461.1.mbittner@juno.com> On Sun, 9 May 1999 23:06:24 -0400 (EDT) REwing@aol.com writes: > Sorry guys. There won't be any pictures of this brute. Bummer. Well then, pictures of the next one. :-) Matt Bittner ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 07:26:23 -0500 From: "Paul Schwartzkopf" To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Blue Max new releases Message-ID: >>List, >>Please describe what the RIPPLE looks like....gettin' paraniod. >>Bob This is what appears to be a "wave" in the plastic that runs parallel with the training edge, just a little inboard of the trailing edge. Gives the wing surface a slight "stepped" appearance. Paul A. Schwartzkopf ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 07:36:52 -0500 From: "Robert M. Farrar" To: Subject: Re: Blue Max new releases Message-ID: <000601be9ae1$ca35dfc0$603d88cf@rmf> Paul, Thanks. Bob -----Original Message----- From: Paul Schwartzkopf To: Multiple recipients of list Date: Monday, May 10, 1999 7:27 AM Subject: Re: Blue Max new releases >>>List, >>>Please describe what the RIPPLE looks like....gettin' paraniod. >>>Bob > >This is what appears to be a "wave" in the plastic that runs parallel with the training edge, just a little inboard of the trailing edge. Gives the wing surface a slight "stepped" appearance. > >Paul A. Schwartzkopf > > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 08:57:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Allan Wright To: wwi Subject: Rogues Gallery Message-ID: <199905101257.IAA08493@pease1.sr.unh.edu> Hi List, The weekend was productive for many rogues - 6 more images added. Thanks to all who contributed. -Allan =============================================================================== Allan Wright Jr. | You fell victim to one of the 'classic' blunders! University of New Hampshire+--------------------------------------------------- Research Computing Center | WWI Modeling mailing list: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Internet: aew@unh.edu | WWI Modeling WWW Page: http://pease1.sr.unh.edu =============================================================================== ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 08:51:15 -0500 From: "Paul Schwartzkopf" To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Rogues Gallery Message-ID: Hey Bob--I thought your list messages made you sound a little younger than your picture shows! ;-) Paul A. Schwartzkopf ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 11:50:33 -0300 From: "Diego Fernetti" To: "WW1 mailing list" Subject: Alb DII # D1773 Message-ID: <000501be9af4$755ed700$4640a8c0@prens-001.ssp.salud.rosario.gov.ar> Hi list: Does anyone knows who were the pilot of Alb DII serial # D1773, with a big, black E painted on fuselage sides and spine?. I have an illustration of this one in a couple of books and looks like an easy paint scheme, but I'm not sure about its accuracy. TIA D. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 11:01:34 -0300 From: "Diego Fernetti" To: Subject: RE: Rogues Gallery Message-ID: <000801be9aed$9d7d16e0$4640a8c0@prens-001.ssp.salud.rosario.gov.ar> Bob P. Is that your last picture on long pants? ;-) D. -----Mensaje original----- De: Allan Wright Para: Multiple recipients of list Fecha: Lunes 10 de Mayo de 1999 10:11 AM Asunto: Rogues Gallery > >Hi List, > >The weekend was productive for many rogues - 6 more images added. Thanks >to all who contributed. > >-Allan > >=========================================================================== ==== >Allan Wright Jr. | You fell victim to one of the 'classic' blunders! >University of New Hampshire+--------------------------------------------------- >Research Computing Center | WWI Modeling mailing list: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu >Internet: aew@unh.edu | WWI Modeling WWW Page: http://pease1.sr.unh.edu >=========================================================================== ==== > ------------------------------ End of WWI Digest 1572 **********************