> Round or square, you can be pretty sure it wasn't brass! Brass is:
I think Shane was referring to Eduard's PE framing.
> I don't have datefile #16 but square just doesn't make sense. Round
> (i.e. tubes) combines maximum strength with minimum weight. This
> is basic mechanical engineering. Unless there is some reason why
> they couldn't produce 'tubing' in sufficient quantity or quality,
> 'square' wouldn't make sense at all.
The "square" bits will be the wooden bits,, i.e. frame members,
if I remember my Pups aright.
BTW, interesting to see that the wings on Eduard's Pup are also
a bit short. I wonder what they're up to?
Comforting to see it's only $A35; I still haven't got mine 80(
Cheers,
Mick.
-- --
Mick Fauchon | Internet: ulmjf@dewey.newcastle.edu.au
Reference Section, Auchmuty Library | Ph (intl+61+49) 215861
University of Newcastle, AUSTRALIA | Fax (intl+61+49) 215833
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
M M
M Tasmanian Devil: "#@%!&^*%%...!#@!&**%^@@#$#-+*+*&##@...!!" M
M M
M Yosemite Sam : "Cut out that Army talk!..Yer in the Navy now!" M
M M
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM