WWI Digest 1507 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) Re: Nieuport question by "Brad Gossen" 2) Uncle Sniffy by "David Vosburgh" 3) Shane by Matthew E Bittner 4) RE: Shane by Shane Weier 5) Re: 72 scale kits by "Bill Neill" 6) Re: Shane by "Steven M. Perry" 7) Re: yippee!!! by DavidL1217@aol.com 8) RE: Uncle Sniffy by Shane Weier 9) Albatros three-colour camo (was Re: yippee!!!) by Bob Pearson 10) Pfalz DIII Question by David Kinnear 11) Re: Wat is a capuchin friar knot ? by David Kinnear 12) Re: Shane by KarrArt@aol.com 13) Re: Shane by "Steven M. Perry" 14) Re: Shane by Ernest Thomas 15) Re: Pfalz DIII Question by mgoodwin@ricochet.net 16) RE: Uncle Sniffy by Dave Watts 17) RE: Shane by Shane Weier 18) Re: Pfalz DIII Question by David Kinnear 19) Re: Nieuport question by Mike Fletcher 20) Re: Shane by peter crow 21) Re: Pfalz DIII Question by KarrArt@aol.com 22) RE: Nieuport question by Shane Weier 23) Re: Shane by Dave Watts 24) Re: Shane by KarrArt@aol.com 25) Re: Pfalz DIII Question by David Kinnear 26) RE: Kruten's/Kazakov's Nieuport marking by "Hirohisa Ozaki" 27) Re: Albatros three-colour camo (was Re: yippee!!!) by "Steven M. Perry" 28) Re: Pfalz DIII Question by bshatzer@orednet.org (Bill Shatzer) 29) Re: Shane by Ernest Thomas 30) Re: Shane by KarrArt@aol.com 31) Bent wings by David Kinnear 32) Re: Bent wings by Albatrosdv@aol.com 33) Re: Bent wings by David Kinnear 34) Re: Shane by "Sandy Adam" 35) Shane by hans.juergen.glueck@gis-online.de 36) RE: Shane by "Diego Fernetti" 37) CAD programs by Suvoroff@aol.com 38) Re: Shane by "Charles and Linda Duckworth" 39) Re: Bent wings by "Steven M. Perry" 40) off-topic, Potez XXV interior colors by "Hirohisa Ozaki" 41) Re: CAD programs by Dennis Ugulano ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 20:09:24 -0500 From: "Brad Gossen" To: Subject: Re: Nieuport question Message-ID: <199903230108.UAA25598@smtp2.globalserve.net> Well soak me with a bucket of propwash! Just checked the SE5a and have found numerous examples with metal kickplates both in the factory and in the field. There are clear signs of paint chipping on the doors. I thought I knew this airplane. None apparent on the F2B though. You learn something new every day. Brad ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 20:14:55 -0500 From: "David Vosburgh" To: "WWI Mailing List" Subject: Uncle Sniffy Message-ID: <000901be74ca$9172fac0$0ad690d0@Pvosburg> Does anyone have Graham's current e-mail address? I thought he'd changed it from the Citicorp address before he unsubscribed, but can't recall for sure. TIA, DV ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 21:36:13 -0600 From: Matthew E Bittner To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Shane Message-ID: <19990322.213614.-776541.0.mbittner@juno.com> Shane, Nice Pics. You're insane. ;-) Matt Bittner ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 13:40:23 +1000 From: Shane Weier To: "'wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu'" Subject: RE: Shane Message-ID: Matt, > Nice Pics. You're insane. ;-) Thanks :-þ.... More to follow, complete with paint and bowden cables. Shane ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 19:53:25 -0800 From: "Bill Neill" To: Subject: Re: 72 scale kits Message-ID: <002501bf6ad5$bc03b0c0$c8dcafce@bill> Ok, the Bristol Scout D and Bristol M1C are gone, various interest in the others, but I would rather swop than sell, if I don't get swop offers in the next day or three, then I will go for selling. I'm not just interested in WW1 48 scale kits, I would go for relevant brass or decals. I also build airliners in 72 or 144, and all British civil or military in 48. More specifically...any WW1 RFC monoplane in 48, Lindberg Gladiator or Bulldog or other 20s/30s RAF subjects except Hawker Demon. Bill Neill Bill Neill ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 23:02:04 -0500 From: "Steven M. Perry" To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Shane Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19990322230204.0072c964@pop.mindspring.com> At 10:33 PM 3/22/99 -0500, you wrote: >Shane, > >Nice Pics. You're insane. ;-) > > >Matt Bittner Incredible work Shane. I'm too depressed to even suggest digital mutilation. ;-) Back to my stone knives & bone chissels. Ugh, Grunt. sp ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 23:07:21 EST From: DavidL1217@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: yippee!!! Message-ID: <5908c682.36f71379@aol.com> Forgive me if I missed this, but how much validity is placed in the 3 color schemes. My 'reading' of the photos would not conclude in 3 colors but Dan Abbott's article (which I have) does have some fine references. What are the thoughts of this group? How far into the DIII and DV(a) series do the 3 colors run? ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 14:32:18 +1000 From: Shane Weier To: "'wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu'" Subject: RE: Uncle Sniffy Message-ID: DV, > Does anyone have Graham's current e-mail address? I thought > he'd changed it > from the Citicorp address before he unsubscribed, but can't > recall for sure. The only other address I can find him using is graham_nash@hotmail.com ...and I don't *think* this is more recent than the citicorp address. Shane ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 20:36:07 -0800 From: Bob Pearson To: WW1 Mailing list Subject: Albatros three-colour camo (was Re: yippee!!!) Message-ID: <199903230436.UAA19813@spare.rapidnet.net> David, We went over this a few months back (not sure exactly when) and used examples from the Albatros Flying Circus Special. This would tend to supercede the earlier notions put forward in the Albatros Fighters Special Bob ---------- > From: DavidL1217@aol.com > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: Re: yippee!!! > Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 23:16:50 -0500 (EST) > > Forgive me if I missed this, but how much validity is placed in the 3 color > schemes. My 'reading' of the photos would not conclude in 3 colors but Dan > Abbott's article (which I have) does have some fine references. What are the > thoughts of this group? How far into the DIII and DV(a) series do the 3 > colors run? ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 20:57:25 -0800 From: David Kinnear To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Pfalz DIII Question Message-ID: <199903230454.UAA19160@danube.cisco.com> Hey lhistees- How did the upper wing on the DIII look? Was it flat? Did it hav some dihedral? The reason I ask is that my eduard kit's upper wing has a dihedral upward bend that I think is warping but want to make sure before I try and straighted it. TIA David ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 20:58:39 -0800 From: David Kinnear To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Wat is a capuchin friar knot ? Message-ID: <199903230455.UAA19176@danube.cisco.com> A woman? Do I get the five pounds? >Philippe Spriesterbach >One of the (numerous) Mad Scratchbuilders >http://www.ping.be/phillipe_models/ >philippe.spriesterbach@ping.be >IPMS Belgium Member #F015 >IPMS Brussels Secretary > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 23:44:59 EST From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Shane Message-ID: In a message dated 3/22/99 8:08:50 PM Pacific Standard Time, smperry@mindspring.com writes: << >Shane, > >Nice Pics. You're insane. ;-) > > >Matt Bittner Incredible work Shane. I'm too depressed to even suggest digital mutilation. ;-) Back to my stone knives & bone chissels. Ugh, Grunt. sp >> Uh...did I miss something? Shane's pictures? Where? How? Robert K. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 23:58:24 -0500 From: "Steven M. Perry" To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Shane Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19990322235824.0072df3c@pop.mindspring.com> >Uh...did I miss something? Shane's pictures? Where? How? >Robert K. http://pease1.sr.unh.edu/Images/Weier/index.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 23:06:08 -0600 From: Ernest Thomas To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Shane Message-ID: <36F72140.39BE@bellsouth.net> > << >Shane, > > > >Nice Pics. You're insane. ;-) > > > > > >Matt Bittner > > Incredible work Shane. > > I'm too depressed to even suggest digital mutilation. ;-) > > Back to my stone knives & bone chissels. Ugh, Grunt. > > sp >> > WE'RE NOT WORTHY!!! E. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:05:13 -0800 From: mgoodwin@ricochet.net To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Pfalz DIII Question Message-ID: <36F7C9C9.59CB@ricochet.net> David Kinnear wrote: > > > How did the upper wing on the DIII look? Was it flat? Did it hav some dihedral? According to the datafile there was no dihedral on upper wing and 1 degree on lower wing. Riordan ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:13:05 -0500 From: Dave Watts To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: RE: Uncle Sniffy Message-ID: <199903230511.AAA20949@mail.netdirect.net> Sorry to hear Graham's gone. I keep getting un subscribed automatically. It's kind of frustrating, since with my travelling and everything else, I don't know how long I've been kicked off. Anyone else having this problem? Best to all, glad to back! Hope I didn't miss too much. Dave W. >> Does anyone have Graham's current e-mail address? I thought >> he'd changed it >> from the Citicorp address before he unsubscribed, but can't >> recall for sure. > >The only other address I can find him using is > >graham_nash@hotmail.com > >..and I don't *think* this is more recent than the citicorp address. > >Shane > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 15:14:11 +1000 From: Shane Weier To: "'wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu'" Subject: RE: Shane Message-ID: EtH > > WE'RE NOT WORTHY!!! Cut it out !!!!! I've looked at pictures of your models too and you're just as crazy as me. Hell, everyone here is crazy. Get outta my comfy chair !! Shane ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 21:17:32 -0800 From: David Kinnear To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Pfalz DIII Question Message-ID: <199903230514.VAA19693@danube.cisco.com> Great! Thanks David At 12:10 AM 3/23/99 -0500, you wrote: >David Kinnear wrote: >> >> >> How did the upper wing on the DIII look? Was it flat? Did it hav some dihedral? > >According to the datafile there was no dihedral on upper wing and 1 >degree on lower wing. > >Riordan > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 21:22:52 -0800 From: Mike Fletcher To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Nieuport question Message-ID: <36F7252C.4057BF55@mars.ark.com> it is a replica Nie.17 and it may have been done because that was how it had been done when they got it - I have no idea. Shane Weier wrote: > > Mike, > > > NAM's replica had a dark fabric pocket, shaped like the front > > of a foot - I have no idea as to what sourse they may have had to > > determnine that that was how it was done, however I have never > > seen anything that contradicted it > > I'm a bit lost. We've drifted away from Nieuports a bit and I'm not sure > whether you're refereing to a replica Nie-17 or another aircraft. Can you > clarify slightly please? > > Shane -- Mike Fletcher ___ ., mdf@mars.ark.com |-\|^----! ; mikef@sparc.nic.bc.ca |--n--""*" icq=19554083 @ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 21:22:18 -0800 (PST) From: peter crow To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Shane Message-ID: <19990323052218.19016.rocketmail@web707.mail.yahoo.com> > > WE'RE NOT WORTHY!!! > E. > Triple Ditto... great stuff P. Crow... now looking into knitting & basket weaving and trashing all kits..;-) _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:14:28 EST From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Pfalz DIII Question Message-ID: In a message dated 3/22/99 8:56:40 PM Pacific Standard Time, dkinnear@cisco.com writes: << Hey lhistees- How did the upper wing on the DIII look? Was it flat? Did it hav some dihedral? The reason I ask is that my eduard kit's upper wing has a dihedral upward bend that I think is warping but want to make sure before I try and straighted it. TIA David >> No dihedral but with a bit of washout on the ailerons. Robert K. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 15:27:05 +1000 From: Shane Weier To: "'wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu'" Subject: RE: Nieuport question Message-ID: Mike > it is a replica Nie.17 and it may have been done because that > was how it had been done when they got it - I have no idea. > Okay, now I'm back on track. Serves me right for drifting away from the subject :-) Shane ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:28:23 -0500 From: Dave Watts To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Shane Message-ID: <199903230526.AAA24731@mail.netdirect.net> Shane, The hat is off, it's staying off! Damned nice! Dave W. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:13:01 EST From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Shane Message-ID: <1cc5a674.36f722dd@aol.com> In a message dated 3/22/99 9:06:20 PM Pacific Standard Time, smperry@mindspring.com writes: << >Uh...did I miss something? Shane's pictures? Where? How? >Robert K. http://pease1.sr.unh.edu/Images/Weier/index.html >> Ahhh! I found, I looked, I wept.Time to call for the patented RK transcontinental digit-buster! Robert K. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 21:35:44 -0800 From: David Kinnear To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Pfalz DIII Question Message-ID: <199903230532.VAA20116@danube.cisco.com> Thanks At 12:24 AM 3/23/99 -0500, you wrote: >In a message dated 3/22/99 8:56:40 PM Pacific Standard Time, >dkinnear@cisco.com writes: > ><< Hey lhistees- > > How did the upper wing on the DIII look? Was it flat? Did it hav some >dihedral? The reason I ask is that my eduard kit's upper wing has a dihedral >upward bend that I think is warping but want to make sure before I try and >straighted it. > > TIA > > David >> > >No dihedral but with a bit of washout on the ailerons. >Robert K. > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 14:41:37 +0900 From: "Hirohisa Ozaki" To: Subject: RE: Kruten's/Kazakov's Nieuport marking Message-ID: <04a701be74ef$d1b8af60$b11db684@dosv64.miln.mei.co.jp> Mike, Thank you for your research. Pedro, Would you please send scans me too? Hiro -----Original Message----- From: Mike Fletcher To: Multiple recipients of list Date: Thursday, March 18, 1999 4:07 PM Subject: Re: Kruten's/Kazakov's Nieuport marking >Kazakov's markings are incorrect in two ways - first it should be clear >doped linen overall (the greyish russian version), and second, the >national markings should have white lines separating each colour - the >kit roundels are the type used on the 16, 17, 21 and 23 that were >imported from France, but it wasn't a type commonly found on the 11 >(especially from his unit). I cannot find the book that has his aircraft >in it, but it was a standard death or glory n.11, iirc. >-- >Mike Fletcher ___ ., >mdf@mars.ark.com |-\|^----! ; >mikef@sparc.nic.bc.ca |--n--""*" >icq=19554083 @ > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:37:53 -0500 From: "Steven M. Perry" To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Albatros three-colour camo (was Re: yippee!!!) Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19990323003753.00731a3c@pop.mindspring.com> Was the 3 color scheme applied at the factory? And since D-SA shows the rudder as the Lt.Green, would the Albatros Logo be applied to the Lt. Green fabric on the rudder or would it have been painted over? TIA sp ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 21:44:43 -0800 (PST) From: bshatzer@orednet.org (Bill Shatzer) To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Pfalz DIII Question Message-ID: <199903230544.VAA26622@compass.OregonVOS.net> David writes: >Hey lhistees- > >How did the upper wing on the DIII look? Was it flat? Did it hav some >dihedral? The reason I ask is that my eduard kit's upper wing has a >dihedral upward bend that I think is warping but want to make sure >before I try and straighted it. Any observable dihedral on the top wing would be incorrect. Cheers and all, -- Bill Shatzer - bshatzer@orednet.org "You don't need a weather man to know which way the wind blows." -Bob Dylan- ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:06:26 -0600 From: Ernest Thomas To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Shane Message-ID: <36F72F62.44C7@bellsouth.net> Shane Weier wrote: > Hell, everyone here is crazy. Get outta my comfy chair !! > Lemme rest here a bit. At least you build a bunch of stuff that will be seen. I just did a plug and wire job on a straight six Mercedes from Tom's and it's all mostly out of sight. But fwiw, it IS possible to feed six strands of .006 brass rod through a 20 gauge spinal needle. bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb.... EtH 'success walks hand in hand with failure down the Hollywood blvd'. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 01:15:28 EST From: KarrArt@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Shane Message-ID: In a message dated 3/22/99 10:10:05 PM Pacific Standard Time, ethomas6@bellsouth.net writes: << EtH 'success walks hand in hand with failure down the Hollywood blvd'. >> He looks up ladies dresses as they sadly pass 'im by....... RK ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 23:39:05 -0800 From: David Kinnear To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Bent wings Message-ID: <199903230736.XAA22971@danube.cisco.com> Help again guys? I knew I should have kept the old mails that dealt with this. Let me throw this out, in order to reshape the wing, I place it in warm water, and then place a suitable weight on top of it while it is lying on a flat surface. Correct? Bear with me guys, I'm getting better. David ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 02:38:30 EST From: Albatrosdv@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Bent wings Message-ID: <835005bc.36f744f6@aol.com> In a message dated 99-03-23 02:37:34 EST, you write: << Let me throw this out, in order to reshape the wing, I place it in warm water, and then place a suitable weight on top of it while it is lying on a flat surface. Correct? >> Put it in hot water, reshape it, run it under cold water to "freeze" it in position. Tom Cleaver ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 23:50:12 -0800 From: David Kinnear To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Bent wings Message-ID: <199903230747.XAA23182@danube.cisco.com> Great! Thanks At 02:40 AM 3/23/99 -0500, you wrote: >In a message dated 99-03-23 02:37:34 EST, you write: > ><< Let me throw this out, in order to reshape the wing, I place it in warm >water, and then place a suitable weight on top of it while it is lying on a >flat surface. Correct? > >> >Put it in hot water, reshape it, run it under cold water to "freeze" it in >position. > >Tom Cleaver > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:02:08 -0000 From: "Sandy Adam" To: Subject: Re: Shane Message-ID: <199903230901.JAA10861@beryl.sol.co.uk> Glorious stuff Mr Weier - you are inshane! Sandy ---------- > From: Steven M. Perry > To: Multiple recipients of list > Subject: Re: Shane > Date: 23 March 1999 05:03 > > > >Uh...did I miss something? Shane's pictures? Where? How? > >Robert K. > > http://pease1.sr.unh.edu/Images/Weier/index.html ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 10:08:18 +0100 From: hans.juergen.glueck@gis-online.de To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Shane Message-ID: <4125673D.0031F8D7.00@mailhost.gis-online.de> Shane, WOW, incredible work ! Hans ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 07:10:05 -0300 From: "Diego Fernetti" To: Subject: RE: Shane Message-ID: <005801be7515$53538ca0$4640a8c0@prens-001.ssp.salud.rosario.gov.ar> Para: Multiple recipients of list Fecha: Martes 23 de Marzo de 1999 2:42 AM Asunto: Re: Shane >In a message dated 3/22/99 9:06:20 PM Pacific Standard Time, >smperry@mindspring.com writes: > >Uh...did I miss something? Shane's pictures? Where? How? > >Robert K. > > http://pease1.sr.unh.edu/Images/Weier/index.html > You, you, you....!!!! Antipodean!! D. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 07:07:55 EST From: Suvoroff@aol.com To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: CAD programs Message-ID: Dear Group; I have but one thing remaining to my ALPS decal-producing system, and that is the CAD program. I checked out the local computer stores and what they've got now is CorelDraw 8, which I am sure must be a great program, but frankly I choke at the $209 asking price (now, how many Toko kits is that?). And also I doubt if all that drawing power is really needed for me just for the rather simple decals I plan on making. So does anyone here have any recommendations for good (but less expensive) drawing programs? Would a somewhat earlier version of CorelDraw or Adobe Illustrator be available at a reduced price somewhere? Thanks in advance for any replies. Yours, James D. Gray ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 06:23:09 -0600 From: "Charles and Linda Duckworth" To: Subject: Re: Shane Message-ID: <005401be7527$efcfcd20$8a5ddfd1@cnlduckwor> Checked out email before leaving town this morning and saw Shane's excellent models - so now instead of thinking about my business day activities my mind's cluttered with thoughts of Shane's Bristol Fighter and Albatros control columns! Great work, Charlie ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 07:36:47 -0500 From: "Steven M. Perry" To: wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu Subject: Re: Bent wings Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19990323073647.00797600@pop.mindspring.com> At 02:36 AM 3/23/99 -0500, you wrote: >Help again guys? > >I knew I should have kept the old mails that dealt with this. >Let me throw this out, in order to reshape the wing, I place it in warm water, and then place a suitable weight on top of it while it is lying on a flat surface. Correct? > >Bear with me guys, I'm getting better. > >David David: A word to the wise. Heat your water on the stove stirring it frequently as it warms, not in the microwave. I tried the microwave and heated it until it was almost about to boil. I took the water out and let it set a couple of seconds and then stuck the warped wing into it. It exploded into furious boiling. The wing evidently acted like boiling chips do in the lab. The wing was melted to a blob before I could snatch it back. Let us know how it comes out. HTH sp ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:57:08 +0900 From: "Hirohisa Ozaki" To: "WWI ML post" Subject: off-topic, Potez XXV interior colors Message-ID: <075e01be752c$a8dcb540$b11db684@dosv64.miln.mei.co.jp> Hi All, I have a Hitkit 1/72 Potez XXV A2 kit. It included cockpit detail parts by injection plastic but I must scratch-build many of them. What a waste of time! BTW, I found I have no references about this airplane. Does anyone know its interior colors? cockpit side wall, frames, sheet, meter panel, control stick, rudder pedal, etc. Sorry off-topic. Hiro ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 08:05:30 -0500 From: Dennis Ugulano To: "wwi@pease1.sr.unh.edu" Subject: Re: CAD programs Message-ID: <199903230805_MC2-6F07-7F78@compuserve.com> James, Look into Paint Shop Pro 5 and see if meets your needs. I have it and from what I've studied so far, it does the work of some very expensive programs. Also, the Sams Teach Yourself book is a big help. Dennis Ugulano email: Uggies@compuserve.com http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/uggies Page Revised 2/27/99 ------------------------------ End of WWI Digest 1507 **********************