> Unfortunately Mick was right.
That's better than getting the Red Face Award .... again 80)
From that time check today I assume
> that's Newcastle, Aus, not UK Mick.
Correct.
Anyway a quick count along the
> wings showed a missing span, and a quick measurement showed the span
> to be short by exactly that amount.
Both my sets bore that out. If you count from the wing-root outboard,
both sets of drawings show 12 rib-stations; the kit only has 11.
I didn't have time to do too much
> more at 2 am so forgive me (or my alcoholic sister).
I won't ask.
> would be to cut the wing in two, but where would be best? I had
> thought this would be a relatively painful intro to both ww1 and
> limited run kits.
I wouldn't normally say this, but I don't think I'd do it. I wouldn't
really matter where you cut it in; a good pooint would be any span
between the wing-root (shoulder?) and the attachment-points for the
turnbuckles. In short, there's so much work in it, it hardly bears thinking
about.
Hope the Siemens is easier because I couldn't resist
> it.
Apparently it is.
Cheers,
Mick.
-- --
Mick Fauchon | Internet: ulmjf@dewey.newcastle.edu.au
Reference Section, Auchmuty Library | Ph (intl+61+49) 215861
University of Newcastle, AUSTRALIA | Fax (intl+61+49) 215833
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
M M
M Tasmanian Devil: "#@%!&^*%%...!#@!&**%^@@#$#-+*+*&##@...!!" M
M M
M Yosemite Sam : "Cut out that Army talk!..Yer in the Navy now!" M
M M
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM